About the Temperaments Part XX – Considering the Causes of Fear for All Temperaments

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part eighteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first nineteen parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

  1. Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/

  1. Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #55 About the Temperaments Part XX – Considering the Causes of Fear for All Temperaments

A review of what we’ve covered about fear so far

In the more recent lessons we have been considering the passion of fear. We saw that the passions are movements of the sensitive (non-rational) part of the soul arising when we imagine good or evil. This movement is the action of our sensitive appetite (desire) and is naturally influenced by our sensitive apprehension (i.e., perceiving through our senses). Furthermore, this movement produces a corporeal transmutation (viz., physical change) in us.

We saw that there are two groups of passions – the concupiscible and the irascible. The concupiscible passions are concerned with sensible good or evil (simply apprehended as such) which cause pleasure or pain. Thus, sensible good or evil, in itself, is the object of the concupiscible passions. The passions in the concupiscible group are joy, sorrow, love, hatred, and such like.

The irascible passions are concerned with good or bad in so far as this good or bad is arduous, that is, a good which is difficult to acquire or an evil that is difficult to avoid. Hence, the arduous good or evil is the object of the irascible passions. The passions in the irascible group are daring, fear, hope, and such like.

Then we considered in more detail what fear is. We saw that the passion of fear is the soul’s anticipation of suffering an evil which is difficult to avoid. The object of fear is something reckoned as an evil to come, near at hand, and difficult to avoid.

What is the Cause of Fear?

Let us look at what St. Thomas says regarding this question. St. Thomas, quoting St. Augustine, says, “There can be no doubt that there is no cause for fear except the loss of what we love, when we possess it, or the failure to obtain what we hope for.”1

For this reason, St. Thomas explains that “all fear is caused by our loving something: and consequently love is the cause of fear.”2

But exactly how is it that love can cause fear? First, let us recall what love is.

What is Love?

In a previous lesson3, we saw that a good (or something perceived as good) causes the soul to incline toward it and this inclination is the passion of love. Love is the soul’s inclination toward a (desired) good thing. The good thing which is desired is the object of that love.

However, regarding the soul’s inclination toward the good thing, we could also “look at it from the other direction”. We could say that the desired good thing acts upon the soul drawing (i.e., inclining) the soul towards it. In this way the good thing that is desired is an agent that causes – i.e., “does the work” (as it were) – of attracting the soul to it. St. Thomas calls an agent or force that does a work or brings about a result – an “efficient cause (also known as an “agent cause”). So the object of love can be regarded as the agent (i.e., the force) which attracts the soul to it and hence is the efficient cause of love in the soul.


Now Let Us Consider Fear

Man naturally seeks the good that he loves and he desires to obtain that good. But, what happens when an obstacle prevents him from obtaining the good he desires?

Since the obstacle is a force that brings about the result (namely, the man is prevented from possessing what he loves), he will view the obstacle as an evil (i.e., undesirable and bad). Thus, the obstacle will become an object of fear to the man when all of these conditions are true concerning how the man reckons the obstacle:

  1. As an evil to come (separating him from the good that he loves);

  2. That this obstacle is near at hand (and not in the distant future); and

  3. That the obstacle is difficult to avoid,

(Remember, as we saw above and previously,4 fear is one of the irascible passions and is concerned with a future evil, near at hand, and arduous.)

Again, since the obstacle is a force (i.e., agent) that prevents the man from obtaining what he loves (and seeks), this obstacle causes the man to fear that he will not obtain what he loves and so this obstacle is an efficient cause of the man fearing that he will be deprived of what he loves.

Therefore St. Thomas says, “And thus it is that love causes fear: since it is through his loving a certain good, that whatever deprives a man of that good is an evil to him, and that consequently he fears it [viz., the obstacle] as an evil.”5

So St. Thomas teaches that something which can inflict an evil on us is the efficient cause of fear and the object of fear (what we fear) for us. In addition to this, St. Thomas explains that the material disposition of a man can also be a cause of fear in him. By material disposition, St. Thomas means that the love a man bears towards the good thing makes him apt to be afraid of not obtaining what he loves.6

Likewise if a man already possesses the good thing he loves, he can fear losing that good through some evil which is an obstacle to his continued possession of it.

