Author: Catholic Candle
Conciliar Betrayal of the Mystical Body of Christ
The
Conciliar Hierarchy’s Removal of
Fasting Obligations
When one compares obligatory pre-Vatican II Church discipline to the laxity after Vatican II, we recognize a main cause of the utter destruction of Catholics’ spiritual and moral strength which the previous Church disciplines had engendered.
Some of the Catholic Candle Team had the opportunity to read Pope St. Leo the Great’s sermons regarding the September Ember Days1 and were struck by the wisdom of his edifying admonition to keep well the Ember Days.
Pope St. Leo the Great, a Doctor of the Church,2 expounded on the Church’s beautiful benefits and the important symbolism of having its members keep these appointed fasts together. He makes several forceful arguments why the faithful should fast on common appointed days.
-
Pope St. Leo the Great tells us that, because man has the wounds of original sin, he is greatly benefitted by wholesome fasting. In other words, fasting is a necessary remedy for man, wounded as he is by Original Sin and his actual sins.
-
St. Leo says that public services (such as this fasting) are of a higher character than private ones. Here is his explanation:
The fast which the whole Church undergoes leaves out no one from the general purification, and God’s people then become strongest when the hearts of all the faithful meet together in one common act of holy obedience3 when, in the camp of the Christian army, there is on all sides, the same making ready for the fight and for defense. Though the cruel enemy rages in restless fury, and spreads all around his hidden snares, yet he will be able to catch no one and wound no one, if he finds no one off his guard, no one given up to sloth, no one inactive in works of piety.
-
This faithful and blessed Leo tells us that the September fast calls us in this public way to self-amendment, “that we may lift our souls to the Lord free from worldly cares and earthly concerns”. St. Leo continues:
Let
us at least on these days, which are most healthfully ordained for
our correction, withdraw ourselves from worldly occupation, and steal
a little time for promoting our eternal welfare. … And the
fullest abolition of sins is obtained when the whole Church offers up
one prayer and one confession. For if the Lord has promised
fulfillment of all they shall ask, to the holy and devout agreement
of two or three, what shall be denied to many thousands of the people
who unite in one act of worship, and with one breath make their
common supplication?
-
This Great Doctor adds that the community of goods and actions is most precious in God’s sight:
It is a great and very precious thing in the Lord’s sight, beloved, when Christ’s whole people engage together in the same duties, and all ranks and degrees of either sex co-operate with the same intent: when one purpose animates all alike to declining from evil and doing good; when God is glorified in the works of His slaves, and the Author of all godliness is blessed in unstinted giving of thanks.
Quoting Scripture, Pope St. Leo tells us:
“Be holy, for I am holy”. That is to say: choose Me and keep from what displeases Me. Do what I love, love what I do. If what I order seems difficult, come back to Me Who order, so, from where the command was given, help might be offered. I, Who furnished the desire, will not refuse support. Fast from contradiction, abstain from opposition. Let Me be your food and drink. None desire in vain what is Mine, for those who stretch out toward Me seek Me because I first sought them.
Thus, St. Leo exhorts his flock as follows:
The four seasons of the year have their allotted time for that same observance of restraint. We continue to know, as the course of the whole year returns, that we are unceasingly in need of purification.
Pope St. Leo is plain in his instruction that we need to do penance for the salvation of our souls. Contrast this with the modern conciliar church which simply strikes from the ecclesiastical law almost all fasting requirements. The post-conciliar hierarchy has betrayed the flock by disregarding what is so crucial for salvation. They contradict what Our Lord said was required to obtain everlasting life. “Unless you do penance, you shall likewise perish.”
The modernists have disregarded the Ember Days and virtually abolished Lenten Fasting, keeping only Ash Wednesday and Good Friday. The devil knows well that he has won a major victory, working by means of his tools – the conciliar hierarchy!
Let us strive to always strictly keep the old rules for fasting and offer up this sacrifice for the restoration of all things in Christ. This is not the time to do only the minimum of penance! Use the pre-Vatican II rules for fasting and abstinence which are found here: https://catholiccandle.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Traditional-Rules-for-Fast-Abstinance.pdf
Let us not be stingy with God! He is never outdone in generosity!
1 The 1917 Catholic Encyclopedia explains:
Ember days (corruption from Lat. Quatuor Tempora, four times) are the days at the beginning of the seasons ordered by the Church as days of fast and abstinence. They were definitely arranged and prescribed for the entire Church by Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085) for the Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday after 13 December (S. Lucia), after Ash Wednesday, after Whitsunday, and after 14 September (Exaltation of the Cross). The purpose of their introduction, besides the general one intended by all prayer and fasting, was to thank God for the gifts of nature, to teach men to make use of them in moderation, and to assist the needy. The immediate occasion was the practice of the heathens of Rome. The Romans were originally given to agriculture, and their native gods belonged to the same class. At the beginning of the time for seeding and harvesting religious ceremonies were performed to implore the help of their deities: in June for a bountiful harvest, in September for a rich vintage, and in December for the seeding; hence their feriae sementivae, feriae messis, and feri vindimiales. The Church, when converting heathen nations, has always tried to sanctify any practices which could be utilized for a good purpose. At first the Church in Rome had fasts in June, September, and December; the exact days were not fixed but were announced by the priests. The “Liber Pontificalis” ascribes to Pope Callistus (217-222) a law ordering the fast, but probably it is older. Leo the Great (440-461) considers it an Apostolic institution. When the fourth season was added cannot be ascertained, but Gelasius (492-496) speaks of all four. This pope also permitted the conferring of priesthood and deaconship on the Saturdays of ember week–these were formerly given only at Easter. Before Gelasius the ember days were known only in Rome, but after his time their observance spread. They were brought into England by St. Augustine; into Gaul and Germany by the Carlovingians. Spain adopted them with the Roman Liturgy in the eleventh century. They were introduced by St. Charles Borromeo into Milan. The Eastern Church does not know them. The present Roman Missal, in the formulary for the Ember days, retains in part the old practice of lessons from Scripture in addition to the ordinary two: for the Wednesdays three, for the Saturdays six, and seven for the Saturday in December. Some of these lessons contain promises of a bountiful harvest for those that serve God.
2 He is also referred to as Pope St. Leo I. He reigned from 440 to 461 A.D.
3 Notice that Pope St. Leo puts the greater focus on the obedience of this public fast rather than the bodily mortification of it. This is because the most important element of fasting (when we fast according to the Church’s rules and schedule rather than at times of our own choosing), is that we are obeying and are being directed by the Church’s commandment, not by our own will and preference.
Even in our times of infidelity and laxness, we can still benefit from this element of obedience (in some way) when we fast on the traditional days of fasting because they were chosen by the Church, not by us, so that we submit our will to the Church’s traditional directives.
This submission of our will is a greater sacrifice than the sacrifice of the food itself which we deny to our bodies, because our submission of our higher power (our will) is a greater sacrifice than is the submission of our lower nature (viz., our body) when we choose our own days on which to undertake a private fast.
Thus, the unfaithful post-conciliar hierarchy harmed Catholics by removing the fasting requirements because (predictably) most Catholics will not fast if they are not required to do so. But even worse is the harm these conciliar hirelings inflicted by removing Catholics’ exercise of virtue and the merit of the obedience by following the Church’s specific fasting requirements.
Words to Live By – From Catholic Tradition
Prayer of St. Thomas More, composed in the Tower of London while awaiting Execution:
Give me the grace, Good Lord, to set the world at naught, to set my mind fast upon Thee, not to hang upon the blasts of men’s mouths, to be content to be solitary, not to long for worldly company, but utterly to cast off the world and to rid my mind of the business thereof.
CC in Brief – Making Donations During Our Time of Great Apostasy
Catholic Candle note: Catholic Candle normally examines particular issues thoroughly, at length, using the teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas and the other Doctors of the Church. By contrast, our feature CC in Brief, usually gives an extremely short answer to a reader’s question. We invite every reader to submit his own questions.
CC in Brief
Making Donations During Our Time of Great Apostasy
Q. The [Church’s] commandment to contribute to the support of the Church is somewhat challenging, bearing in mind the current situation in the human element of the Church. Any suggestions on where to direct such support?
A. Good question, regarding contributing to the support the Church! The first thing to keep in mind is to make sure that you do no harm. Do not contribute to any compromise group under a misplaced desire to “contribute somewhere” or to donate to the “least bad” group available! Compromise priest and groups are not doing God’s work!
Further, do not contribute to a group that does both good work and also evil, under the rationalization that you are donating to that group “for the good part of the work they do”.
Your donation money is God’s money. Of course, everything we have belongs to God and we are His stewards of whatever He chose to give us out of His largess. He does not need us or our donations in order to accomplish His work. He can easily do everything He wants to do without us. But He wants us to donate to His causes because it is good for us to serve Him in this way.
We recommend that you make sure you always give wisely. Give alms to the needy who are truly needy. Here is an example of persons who do not seem to be truly needy: One of the Catholic Candle Team works in a large city’s business district. He sees beggars near the train station every day who, after rush hour (i.e., when most people are gone), are sitting on the sidewalk smoking and texting on their cell phone that had been hidden. Considering further, that most beggars have access to the state’s myriad government “social services” programs and welfare freebies, it would seem that such beggars are not the best recipients of our alms.
Regarding our giving alms to the truly needy: one example is that we recently became aware of a newly-widowed woman, the mother of a Catholic family with dependent children. Although, of course, we want to do good to everyone, we should especially want to help Catholics, following St. Paul’s teaching: “let us work good to all men, but especially to those who are of the household of the Faith.”. Galatians, 6:10.
The truly needy include, most of all, those with great spiritual need. There is such great spiritual need now! Although we want to relieve bodily needs as well as spiritual needs, it would be infinitely better for one person to save his soul by means of spiritual alms than a hundred people to have their bodily needs met if they were still to lose their souls. So all alms prudently given are great but alms which do important spiritual good are best.
Give away rosaries to those who are interested, along with information on how to pray the rosary. Give away Catholic books, Traditional Catholic Missals, etc. But do this wisely. Give them to those persons whom you think are interested and will really use them or read them. A woman on the Catholic Candle Team intentionally strikes-up friendly conversations with modestly-dressed women when she sees them at the grocery store, to see if they are interested in the Truth. When she finds one that is, she sees how she might help.
Another idea starts with the observation that, when an uncompromising priest becomes available to us in the future, he will need financial help to do the most good. So this idea is that, by setting aside money now (as appropriate) to place yourself in a position to assist God’s work by supporting such an uncompromising priest when God sends him to us. For example, in the past, when God sent us a then-uncompromising priest, there existed an uncompromising Catholic charity which paid for all of his plane tickets to fly around the country and other parts of the world to bring the uncompromising Mass, Sacraments and True Faith to the people. We think that a similar time will come again in the future and we should try to be ready to help financially (as well as in other ways). Thus, creating such a fund and giving funds to it as you are able, would in our opinion, be considered alms in God’s eyes (assuming a person is honest with himself that he is not simply keeping the money for himself).
But rather than creating one’s own fund, you should know that that the particular uncompromising Catholic charity referred to above still exists (and is a tax-deductible public charity under IRS regulation 501(c)(3)). You can still contribute to it if you wish. Some members of the Catholic Candle Team are connected with that charity but, of course, do not receive any of the money themselves. Everyone working for that charity volunteers and donates his time and receives no salary or payment of any type. That public charity is called Traditional Catholic Religious Life, Inc. But that charity does not currently have any priests to support because they have no access to, or information about, any uncompromising priests. Please contact Catholic Candle at CatholicCandle@gmail.com if you are interested in donating.
Lesson #61 About the Temperaments – Part XXV – The Fight against Worldliness which is a Huge Detriment to a Deep Prayer Life
Catholic Candle note: The article below is Part XXVI of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty-five parts:
-
Part I: Beginning our study of the choleric temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/
-
Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/
-
Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/
-
Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/
-
Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/
-
Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/
-
Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/
-
Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/
-
Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/
-
Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/
-
Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/
-
Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/
-
Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/
-
Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/
-
Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/
-
Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/
-
Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/
-
Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/
-
Part XXI: Explaining the effects of fear in all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/04/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxi-explaining-the-effects-of-fear-in-all-temperaments/
-
Part XXII: Explaining how to order our loves so we can use the passion of fear properly, and how the devil attempts to prevent this ordering: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/05/28/about-the-temperaments-part-xxii-how-to-order-our-loves-so-we-can-use-the-passion-of-fear-properly/
-
Part XXIII: Explanation of sloth in order to analyze this snare of Satan and to combat him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/
-
Part XXIV: Explaining more about how the devil tries to draw us away from reasoning and from the things of God: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/07/29/about-the-temperaments-part-xiv-how-the-devil-draws-us-away-from-reasoning-and-the-things-of-god/
-
Part XXV – Explaining the Devil Attempts to Destroy Our Prayer-Life and How We Should Counterattack: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/08/31/lesson-60-about-the-temperaments-part-xxv-the-devil-attempts-to-destroy-our-prayer-life/
Mary’s School of Sanctity
Lesson #61 – About the Temperaments, Part XXV – The Fight against Worldliness which is a Huge Detriment to a Deep Prayer Life
In our last lesson we saw how the devil sought to undermine and destroy St. Teresa of Avila’s salvation. We saw how her worldliness weighed her down and hindered her desire to give herself completely to God. We will now apply this lesson to ourselves and search our souls to see if we are also inordinately attached to the world (as she had been, earlier in her life). Our worldly attachment can be determined primarily by our use of creatures (i.e., all things created by God). Thus, it is important to examine our use of creatures.
Because
worldly attachments draw us away from prayer and from God, we must
avoid inordinate attachments to the world. In this lesson we will
focus on the creatures that particularly draw our minds
away from God, which imperceptibly also draw our hearts from God.
However, before we delve into the use of creatures, let us remind
ourselves of what Our Lord says about worldliness and keep His words
in our mind as we consider our use of creatures.
Let Us Remember What Our Lord Says About Worldliness
Our Lord explained to His Apostles that they must be “in the world” but not “of the world.” Praying to His Father, Our Lord says the following words:
I have given them Thy word, and the world hath hated them: because they are not of the world, as I also am not of the world.
I pray not that Thou shouldst take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldst keep them from evil.
They are not of the world, as I also am not of the world.
St. John’s Gospel, 17:14-16.
These
precious words of Our Dear Lord should keep us focused on God’s
Will and on our Eternal Good, so that we make a thorough and sober
examination of conscience concerning our use of creatures.
Our Use of Creatures – Including Time
St. Ignatius of Loyola explains in his Spiritual Exercises how creatures must be used to help us to attain our end, namely heaven.1 But how do we know if something is detrimental to the attainment of our end?
We must weigh whether the object (viz., the creature in question) distracts us from God and from the proper service and love that we owe to God. To help us to conduct this careful weighing, let us consider how we use time, which itself is a creature.
Our Lord alludes to the proper use of time when He warned His Apostles that we will be judged on every idle word.
But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it on the Day of Judgment.
St. Matthew’s Gospel, 12:36.
Fr. Martin von Cochem, in his book The Four Last Things, expands this consideration further when he says:
If it is so hateful to a criminal to be brought before an earthly magistrate, well may the poor soul quake with fear when she [meaning the soul2] is introduced into the presence of God, the strict and omniscient Judge, and required to give the most accurate account of all of the thoughts, words, deeds, and omissions of her past life.3
With these quotes in mind, let us investigate the tactics of the devil to tempt us to be worldly, waste time, and not use our intellects.
As we discussed recently in our lessons, the things that the devil especially does not want us to focus on are:
-
Filial love towards God;
-
Deep and careful thinking;
-
Knowledge of God;
-
Knowledge of ourselves; and
-
The purpose for which we were created.
Therefore,
the devil presents his allurements to our souls principally to
obstruct these five focuses.
The Devil First Attacks the Intellect of Man
In
striving to wreak the greatest destruction upon man, the devil seeks
first to attack man’s ability to reason. For in doing this, the
devil can easily conquer the soul of the man by destroying his focus
on the other four areas listed immediately above. As we explained in
a recent lesson,4
the devil first tries to distract man in order to hinder him from a
life of prayer. Below, we discuss this further.
Distractions of Our Minds
The devil uses creatures which distract our minds and prevent us from developing a desire to think deeply. He wants this desire to be weak in us or, better yet, to be entirely absent from us.
He also tries to make us worldly by tempting us to put ourselves and other interests ahead of God – that is, have false gods before God.