A Concrete Example of What We Have Just Explained

Suppose a man is a farmer and has planted a field of corn. He purchased very good seed; the field was well-prepared with the proper tilling and nutrients; and he then sowed his corn. He tended his crop by watering it diligently and preventing weeds and insects from infesting the crop. Therefore he anticipated a very good crop. The corn was growing extremely well and showed much promise of a great harvest. Then one hot summer day golf-ball size hail destroyed his entire crop.

In this example, the hail was the efficient cause (i.e., the doer or agent) that brought the farmer the great evil of a ruined crop.

We could say that farmers have many fears regarding their crops. They fear insufficient rainfall. They fear animals and insects eating the plants. They fear a cold snap that would damage the crops. They fear hailstorms. And more. All of these agents of destruction are efficient causes of fear for the farmer. Even if they do not actually happen, the farmer still fears that they might happen.7

We understand that the farmer would naturally love his crop as his property and his work. He also loves the success of his endeavors, and in addition to this, loves his livelihood and the good of his family which he loves and supports. Through these circumstances, he is materially disposed to love his crop and fear its loss.

Because a person naturally loves what he perceives as good, when he thinks that he will be deprived of the good which he loves, then he perceives the deprivation as an evil and consequently fears the deprivation.8

Are there any other causes of fear?

St. Thomas inquires, “Whether Defect Is the Cause of Fear?”

To answer this question he examines the teaching of the great philosopher Aristotle, who explains that “wealth, strength, a multitude of friends, and power drive fear away”9

St. Thomas starts with this truth as a principle and shows us that a defect can cause fear in two ways:

  1. Fear can be caused by the disposition of the man who fears; and

  2. Fear can be caused by the person feared.

In the first of these ways, fear can be caused by a condition in the man who fears. In this case, some defect, in itself, is the cause of fear because it is owing to some lack of power that one is unable easily to repulse a threatening evil. And yet, in order to cause fear, this defect must be able to be measured in some way. For example, the defect which causes fear of a future evil, is less than the defect caused by evil present, which is really the object of sorrow. And an even worse defect would exist if a man was entirely missing the perception of the evil or the love of the good which is involved.10

In the second way, the fear can be caused by the person who is feared because his power and strength are in themselves causes of fear. This is because power and strength are apprehended as something harmful to a person against whom they are used when they cannot be repulsed.

Some Spiritual Applications of These Principles

These truths about fear are applicable in many ways. But the reason we are presently studying fear is part of our careful study of the temperaments. We are treating fear and its consequences so that we can specifically apply what we know about fear to each of the temperaments as we study them.

Presently, we will make only a few basic connections but, after we study the effects of fear on our souls and bodies, we will go into more depth about the spiritual ramifications of fear.

We Must Be on Guard about What We Love

Because of the fact that love is the cause of fear, and that fear (as is true of the other passions) must be used in conformity with reason, we must be careful what we love so that we love only what is reasonable to love and only in the degree it is reasonable to love it.

The devil is always “lurking nearby” to tempt us to love creatures inordinately. Here is a short list of things that the devil frequently tempts us to love unreasonably and, consequently to unreasonably fear losing:

  • We love bodily comfort. Hence we want to pamper ourselves and indulge our bodies with luxuries.

  • We love a conscience that does not rebuke us because these rebukes are uncomfortable. Hence, we avoid self-reflection and examining our conscience because of what we might find.

  • We love ease of body and so we are prone to laziness and avoiding physical work.

  • We love to relax our minds and escape from difficult mental activity.

  • We love to avoid commitments and responsibility because they are often difficult and uncomfortable.

  • We love pleasures, entertainments, and travel.

  • We love acceptance, social approval, and being like everyone else. Therefore, we desire to conform to fashions, act just like everyone else, use the same electronic gadgets as everyone else; and

  • We love being honored, praised, respected, sought after.

The loves listed here can be found in different people in varying degrees. The list is not exhaustive and is only meant as a starting point for us to examine our loves to see if they are disordered, and hence displeasing to God.

In future lessons we will strategize how to fight the allurements of the devil and his pomps in order that we can avoid having disordered loves and hence unreasonable fear of losing those things loved excessively.

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will explore what St. Thomas explains about the effects of fear on the soul and consequently on the body. In this way we will be able to better address how we must use the passion of fear properly.

1 Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.1, Sed Contra, (Quoting St. Augustine’s work, Eighty-Three Questions, at Q.33).

2 Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.1, Sed Contra.

3 Read this article: Lesson #50: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/10/3050/


4 Read this article: Lesson #50: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/10/3050/


5 Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.1, Respondeo (bracketed words added for context).

6 St. Thomas characterizes as “material dispositions” those circumstances in which there is a good which a man loves but that good is vulnerable to loss through an evil which he apprehends. Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.1, Respondeo.

7 Even in these modern times with crop insurance, farmers still fear deductibles, increased premium rates, payment delays, extra paperwork, etc.

8 Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.1, Respondeo. Here is how St. Thomas explains this truth:


That which can inflict such an evil, is the efficient cause of the object of fear, and, consequently, of fear itself. While that which renders a man so disposed that thing is such an evil to him, is a cause of fear and of its object, by way of material disposition. And thus it is that love causes fear: since it is through his loving a certain good, that whatever deprives a man of that good is an evil to him, and that consequently he fears it as an evil.


Emphasis added.

St. Thomas adds two further interesting points which add to his explanation of how love is ultimately the cause of fear.


1) As stated above (Q.42, a.1), fear, of itself and in the first place, regards the evil from which it recoils as being contrary to some loved good: and thus fear, of itself, arises from love. But, in the second place, it regards the cause from which that evil ensues: so that sometimes, accidentally, fear gives rise to love; in so far as, for instance, through fear of God’s punishments, man keeps His commandments, and thus begins to hope, while hope leads to love, as stated above (Q.40, a.7).


2) He, from whom evil is expected, is indeed hated at first; but afterwards, when [and if] once we begin to hope for good from him, we begin to love him. But the good, the contrary evil of which is feared, was loved from the beginning.


Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.1, ad 1 & ad 2 (bracketed word added for clarity).

9 In the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.43, a.2, St. Thomas quotes these words of Aristotle from Aristotle’s treatise on Rhetoric, Bk. 2; Ch, 5 #1383b1. These words carefully reflect human nature and what happens when we feel ourselves superior to our rivals and also that we only fear when we feel they are superior to us, e.g., in wealth or strength.


10 We will return to this unfortunate situation in a future lesson.

Lesson #54: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Whether Sin Is an Object of Fear for All Temperaments

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part eighteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first seventeen parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

  1. Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/


Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #54 – About the Temperaments Part XIX – Considering Whether Sin Is an Object of Fear for All Temperaments

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will label him as a choleric.

Let us continue our investigation of the objects of fear. St. Thomas addresses the question, Whether the Evil of Sin Is an Object of Fear?

In order to answer this question, St. Thomas explains two important aspects.

  1. That fear comes from an extrinsic evil (that is, an evil that lies outside of a man).

  2. Comparing pain and sorrow on one hand, to fear on the other hand.


The First Aspect

St. Thomas tells us that the object of fear is some future evil which is arduous and not to be easily avoided. Fear results in us considering some future evil which is outside of us.

Now that we have examined the types of fear, let us join St. Thomas in the next appropriate thing to ponder, namely, the object of fear. St. Thomas teaches that “from this, we may gather that whatever is entirely subject to our power and will, is not an object of fear. Nothing gives rise to fear save what is due to an external cause.”1

However, the human will is the proper cause of the evil of sin: (because sin is voluntary, requiring that the will consents to what is contrary to reason). Consequently, the evil of sin, properly speaking, is not an object of fear because the will could say “no” to the sin which is the subject of the temptation.2

But the human will may be inclined to sin through an extrinsic cause having a strong “pull” on him. For instance, a man may be afraid to be lured into sin by dwelling in the company of wicked men.

Yet, in this case, the man fears being led astray rather than the sin considered in its proper nature, that is, as his voluntary act. So, we see that voluntary acts are not objects of fear to a man.

The Second Aspect

St. Thomas explains to us that both sorrow and fear regard evil. Sorrow is about an evil which is now present, and fear concerns a future evil. Sorrow is in the concupiscible power so it regards evil absolutely, whether it be great or small. On the other hand, fear is in the irascible part and regards evil to the extent that it is arduous or difficult. But plainly, an evil loses this character of difficulty when it is subject to our will and choice. Consequently, only those things which we consider to be difficult for us would make us fear that they will come to us.

With St. Thomas having explained these two aspects to us, we see that strictly speaking, the evil of sin is not a subject of fear.3

Two Additional Questions Concerning the Objects of Fear

St. Thomas raises two other questions which we should discuss briefly. They are:

  • Whether Sudden Things Are Especially Feared? and

  • Whether Those Things are More Feared for Which There is no Remedy?