Satan wants us to focus on this world and its problems, activities, and allurements, instead of submitting our wills and our lives to God. He wants us to be distracted with the concerns of this world – whether fables such as manmade climate change, or simply seeing the evils all around us, the devil wants us to be so worried about anything except our salvation. He certainly doesn’t want us to trust in God and to turn to Him in prayer.
He
wants us to waste time, especially with entertaining ourselves. He
wants man to lead a life of dissipation. Thus, the devil doesn’t
want anyone to ever use his God-given intellect.
The Gadgets – the Tools of Satan
For decades the devil has used technology and promoted gadgets that are effective tools to lure souls away from God. One could say that the start of many moral perils was the motion picture. After the advent of movies, then came television. Television was fashioned into a highly effective means to corrupt society. What a great many souls have been corrupted by these tools! This corruption came in the form of:
-
Indoctrination with lies – both explicit and implied;
-
Promotion of worldliness;
-
Promotion of covetousness and envy;
-
Promotion of immodesty and impurity;
-
Promotion of passively received sights and sounds which are not filtered by our intellect; and
-
All the while squandering huge amounts of our time.
Then came a more recent gadget: a very portable cellular phone which the devil mockingly (and ironically) inspired to be named “the smart phone”. This tool encourages modern man to not use his intellect and instead to blindly believe whatever he sees and hears on this gadget. This gadget contains all of the dangers of television and many more – all in a device small enough to allow a person to carry it easily and to engage in these evils everywhere he goes.
When one considers all of the ramifications of having and using this gadget often, one can readily see how this tool of Satan is a masterful stroke to sweep souls into hell. From pornography to satisfying one’s idle curiosity – all readily accessible at one’s fingertips. This so-called “smart phone” is a classic trap of Satan!
Adding further evil, the devil presents this gadget as a status symbol. It is widely implied in society that one is “strange” if one does not use a so-called “smart phone” – and indeed, if that device is not a newer-model one. Thus, having a so-called “smart phone” can be a temptation to envy and to pride (unreasonable human respect) because the pressure is so strong to follow the crowd. People do not want this latest fad to leave them behind.
The fact that the world promotes these so-called “smart phones” for use everywhere and for all types of transactions and interactions, shows the devil’s influence is behind this gadget. There is hardly any place one can go without seeing people immersed in their phones. The devil’s servants push so heavily the impression that no one can “get by” without having one of these phones, that our times seems almost apocalyptic.5
These so-called “smart phones” certainly promote the spirit of the world and direct users to the pool (or we could say “cesspool”) of information tainted and twisted to match the prince of this world, namely Satan. What should a person do if he has one of these phones? He should do what would please Our Lord. He should avoid having one of them by trying to retain a land-line even if it is more expensive. If one has a cellular phone, it would be best to try to not get the latest fad or status phone but instead to be poor-in-spirit and not be like everyone else.
Also, it would be best to use the phone very sparingly – rarely, even. Let us look at what St. Bonaventure says when he is addressing the obstacles to the prayer of contemplation. He explains how St. Bernard of Clairvaux describes the fourth obstacle to contemplation as “the phantoms of corporeal images.” St. Bonaventure says,
This last [meaning the fourth obstacle to contemplation] is more difficult to overcome than the others [viz., barriers to contemplation], and therefore solitude is especially recommended in contemplation. It behoveth the man who contemplates to be in some sense dumb, deaf, and blind so that seeing he may not see, and hearing he may not hear, nor take delight in talking; that is, that he may be so withdrawn from transitory things, and so united to God, that he may not, by hearing, seeing, speaking, cease to contemplate, but that he may avoid interruption as much as possible. And if necessity obliges him to break off [from his prayer], he must not lay up in the soul those images of things which have passed through its windows. 6
If St. Bonaventure could say this of the distractions of simple everyday discourse with one’s fellow man, how much more he would say if he saw man’s modern technological gadgetry? Furthermore, if one considers the nature of the so-called “smart phone”, where what one hears and sees on this phone is passively absorbed by the mind, and these images on the screen are constantly flashing from one thing to the next, it is easy to understand how this is disruptive to one’s ability to concentrate.
All of this, likewise, harms one’s ability to focus on his prayers and fight the distractions of all that he has seen and heard. Hence, the use of the so-called “smart phone” is not conducive to the soul’s ability to focus on heavenly things and a deep prayer life. Instead, it distracts and agitates the soul, making it more difficult to settle down into the proper frame of mind to ponder and pour out one’s heart to God. One could also see that the degree of this dissipation one experiences corresponds to the degree in which the will is weakened in its efforts to serve God.
When the mind has been engaged in worldly matters and the allurements of the senses, one is less apt to desire to engage in mental work (including spiritual work). The devil can take advantage of the wounds of Original Sin and can easily tempt a person to believe that intellectual work is so tedious and difficult that he will think that mental work is such a “chore” or a “plague.”
We
can see this attitude in the world around us where most people do not
desire to think carefully or to think independently of the world.
Many simply spend hours mentally loitering, frittering away their day
on their so-called “smart phone.” How often do we find that when
we ask someone a question, he immediately pulls out his so-called
“smart phone” to find the answer? He’d rather trust a worldly
gadget than his own intelligence. In conclusion, it seems prudent to
be very
leery of this modern thought-blocking gadget.
One Can Do a Simple Examination of Conscience to See His Attachment to This Gadget:
-
How often do I use this phone?
-
How long am I on this phone during a single use?
-
Do I ever just leave the phone behind and go about my day?
-
Do I find that I have it with me all day?
-
Do I have it at my bedside at night?
-
Do I check my phone as soon as I awaken in the morning?
-
Do I use my phone in bed?
-
Has my phone been a source of past sins?
-
Does it interrupt my family or social interactions?
-
Do I quickly get onto my phone when I have a “spare minute”?
-
Has this phone really become a strange god before God?
Some Tips on How to Treat a So-Called “Smart Phone”:
-
Never use the phone without real need.
-
Never use the phone for entertainment.
-
Never use the phone for social media.
-
Never use the phone for “window shopping.”
-
Before using a “smart phone”, ask yourself what you specifically need to accomplish on the phone. Do this task and get off of it. Do not expand the scope of your original reason for using the phone.
-
Never forget that the devil’s minions use this tool to keep track of and indoctrinate society.
As
one weans himself off of his so-called “smart phone”, a person
discovers that he has a new freedom. In this way one can see that
the “smart phone” really makes one a slave to a mere creature.
It is Important to Test Ourselves to See How Attached We Are to Objects, that is, to Creatures:
One can ask himself questions similar to the ones regarding the “smart phone” and substitute another object in its place. If one finds he is inordinately attached to any object or person, he should pray to Our Lord to help him to detach himself and to order this creature and all creatures to God and to our final end. As St. Ignatius teaches, we must be indifferent to all objects and persons “in so far as it is left to the choice of our free will and is not forbidden”.
The simple rule-of-thumb to test our attachment to an object, i.e., to a creature, is to recall these words of Our Lord:
For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?”
St. Matthew’s Gospel, 16:26.
We
should ask ourselves who really
comes first with us, God or a creature? Do our actions and habits
show this? Here is a strong sign: what comes first with us and what
we love most, tends to be what we seek to spend our time with, when
we are able to do so.
In Conclusion:
This
self-awareness of our use of creatures is extremely important in
fostering a healthy prayer life and Divine Friendship. Also, God put
it in man’s nature for him to take the greatest delight in using
his highest faculty (viz.,
his intellect). This should be a great incentive to improve our
minds as well as to avoid all worldly dissipations. These
dissipations and the creatures that foster them must be avoided if we
are to have the degree of Divine Friendship that the Good Lord wills
for us to have with Him.
A Preview…
Having considered how the devil tries to destroy our desire and likewise our delight in using our intellects, in our next lesson, we can concentrate on how the devil lures us to bodily pleasures, concerns, and desires as a means to draw us away from God and from a life of prayer.
1
In his explanation of the Principle
and Foundation,
St. Ignatius tells us how we should use creatures only as a means to
reach our spiritual end. Here are his words:
All
other things on the face of the earth are created for man to help
him fulfill the end for which he is created. From this it follows
that man is to use these things to the extent that they will help
him to attain his end. Likewise, he must rid himself of them in so
far as they prevent him from attaining it.
Therefore,
we must make ourselves indifferent to all created things, in so far
as it is left to the choice of our free will and is not forbidden.
Acting accordingly, for our part, we should not prefer health to
sickness, riches to poverty, honor to dishonor, a long life to a
short one, and so in all things we should desire and choose only
those things which will best help attain the end for which we are
created.
See the Catholic Candle article about the Principle and Foundation which is discussed in Mary’s School of Sanctity, Lesson #11, which is found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2022/06/27/lesson-11-the-principle-and-foundation-part-ii/
2 The Latin word for soul is “anima”, which is a feminine noun, and therefore this noun is sometimes given a feminine pronoun.
3 This quote is taken from Fr. Martin von Cochem’s book The Last Four Things ©1899 by Benzinger Brothers, p.27 (bracketed words added for clarity).
4 Read about this here: Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #60 – About the Temperaments – Part XXV – The Devil Attempts to Destroy Our Prayer-Life. How Should We Counterattack?: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/08/31/lesson-60-about-the-temperaments-part-xxv-the-devil-attempts-to-destroy-our-prayer-life/
5 Compare this current state of things to the prophesy in the Apocalypse, 13:16-17:
[The Beast] shall make all, both little and great, rich and poor, freemen and
bondmen,
to have a
character in their right hand,
or on their foreheads. And that no
man might buy or sell, but he that hath the character,
or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
6 Quote taken from St. Bonaventure’s work On the Life of Our Lord, chapter 56 (bracketed words added for clarity).
The Blessing of a True, Catholic Liberal Education – Part XI
Catholic Candle note: Below is part 10 of our exploration of the best type of education – which is a true Catholic Liberal Education. Do not confuse this education with many university programs called “liberal arts” but which are full of fluff, falsehood, and aimless so-called “cultural enrichment” courses and “humanities”.
A liberal education also does not refer to liberalism, nor is a true liberal education an indoctrination into that error of liberalism or political correctness. In fact, a true Catholic Liberal Education is the best antidote to the errors of liberalism.
As context for this tenth part of this article, let us recall what we saw in the earlier nine parts:
Previously, in part 1 of this article,1 we examined the problems we see in modern education:
-
Modern colleges do not improve the quality of their students’ minds (and their thinking ability) much or at all.
-
Most “education” is merely job training, fluff courses, and/or leftist indoctrination.
-
The students are trained to sound like someone in their field but they do more memorizing and little thinking.
-
Grade “inflation” and degree “inflation” are rampant. Grades and academic degrees do not mean much anymore.
In part 2 of this article,2 we examined, in general, what education is. We considered the human soul and the perfection of its highest faculty (i.e., its highest power) – which is the intellect – and which is immaterial (i.e., incorporeal). We saw that our intellects are perfected through knowing eternal, unchangeable truths and the causes of things.
In part 3 of this article,3 after having seen what true education is, we examined the question who should perfect his intellect.
In part 4 of this article,4 having seen that modern universities do not provide a true education, we consider whether there is ever a good reason for men or women to attend them.
In part 5 of this article,5 having seen that women and girls should pursue a True Catholic Liberal Education – just as men and boys should, too – we then considered what the best environment is in which women and girls should do this.
In part 6 of this article, we addressed the objection that, having seen the great value of a true Catholic Liberal Education, we should be afraid that the great blessing of this education would be a danger to our souls because it might foster in us the vice of pride.6
In part 7 of this article, we considered more fully the difference between the education which is appropriate for a free man as contrasted to the education which is appropriate for a slave.7
In part 8 of this article, we considered further how the truth perfects our minds. This shows us that we must really know the truth, not merely believe true opinions.8
In part 9 of this article, we considered more-specifically what studies (sciences) belong in a Catholic Liberal Education.9
In part 10, we explore the motive and the goal of a true Catholic Liberal Education. A Catholic Liberal Education Begins in Wonder and Aims at Wisdom.10
Below, in part eleven, we consider what authors and books we should use in our Catholic Liberal Education.
What Authors and Books Should We Use in Our Catholic Liberal Education?
Part
11
In our recent consideration of wisdom, we saw what wisdom is and that it is a priceless gift from God. We saw that the highest truths and wisdom perfect our highest faculty – viz., our intellect.
But which specific books and authors should we read when studying the various sciences of a genuine Catholic Liberal Education? There are many authors of many books written on the subjects (e.g., geometry) which we should study in a Catholic Liberal Education. Which ones are the best books and authors for us to use in these studies?
In our pursuit of the greatest truths about the objective order established by God, we should use the original writings of the greatest thinkers – who wrote in the Western intellectual tradition which is the foundation and flowering of Christendom. These works must be read not primarily for historical or cultural reasons, but because they are the most successful attempts to understand things as they are in themselves, while attending to our common experience.11
Generally, these works are called the Great Books of the Western World. Here are a few examples of these Great Books: Euclid’s Elements (the greatest work of geometry), and many works by St. Augustine, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Fr. Gregory Mendel, Archimedes, and J. Henri Fabre (as well as many other authors).
We should read these Great Books seeking to understand the greatest truths of reality. These books should not be the object of study. The object of study should be the truths themselves examined in those books.
Nor should we read the Great Books in order to learn the opinions of those authors but rather to know what the truth is, weighing and examining what those books say, in order to consider their arguments and explanations and thereby come to the truth.
The opinions of even the great authors are not so important. That is why St. Thomas Aquinas, the greatest of all Doctors of the Church and all other thinkers, rightly teaches that arguments based on human authority are the weakest type of argument and are weaker than arguments based on reason.12 (However, in contrast to arguments based on human authority, arguments based on God’s own authority, are the strongest arguments.)13
It is the truth that is important. So, for example, if we are studying What Time is, the fruit of our study should not be concluding that “In Aristotle’s opinion, Time is the measure of motion”. Rather, by considering Aristotle’s arguments and explanations, the fruit of our study should be the better understanding of the reality of what Time is (not merely an author’s opinion).
Further, students should not read these Great Books as “Humanities”, i.e., as outstanding examples of the creativity of the human mind, although these books are certainly that.
Likewise, students should not read these books to become acquainted with our Cultural Heritage, and the refinement of our Western Civilization (as valuable as that is).
Rather, students should read the Great Books because, more than any other works, when studied under the light and guidance of the teachings of the True Catholic Church, these books can open up our minds to the truth about reality.
There are four reasons for this:
-
The Great Books are the most accessible works for the matters they treat, given the difficulty which is inherent in the matters themselves. For example, understanding what motion is or understanding the Blessed Trinity contains inherent difficulties which cannot all be “simplified away”.14
-
The Great Books have withstood the test of time. Many generations from now, Euclid will still be esteemed as the greatest of all geometers, whereas the authors of the modern geometry books will all be forgotten.
-
The Great Books are shown superior by their effect – because they have convinced the world of their ideas. When an author convinces the world of his ideas and arguments – in the face of the world’s prior, contrary beliefs – that feat shows the book’s greater persuasiveness and intrinsic power as compared to a lesser author who merely writes his text book in the “tradition” of a Great Book (such as the countless math books claiming to be “Euclidean Geometry”).
-
The Great Books help us to avoid being overly-influenced by the prejudices of our time. People blindly assume the errors of our age, e.g., ecumenism and evolution. The Great Books are from prior ages unaffected by the current age which blindly assumes the correctness of positions which are currently in vogue. The Great Books help us to “step outside” our time and to better see its errors and the weaknesses of current fads and transitory “orthodoxies”.
Perhaps some people, moved by misplaced humility, fear going to the authors of the Great Books because those people think those works are only for scholars, not for ordinary people like ourselves. But that notion is false. These works are great because they are so accessible and are the simplest treatment of those ideas, given the inherent difficulty of the matters themselves.
St. Thomas Aquinas is the greatest of all thinkers. His brilliance surpasses all others, in large part, because he excels all others at unlocking the most difficult truths for all of us – laymen included. It is a mistake to suppose that he is too great to be read by “pea brains” like us and so we should instead read the books written by some more recent, lesser authors.
In other words, the great authors are so great that they are accessible even to us ordinary people!15 Here is how Archbishop Lefebvre explained this truth:
Let us not think that Saint Thomas is too
much for the faithful and that he is
distant from their faith, for this is
not true and [is] damaging to the faithful.
The philosophy and theology of Saint Thomas are truth.