Whether Sudden Things Are Especially Feared?

As St. Thomas has taught us, the object of fear is an imminent evil, which can be repelled, but with difficulty.

This fear can be due to one of two causes:

  1. The greatness of the evil; and/or

  2. The weakness of him who fears.

Yet, the unwontedness and suddenness of an evil increases both of these causes. Firstly, suddenness helps the imminent evil to seem greater. “Because [as St. Thomas explains] all material things, whether good or evil, the more we consider them, the smaller they seem .… Fear of a future evil is diminished by thinking about it beforehand”4

This is why Our Lord told his apostles ahead of time about the hatred and persecution of the world which they would suffer in the future. Knowing ahead of time would dimmish their fear:

These things have I spoken to you, that you may not be scandalized. They will put you out of the synagogues: yea, the hour cometh, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doth a service to God. And these things will they do to you; because they have not known the Father, nor me. But these things I have told you, that when the hour shall come, you may remember that I told you of them.

St. John’s Gospel, 16:1-4 (emphasis added).

Secondly, unwontedness and suddenness increase the weakness of him who fears, in so far as they deprive him of the remedies with which he might otherwise provide himself to forestall the coming evil, were the evil not taking him by surprise.5

St. Thomas says that although, overall, the above is true (viz., that suddenness increases fear), there may be some circumstances in which the greatness of some evil inspires greater fear through being much thought about.6

Are Those Things More Feared for Which There Is No Remedy?

In his answer to this question, St. Thomas explains that since the object of fear is evil, whatever tends to increase the evil brings about an increase in fear. Evil is increased not only based on the nature of the evil itself but also in respect of particular circumstances.7

It is very interesting to note what St. Thomas tells us about how circumstances increase our fear:

Of that of all the circumstances, longlastingness, or even everlastingness, seems to have the greatest bearing on the increase of evil. Because things that exist in time are measured, in a way, according to the duration of time: wherefore if it be an evil to suffer something for a certain length of time, we should reckon the evil doubled, if it be suffered for twice that length of time. And accordingly, to suffer the same thing for an infinite length of time, i.e. forever, implies, so to speak, an infinite increase.8 However, those evils which, after they have come, cannot be remedied at all, or at least not easily, are considered as lasting forever or for a long time: for which reason they inspire the greatest fear.9

St. Thomas is speaking here of the kind of remedy for a future evil by which it is warded off from coming. He has already explained how, when this type of remedy is removed, then one gives up hope and so here he is referring to the kind of remedy by which a present evil is removed.

St. Thomas also addresses the circumstance that even when one is speaking of death as a thing in which there is no escape, we recognize the fact that we do not fear death from the perspective that death doesn’t threaten us from near but only from afar, and it is for this reason we do not fear it.

Some Spiritual Applications of These Principles

There are many practical applications to draw from this study of fear that we have undertaken. In future lessons, after we study St. Thomas’s teaching concerning the causes of fear and the effects of fear, then we will have the foundation we need to be able to consider better how the principles apply to our spiritual life. But let us here note a few initial fruits of the principles we have learned so far.

It is very interesting to note, based on the explanation of St. Thomas (given above), how Our Lord, in His Providential care and mercy for us warns us about the everlastingness of hell’s punishment because He knows that we humans fear something more when it lasts forever. We Catholics see a connection here to the evil/malice of sin: Because sin is an infinite offense against the all-good, all-loveable God. Thus, Our Lord warns us about the eternal punishment due to sin in order to help us to hate sin and to avoid it.10

The Lord knows how weak we are. He knows that a filial love and filial fear of Him don’t come easy for us, and that this fear takes great effort for us (and of course, doesn’t come without His grace). So, God starts by inspiring servile fear in us, that is, fear of punishment because this is easier for us to understand.

In a future lesson we will discuss servile fear and filial fear in more detail. Suffice it to say for now that filial fear, based on love of God, is the fear of displeasing God. Filial fear is more perfecting than simply fearing God because we fear His just punishments. One has a tremendously happier and easier time working out his salvation when moved by filial fear. This is because filial fear is based on love and love builds true friendship. Friendship makes sacrifice and duties to be done with joy and generosity. When one loves and performs deeds and works out of love for another, then these deeds, works, and sacrifices are not so painful because our hearts desire to show that we love and care. The heart longs to do something for the beloved in order to prove one’s love to his beloved.

A Preview…

In our upcoming lessons we will study the causes of fear and the effects of fear. With a proper understanding of these, we will be able to see how God wants us to use this passion (viz., fear) to serve Him well.

1 Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.3, Respondeo.

2 Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.3, Respondeo.

3 Taken from the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.3, Respondeo & ad. 2.

4 Taken from the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.5, Respondeo.

5 Taken from the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.5, Respondeo.

6 Taken from the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.5, Respondeo & ad. 3.

7 Taken from the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.6, Respondeo.

8 Concerning the four reasons why sin is an infinite evil, read this article: https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/faith/the-infinite-evil-of-sin Especially see reason #3.

9 Taken from the Summa, Ia, IIae, Q.42, a.6, Respondeo.

10 Concerning the four ways in which sin is an infinite evil, read this article: https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/faith/the-infinite-evil-of-sin

Lesson #53: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Pain and Death Are Objects of Fear for Persons of Any Temperament

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part eighteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first seventeen parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #53 About the Temperaments Part XVIII – Explaining how Pain and Death Are Objects of Fear for Persons of Any Temperament


Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will refer to him as a choleric.

In our last lesson we saw how St. Thomas sets forth the way in which fear works in the soul. We saw that there are three appetitive powers in the soul and how each of these powers is used for the general purpose of pursuing something good (or what appears to be good) and avoiding something evil (or what appears to be evil).

Now let us consider the evil that St. Thomas calls an evil of nature viz., things that cause pain and/or death and also why it is that man fears these.

St. Thomas quotes the great Philosopher Aristotle, who teaches that “fear is caused by the imagination of a future evil which is either corruptive or painful.1

St. Thomas Explains What It Means for Something to be an Evil of Nature

St. Thomas teaches that, just as a painful evil is that which is contrary to the will, so similarly a corruptive evil is that which is contrary to nature. This latter evil is properly described as “an evil of nature” because it is opposed to our nature. Just as evil is the absence of a good that something should have, so likewise an evil of nature is the absence of a good that belongs to nature. In this we see that an evil of nature can be the object of fear because it is the absence of something good which belongs to nature.

The evil of nature can arise from either a natural cause or a non-natural cause:

  • When it comes from a natural cause it is called an evil of nature not only from the deprivation of a good of nature, but also because this evil is an effect of nature, such as natural death and other like defects.

  • The evil of nature can arise from a non-natural cause, such as violent death inflicted by an assailant.

In either case the evil of nature is feared to a certain extent, and to a certain extent it is not feared.

For since fear arises from the imagination of future evil, as Aristotle explains,2 whatever removes our imagining of this future evil, removes the fear also. Moreover, if we reflect, we see that there are two ways that a future evil might not be feared – either because it is not considered as an evil or because it is not considered as future:

  1. Because it is remote and far off: for, on account of such distance, a thing is considered as though it were not to be. Hence we either do not fear it, or fear it but little; for, as Aristotle teaches3, we do not fear things that are very far off. This explains why so many people, e.g., most young people, do not fear death or think about it. They know that they will die but death appears to them to be far off so they do not think about it or fear it.

  2. A future evil is considered as though it is present (not future) and thus, as being inevitable and not escapable. As an example of this, Aristotle teaches4 that those who are already on the scaffold, are not afraid because they are on the very point of a death from which there is no escape. This is because, in order that a man be afraid, there must be some hope of escape for him. If there is no hope of escape, the man has sorrow but not fear.

Consequently, evil of nature is not feared if it be not apprehended as something in the future. But if the evil of nature (that is corruptive) be understood as being near at hand, and yet with some hope of escape, then it will be feared.5

Some Further Considerations from St. Thomas

St. Thomas adds that sometimes the evil of nature is an effect of nature and the man cannot avoid it. However, he might try to delay that evil as long as possible. Thus, a man might seek advice and consider how he can defer death and avoid it as long as possible. However, when death does not seem to be near at hand, one does not fear it or consider how to avoid it.

Death and other defects of nature are the effects of the human nature that we have in common. Yet the individual nature rebels against them as far as it can. Accordingly, from the inclination of nature there arises pain and sorrow for such like evils, when present. There arises fear when these evils are imagined in the foreseeable future.6

Further reflection: Of course, it is appropriate to fear death especially in the aspect that with death, we will face our Divine Judge and have to render an account of our lives. This is especially true when we are ill-prepared to obtain a favorable judgment from Him. But, if we focus our efforts on pleasing God and living a just life, then we will be able to foster a filial fear of God and not merely the servile fear of facing God’s just punishments.