Therefore, let us not say that the truth explained in all its
simplicity, and clarity, in addition to its profound logic, cannot be
understood by the faithful. That would be condescension on our
part. This would amount to abandoning and despairing of
communicating to the faithful – a profound tragedy.16
Conclusion
We should spend our lives pursuing the truth, especially about our Holy Catholic Faith. We should do this by reading the great authors of the Great Books.
Looking Ahead
We hear all around us that what is called “academic freedom” is essential to successful learning. But what is academic freedom? And is it good?
To Be Continued …
1 Part 1 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/the-blessings-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education/
2 Part 2 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-ii/
3 Part 3 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/28/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-iii/
4 Part 4 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-iv/
5 Part 5 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-v/
6 Part 6 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/3129/
7 Part 7 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-vii/
8 Part 8 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/10/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-viii/
9 Part 9 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-viii-2/
11 This common experience is the common truths which are the principles of all knowledge and science. Read more about this in part 8 of this article on a Catholic Liberal Education. Part 8 can be found here: Making the Truth “Our Own”, https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/10/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-viii/
12 Summa, Ia, Q.1, a.8, ad 2.
13 Summa, Ia, Q.1, a.8, ad 2.
14 The undiscerning student might suppose that, on a topic such as proving God’s existence, some modern text book authors (e.g., Msgr. Paul Glenn or Garrigou-Lagrange) are clearer and better than St. Thomas. But that student fails to notice that those modern authors often “cheat” their readers by supporting their statements using only an example in place of St. Thomas’s own universal arguments which really prove those same statements.
But a careful thinker understands that giving an example does not prove the truth of a universal statement. Consider that finding a single example of a tall Eskimo does not prove that all Eskimos are tall. If Msgr. Glenn’s treatments were truly better than that of St. Thomas, then Msgr. Glenn would be the Doctor of the Church, not St. Thomas.
Similarly, in mathematics, the physical sciences, logic, and many other sciences, the modern non-great authors often dodge the difficult arguments and use an example instead, to “prove” their point. This dodging the difficult is a great loss for the student.
15 It might be that now, for the first time, some readers understand that we all have a duty to perfect our minds, especially to study our Holy Catholic Faith. But some of these readers will already be emersed in many essential duties of state which prevent them, at least for now, from dedicating more than small “snippets” of time to this important work. Well, each person should do what he can do and as much as he can do in the circumstances in which God placed him.
As explained in the ninth part of this article on the Great Blessings of a Catholic Liberal Education, it is best that students not begin their studies with the highest truths (philosophy and theology), but rather, approach them through studying the seven liberal arts first. https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/10/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-ix/ This approach will give the best results of deepest and most lasting understanding.
Further, St. Thomas Aquinas explains in the prologue to the Summa Theologica that the Summa is for beginners in theology. But St. Thomas anticipated that this beginner would already be somewhat adept in the various parts of philosophy. Thus, we see that there is a proper order of studies and of learning: the liberal arts first, then various branches of philosophy and then theology.
But suppose that a person’s duties of state do not currently allow this better approach? We urge each reader to start without delay and do what he can do with the time and the books that he has or which are reasonably available to him. It is better to start and try rather than fail to even start because he wishes his circumstances allowed a more ideal approach. So, start now, in a way you are able. When questions or confusions arise, then ask for the help and explanations of a wise man you know. You could also write Catholic Candle to ask your question.
16 Archbishop Lefebvre, The spirit of our statutes, the fourth conference in a retreat in Écône, in September 1988, (emphasis added).
Read also, the popes praising the Doctors of the Church telling us that we should especially read them. As those popes explain, most of all, we should read St. Thomas. https://catholiccandle.org/2017/12/16/why-faithful-catholics-follow-the-doctors-of-the-church/
Words to Live By – From
Catholic Tradition
Mortifying
Our Passions and Desires Helps Us Much More Than Choosing to Perform
Unusual Voluntary Penances
Here is how St. John of the Cross, Mystical Doctor of the Church, counsels us:
One must greatly lament the ignorance of certain men, who burden themselves with extraordinary penances and with many other voluntary practices, and think that this practice or that one will suffice to bring them to the union with Divine Wisdom. But such will not be the case if they endeavor not diligently to mortify their desires. If they were careful to bestow half of that labor on this, they would profit more in a month than they profit by all the other practices in many years.
For, just as it is necessary to till the earth if it is to bear fruit, and unless it be tilled it bears nothing but weeds, so likewise is mortification of the desires necessary if the soul is to profit. Without this mortification, I make bold to say, the soul no more achieves progress on the road to perfection and to the knowledge of God of itself, however many efforts it might make, than the seed grows when it is cast upon untilled ground. Wherefore the darkness and rudeness of the soul will not be taken from it until the desires be quenched. For these desires are like cataracts, or like motes in the eye, which obstruct the sight until they be taken away.
Ascent Of Mount Carmel, St. John of the Cross, Bk.1, ch.8, §4.
August 2026 PDF Issue
The Blessing of a True, Catholic Liberal Education – Part X
Catholic Candle note: Below is part 10 of our exploration of the best type of education – which is a true Catholic Liberal Education. Do not confuse this education with many university programs called “liberal arts” but which are full of fluff, falsehood, and aimless so-called “cultural enrichment” courses and “humanities”.
A liberal education also does not refer to liberalism, nor is a true liberal education an indoctrination into that error of liberalism or political correctness. In fact, a true Catholic Liberal Education is the best antidote to the errors of liberalism.
As context for this tenth part of this article, let us recall what we saw in the earlier nine parts:
Previously, in part 1 of this article,1 we examined the problems we see in modern education:
-
Modern colleges do not improve the quality of their students’ minds (and their thinking ability) much or at all.
-
Most “education” is merely job training, fluff courses, and/or leftist indoctrination.
-
The students are trained to sound like someone in their field but they do more memorizing and little thinking.
-
Grade “inflation” and degree “inflation” are rampant. Grades and academic degrees do not mean much anymore.
In part 2 of this article,2 we examined, in general, what education is. We considered the human soul and the perfection of its highest faculty (i.e., its highest power) – which is the intellect – and which is immaterial (i.e., incorporeal). We saw that our intellects are perfected through knowing eternal, unchangeable truths and the causes of things.
In part 3 of this article,3 after having seen what true education is, we examined the question who should perfect his intellect.
In part 4 of this article,4 having seen that modern universities do not provide a true education, we consider whether there is ever a good reason for men or women to attend them.
In part 5 of this article,5 having seen that women and girls should pursue a True Catholic Liberal Education – just as men and boys should, too – we then considered what the best environment is in which women and girls should do this.
In part 6 of this article, we addressed the objection that, having seen the great value of a true Catholic Liberal Education, we should be afraid that the great blessing of this education would be a danger to our souls because it might foster in us the vice of pride.6
In part 7 of this article, we considered more fully the difference between the education which is appropriate for a free man as contrasted to the education which is appropriate for a slave.7
In part 8 of this article, we considered further how the truth perfects our minds. This shows us that we must really know the truth, not merely believe true opinions.8
In part 9 of this article, we considered more-specifically what studies (sciences) belong in a Catholic Liberal Education.9
Below, in part 10, we explore the motive and the goal of a true Catholic Liberal Education.
What Are the Motive and the Goal of a True Catholic Liberal Education?
A
Catholic Liberal Education Begins in Wonder and Aims at Wisdom
Part 10
In an earlier part of this article10, we saw that the seven liberal arts are important studies by means of which we should begin our study of the highest sciences – which are philosophy and theology.
We saw that the liberal arts are not the only parts of liberal education or even the most important parts, but they are the key beginning of it. They develop our thinking and help make our minds disciplined, vigorous, and animated by wonder, so that we will not only desire, but also have the means to can acquire knowledge and wisdom, especially the highest truths, which are again, those of philosophy and theology.
Here is the motive and goal of the education that all of us should seek, each according to his circumstances:
A
true, Catholic Liberal Education
begins in wonder and aims at
wisdom.
Let us “unpack” that statement by first looking at what we mean by wonder and then let us consider what wisdom is.
What
is Wonder?
Wonder is the proper human motive for true education. Wonder involves two things simultaneously: ignorance and knowledge (in different respects). Man finds himself wondering because, at the same time, he both knows something and also doesn’t know everything.
Let us contrast wonder with mere curiosity. Wonder implies that a person knows a group of facts (i.e., truths) and, knowing these facts, he seeks an explanation of them – viz., their causes. Wonder involves a certain delight and joy, a sort of fascination with the way things are. But at the same time, the person has a certain lack of comfort because he is aware of his own lack of knowledge. So he asks why things are the way they are. Wonder implies that a person has a certain confidence that the world around him is ultimately explainable. When a person is animated by wonder, he goes through his day, week, or month, seeing additional intellectual connections between various things. He goes through life seeing more aspects of the world around him which are interesting and for which he seeks explanations.
By contrast, a person motivated by curiosity is more interested in questions concerning how. When a person is motivated by curiosity, he is not so interested in questions concerning why – and is not so motivated to seek to know why something is true and what its causes are. Rather, curiosity leads a person to focus on seeking to do something and desiring to see if his idea will “work” to achieve a useful practical result or even merely a sensational spectacle. A curious man ultimately seeks power.11 He is more concerned to see how certain generalizations work or how they apply to varying circumstances. In contrast to a person who wonders, a person motivated by curiosity assumes the validity of a principle, in order to see how effectively this principle can be harnessed to exploit a given situation in order to achieve a particular useful result.
This is not to say that the methods of verification in experimental science may not very well be an instrument of wonder of a high order, but when those instruments are employed not in order to understand the truths of Nature, but in order to find what works, then curiosity and not wonder is the immediate motive.
So the man who wonders at the lightning he sees in the sky is considering questions such as what causes lightning and what is the nature of lightning. But the man who sees the lightning and seeks to protect his house from being struck by lightning is curious rather than wondering. He asks himself things such as, if he places a metal pole on his roof, will that protect his house?
The proper satisfaction of a man who wonders is knowledge of the causes of things around us, e.g., what is lightning and what causes it. By contrast, the proper satisfaction of a curious man is seeing that his idea works successfully, e.g., the
lightning rod protected his house from a lightning strike. 12
Curiosity and the practical improvements engendered by it are generally not evil13 and are sometimes even necessary. But they are much lower than the possession of universal, eternal truth. Such curiosity is lower than wonder in a way similar to food for the body being lower than food for the mind. This is because wonder leads to the perfection of our intellect; curiosity leads to perfection of the practical circumstances of our life. The perfection of our intellect is much greater and nobler!
So a man who sees and wonders is spurred on to learn the causes of the things around him because they are interesting and the world around him is explainable by reason. Those causes are worthy of investigation for the sake of the truth because Nature is worthy of investigation (and even more worthy is the First Cause of Nature, Who is God). By contrast, curiosity spurs a man to solve a problem which improves the practical aspects of his life or otherwise helps him, e.g., have a safer home.
Thus, a liberal education begins in wonder, not in curiosity. By contrast (for example), building a better mousetrap begins in curiosity, not in wonder.
So a Catholic Liberal Education begins with wonder and involves the seeking of the truth which is the knowledge of the causes of things. This true education aims at wisdom (as we stated above).
But what is wisdom? Let us next consider that question.
First, Let Us Remember that Wisdom is a Priceless Treasure!
First, let us reflect that wisdom is one of the most important blessings from God. “All wisdom is from the Lord God”.14
Wisdom is incomparably better than fame, prestige, power, riches, pleasures, or comfort. As the Book of Wisdom declares:
I preferred her [viz., wisdom] before kingdoms and thrones, and esteemed riches nothing in comparison of her. Neither did I compare unto her any precious stone: for all gold in comparison of her, is as a little sand, and silver in respect to her shall be counted as clay.15
In fact:
Wisdom is better than all the most precious things: and whatsoever may be desired cannot be compared to it.16
And:
She [i.e., wisdom] is an infinite treasure to men! 17
Therefore, we should pursue wisdom above all of these things. As the wise man teaches us in the Book of Proverbs:
Get wisdom, because it is better than gold.18
What is Wisdom?
St. Thomas Aquinas explains to us (following Aristotle’s teaching) that:
Wisdom is a knowledge of causes.19
This definition fits perfectly with what we saw above about wonder. That is, seeking the true knowledge which is offered in a Catholic Liberal Education begins in wonder. As we saw above, true wonder (as contrasted to mere curiosity) motivates us to seek to understand the things that are, and to know their causes.
The
Wisdom We Discuss Here (and Which We Seek) is Wisdom Simply
Speaking,
not Wisdom in a Restricted
Sense
In this present article, we are considering the nature of wisdom simply, that is, unqualifiedly. Let us contrast this unqualified wisdom to what we could call “wisdom” as that word is used in a narrow or restricted sense.
In a qualified sense – i.e., in some way – we could call something “wisdom” which is the knowledge of causes pertaining to a narrow field or pursuit, such as carpentry (or one of the other manual arts). A man could be called a “wise carpenter” because he has the knowledge of the causes of his art. For example, a “wise carpenter” might reject the use of a particular beam (i.e., plank) which is full of knots because he knows that such a beam would not possess the strength it should have because those knots weaken it.
Such a carpenter is not wise absolutely speaking (unqualifiedly) but is wise in a certain, limited respect (viz., regarding his particular field), because he knows the causes which affect his own special art.
But in this present article, we are considering the wisdom by which we would call a man “wise” without qualification, as opposed to calling him “wise” only in a certain specialized respect (as we would say a “wise carpenter”). In other words, in this article we are examining what wisdom is absolutely, because of which we would call a man “wise” without adding any qualification such as “carpenter”.
This distinction is similar to the difference between a man being called “good” without qualification (because he possesses great virtue) as contrasted to a person being called “good” qualifiedly, such as being a “good plumber” or a “good assassin”. Being a “good assassin” refers to the person possessing a high degree of the assassin’s skill for killing people. We do not call this assassin “good” without qualification (but we could call him “good” in this certain respect).
Likewise, calling a man “wise” with respect to carpentry is not the same as calling him “wise” without qualification. So in this article, we examine the nature of wisdom as it gives a general excellence to a person and because of which he would be called “wise” as a person (and not in a qualified sense such as wise as a carpenter).
There
Are Two Kinds of Wisdom Simply
Speaking
There are two kinds of wisdom simply speaking. They are speculative20 wisdom and practical wisdom. Both of them are the knowledge of causes, but in different ways. They reflect the two kinds of causes that every person should know. Each of these kinds of wisdom causes a person to be called “wise” without qualification:
-
Because of speculative wisdom, a person is called wise as the knower of the deep causes of things, especially the First Cause of all things; and
-
Because of practical wisdom, a person is called wise as a doer, acting well in light of his final end.
Both kinds of wise men we call “wise” simply speaking, without limiting this adjective by a qualifying word such as “carpenter”.
Let us briefly look at each of these types of wisdom.
What
Is Speculative Wisdom?
Speculative wisdom is wisdom in those matters which concern the highest truths21 which are most worth knowing and which most-greatly perfect our intellects.
But in addition to knowing high truths, we must also know the causes of those high truths; (of course, God is uncaused but is the ultimate Cause of everything else). It is important that, in knowing the highest truths, we also know their causes because we do not know something fully if we do not know its causes.
But there is a difference in causes. Some are lower-level, proximate causes which are themselves caused by higher causes. For example, a dog is one of the causes of its own puppies but God is the higher cause of not only those puppies, but also the parent dogs, as well as all other dogs and creatures.
The most complete and most satisfying knowledge of a thing is to know it with all of its causes, even up to (and especially) the Highest Cause, which is the First and Highest Cause of all creatures. This is God.
St. Paul infallibly teaches us that we can know God by natural reason, as the First Cause of all other things. In other words, looking at creatures, we can see God’s work in them and that God is their cause. Here are St. Paul’s words:
[T]he invisible things of Him [viz., God], from the creatures of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; His eternal power also, and Divinity.22
St. Thomas refers to speculative wisdom when he explains (following Aristotle’s teaching) that “it belongs to wisdom to consider the Highest Cause.”23
This knowledge of things with their highest causes is the deepest and fullest way to know things and is speculative wisdom.
The science which treats of the first causes (including naturally knowable truths about God Himself, such as His existence and some of His perfections) in the light of the natural capacity of human reason is called metaphysics – which is a type of speculative wisdom – as this wisdom is attainable by the power of human reason. The science which studies God in the higher light of what He has revealed about Himself is also called speculative wisdom, but it is wisdom as attainable by the greater light of the Catholic Faith. Thus, Catholic theology is the highest wisdom and is the principal satisfaction of wonder on this side of the grave.
What
Is Practical Wisdom?