A Preview …

In our next lesson, we will continue our study of the objects of fear. We will discuss St. Thomas’s explanation of the next aspect of fear, viz., Whether the Evil of Sin Is an Object of Fear. In that discussion St. Thomas makes the important distinction between pain and sorrow on one hand and fear on the other hand. At that point, we will be able to make some practical applications for the spiritual life.

1 Taken from Summa Ia-IIae Q.42 a. 2 Whether Evil of Nature Is an Object of Fear? Respondeo.

2 Aristotle’s Treatise on Rhetoric, Bk. 2; ch.5 #1382a21.


3 Aristotle’s Treatise on Rhetoric Bk. 2: ch.5, #1382a21.

4 Aristotle’s Treatise on Rhetoric Bk. 2: ch.5, Bk 2. Ch. 5 #1383a5.

5 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.42, a.2, Respondeo, Whether Evil of Nature Is an Object of Fear?

6 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.42, a.2, Reply, ad 2 & 3, Whether Evil of Nature Is an Object of Fear?

Lesson #52: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat Part XVII

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part seventeen of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first sixteen parts can be found here:

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38: About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43: About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #45: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #46: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat – Part XI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #47: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #48: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #49: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #50: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #51: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat Part XVI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #52 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XVII: the Objects of Fear1


Note: In this article, when referring to a person with a choleric temperament, we will simply refer to him as a “choleric”.

Now that we have examined the types of fear,2 let’s now consider with St. Thomas the object of fear – which logically comes next. The object of fear is simply what we fear. But there is a lot to be said about this!

Humans of all temperaments are afflicted with fear. All of us have felt fear. But have we ever stopped to ponder deeply what it is that we fear? Again we have the blessing of St. Thomas’ guidance when answering this question.

St. Thomas probes all subjects deeply and takes each one to its foundation, so when inquiring about the object of fear he begins by asking the question, Whether the Object of Fear is Good or Evil?

As always, St. Thomas examines this question humbly and methodically. He does not assume that the great thinkers who preceded him cannot help him with the inquiry. As with other inquiries, St. Thomas searches what the Fathers and Doctors of the Church teach on this question.

First, he informs us that St. John Damascene, Doctor of the Church, teaches that, “Fear is of a future evil.”3


St. Thomas explains how fear works in the soul

St. Thomas explains that fear is a movement of the appetitive power. By “appetitive power”, he means the power of the soul by which it desires.

There are three types of appetitive powers:

  • The natural appetite – which seeks what is suitable according to nature. An example of this is a tree naturally seeking the sunlight and so a tree which is always in the deep shade of other trees will grow sideways in order to obtain un-shaded sunlight;

  • The sensitive appetite – which seeks what is desirable in relation to the power of sensation of a man’s (or other animal’s) soul. One example of a sensitive appetite is an animal’s hunger for food; and

  • The intellectual (or rational) appetite – otherwise known as the will. This appetite desires the good known by the intellect in a way analogous to the sensitive appetite desiring the good which is sensed by man or another animal.

St. Thomas explains what is involved with this appetitive movement in the soul. Here are his words:

It belongs to this [viz., appetitive] power to:

  • Pursue the good. Consequently, whatever movement of the appetitive power that implies pursuit, has some good for its object; and

  • Avoid the evil. Consequently, whatever movement implies avoidance, has, for its object, some evil.

However, fear can regard good also, in so far as referable to evil. This can be in two ways.

  1. Inasmuch as an evil causes privation of a good. A thing is evil from the very fact that the evil thing is a privation of some good. Wherefore, since evil is shunned because it is evil, it follows that evil is shunned because it deprives a person of a good that one pursues through love. St. Augustine explains that there is no cause for fear except the loss of a good that we love; and

  2. Good can be related to evil as its cause in a way: viz., in so far as some good can, by its power, bring harm to another good that we love. And so, fear regards things in two ways, namely,

  1. The evil from which it shrinks; and

  1. That good which by its power can inflict that evil [on us]. In this way God is feared by man [although God is All-Good], inasmuch as He can inflict punishment, spiritual or corporal. In this way, too, we fear the power of man; especially when the power of the man has been thwarted, or when the power of the man is unjust because then that power is more likely to do us harm.

In like manner one fears a person who is over him or that has the power to do him harm. Thus, a man fears another who knows him to be guilty of a crime, lest he reveal the crime to others.4

Therefore, we can see that the passion of fear is a good thing when it is used properly – when we fear the appropriate things, e.g., when we fear sin or anything that displeases God, and when we fear something else which is truly harmful and so this fear can help us to avoid the evil. By contrast, when we fear inordinately, that is, irrationally in any way, then we are not using fear as God intended.

We must remember that God created the passions in us and they are good. But we must use fear (and the other passions) correctly because fear (and all things created by God) can be abused, resulting in sin and chaos in our lives.

If we reflect well, we see that there are many things that we are accustomed to fear. But we must learn to distinguish – by using our reason – exactly what is appropriate for us to fear and what is not.


A Preview …

In our next lesson we will continue our study of the objects of fear. We will discuss what St. Thomas calls the evil of nature viz., things that cause pain and/or death, and how it is that man fears these. We will also make some practical considerations concerning how we should handle our fears.

1 Fear influences all temperaments but not in the same way. Later, when we study the other temperaments, we will draw upon the teaching of St. Thomas about fear which we now set out in the context of the choleric temperament.

2 See Lesson #51, found here: Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #51: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat Part XVI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

3 Taken from St. John Damascene, De Fide Orthodox ii,12, as quoted in the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.42, a.1, Whether the Object of Fear is Good or Evil?

4 Taken from Summa Ia-IIae Q. 42 a. 1 Whether the Object of Fear is Good or Evil? Respondeo [Bracketed words added for clarity.]

Lesson #51: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat Part XVI

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part sixteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first fifteen parts can be found here:

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38: About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43: About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #45: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #46: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat – Part XI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #47: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #48: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #49: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #50: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #51: About the Temperaments –
Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament –
The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat Part XVI

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article, we simply will call him a choleric.

In our last lesson we explained the basics about the passions and how they work in the soul. With this preparation finished, we now begin our look at the passion of fear in particular.

Using St. Thomas Aquinas as Our Guide

Because St. Thomas is so thorough in his treatment of everything, he is called the Doctor Communis, that is, the Common Doctor of the Church, because he is the one, most of all, to guide and instruct us in anything.1 We will let St. Thomas, greatest Doctor of the Church, be our guide in our study. It is very valuable to look at St. Thomas’s explanation because he shows us so clearly how we are affected by our passions – in this case, by fear.

Where do we begin?

First, after showing that fear is indeed a passion in the soul (as we saw in our last lesson), St. Thomas then addresses two important questions, “Whether Fear is a Special Passion?” and “Whether There is a Natural Fear?

To the first question he answers simply that, yes, fear is a special passion – and explains why this is true. Here are his words:

The passions of the soul derive their species2 from their objects; hence, that is a special passion which has a special object. However, fear has a special object, as hope has. For just as the object of hope is a future good, difficult but possible to obtain, so the object of fear is a future evil, difficult and irresistible. Consequently, fear is a special passion of the soul.3

To the second question (Whether There is a Natural Fear), St. Thomas begins by having us first understand what he means by the word “natural” in this context. Summarizing St. Thomas, movements can be called natural in two ways:

  1. A movement is said to be natural simply speaking when the movement occurs without the involvement of the senses or the intellect. Some examples of this are the movement of fire which naturally inclines upward, the movement of a stone which tends to fall downward, and nutritive powers of animals and plants which tend to growth and life.

  2. A movement is also said to be natural when nature inclines in a certain direction but man (or a different animal) does not move invariably. Such movement involves the senses or the intellect. St. Thomas remarks, “In this way, even the acts of the apprehensive power, such as understanding, feeling, and remembering, as well as the movements of the animal appetite, are sometimes said to be natural.”4

In this quote St. Thomas is acknowledging the fact that animals and man both have an animal nature. However, St. Thomas makes an important distinction that, for irrational animals, God put in them the ability to act in an ordered, reasonable way, and this is called instinct. By contrast, God created man to want the good and created man to use his reason to seek the good. Nevertheless, man is able to delude himself about what is good and in this way, St. Thomas tells us, that man is able to pursue the apparent good instead of the true good. So, for example, a tired student is able to pursue the apparent good of sleeping longer in the morning instead of the true good of attending class.