The other kind of wisdom is called practical wisdom and is also called prudence. It is one of the four Cardinal Virtues. It is also a Gift of the Holy Ghost, as well as an infused moral virtue (infused into the souls of those who are in the state of Sanctifying Grace).
Practical wisdom is concerned with right reason as it applies to our active life. This wisdom regulates the passions and appetites which move us. Practical wisdom does this by ordering all of our actions (and our life) to our Final End. This Final End is also called the Final Cause of our actions because our end (that is, the goal) is the ultimate cause (reason) why we do what we do.
For example, suppose that a man has an urgent need to travel to an adjoining city immediately. He might go into his bedroom, for the sake of getting his car keys. His obtaining his keys is for the sake of driving his car, which is for the sake of going to the gas station, which is for the sake of filling his empty gas tank, which is for the sake of being able to drive to that adjoining city without running out of gas, all for the sake of making the urgent journey. The Final Cause (the ultimate reason) for each of those activities was in order to arrive in the adjoining city. In other words, finally, the cause of all of those activities was the arriving there. By contrast, if the man stopped to read a novel, the Final Cause of that pastime would not be the urgent trip to the adjoining city.
Likewise, any part of our life which does not promote our Final Cause, is vain. Anything we do which will not help us to achieve the goal for which we have been created (and for which are on earth) is ultimately foolishness that we will regret. That is why one way in which practical wisdom can be summed up is as follows:
It is Practical Wisdom (Prudence) to live every minute of our lives in the way that, at our Judgment, we will want to have lived.
Here is how St. Ignatius of Loyola teaches this practical wisdom:
Man is created to praise, reverence, and serve God Our Lord, and by this means to save his soul. All other things on the face of the earth are created for man to help him fulfill the end for which he is created. From this it follows that man is to use these things to the extent that they will help him to attain his end. Likewise, he must rid himself of them insofar as they prevent him from attaining it.
Therefore, we must make ourselves indifferent to all created things, insofar as it is left to the choice of our free will and is not forbidden. Acting accordingly, for our part, we should not prefer health to sickness, riches to poverty, honor to dishonor, a long life to a short one, and so in all things we should desire and choose only those things which will best help us attain the end for which we are created.24
St. Paul urged his flock to live according to practical wisdom when he taught them that they should:
Walk with wisdom towards them that are without.25
St. Paul is teaching us that (practical) wisdom should guide our actions, i.e., our “walk”.
Following St. Augustine, Doctor of the Church, St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that prudence, i.e., practical wisdom, “judges of human acts by Divine things, and directs human acts according to Divine rules.”26
We see that practical wisdom should cause us to order our lives fearing the Lord so that we can live a life obeying Him and living in His friendship. Here is one way in which the Book of Proverbs teaches this truth:
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.27
As we saw in an earlier part of our current investigation of The Blessings of a True Catholic Liberal Education,28 we should study the truths of Ethics and Politics to attain this practical wisdom.
Both
Types of Wisdom Have the Same Ultimate Object: God
We see, by looking at both speculative wisdom and practical wisdom, that God is the beginning and end. That is, both kinds of wisdom ultimately are knowledge of God but in different aspects.
Speculative wisdom starts with all of the various truths around us and traces them back to their First Cause, Who is God. By contrast, through Ethics and Politics, practical wisdom considers our Final End (Who is God) as the reason and guiding principle for all of our actions and makes sure that all of our actions are for the sake of Him, Who is our Last End and our Final Cause (to use the proper philosophical term).
Thus, we see more fully the literal truth of what Our Lord says in the Apocalypse:
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.29
Our Lord is the Beginning and First Cause of all that exists; He is the End and Highest Principle to which all of our actions and our lives should conform.
So in all of the studies of a true education, God is the ultimate subject of study – as the First Beginning (the First Cause) of the speculative sciences, and as the Last End of the practical sciences of Ethics and true Political Science.
This
Lifetime Pursuit of Wisdom Is The Life of a Free Man
Now through the efforts of a lifetime of study, a man can more fully acquire deeper and broader wisdom. But such precious wisdom nonetheless is indeed the work of a lifetime.
However, this man’s whole “journey” – even the earlier part – should be characterized by the pursuit of this great good, and this work of his entire life is rightly called philosophy – which means the love of wisdom. For every study such a man undertakes is for the sake of wisdom.
And insofar as he lives for wisdom, his whole life is devoted to that which in itself makes life worth living. Thus, he is not a slave but a free man. Accordingly, only the kind of education which introduces a man to the philosophical life is properly named liberal.
Conclusions
of this Present Part of the Article (viz.,
Part 10)
A true, Catholic Liberal Education begins in wonder and aims at wisdom. God made us to wonder at the world around us and to perfect our minds seeking the causes of things. This is speculative wisdom. He instilled this healthy sense of wonder in us precisely so that we would seek Him, the Cause of causes.
Practical wisdom is acting according to our final end (i.e., goal), which is the Final Cause of all of our actions (i.e., the ultimate reason why we act).
Both types of wisdom ultimately lead back to God, the First Cause and Last End (that is, the Final Cause).
Looking
Ahead
We seek wisdom through perfecting our
highest faculty – viz., our intellect – with the highest
truths. But there are many authors of many books written on the
subjects which are studied in a Catholic Liberal Education.
Which ones are best to use in these studies?
To Be Continued …
1 Part 1 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/the-blessings-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education/
2 Part 2 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-ii/
3 Part 3 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/28/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-iii/
4 Part 4 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-iv/
5 Part 5 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-v/
6 Part 6 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/3129/
7 Part 7 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-vii/
8 Part 8 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/10/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-viii/
9 Part 9 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-viii-2/
11 In this article, we are treating “scientific curiosity” which motivates inventing useful machines, experimenting to achieve quicker results or more efficient, successful processes and methods, etc. These investigations are generally not evil in themselves but are a lower, practical goal, as compared to the truth about the causes of things.
But the word “curiosity” is also used to mean something sinful and lower than the “scientific curiosity” discussed here. This lower curiosity is the useless and idle desire to know about people or things that do not concern one’s self. This is also called “nosiness” and refers to things such as the desire to know one’s neighbor’s private affairs, or seeking to discover the gossipy details of the private lives of celebrities. Such idle curiosity, which is a sin, is not the type of curiosity which is contrasted with wonder in this article.
12 Of course, there is nothing to prevent a man from having both wonder and curiosity about the same subject. So, by wonder, a man could want to know the causes of lightning; and by curiosity, also want to harvest its power, protect himself from it, etc. Or, curiosity could eventually cause wonder, or we suppose, wonder could degrade into mere curiosity.
13 However, some developments caused by curiosity can be evil, such as many aspects of bio-engineering, stem-cell research, vaccines developed using the bodies of murdered babies, etc.
14 Ecclesiasticus, 1:1.
15 Book of Wisdom, 7:8-9.
16 Book of Proverbs, 8:11.
17 Book of Proverbs, 7:14.
18 Book of Proverbs, 16:16.
19 St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Bk 1, Ch 2.
20 The word “speculative” comes from the Latin word, “speculari”, meaning “to observe”. The word “speculative” here refers to matters which are studied and learned because of their intrinsic value and without seeking practical application leading to action.
This is the original meaning of the word and is very different from the modern usage of the word “speculative” which means “doubtful or based on conjecture”.
21 Here is one way that St. Thomas Aquinas, Greatest Doctor of the Church, explains this point:
Man’s good [unqualifiedly] consists in the knowledge of truth; yet man’s sovereign [i.e., chief] good consists, not in the knowledge of any truth whatever, but in the perfect knowledge of the sovereign truth [i.e., God], as the Philosopher [Aristotle] states (Ethic. x, 7, 8).
Summa, IIa IIae Q. 167. A1, ad 1 (bracketed words added for clarity).
22 Romans, 1:19-20 (bracketed content added to show context).
23 Summa, IIa IIae, Q.45, a.1, Respondeo.
24 Principle and Foundation of the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius.
25 Colossians, 4:5.
26 Summa, IIa IIae, Q.45 a.3, respondeo.
27 Book of Proverbs, 9:10.
28 For a fuller explanation of the importance of studying true Ethics and Politics, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/10/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-ix/
29 Apocalypse, 1:8 (emphasis added).
Lesson #60 About the Temperaments – Part XXV – The Devil Attempts to Destroy Our Prayer-Life.
Catholic Candle note: The article below is Part XXIV of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty-three parts:
-
Part I: Beginning our study of the choleric temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/
-
Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/
-
Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/
-
Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/
-
Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/
-
Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/
-
Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/
-
Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/
-
Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/
-
Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/
-
Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/
-
Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/
-
Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/
-
Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/
-
Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/
-
Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/
-
Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/
-
Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/
-
Part XXI: Explaining the effects of fear in all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/04/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxi-explaining-the-effects-of-fear-in-all-temperaments/
-
Part XXII: Explaining how to order our loves so we can use the passion of fear properly, and how the devil attempts to prevent this ordering: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/05/28/about-the-temperaments-part-xxii-how-to-order-our-loves-so-we-can-use-the-passion-of-fear-properly/
-
Part XXIII: Explanation of sloth in order to analyze this snare of Satan and to combat him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/
-
Part XXIV: Explaining more about how the devil tries to draw us away from reasoning and from the things of God: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/07/29/about-the-temperaments-part-xiv-how-the-devil-draws-us-away-from-reasoning-and-the-things-of-god/
Mary’s School of Sanctity
Lesson
#60 About
the Temperaments – Part XXV –
The
Devil Attempts
to Destroy Our Prayer-Life.
How Should We Counterattack?
The Importance of Fostering a Strong Prayer Life
On many occasions, Our Lord emphasizes of the importance of prayer. He tells us to (1) persevere in prayer;1 (2) be humble in prayer;2 and to (3) trust in God saying, “And all things whatsoever you shall ask in prayer, believing, you shall receive.”3
He assures us that His heavenly Father cares about us. He taught His Apostles The Lord’s Prayer, viz. The Our Father, which includes all of these aspects. In fact, The Lord’s Prayer is the perfect prayer4 and is meant to be said with humble submission to God’s will and a desire to receive our intellectual and spiritual daily bread.
Furthermore, Our Lord instructed His Apostles (and us) to pray always. Our Lord said, “Watch ye, therefore, praying at all times, that you may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that are to come, and to stand before the Son of man” 5, and “Pray, lest you enter into temptation”.6
Since prayer is the lifting of the heart and mind to God,7 we fulfill this precept of Our Lord when we live in the presence of God and keep Him in our minds as we try to please Him in all of our thoughts and actions.
The
Four Temperaments and How They Typically Affect the Soul’s
Spiritual Life
As
we saw in our last lesson,8
it is important to know ourselves so we can better use our
inclinations to make spiritual progress and to avoid spiritual harm.
This is one of the many reasons why it is crucial to discover our own
particular temperament. But a person might say, “I do not know
what temperament I have.” It is a major goal of this present study
of the four temperaments that we will all gain a deeper understanding
of the temperaments and discover our own temperament (if we have not
already identified it). However, for the present, we list below some
general characteristics and spiritual tendencies of persons with a
predominance of one of the four temperaments:
A Choleric Tends to:
-
Be extremely high strung;
-
Be very excitable and prone to become agitated;
-
Have lots of nervous energy;
-
Allow his thoughts to race “a mile per minute” and thus he has a tendency to be superficial in his thinking. He needs to force himself to slow down and to deliberate carefully, especially to consider what is most pleasing to God. He has to force himself to relax and be calm; and
-
Be undaunted by anything and tends to be overconfident; this makes it difficult for him to cultivate a deep trust in God and also a healthy mistrust of himself.
A Sanguine Tends to:
-
Predominantly use his imagination;
-
Love beauty, especially in art and religious pictures;
-
Be easily distracted and must strive to stay focused; and
-
Be a shallower thinker and must make efforts to form the habit of probing deeper into a subject.
A Melancholic Tends to:
-
Use lots of considerations to analyze truths and to draw many conclusions;
-
Be a deeper thinker and be attracted to prayer;
-
Be prone to scruples; and
-
Be prone to worry and to a lack trust in God’s Providence; he has to make efforts to look for hope in difficulties.
A Phlegmatic Tends to:
-
Lack energy;
-
Have a hard time motivating himself, as well as feeling and showing enthusiasm;
-
Be a slow and methodical thinker; and
-
Have a difficult time observing the movements of his soul because impressions need to be repeated many times before they leave a mark.
We can see from this short list of the spiritual tendencies of each temperament that some temperaments are more prone to reflection and prayer, while others are more prone to spiritual laziness. But we must remember that no temperament is immune from the traps of the devil! WE MUST NOT FORGET that the devil’s pull to sloth can affect ALL souls although some souls fall into this trap more easily than others do. No one should disdain those souls who fall more easily into this snare. Instead, we should foster pity if we find that prayer is easier for us than for some souls who find it almost impossible to focus and pray!
We must all be on our guard. In this lesson we will look at the Life of St. Teresa of Avila and find some striking snares that Satan used on her. We will see Satan’s subtle temptations to lure her soul away from prayer. We will see how well she endured these temptations and see the ones for which she fell.
By
looking at her experience we will be able to see how it is paramount
for us to study ourselves and to be on high alert for anything that
is detrimental to our prayer life.
Four Aspects Regarding the Spiritual Life of St. Teresa of Avila
In our present consideration of prayer and the devil’s tricks, we will consider four aspects of the life of St. Teresa of Avila:
-
Her need to read a book in order to try to pray;
-
Her need to see a picture in order to pray;
-
Her description of her sloth; and
-
Her temptation to give up mental prayer in her meditations because she was not humble and sinless enough to pray.
With the help of William Thomas Walsh, one of her biographers, and using the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits of St. Ignatius of Loyola,9 we will be able to make the necessary connections between these four aspects in St. Teresa’s prayer life. Indeed, we will see how Satan was pulling her soul one way into one form of pride and then in another direction to drag her into a different form of pride.
Mr. Walsh explains how St. Teresa was vain, was caught up in worldly friendships, and was not willing to abandon herself completely to God.10 Furthermore, although she was careful to not commit any mortal sins, she was not cautious about venial sin and did not give up occasions of sin. We will see how these things led to her downfall.
Since St. Teresa was trying to avoid mortal sin, Satan tempted her with false reasoning in a different way. As St. Ignatius explains in his Rules for the Discernment of Spirits, this is a typical tactic of the devil.11 The devil certainly did not want her to succeed in having a prayer life, so he deceived her to be disappointed that she needed to use a book to occupy her mind and needed to use a picture to touch her heart in order to move herself to make acts of love for God. Her disappointment in herself and her discouragement about her problems praying were temptations to pride.
Regarding
the Need to Use a Book
She thought it was impossible for her to practice mental prayer without a book, and so she says,
Reading is of great service towards procuring recollection in anyone who proceeds in this way [viz., the way of prayer]; and it is even necessary for him, however little it may be that he reads, if only as a substitute for the mental prayer which is beyond his reach.12
And again,
My
soul was as much afraid to pray without one
[viz.,
a book],
as if it had to fight against a host
[i.e.,
an army].
With
a book to help me — it was like a companion, and a shield whereon to
receive the blows of many thoughts –
I found comfort; for it
was not usual with me to be in aridity:
but
I always was so when I had no book;
for
my soul was disturbed, and my thoughts wandered at once.
With one, [viz.,
a
book]
I began to collect my thoughts, and, using it as a decoy, kept my
soul in peace, very frequently by
merely opening a book –
there was no
necessity for more.
Sometimes, I read but little; at other times, much – according as
our Lord had pity on me.13
Regarding Her Need to See a Picture
She expresses her disappointment in her poor imagination as follows:
God never endowed me with the gift of making reflections with the understanding, or with that of using the imagination to any good purpose; my imagination is so sluggish, that even if I would think of our Lord’s Humanity, or picture It to myself, as I used to labor to picture It, I never could do it.14 …
My understanding was so dull, that I could never represent in the imagination either heavenly or high things in any form whatever until our Lord placed them before me in another way.15
And again,
I was so little able to put things before myself by the help of my understanding, that, unless I saw a thing with my eyes, my imagination was of no use whatever. I could not do as others do, who can put matters before themselves so as to become recollected thereby. I was able to think of Christ only as man. But so it was; and I never could form any image of Him to myself, though I read much of His beauty, and looked at pictures of Him. I was like one who is blind, or in the dark, who, though speaking to a person present, and feeling his presence, because he knows for certain that he is present – I mean, that he understands him to be present, and believes it – yet does not see him. It was thus with me when I used to think of our Lord. This is why I was so fond of images.16
During this period of her life, Satan deluded her to such an extent that she really thought that some people just could not engage in mental prayer. She thought that such people simply did not have the ability although they otherwise had normal abilities and use of their minds. She explained in her autobiography that she thought that she and some other people simply could not engage in mental prayer.
The
problem was really with her will as she saw later on. We will treat
mental prayer later in this lesson.
Regarding Her Dread of Prayer – Her Sloth
Satan deluded her, moving her to a great dread and fear of prayer. These quickly led her to sloth – i.e., a distaste for the things of God and the loss of charity in the soul.
St. Ignatius of Loyola teaches us that Satan studies the soul in order to detect its weaknesses and then he attacks at those weak spots.17 This includes Satan pushing someone further in a bad direction in which he is already leaning. St. Teresa wrote,
I failed in my duty to God, because I was not leaning on the strong pillar of prayer. I passed nearly twenty years on this stormy sea, falling and rising, but rising to no good purpose, seeing that I went and fell again. My life was one of perfection;18 but it was so mean, that I scarcely made any account whatever of venial sins; and though of mortal sins I was afraid, I was not so afraid of them as I ought to have been, because I did not avoid the perilous occasions of them. I may say that it was the most painful life that can be imagined, because I had no sweetness in God, and no pleasure in the world.19
And again,
When I was in the midst of the pleasures of the world, the remembrance of what I owed to God made me sad; and when I was praying to God, my worldly affections disturbed me. This is so painful a struggle, that I know not how I could have borne it for a month, let alone for so many years.20
Later, speaking from the perspective of her better understanding of these matters after her conversion, she says,
I do not understand what there can be to make them afraid, who are afraid, to begin mental prayer, nor do I know what it is they dread. The devil does well to bring this fear upon us, that he may really hurt us. By putting me in fear, he can make me cease from thinking of my offences against God, of the great debt I owe Him, of the existence of heaven and hell, and of the great sorrows and trials He underwent for me …. I was more occupied with the wish to see the end of the time I had appointed for myself to spend in prayer, and in watching the hour-glass, than with other thoughts that were good. If a sharp penance had been laid upon me, I know of none that I would not very often have willingly undertaken, rather than prepare myself for prayer by self-recollection. And certainly the violence with which Satan assailed me was so irresistible, or my evil habits were so strong, that I did not betake myself to prayer; and the sadness I felt on entering the oratory was so great, that it required all the courage I had to force myself in.21
We can see by these quotes how the Father of lies attacks souls with great violence so he can dissuade them from practicing mental prayer. In these passages one must keep in mind that St. Teresa of Avila was primarily afflicted in her soul because she was not willing to give up worldly friendships. These are the occasions of sin to which she refers.
There
were two occasions in which the Lord brought her to tears of
compunction as she was beginning to convert and to change her life.
Unfortunately, she viewed those tears as womanly weakness and tried
to disregard them. She was choleric-sanguine in temperament and did
not appreciate those precious tears as she ought to have done. In a
future lesson we will come back to the dangers choleric women face
when dealing with their feminine nature.
Regarding Her Temptation to Give Up Mental Prayer Because She Was Not Humble and Sinless Enough
The next form of pride Satan tempted her with was to have her believe that she would overcome her sinful tendencies without Divine aid.
She tells us,
I do not think I ever escaped so great a danger as this device of Satan, which he would have imposed upon me in the disguise of humility. He filled me with such thoughts as these: How could I make my prayer, who was so wicked, and yet had received so many mercies? It was enough for me to recite the [Divine] Office, as all others did; but as I did not do that much well, how could I desire to do more? I was not reverential enough, and made too little of the mercies of God. There was no harm in these thoughts and feelings in themselves; but to act upon them, that was an exceedingly great wickedness. Blessed be Thou, O Lord; for Thou camest to my help. This seems to me to be in principle the temptation of Judas, only that Satan did not dare to tempt me so openly. But he might have led me, little by little, as he led Judas to the same pit of destruction.22
A little later in her recounting of this horrific temptation, St. Teresa adds:
I do not think I ever gave up my purpose of resuming my prayer; but I was waiting to be very free from sin first.
Oh, how deluded I was in this expectation! The devil would have held it out before me till the Day of Judgment, that he might then take me with him to hell. Then, when I applied myself to prayer and to spiritual reading, – whereby I might perceive these truths, and the evil nature of the way I was walking, and was often importunate with our Lord in tears, – I was so wicked, that it availed me nothing; when I gave that up, and wasted my time in amusing myself, in great danger of falling into sin, and with scanty helps, – and I may venture to say no help at all, unless it was a help to my ruin, –what could I expect but that of which I have spoken?
I believe that a certain Dominican friar, a most learned man, has greatly merited in the eyes of God; for it was he who roused me from this slumber. He made me – I think I said so before – go to Communion once a fortnight, and be less given to evil; I began to be converted, though I did not cease to offend our Lord all at once; however, as I had not lost my way, I walked on in it, though slowly, falling and rising again; and he who does not cease to walk and press onwards, arrives at last, even if late. To lose one’s way is – so it seems to me – nothing else but the giving up of prayer. God, of His mercy, keeps us from this!23
We can see how insidiously clever Satan is when we consider St. Teresa’s temptations. We see how the devil had earlier lured St. Teresa into the worldly vanities into which she fell. Then because her conscience was pricking her, the devil “took her in the opposite direction” by preying upon her sensitive conscience and trying to drive her into scruples (which is another form of pride). The devil’s motive was to do anything he could to have her give up prayer because that would surely be her downfall.
The
devil’s attacks on St. Teresa are interesting and instructive for
us concerning the devil’s use of this same tactic especially
targeting Catholics – because the damnation of a Catholic is a much
greater victory for Satan (as compared to the damnation of a person
outside of the Church) and such damnation mocks God’s greater
goodness toward Catholics.
An Important Note about Mental Prayer. What is Mental Prayer?
Mental prayer, like all prayer, is lifting the heart and mind to God.24 This speaking to God is making an act of our will. It can be telling Him that we love Him. Our words to God do not have to be elaborate. We simply can tell Him what we are thinking. It is not that He doesn’t already know this, but He wants us to desire to tell Him. He wants us to cooperate with Him in the work of our salvation.
Thus, mental prayer is dependent upon our actions. It is important to keep in mind that St. Teresa really had the human ability to collect her thoughts and say something to God. She explains how she was fooled by the fear (with which Satan deluded her) of trying to gather her thoughts and simply to open her heart to speak to God. She was simply resisting God’s call to give Him her whole heart. Once she was willing to abandon her heart to God, her friendship with Him grew to a beautiful mystical marriage.25
St. Teresa herself has this to say as a lesson we should learn from her experience:
One must humbly ask himself to consider (1) what the world is; (2) what he owes to God; (3) the great sufferings of God for him; (4) his own scanty service in return; and (5) the reward God reserves for those who love Him.
If one considers these things then, he learns how to defend himself against his own thoughts and against the occasions and perils of sin.26
We
should be grateful to God for allowing us to have knowledge of the
wonderful lives of the saints in order to learn how they cooperated
with God in their salvation. God is marvelous in His Providence and
His sculpting of souls. What a great inspiration for us all!
A Preview…
We want to learn, as did St. Teresa of Avila and the other saints, the fruits of avoiding worldliness. In our next lesson we will look further into how we can know ourselves better in order to help us to avoid worldliness, so that we can foster and preserve a solid prayer life and to grow in friendship with God.
1 For help and encouragement to persevering in prayer, read this short article: https://catholiccandle.org/2020/05/01/be-assured-your-prayers-are-always-answered-so-persevere/
2 “The prayer of him that humbleth himself, shall pierce the clouds”. Ecclesiasticus, 35:21.
3 St. Matthew’s Gospel, 21:22.
For a greater appreciation of The Our Father and for help learning to pray it more perfectly, read this short article: https://catholiccandle.org/2022/09/22/if-you-want-to-say-the-most-effective-prayer-say-the-our-father/
5 St. Luke’s Gospel, 21:36.
6 St. Luke’s Gospel, 22:40.
7 To better understand the essence of prayer, read this short article: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/10/cc-in-brief-essence-of-prayer/
9 For a thorough analysis of the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits of St. Ignatius of Loyola, read this five-part article:
10
For example, see, St.
Teresa of Avila,
by William Thomas Walsh, Bruce Publishing Co., Milwaukee, ©1943,
pages 75, 84-85.
11 St. Ignatius explains:
In the persons who are going on intensely cleansing themselves from their sins and rising from good to better in the service of God our Lord, each spirit uses a method contrary to the one he used in the first Rule, for then it is the way of the evil spirit to bite, sadden and put obstacles, disquieting with false reasons, that one may not go on; and it is proper to the good [spirit] to give courage and strength, consolations, tears, inspirations and quiet, easing, and putting away all obstacles, that one may go on in well doing.
Rule #2 of the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits Week One of the Spiritual Exercises.
12 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶12.
13 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶13.
14 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶10.
15 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 9, ¶6.
16 Taken from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 9, ¶7.
17 St. Ignatius explains:
The enemy’s behavior is like that of a military leader who wishes to conquer and plunder the object of his desires. Just as the commander of an army pitches his camp, studies the strengths and defenses of a fortress, and then attacks it on its weakest side, in like manner, the enemy of our human nature studies from all sides our theological, cardinal, and moral virtues. Wherever he finds us weakest and most in need regarding our eternal salvation, he attacks and tries to take us by storm.
Rule #14, of the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits Week One of the Spiritual Exercises.
18 St. Teresa is not saying here that she was perfect. When she says “my life was one of perfection” she refers to the fact that she was bound by the vows in the religious life. This life is called the “life of perfection” because this life has perfection as its goal and because this life is ordered more directly to lead a person to becoming perfect, as compared to the life of a layman. Here is how St. Thomas explains this distinction:
One is said to be in the state of perfection, not through having the act of perfect love, but through binding himself in perpetuity and with a certain solemnity to those things that pertain to perfection. Moreover, it happens that some persons bind themselves to that which they do not keep [viz., unfaithful religious], and some fulfil that to which they have not bound themselves [viz., spiritual laymen], as in the case of the two sons (Matthew 21:28-30), one of whom when his father said: “Work in my vineyard,” answered: “I will not,” and “afterwards . . . he went,” while the other “answering said: I go . . . and he went not.” Wherefore nothing hinders some from being perfect without being in the state of perfection, and some in the state of perfection without being perfect.
Summa, IIa IIae, Q.184, a.4, Respondeo (bracketed words added for clarity).
19 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 8, ¶1 [bold and italic added for emphasis].
20 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 8, ¶2.
21 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 8, ¶10.
22 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 19, ¶16, [emphasis added; bracketed word added for clarity].
23 Quoted from The Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 19, the end of ¶17, & ¶¶ 18-19 [bold and italic added for emphasis].
24
For a further explanation of mental prayer including meditation,
read this article:
https://catholiccandle.org/2021/09/03/lesson-2-meditation-how-why/
25
Concerning this mystical marriage of the soul with Christ, to
which all souls in the state of grace are called, read this article:
https://catholiccandle.org/2019/06/20/our-souls-should-be-docile-brides-of-christ/
26 Quoted from The Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶11.
Words to Live By – From Catholic Tradition
God Sends to Us Life’s Blows and Disappointments for Our Own Good
St. Anthony of Padua, Doctor of the Church, invokes the teaching of Pope St. Gregory the Great, Doctor of the Church, about the Crosses that God sends for our own good:
Constant
temporal success is a sure sign of
eternal damnation.
St. Anthony of Padua, Sermon for the 6th Sunday after Pentecost, quoting Pope St. Gregory the Great, from his work entitled de Moralis, XXVI, 18:35.
The 2026 SSPX Consecrations Do Not Change the Fact that…The SSPX is Still Liberal!
Most of the Catholic world has heard the news that the SSPX consecrated four new bishops on July 1st, 2026, in Econe, Switzerland.
We at Catholic Candle are concerned that even many Catholics who consider themselves Traditional and have tried not to compromise, may perhaps be confused or even deceived by these new consecrations. Some people might argue thus: “After all, does not the Catholic world desperately need more Traditional Catholic bishops? There is a great shortage of bishops who are Latin-Mass and non-liberal. At least these consecrations were a wonderful thing!” Indeed, the “conservative” media, the friends of the “new” SSPX (such as LifeSiteNews) are ablaze with stories and coverage supporting the consecrations.
Further, some might even take a stronger position, something like this: “Rome is clearly even more evil and modernist today than it was in 1988 under Pope John Paul II. So these new consecrations are not only justified, but they are a sure sign that the SSPX has given up its decades of past liberalism, has given up trying to make a practical deal with modernist unconverted Rome, and has regained the no-nonsense attitude of Archbishop Lefebvre near the end of his life. Since this is the case, maybe we should consider attending the SSPX again.”
Below is a two-part article which will show these above conclusions to be great mistakes. Here is a summary:
PART ONE We will begin with a brief reminder of the critical lessons Archbishop Lefebvre learned in dealing with conciliar Rome and the modernist popes, and his resulting militant but charitable mindset and convictions.
PART TWO: Then we will contrast Archbishop Lefebvre’s wise approach in the final years of his life with the behavior and words of the “new” SSPX leaders beginning after Archbishop Lefebvre died, and continuing to the present. We will see that the SSPX’s serious liberalism continues up to the present time (2026).
CONCLUSION: Thus the “new” SSPX is still a liberal organization. Those who have remained in the “new” SSPX until now, over 14 years since the scandals became plain to see (in 2012), are condoning and supporting the SSPX liberalism. But consecrating new bishops in 2026 (who are themselves liberal) on behalf of a liberal organization – far from helping – only makes that liberal organization more likely to continue, and to continue to attack Genuine Catholic Tradition. Thus the 2026 consecrations themselves are the acts of liberals promoting their own liberal group. Nobody should think the SSPX has “turned around” just because there are new bishops. Much less should anyone think it is safe to return to the SSPX.
(In
a future article, Catholic
Candle
will show that the SSPX has for years been continually eroding the
central argument and justification for its own continued existence:
the state of necessity and supplied jurisdiction. The issue of this
erosion is important, and closely related to this present article.)
PART ONE: Archbishop Lefebvre Learned Lessons and Gained Wisdom
In any father-son relationship, it would be very difficult and painful for the son to see his father do and say evil and deranged things. Yet it would be very unlikely that a 16-year old son would suddenly “move out of his father’s home” the first time his father comes home stone-cold drunk and starts throwing furniture around. Rather, the loving son would likely retain hope through even more of such episodes and dangers, not only defending himself each time, but trying over and over again to help his father to see clearly afterwards. Things would likely continue this way until the son’s very life was threatened, and/or that son’s hope and trust in the father’s recovery all but disappeared. At that point, the son would realize – for his own sake – that he must remove himself from the practical control of the father by placing physical distance between them. Moving out would, of course, not mean the son thinks that his father no longer has any authority over him. Rather, the son moves out simply because he sees he must not allow that dangerous father to put him (the son) in practical danger by allowing him to misuse his authority through evil actions, commands, and bad examples.
The case of Archbishop Lefebvre and the conciliar popes is similar to this illustration, but is incomparably more serious. With the drunk father, it was just the son, and just his bodily life in danger. But with the conciliar popes, it is the entire human element of the Church put in danger, and not merely bodily, but put in danger of losing their immortal souls for all eternity. For at least the drunk father never sat down and insisted his son also get drunk and sin. But that is just what modernist Rome has done to the human element of the Church for 60+ years, attempting to make Catholics accept the heretical documents of Vatican II,1 the new mass, and all the other rotten fruits of Vatican II.
During
the Second Vatican Council and all through the 1970s and 1980s,
Archbishop Lefebvre was amazed at the innumerable and shocking
scandals of the modernist popes (most notably Popes Paul VI and John
Paul II). These popes were methodically implementing what Vatican II
taught. Archbishop Lefebvre saw that these popes were clearly
“stone-cold drunk” (as it were) with modernism, and that they
demanded that the entire Church believe the same things. Archbishop
Lefebvre tried in true charity for many years to help these popes
(and modernist Roman clergy) and to protect the true Traditional
Catholic Faith. He met numerous times with them and wrote many
letters, hoping they would come to see reason and clear Traditional
Catholic doctrine.
A Critical Turning Point for Archbishop Lefebvre
But – and here is the key point: eventually, he came to the firm conclusion that, just as was true of Pope Paul VI before him, Pope John Paul II and his staff also were completely unreceptive to the truth. Instead, they were firmly and hopelessly committed not only to the heretical and deadly documents of Vatican II, but also to the destruction of virtually all that is good and holy in the Church.
Traditional Catholics could never over-emphasize the importance of this “ah-ha!” moment – this tremendous grace in which Archbishop Lefebvre saw that he should never again work with Rome until it converts. The entire Church (including each of us) has been the beneficiary of his discovery and subsequent resolve. He summed up his more guarded, wiser mindset in a number of interviews. First, let’s consider the interview given shortly after the 1988 consecrations, including these famous words which we would all do well to memorize:
“Interviewer: … What do you think of a possible re-opening of the dialogue with Rome?
Archbishop Lefebvre: We [Rome and I] do not have the same outlook on a reconciliation. Cardinal Ratzinger sees it as reducing us, bringing us back to Vatican II. We see it as a return of Rome to Tradition. We don’t agree; it is a dialogue of death. I can’t speak much of the future, mine is behind me, but if I live a little while, supposing that Rome calls for a renewed dialogue, then, I will put conditions. I shall not accept being in the position where I was put during the [early 1988] dialogue. No more. I will place the discussion at the doctrinal level [saying the following to the pope, if he asks the SSPX to return to talks]: “Do you agree with the great encyclicals of all the popes who preceded you? Do you agree with Quanta Cura of Pius IX, Immortale Dei and Libertas of Leo XIII, Pascendi Gregis of Pius X, Quas Primas of Pius XI, Humani Generis of Pius XII? Are you in full communion with these Popes and their teachings? Do you still accept the entire Anti-Modernist Oath? Are you in favor of the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ? If you do not accept the doctrine of your predecessors, it is useless to talk! As long as you do not accept the correction of the Council, in consideration of the doctrine of these Popes, your predecessors, no dialogue is possible. It is useless.” Thus, the positions will be clear. … What opposes us is doctrine; it is clear.”2
A few notes on the above quote:
-
Archbishop Lefebvre did not make this decision merely because he was “tired of these talks” or from some other personal motive of inconvenience or temporal concern. Rather, he did so because he realized that it is deadly, when dealing with a smooth-talking and tricky enemy, to continue “rubbing elbows” and engaging in dialogue. We must remember that just about any of us would be quite nervous and unable to think clearly if we ourselves were sitting in the office of the most powerful man on earth, the Vicar of Christ (yes, even the destroyer-popes), surrounded by the top Vatican officials. Our filial fear of our father would be present.
On top of that, these Roman diplomats are very experienced with words and pressure techniques. For proof of how dangerous it is to talk with the modernist Romans, consider this: During the talks, Rome at one point even convinced Archbishop Lefebvre himself to put his signature on a deadly practical agreement which would have proven a death-warrant for the SSPX and all of Catholic Tradition.3 Through a great grace no doubt, he quickly realized his grave mistake, and rescinded his agreement the next day.
-
In the quote above, Archbishop Lefebvre used the conciliar-invented and nonsensical phrase “full communion”. He did so not because he really thought there exists such a distinction as “full” and “partial” communion with the Church (he explicitly denied that many times). Instead, he quotes that phrase to the Romans as a sort of tongue-in-cheek technique, using the conciliar popes’ own terminology against them (to help them, not to hurt them).
The same point is drawn out even more explicitly in another interview Archbishop Lefebvre gave a few months later:
-
“They have to stop with their ecumenism; they have to bring back the true meaning of the Mass, restore the true definition of the Church, bring back the Catholic meaning of collegiality, and so on. I expect from them a Catholic, and not a liberal, definition of religious liberty. They must accept the encyclical Quas Primas on Christ the King, and the Syllabus [of Pope Pius IX]. They must accept all this, because this is, from now on, the condition determining all new discussions between us and them.”4
-
“If ever there were a willingness from Rome to resume discussions, this time, I will be the one to set down the conditions. As Cardinal Oddi said, ‘Archbishop Lefebvre is in a strong position.’”5
One might object: “Good heavens, Your Excellency, how in the world is Rome ever going to convert if we Catholics refuse to talk with them and convince them of their errors?” Archbishop Lefebvre certainly did not accept this naïve reasoning (which he knew some of his priests held). In an interview, he reminded us all of the important truth that, “It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who make the subjects.”6 Besides, he came to realize that modernism is such a fatal disease that Rome could only be converted by Our Lord’s power and grace obtained by the intercession of Our Lady. Besides, Rome already had all the documents it needed at its fingertips, all the persuasion given in the countless previous meetings and letters from Archbishop Lefebvre himself. Clearly no human means worked in his attempts to convert his superior, the pope.
Archbishop Lefebvre followed up with more interviews and statements, emphasizing how bad it would be to “make a deal” with modernist Rome, stating:
-
“It is dangerous to put oneself into the hands of the conciliar bishops and Modernist Rome. It is the greatest danger threatening our people. If we have struggled for twenty years to avoid the conciliar errors, it was not in order, now, to put ourselves into the hands of those professing these errors.”7
-
“It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this conciliar church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.”8
-
“The See of Peter and the posts of authority in Rome are being occupied by anti-Christs.”9
-
“We must no longer engage in dialogue with the Roman authorities. They only want to bring us back to the [Vatican II] Council; we must have no dealings with them.10
Take
good note how Archbishop Lefebvre does not shrink from using the
strongest of terms such as ‘antichrist’. This is to teach us
just how dangerous modernist Rome is, as well as to show the Romans
themselves true
charity by
telling them the great danger they are in. Keep this in mind when we
consider the “new” SSPX’s words below.
Archbishop Lefebvre’s Reaction to the (Supposed) 1988 “Excommunications”
In June 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four new bishops for the SSPX. Pope John Paul II, claiming Archbishop Lefebvre’s act was disobedient and schismatic, almost instantly “excommunicated” Archbishop Lefebvre as well as the other bishops who were involved in the consecrations. It is not the intention of this article to dispel the myth that there was any validity to the purported excommunications. There are many good articles which prove conclusively that Pope John Paul II’s action was unjust, invalid, and of no effect.11
For our purposes here, let us focus on how Archbishop Lefebvre reacted to the fictitious excommunications. Keeping this in mind will help us to assess the current situation of the “new” SSPX. Here are Archbishop Lefebvre’s words:
-
“We are convinced that all these accusations of which we are the object, all these penalties of which we are the object, are null, absolutely null! … We take no account of them at all.”12
-
In July, 1988 – one month after the consecrations, Archbishop Lefebvre paraphrased Rome’s words and his response to Rome: “‘[Rome:] Since you don’t want to come with us, we excommunicate you.’ [Archbishop Lefebvre:] ‘Very well. Thank you. We prefer to be excommunicated. We do not want to participate in this shocking work in the Church that has been carried out in the last 20 years.’”13
-
Archbishop Lefebvre knew the “excommunications” came from a pope acting on behalf of a new church (the conciliar church) and new religion (the conciliar religion), which were born during Vatican II. Here is his explanation: “But the Church [acting] against her past and her Tradition is not the Catholic Church; this is why being excommunicated by a liberal, ecumenical, and revolutionary Church is a matter of indifference to us.” 14
But it was not just Archbishop Lefebvre who alone had this spirit and correct thinking. All the top leadership of the SSPX worldwide also saw the truth and had the correct militant Catholic attitude at that time. In a 1988 letter to Cardinal Gantin, Fr. Franz Schmidberger (the Superior General of the SSPX) and all the District Superiors, Seminary Rectors, and Superiors of Autonomous Houses of the SSPX worldwide all asked Rome to also be “excommunicated” alongside Archbishop Lefebvre and the newly-consecrated bishops, so little did these SSPX leaders care about such an apparent “stain”. They wanted to help souls to see how evil Rome was, to show the unanimity of the top SSPX leadership, and most importantly, to show Catholics what they should do if the shepherd turns into a wolf. Here is what they wrote to Rome:
[W]e have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society. Yes, we have no part, nullam partem habemus, with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly. We believe in the One God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and we will always remain faithful to His unique Spouse, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church … To be therefore publicly associated with the sanction [i.e., “excommunications”] which strikes the six15 Catholic bishops, defenders of the faith in its integrity and totality, would be for us [i.e., the other top SSPX leadership] a mark of honor and a sign of orthodoxy before the faithful.16
While Archbishop Lefebvre was alive, the (old and good) SSPX was at its height. This was especially glorious in the 1980s and 1990s. There was a worldwide and consistent fighting spirit across the SSPX.17 Its media outlets, pulpits, magazines, books, and nascent websites consistently lit up in reaction to the scandals of Rome and the popes, exposing error, and teaching the opposing truths. It was a beautiful time most of us perhaps took for granted.
Archbishop Lefebvre died in March, 1991, just a few years after providing the Church four new bishops in what he called “Operation Survival”.
Let us recall critical truths here, to prepare for PART TWO of this article:
-
Until his dying breath, Archbishop Lefebvre never once spoke with regret of the consecrations;
-
Nor did he express any fear of the supposed excommunications. Rather, he spoke about them with disdain.
-
Nor did he take back his words that he would never again deal with Rome until Rome converted.
Conclusion of PART ONE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s actions and words were a critical guidepost for us all, showing his fellow Catholics these critical lessons of how to act and think in this crisis:
-
Be confident that it is we, not Rome, that has Catholic Tradition.
-
We should not fear or be pressured into compromise in response to the “scare tactics” from Rome or one’s own local conciliar “bishop”;
-
And perhaps the most important practical lesson: It is hopeless, vain, and dangerous to “talk” with superiors who do not want to profess the Catholic Truth. They will “convert” us to their errors, rather than we converting them.
Keep
these truths in mind as we now assess the “new” SSPX in 2026.
PART TWO: The SSPX after Archbishop Lefebvre
In the above review, we saw that:
-
Archbishop Lefebvre learned the critical lesson that there should be no dialogue about a practical agreement with unconverted Rome;
-
He completely disregarded Rome’s unjust punishments; and
-
He had no intention whatsoever of placing the (then-good) SSPX into the hands of unconverted Rome.
That review was necessary in order to correctly analyze the modern-day SSPX, including the July, 2026 consecrations.
But
just talking about 1988 and Archbishop Lefebvre is not
enough to be able
to assess the situation of the current-day SSPX. We must undertake a
mini-review of what happened to the SSPX beginning after Archbishop
Lefebvre died, and continuing to the present day. Sadly, the old
SSPX under its new leadership almost immediately commenced the 20+
year series of scandals which transformed it into the “new” SSPX
we see today.
Various Eras of SSPX Liberalism and Decay
1991 to 2012:
An important event took place in 1994: Bishop Bernard Fellay was elected Superior General, succeeding Fr. Franz Schmidberger. This was an immediate bad sign, for the Archbishop had not thought electing an SSPX bishop as superior of the SSPX was necessary, and in fact, in the 1988 consecrations, he avoided doing this.18
But more importantly, the SSPX’s former zeal quickly began to fade. Soon after Bp. Fellay was elected, the SSPX leaders quietly abandoned the wisdom of their founder and began secret talks with Rome with the specific intention of making a practical agreement with modernist, unconverted Rome.19
Beginning almost imperceivably, the SSPX’s media outlets and pulpits soon became more and more quiet and less militant about the errors of Vatican II, the conciliar Revolution, and the popes’ scandals.
This softening was no accident: the SSPX was doing two things:
-
It was positioning itself to be less offensive and more “loyal” to the pope. The “new” SSPX hoped to please modernist Rome so that the SSPX could obtain a practical agreement with Rome. It is awkward and uncomfortable to attack Rome while engaging in “dialogue” seeking favors from it.
-
It was painting those same modernist popes in a better light in order to weaken the resistance of some of its own priests and laymen to making a deal with Rome.
In
2006, Bishop Fellay was re-elected as Superior General for another
twelve years – and this would virtually ensure the death of the
“old” SSPX, as we will now see.
2012 to 2018:
These seven years produced a Mount Everest-sized heap of shocking scandals. For our purposes here, we will give a brief history and just mention a few of those scandals.
In the summer of 2012, the world suddenly learned about some of the fruits of Bishop Fellay’s years of secret maneuverings and betrayals – which had hitherto been known only to those directly involved. In what is perhaps the biggest SSPX scandal ever, Bishop Fellay gave Pope Benedict a shocking proposal (the “2012 Doctrinal Declaration”). In this document, Bp. Fellay asked Rome to grant the SSPX certain gifts. One of these was that Rome would “lift the 1988 excommunications.” This was a scandal in itself (remember the first part of this article) as is evident from Archbishop Lefebvre and all of the SSPX leadership (at the time) considering it a badge of honor to be “excommunicated” from the conciliar church. Heretofore, Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX superiors in 1988 never considered those “excommunications” as real, and they certainly never asked for them to be rescinded. But in 2012, Bishop Fellay promised that, if Rome would “lift the excommunications”, then the SSPX would agree to officially accept the documents of Vatican II as reconcilable with Tradition (which was truly an impossibility), and to accept the new mass and the new Canon “law” as legitimate (which was impossible because evil things such as these could never be legitimate).
It became clearer and clearer that Bishop Fellay had, for many years, had his sights on a deal with Rome at all costs. The whole Traditional world was shocked and many good priests and faithful left the SSPX. In fact, some (but certainly not all) of the SSPX leadership reacted strongly, as shown in a very revealing internal letter leaked to the public in 2012. This letter was written by the other three bishops consecrated in 1988 (Bishops Williamson, Tissier, and Galarreta) to Bishop Fellay. In it, they pleaded with him to stop his destruction and suicide mission of talking with Rome, and instead to follow Archbishop Lefebvre’s wise principle: no practical agreement or talks with modernist, unconverted Rome. Bishop Fellay ruthlessly shut down those three bishops, painting them as sedevacantists and lacking Faith.20 This was the last significant defense of Archbishop Lefebvre’s policy and of Tradition we would ever hear from Bishops Tissier and Galarreta, for they soon afterwards became insignificant “yes men”, rubber-stamping all that Bishop Fellay did and said.
Shocking SSPX scandals continued at an alarming rate, not only from Bp. Fellay but from many district superiors and articles from the SSPX outlets. These scandals are well-documented in various Catholic Candle articles21, but here are a few reminders:
-
The “new” SSPX recast the conciliar revolutionaries and destroyers as being “victims” of Vatican II22 and says that the conciliar barbarians including Pope Francis “abide in the truth”.23
-
The slide continued in countless ways. The “new” SSPX followed the conciliar church by:
-
The “new” SSPX:
This period of years beginning roughly in 2012 commenced a new direction – a new marketing ploy in which the “new” SSPX continued to have doctrinal articles but those were largely in a liberal direction. Thus, there were a great many statements of the “new” SSPX proving its liberalism. But gradually the “new” SSPX began to avoid doctrinal matters in general because they were too controversial. Instead the “new” SSPX focused on positive, “happy” things such as:
-
Promoting gratitude to its own elderly priests;
-
Promoting its own confirmations, pilgrimages, camps, and (watered-down) retreats;
-
Promoting the beauty of the Mass;
-
Recounting the lives of the saints;
-
Giving a pious thought for each day or explanation of the Gospel;
-
Promoting cultural articles about Catholic art and music; and
-
Discussions – usually from conciliar “conservatives” of political news in the Church.
As explained by Fr. Jergen Wegner, who was then U.S. District Superior of the SSPX:
A final characteristic of the new style is its positivity. Devoid of any aggressive and imposing elements, we are committed to avoiding unnecessary polemics … primarily we want to stand out by positive reporting ….31
All such “happy” published material avoids controversy and avoids alienating modernist Rome.
There is so much more SSPX liberalism we could catalogue. For an incomplete but longer catalogue of SSPX liberalism, go to https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/#gsc.tab=0 and click on the SSPX button.
Many
priests and laymen who had left the SSPX had all they could do at
that time, writing article after article to warn others. The “new”
SSPX eventually expelled the last bishop who was speaking out against
its liberalism: Bishop Williamson, who, although he could correctly
see Bishop Fellay’s errors, could apparently not see the many
serious problems of his own – problems which are documented in many
Catholic
Candle
articles.32
2018 – 2026:
On
July 11, 2018, during the 4th General Chapter at Écône,
Switzerland, Fr. Davide Pagliarani was elected as the new Superior
General of the SSPX for a 12-year term (2018–2030). Some faithful
did not know that Fr. Pagliarani had for years been Bishop Fellay’s
“right hand man” and had been ordained a priest by him. Thus
some folks held out the vain hope that there would now be a return to
the “old SSPX” since Bp. Fellay was now no longer superior
general.
Scandals of the “new” SSPX under Fr. Pagliarani
Why the “new” SSPX perhaps now merely APPEARS more conservative than in past years
One way to categorize scandals is whether they are commissions (things said and done) or omissions (things not said or done). During Bishop Fellay’s 24-year tenure, we saw countless scandals of both kinds, which caused many good priests and faithful to leave the SSPX.
Let us now examine both the commissions and omissions during Fr. Pagliarani’s tenure from 2018 to 2026. This will “put the nail in the coffin” to the myth that the “new” SSPX has “turned around”.
We
will begin with the commissions because we want to leave the end of
this article to expose the more difficult-to-detect omissions.
1. Scandalous Commissions under Fr. Pagliarani
During Fr. Pagliarani’s tenure (2018 to the present 2026), there perhaps have not been as many commissions. (The Catholic Candle team stopped carefully watching and analyzing the “new” SSPX liberalism at some point around 2017; so we do not have as thorough a list as we would like to provide.) Nevertheless, there have been enough to scandalize faithful and informed Catholics. Catholic Candle posted an article in March of 2025 entitled, 21 Examples of Liberalism in the “New” SSPX.33 The “new” liberal SSPX has never publicly retracted any of this liberalism, as is their duty.34
The “new” SSPX under Fr. Pagliarani has added the following additional scandals:
-
The SSPX previously taught the truth that the rubella vaccine and other vaccines developed through abortion are always sinful. By contrast, the “new” SSPX under Fr. Pagliarani now says not only that this same rubella vaccine is justifiable for some people, but also that the COVID “vaccines”, which were also developed through abortion, are also justified. The SSPX’s new position is wrong, liberal, and contradicts its own prior teaching on vaccines developed through abortion.35
-
The “new” SSPX, rather than putting Bishop Fellay somewhere he can do no more damage, has instead retained him in an important role of SSPX leadership – that of First Counsellor General of the SSPX General Council. This shows the continuation of the liberalism that Bp. Fellay promoted.
-
The “new” SSPX under Fr. Pagliarani has for years now had deals in place with modernist conciliar ‘bishops’ to use diocesan conciliar buildings in which to pray and say Mass. For example, a conciliar “bishop” in Fribourg, Switzerland had granted the “new” SSPX permissions to use certain “sacred” buildings of his diocese, and the “new” SSPX began taking advantage of those permissions as far back as 2019.36 But that same “bishop” withdrew those permissions in July, 2026, in response to the “new” SSPX’s consecrations.37 Multiple Catholic Candle articles have shown that there are many reasons why it is a great evil and scandal to use the buildings of the conciliar Revolution, including that sacrileges regularly take place in those buildings, and the danger to the Faith of those who enter and pray in those buildings.38
-
The “new” SSPX now promotes the false conciliar “apparition” at Akita, Japan.39
-
The “new” liberal SSPX promotes conciliar “saints” and the conciliar “canonization” processes, e.g., of Annella Zervas40, an American nun who is currently being promoted in the conciliar church’s processes for “canonization”, and for whom the conciliar church appointed a woman postulator.41
-
The “new” SSPX, (which Rome has once again declared to be “excommunicated” in 2026), has reacted to Rome’s decree of “excommunication” in a way that was the very opposite of the militant and Catholic way Archbishop Lefebvre did in 1988. We saw in the first part of this article multiple quotes from Archbishop Lefebvre and the top SSPX leaders that they considered the 1988 “excommunications” to be nothing, proclaiming them null and void, even proud to have received them. Further, Archbishop Lefebvre knew that the “excommunication” came not from the Catholic Church, but from the conciliar church: “This is why being excommunicated by a liberal, ecumenical, and revolutionary Church is a matter of indifference to us.”42 By contrast, in July 2026, the “new” SSPX leaders even submitted a canonical appeal to Rome’s decree of excommunication. The “new” SSPX filed this request to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on July 11, 2026, in an attempt to suspend and even stop the (supposed) legal force of Rome’s ruling of excommunication.43 This legalistic approach is a scandal to Catholics:
-
By doing this, the “new” SSPX implicitly denies the existence of the conciliar church, and instead, continues its pattern (for over 10 years) of not distinguishing the Catholic Church from the conciliar church.44
-
By doing this, the “new” SSPX implicitly denies that they are at war with modernist Rome – for enemies at war do not file legal petitions seeking the help of the enemy.
-
Pope John Paul II’s horrific 1983 Code of Canon Law includes many evil precepts. But the “new” SSPX in this 2026 appeal process quotes and relies upon only the 1983 Code, and does so in perhaps the most official correspondence to date with Rome.45 This informs the world that it is okay to use the terms and rules of the enemy, in order to get what you want.
-
The “new” SSPX under Fr. Pagliarani has continued to rely upon and has never rejected the faculties for confessions and marriages it received from Pope Francis under the tenure of Bishop Fellay.
-
The “new” SSPX under Bp. Fellay began calling the new mass “Holy Mass”.46 Now, under Fr. Pagliarani, the SSPX calls the Traditional Mass by its conciliar name, viz., the “Extraordinary Form” 47
2. Scandalous Omissions under Fr. Pagliarani
Omissions are by nature harder to recognize than commissions. For example, it is easy to spot the scandal of a priest who says in a sermon that “all religions are good and are willed by God.” Such things are even easier to spot if repeated over and over. (Hopefully, we would not keep coming back week after week to see if the priest did so!)
But the following is a rarer “catch”, for a hypothetical person to exclaim: “I just love Fr. Jones’ sermons – week after week he always talks about St. Thomas Aquinas, virtues, and charity. It is all so beautiful and inspiring. I feel like I am in heaven after I leave Church. (… long pause – grace enters in …) Hmmm…. But come to think of it, he rarely or even never talks about the errors of Vatican II that threaten us all, like Archbishop Lefebvre so frequently did...” This person has correctly recognized a serious omission. This sort of “Aha! moment” is much rarer, again because it is harder to spot omissions in general, but also because most of us are not as vigilant as we should be. All it takes for a person or parish to become liberal is to not regularly hear and be warned about those errors.
Here
is another thought experiment. Imagine that “Pope Pius XIII” is
elected after Pope Leo XIV dies. Suppose on the good side, Pope Pius
XIII commits no modernist scandals, states good general doctrine, and
even commands all bishops and priests to allow the Tridentine Mass
with no restrictions. In short, suppose he does no commissions to
shock even Traditional Catholic sensibilities. But suppose further
that this pope says and writes absolutely nothing to explicitly
condemn the previous 60+ years that elapsed since Vatican II – no
condemnation of the rotten Vatican II documents themselves, no
condemnation of the evil novus ordo rite of mass, and no condemnation
of the infinitude of scandals of the modernist destroyer-popes that
immediately preceded him, and so on. What should we think of this
new pope? Is he a good pope? He
is not!
He is still a bad pope, because he is grossly negligent in his duty.
Public scandals and problems must be corrected thoroughly, publicly,
and as soon as possible, to avoid the loss of souls.48
Imagine the confusion of Catholics under this pope’s reign: “So
what’s the bottom line: Was Vatican II right in all its teachings,
or were all the previous popes? Should I go to the new mass or the
Tridentine mass? Both are allowed everywhere and are easy to find
now.” There would be countless other serious confusions, e.g.,
about the New vs. the Old Canon Law, and so on.
First omission under Fr. Pagliarani: failure to correct Bishop Fellay’s scandals
Just
as in the “Pope Pius XIII” example above,
the “new” SSPX has never distanced itself from, or made public
retraction / reparation / correction of, any of the shocking scandals
of the 24 years in which Bishop Fellay was the superior of the SSPX
(1994-2018). These
scandals were so numerous and many are so serious that almost any one
of them could be enough in God’s eyes for a bishop or superior to
lose his soul at his judgment. Yet, we are not aware of even a
single SSPX article written since Fr. Pagliarani became superior
general that states, “We were wrong about [such-and-such words and
actions], and we seriously endangered many souls for years. We
unjustly punished good priests and persecuted good faithful. Now we
see that [the opposite] is the right thing to do and say”, etc.
Second omission under Fr. Pagliarani: failure to follow Archbishop Lefebvre ’s wisdom
Recall in the first part of this article that Archbishop Lefebvre learned the important lesson to never again “dialogue” with Rome without proof of its conversion, for he realized that nothing but great harm to souls could come out of doing so. The “whole world” knows that Bp. Fellay ignored that wisdom and persistently attempted49 to make a practical deal with unconverted Rome. But many people wrongly think Fr. Pagliarani has completely reversed that policy and returned to Archbishop Lefebvre’s wisdom.
The truth is that at best one might argue that Fr. Pagliarani has merely “suspended” Bp. Fellay’s policy of talks, while leaving the “window open” for Rome to see that “we are ready when you are ready”.
We can see this clearly by analyzing a February 18th, 2026 letter that the “new” SSPX wrote to Rome.50 The historical context of that letter is this:
-
In 2019, only six months after Fr. Pagliarani took the reins of the “new” SSPX, he reached out to unconverted Rome under Pope Francis, asking for new talks.51 It was he that asked for these talks, not Rome. On the good side, the subject of the letter was clearly to discuss doctrine. (And that makes it better than Bp. Fellay’s maneuverings which were merely to make a practical deal without doctrinal agreement.) But on the bad side, in this letter Fr. Pagliarani follows nothing of the firm decision and wisdom of Archbishop Lefebvre. That is, he omits to ask Rome: “Before we agree to talk, answer me this: Have you converted? Do you accept the truth the pre-Vatican II popes consistently taught?” In any case, Rome did not respond to the “new” SSPX’s request to dialogue.
-
Seven years passed. No doubt the “new” SSPX was in a serious quandary of its own making. During this time, the “new” SSPX would be reflecting: “We hesitate to offend Rome by consecrations because we want to be accepted into the conciliar church and get lots of favors. But on the other hand, our remaining two bishops are soon going to die and then we’ll be helpless!” They made their decision: on February 2, 2026, the SSPX wrote to Rome (now under Pope Leo XIV) and announced that the “new” SSPX intended to consecrate bishops without a papal mandate.
-
In response, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, invited SSPX Superior General Fr. Pagliarani to Rome for talks. The SSPX knew well that this Cardinal Fernandez was a modernist who had also written grossly impure books, and is guilty of many other grave scandals.
-
Nevertheless, the “new” SSPX accepted the invitation, and the meeting took place on February 12, 2026. Once again, the “new” SSPX asked Rome nothing about whether it would accept true Catholic doctrine before talking.
-
Six days after the meeting, on February 18th, 2026, Fr. Pagliarani wrote a follow-up letter back to Rome. It is that letter we analyze below.
Analysis of the February 18th, 2026, letter of the SSPX to Rome
Instead of reproducing the entire letter, we will provide excerpts. But we encourage all to read the letter in its entirety, at this link: https://fsspx.news/en/news/letter-father-pagliarani-cardinal-fernandez-57309
In that letter, Fr. Pagliarani’s SSPX writes the following:
-
“… This was precisely my intention in 2019, when I suggested a discussion during a calm and peaceful time, without the pressure or threat of possible excommunication, which would have undermined free dialogue—as is, unfortunately, the situation today. … We both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally … [and that] the texts of the [Second Vatican] Council cannot be corrected, nor can the legitimacy of the liturgical reform be challenged … ”
Note: The SSPX says that both sides know that there is no way to agree doctrinally, yet the SSPX seeks to continue meeting and dialoguing. What could another meeting accomplish except a practical agreement without a doctrinal agreement, to put the SSPX under the direct practical control of modernist Rome?
-
The “new” SSPX frames doctrinal discussions as merely ‘desirable’ and ‘useful’, rather than essential. But we already know that for Archbishop Lefebvre, it became a matter of principle that he would no longer talk with unconverted Rome. Yet the “new” SSPX writes this to Rome: “For the Society’s part, a doctrinal discussion has always been – and remains – desirable and useful.”
-
The “new” SSPX pretends that Rome genuinely loves the Truth and the salvation of souls. The “new” SSPX is patronizing and scandalous when it writes: “Indeed, even if we [viz., the SSPX and Rome] do not reach an agreement, fraternal exchanges allow us to better know one another, to refine and deepen our own arguments, and to better understand the spirit and intentions behind our interlocutor’s positions—especially their genuine love for the Truth, for souls, and for the Church. This holds true, at all times, for both parties.”
Note: Although we would not judge or declare that we know that the conciliar hierarchy consciously hates souls and hates the Church, nonetheless, virtually everything they do attacks souls and attacks the Church. So this claim (viz., love of souls and the Church) is contrary to all objective evidence whatever might be their subjective, interior intent. It is as incongruous as watching a man stab people with a butcher knife and say “we know that he and we can agree on loving people and loving life.”
-
The “new” SSPX is firstly concerned with the welfare of the SSPX, not the Common Good: Fr. Pagliarani writes: “More recently, we have written twice to the Holy Father: first to request an audience, then to clearly and respectfully explain our needs and the real-life situation of the Society.” The “new” SSPX admits here that it writes to Rome to get favors, to get approval, to convince Rome “we are doing good work!”, to get ‘regularized’. All of this is quite different than Archbishop Lefebvre’s language of telling Rome to its face that they do the devil’s work and must convert, so that Rome might then convert the world.
-
The “new” SSPX continues to pretend its own canonical situation is irregular. There is nothing wrong with the SSPX’s canonical status. All of Rome’s past attempts to illegally and unjustly suppress, excommunicate, and silence it are null and void. Archbishop Lefebvre never recognized the validity of Rome’s “punishments”. Yet the “new” SSPX has for years now continued to tell the world (and Rome) that it believes in the validity of the censures, and that is why a deal is so badly needed. The “new” SSPX exhibits this same false concern in this February 18th letter regarding the “excommunications”. It writes: “That is why, over the years, the Sovereign Pontiffs have taken note of this existence [viz., of the SSPX] and, through concrete and significant acts, have recognised the value of the good it [i.e., the SSPX] can accomplish, despite its canonical situation”. And: “It asks nothing else of you – no privileges, nor even canonical regularisation”.
-
The “new” SSPX is craven in its cowardly attempts to defend Our Lady’s honor: Our readers probably know that in 2025, Cardinal Fernandez, with the approval of Pope Leo XIV, blasphemed Our Lady, telling the world to no longer use the glorious titles of Our Lady “Mediatrix of All Graces” and “Co-Redemptrix”. The “new” SSPX closes this February 18, 2026 letter, apologizing to those same modernist Romans as it faintheartedly defends her honor: “I pray for you in particular to the Holy Ghost and – do not take this as a provocation – His Most Holy Spouse, the Mediatrix of all Graces.”
Contrast
all this with the spirit of Archbishop Lefebvre and the “old”
SSPX in 1988 after the supposed excommunications. The
tone of the entire February 18 letter is fawning and begging. The
“new” SSPX lacks the militancy of the old SSPX and Archbishop
Lefebvre. That
militant spirit is seen in the multiple quotes provided earlier in
this article, showing that Archbishop Lefebvre and the entire SSPX
leadership took no notice of the “excommunications” and boldly
told Rome so. Also, the cringing and soft diplomatic language of the
“new” SSPX embodies a great
lack of
charity
to the Romans.
By failing to tell the Romans the truth (for fear of offending them
and wrecking diplomatic relations), there is less chance of them ever
converting and instead, them going to hell.
Conclusion
The “new” SSPX under Fr. Pagliarani might appear (though falsely) to have “turned around” because the scandals are less obvious than those under Bishop Fellay. But careful analysis shows that nothing has really changed. The consecration of new bishops in 2026 does nothing to show that the “new” SSPX has begun to come to its senses and reject its liberalism. Rather, it just gives those four new liberal bishops a greater capacity to promote the SSPX liberalism . The entire situation is very much unlike that of the beautiful 1988 consecrations performed by Archbishop Lefebvre .
Thus, faithful and informed Traditional Catholics should continue to shun the “new” SSPX and continue to pray for its conversion.
1 All of the documents of Vatican II are evil and they contain hundreds of heresies. See, e.g., Vatican II’s promoting religious liberty in contradiction to the infallible teaching of the Church. See, e.g., https://catholiccandle.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Errors-of-Dignitatis-Humanae.pdf
See also:
2 Archbishop Lefebvre And The Vatican, interview of Archbishop Lefebvre given to Fideliter Magazine, November-December 1988 (emphasis added; bracketed words added for clarity). This interview is found here: https://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/Archbishop-Lefebvre/Archbishop_Lefebvre_and_the_Vatican/Part_II/1988-11.htm
3
In early May, 1988, he signed a sort of “truce” and practical
agreement with Pope John Paul II (the “May 5th
Protocol”). This agreement would have placed the SSPX under the
practical control of unconverted Rome, allowing Rome to provide a
replacement bishop and set up a sort of official structure for the
SSPX within the conciliar church.
4 Interview in Controverses Magazine, 1988 (bracketed words added for clarity).
5 Interview in Controverses Magazine, 1988.
6
The
Protocol of Agreement? No!
(Fideliter,
1988, emphasis
added).
7 Archbishop Lefebvre, Interview, Fideliter, 1989 (emphasis added).
8 Spiritual Journey, by Archbishop Lefebvre, ch.3.
9 Archbishop Lefebvre, Letter to his four future bishops, Aug 29, 1987 (emphasis added).
10
Interview in Controverses
Magazine, 1988 (bracketed words added for clarity; emphasis
added).
11 For one analysis of this issue, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/10/since-pope-john-paul-ii-was-a-real-pope-was-archbishop-lefebvre-was-excommunicated/
12 Sermon at the Episcopal Consecrations, June 30, 1988 (emphasis added).
13 Fideliter Magazine, issue 65, 1988 (emphasis added; bracketed words added to show context).
14 Words of Archbishop Lefebvre, quoted from The Biography of Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Bernard Tissier, Kansas City, Missouri: Angelus Press, 2004, pp. 547 (emphasis added; bracketed word added for clarity).
15 Besides Archbishop Lefebvre and the four newly-consecrated bishops, this sixth bishop referred to here was Archbishop Antonio de Castro Mayer, bishop of the diocese of Campos, Brazil. He was faithful to Catholic Tradition, was co-consecrator of these new bishops, and died in April, 1991, exactly one month after Archbishop Lefebvre died.
16 Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops from the worldwide SSPX superiors, July 6, 1988 (emphasis added; bracketed words added to show context), published here: https://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/Archbishop-Lefebvre/Archbishop_Lefebvre_and_the_Vatican/Part_I/1988-07-06.htm
17 In spite of imperfections, some internal scandals, and a great number of defections of priests to the conciliar church, to sedevacantism, and so on.
18 https://sspx.org/en/news/archbishop-lefebvres-apostolic-journey-part-2-58917?utm_source=chatgpt.com and
“Moreover, he carefully avoided consecrating the Superior General of the Society at the time, namely Father Schmidberger, to demonstrate this simple role of auxiliaries to the new bishops, who have no governing power."
SSPX statement quoted here: https://mukwonago.wi.sspx.org/en/news/archbishop-lefebvres-consecrations-sspx-video-lesson-59723?utm_source=chatgpt.com
19 Here is a brief description of the secret meetings between representatives of modernist Rome and the liberalizing leaders of the SSPX after Archbishop Lefebvre’s death: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_for_Reflection_among_Catholics
Here is the lengthy eyewitness account of one of the participants in these dialogues (after Archbishop Lefebvre ’s death) seeking this practical agreement between modernist Rome and the “new” SSPX: https://www.mollat.com/livres/681107/michel-lelong-pour-la-necessaire-reconciliation-le-groupe-de-reflexion-entre-catholiques-grec
We know about these secret dialogues because this (conciliar) participant decided to publish his memoirs. The SSPX would have preferred to keep these dialogues secret because the SSPX leadership correctly understood that Traditional Catholics would be alarmed by these scandalous negotiations.
20 This exchange of letters was made public by an SSPX priest who was alarmed by these compromises of Bishop Fellay.
21 For an incomplete but longer catalogue of SSPX liberalism, go to https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/#gsc.tab=0 and click on the SSPX button.
https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/sspx-ecumenism-heretics-martyrs (2015) & https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/sspx-calls-heretics-christian (2015).
https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/sspx-simoulin-challenge-answered (2015). Quoting SSPX leader Fr. Niklaus Pfluger interview published in the SSPX magazine, Der Gerade Weg.
28 https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/sspx-softer-new-mass (2014) & https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/sspx-simoulin-challenge-answered (2016).
31 Quoted from The Last Word, published in the January/February 2012 Angelus magazine.
32 For an incomplete but lengthy catalogue of the liberalism and errors of Bishop Williamson and his group, go to https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/#gsc.tab=0 and click on the Bishop Williamson button.
34
Read an analysis of this duty here:
https://catholiccandle.org/2020/01/01/duty-to-publicly-correct-our-public-scandals-even-those-we-caused-innocently/
35 For an analysis of why it is a mortal sin to use an abortion-tainted vaccine, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2021/01/01/reject-the-covid-vaccines/
This article also quotes and analyzes the SSPX’s old, traditional position and its more recent liberal position on abortion-tainted vaccines.
36 https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/swiss-bishop-revokes-permission-for-sspx-to-use-diocesan-churches/?utm_source=daily-2026-07-15&utm_medium=email
37 https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/swiss-bishop-revokes-permission-for-sspx-to-use-diocesan-churches/?utm_source=daily-2026-07-15&utm_medium=email
38 See these articles:
-
The “New” SSPX Promotes the Evil of Going into Conciliar Churches to Pray
during the “Holy Year”: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/the-new-sspx-promotes-praying-in-conciliar-churches-during-the-holy-year/
40 See, the SSPX Sisters in Browerville describing their pilgrimage to her gravesite. This description is included in their Summer 2026 newsletter.
42 Words of Archbishop Lefebvre, quoted from The Biography of Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Bernard Tissier, Kansas City, Missouri: Angelus Press, 2004, pp. 547.
43 https://fsspx.news/en/news/general-house-communique-society-files-recourse-against-decree-2-july-2026-60112
44 For a brief comparison of the true Catholic Church to the conciliar church, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2021/10/03/the-devil-v-c-ii-the-conciliar-church/
45 Archbishop Lefebvre signed the May 5th protocol and then rejected it the next day. In this bad protocol, he agreed to “respect” the 1983 Code of Canon Law. The (compromising) Fraternity of St. Peter’s protocol with Rome is worse: it states that the FSSP will “adhere” to the 1983 Code. But here in 2026, with this appeal, the “new” SSPX officially argues from the 1983 code with no disclaimers, as if they, like the Fraternity of St. Peter, fully accepted it, practically speaking.
46 See, e.g., Bishop Fellay’s words here: https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/fellay-teaches-the-new-mass-is-good-and-holy
47 Fr. Pagliarani conference, September 2019, “The Confusion of the Church and the World at the Root of the Crisis”. Here is the quote: “The institutions and the religious communities who habitually celebrate the extraordinary form of the Mass have found true stability in number and life.” (Emphasis added.) http://www.angelusonline.org/index.php?section=articles&subsection=show_article&article_id=4242
48
Read an analysis of this duty here:
https://catholiccandle.org/2020/01/01/duty-to-publicly-correct-our-public-scandals-even-those-we-caused-innocently/
49 For example, recall the secret meetings between representatives of modernist Rome and the liberalizing leaders of the SSPX after Archbishop Lefebvre’s death: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_for_Reflection_among_Catholics
Here is the lengthy eyewitness account of one of the participants in these dialogues (after Archbishop Lefebvre ’s death) seeking this practical agreement between modernist Rome and the “new” SSPX: https://www.mollat.com/livres/681107/michel-lelong-pour-la-necessaire-reconciliation-le-groupe-de-reflexion-entre-catholiques-grec
We know about these secret dialogues because this (conciliar) participant decided to publish his memoirs. The SSPX would have preferred to keep these dialogues secret because the SSPX leadership correctly understood that Traditional Catholics would be alarmed by these scandalous negotiations.
50 “Letter from Father Pagliarani to Cardinal Fernández” https://fsspx.org/en/publications/letter-father-pagliarani-cardinal-fernandez-57315
51 “Letter from Father Pagliarani to Bishop Pozzo, 17 January 2019”
About the Temperaments Part XIV – How the Devil Draws Us Away From Reasoning and the Things of God
Catholic Candle note: The article below is Part XXIV of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty-three parts:
-
Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/
-
Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/
-
Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/
-
Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/
-
Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/
-
Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/
-
Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/
-
Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/
-
Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/
-
Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/
-
Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/
-
Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/
-
Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/
-
Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/
-
Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/
-
Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/
-
Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/
-
Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/
-
Part XXI: Explaining the Effects of Fear in All Temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/04/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxi-explaining-the-effects-of-fear-in-all-temperaments/
-
Part XXII: Explaining How to Order Our Loves So We Can Use the Passion of Fear Properly, and How the Devil Attempts to Prevent this Ordering: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/05/28/about-the-temperaments-part-xxii-how-to-order-our-loves-so-we-can-use-the-passion-of-fear-properly/
-
Part XXIII: Explanation of Sloth in Order to Analyze This Snare of Satan and to Combat Him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/
Mary’s School of Sanctity
Lesson #59: About the Temperaments – Part XXIV – Explaining More about How the Devil Tries to Draw Us Away From Reasoning and From the Things of God
Let us begin our investigation about the allurements the devil uses to drag us away from the use of our reason, as well as the great benefit and the enjoyment that come from thinking deeply. Undertaking this study is crucial if we want to form strategies to fight our arch-enemy.
In
a recent lesson we considered the beautiful reality of filial love1
(i.e.,
the love of a son or daughter) and the satisfaction we get when using
our reason and especially thinking deeply.
Let us look at some initial considerations regarding filial love and
careful thinking.
Some Important Considerations about Filial Love
-
Filial love brings satisfaction to the soul;
-
Filial love draws us close to the heart of God and to a deep, meaningful friendship with Him;
-
Filial love helps us to discipline ourselves and to bring order to our souls;
-
Filial love increases the soul’s hunger for God and our desire to have companionship with Him; and
-
Filial love makes our soul more disposed to understand the truths of God.
Mindful
of these considerations, we are able to see how important it is to
foster this kind of love in our souls.
Some Important Considerations about Using One’s Reason and Thinking Deeply
-
Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) strengthens man’s highest faculty, namely, the intellect;
-
Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) fosters a love of this faculty;
-
Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) helps one to increasingly appreciate God and all truth;
-
Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) ignites a burning hunger to know more truth.
Because
of these great benefits, Satan makes every effort to distract people
from using their intellects.
Sin Depends Upon the Abuse of Reason
Sin occurs when man does not use his reason for the purpose that God intended and when he puts reason’s admonitions aside (viz., his conscience) and consents to evil. Of course, the devil wants people to commit sins. Satan’s goal is the downfall of souls. He seeks sin because he knows that every sin is a step closer to his goal of bringing another soul to damn itself.
Satan
strives to weaken man’s power of reasoning and to induce him to
abandon the proper use of his reason. The old proverb is true, “If
you don’t use it, you lose it.” Hence, when a man begins to
reason less, he will soon form the habit of not
reasoning
well. Then, he will become progressively inclined to not think of
the consequences of his actions, which, in turn, leads him to live
more and more by his emotions. He will weigh things only based on
how he feels,
or worse yet, upon the yearnings of his base passions. .
Hence, his life will become very unstable, unreasonable, and
disorderly. In this way, he will increasingly lead a life of vice
(as we will explain next).
Habits Can Be Stronger than Natural Tendencies
We have discussed how, with our fallen human nature, effort is needed to reason well. We weak humans are disinclined to make efforts. But we can develop good habits that can completely overcome those weaknesses and ill-directed tendencies. But for this to occur, we must work against these tendencies and force ourselves to make the effort to think and especially to think carefully.
Habits are formed by repeated actions. Repeated bad actions form a bad habit, i.e., a vice. By contrast, repeated good actions form a good habit, i.e., a virtue. Consequently, it is crucial that we resolutely make every effort to develop patterns of good actions regardless of the “protests” of our passions and without “counting the cost” to our comfort, convenience, and human respect. In this way, we can foster good habits and a life of virtue.
The
devil knows these truths about us humans and so he tempts us to give
up trying to form good habits. The devil knows that God created an
entire spectrum of souls – each soul having its own personal
tendencies and inclinations. Thus, what we treat here is the devil’s
general
plan of action to ruin souls. But he customizes his plan to fit each
individual, tailoring his temptations and tantalizing each with a
“particular individualized mix” of allurements and fears through
which he strives for that individual’s ruin.
Three
Things the Devil Does Not Want Us to Know: 1) God;
2)
Ourselves; and 3) the Purpose for Which We Were Created.
Knowing God. The devil knows the truths about filial love and deep thinking that we considered above. The devil does not want us to think about God. He does not want us to know God and His Divine attributes. This is because the more we know God, the more we will be drawn to love Him (since He is perfectly loveable) and to unselfishly serve Him. Because the devil hates God as well as us humans, he works against us because he does not want us to have an intimate friendship with God.
Knowing Ourselves. The devil does not want us to know ourselves. True self-knowledge fosters humility and consequently fosters a love of God. Indeed, the devil wants the exact opposite of this. That is, the devil wants us to be full of pride, having an inaccurate and inflated opinion of ourselves, and to hate God. Satan wants us to pamper ourselves and make efforts only to have a life of pleasure, comfort, and honor because these pursuits will lead us to a life of vice – and ultimately to perdition.
Knowing
Our End.
The devil does not want us to know the
purpose of our existence.
Knowing our final end will foster a healthy respect for God and fear
of the Lord, which in turn, will foster filial love of God. The
devil does all he can to distract our thoughts from God. One of the
devil’s major strategies is to encourage us to be as selfish as
possible. Selfishness leads to a life of wretchedness which
naturally will lead to sorrow at the spiritual good of any virtue –
which is sloth (as we saw in our last lesson).2
Because sloth makes a soul reluctant to begin doing any good, one
does not feel inclined to even
begin
making any effort to amend himself. The devil can easily convince a
soul in this sorry state that, indeed, it cannot change. The devil
tells this soul that it simply cannot avoid being the way that it is
and that it is useless to try to improve itself.
If We Fail to Know Either God, or Ourselves, or Our End, then the Devil Has Succeeded
The devil knows that all it takes for a soul to be lost is to lose knowledge of even one of these three, although often, when a soul is ignorant of one of these, it is also ignorant of one or both of the others. Thus, the devil wages his attacks on the soul to bring that soul to become ignorant of at least one of these.
God, ourselves, and our End: these three critical areas of knowledge influence everything in our lives because our relationship with God and our neighbor depends on this knowledge. In particular, on these three truths depends our willingness to be generous with God and our neighbor.
Charity is necessary for Divine friendship, and indeed, charity is Divine friendship.3 Further, charity is necessary for salvation.4 So we can readily see how Satan wants charity to grow cold and to die in us. In fact, Satan would never want charity to exist in us at all!
So the devil likes to use the weapon of sloth and to subtly weaken souls to bring them to this vice because sloth is a vice particularly opposed to charity.5 The devil knows that persons of all temperaments have the wounds of Original Sin and so can be steadily drawn to laxity in the moral life.
But where does the devil start in his attempts to wear down the soul? Most commonly, he targets a person’s prayer life because:
Prayer is the lifeblood of the spiritual life.6
Prayer is a tremendous source of strength and spiritual growth in the soul. Prayer fosters 1) our filial love; 2) deep and careful thinking; and 3) the three kinds of necessary knowledge (discussed above). Also, these, in turn, reciprocally foster our prayer life and praying well.
But
how do we pray well and counteract the devil’s attacks on our
prayer life?
A Preview…
In our next lesson we will analyze the devil’s tactics to destroy our prayer life (and so also, the rest of our spiritual life). In that lesson, we will consider the importance of knowing ourselves and finding effective ways to counteract the devil’s tricks regarding prayer.
2 Read this article: Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #58 – About the Temperaments Part XXIII – Explanation of Sloth in Order to Analyze This Snare of Satan and to Combat Him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/
3 For a further explanation of this truth that charity is Divine Friendship, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2021/06/04/sanctifying-grace-companion-charity/
4 Here is how St. Thomas Aquinas, greatest Doctor of the Church, teaches this truth, following and quoting St. Augustine:
Whosoever does not possess charity is wicked, because “this gift alone of the Holy Ghost distinguishes the children of the kingdom from the children of perdition”.
Summa,
IIa IIae, Q.178, a.2, sed
contra, quoting
St. Augustine’s treatise on the Blessed Trinity, De
Trinitate, bk.15,
ch.18.
5 Here is one way St. Thomas teaches this truth: “Sorrow because of the Divine good about which charity rejoices, belongs to a special vice, which is called sloth.” Summa, IIa IIae, Q.35, a.2, Respondeo.