In a future article, we will discuss man’s ability to deceive himself. We will discuss this later, as we proceed with our study of the temperaments in general and in our focus on how fear affects each of the temperaments.

With these basic concepts in mind, let us now turn to St. Thomas’ division of the types of fear and apply them to the temperaments with a special focus on how fear hinders the intellectual life of the soul.

The Types of Fear

St. Thomas divides fear into six kinds. Here are his words:

Fear regards a future evil which surpasses the power of him who fears, so that it is irresistible. However, man’s evil, like his good, may be considered either in his action or in external things.

In his action, he has a twofold evil to fear.

1. First, there is the toil that burdens his nature: and hence arises laziness, as when he shrinks from work for fear of too much toil.

  1. Second, there is the disgrace which damages him in the opinion of others. And thus:

    1. If disgrace is feared in a deed that is yet to be done, there is shamefacedness;

    2. If, however, it be in a deed already done, there is shame.

On the other hand, the evil that consists in external things may surpass man’s faculty of resistance in three ways.

  1. First by reason of magnitude; when, that is to say, a man considers some great evil the outcome of which he is unable to gauge; and then there is amazement.

  2. Second, by reason of its being unwonted;5 because, to wit, some unwonted evil arises before us, and on that account is great in our estimation. And then there is stupor, which is caused by the representation of something unwonted.

  3. Third, by reason of its being unforeseen; thus, future misfortunes are feared, and fear of this kind is called anxiety.6

Some Considerations Regarding the Kinds of Fear Listed and Some Practical Applications

When St. Thomas is speaking of laziness here, he is referring to a man recoiling from the “toil of external work.” This pertains to a person who fears excessive toil. Anyone of any temperament could have this fear. This kind of person does not want to work but rather seeks to have fun or be idle. Of course, there are degrees of this kind of fear. In the worst case scenario, this fear prevents someone from being able to function in society and in his life. This displeases God very much.

We will discuss the various aspects of fear as we proceed with our investigation. In our study of the temperaments, one crucial thing to remember is that, in all of the difficulties people face, God expects man to use his reason to deal with all of his dilemmas. Indeed, when a person uses his reason properly – including when he forces himself to step back to consider his situation – then there is no problem that he cannot solve the way God wishes.

Shamefacedness is the fear of a base action.7 In other words, one anticipates that if he were to act in a low or base manner, he would bring embarrassment upon himself. If one uses shamefacedness properly, he would avoid doing bad deeds.

On the other hand, as St. Thomas explained above, when one does not think ahead concerning the consequences of an action, he is not using shamefacedness and is “leaping” into a bad deed. Then afterwards, he has the shame of having done the disgraceful deed. St. Thomas tells us here that shame is a kind of fear because a person fears that the past deed will be the occasion of future reproach or disgrace.

The amazement and stupor that St. Thomas is speaking about here are in regard to evil. Here are his words.

Not every amazement and stupor are species of fear, but that amazement which is caused by a great evil, and that stupor which arises from an unwonted evil. Or else we may say that, just as laziness shrinks from the toil of external work, so amazement and stupor shrink from the difficulty of considering a great and unwonted thing, whether good or evil: so that amazement and stupor stand in relation to the act of the intellect, as laziness does to external work.8

Here we find how St. Thomas aptly describes the fear of intellectual effort that affects so many people of all temperaments. We had discussed how the choleric who has bad will does not make the necessary efforts to think. One reason for this is because he does not want to take the time necessary to do a good job (by thinking carefully). Yet, the underlying cause is his fear of the mental toil. If he were to build the habit of thinking carefully, then he would no longer fear the effort required. As we will see in future articles, it is not only cholerics that fear intellectual efforts.

The devil certainly does not want anyone to enjoy using his highest faculty, viz., his intellect. Thus, the devil has been tempting man from the time of Adam’s fall until now, to believe that thinking is too hard. Of course, we must counteract this wretched falsehood of the devil and do everything we can to promote careful thinking in ourselves and in others and foster the further development of our minds.

One more consequence of the devil dissuading a person from thinking deeply and carefully about high truths is that he misses a valuable opportunity for humility through considering how ignorant he is, and comparing the little he knows to all the high and wonderful truths that there are to learn. God and His creation are marvelous and should fill us with a sense of awe! We could never learn enough to completely satisfy our natural thirst for knowledge! Therefore, thinking well promotes humility because we can better assess our limitations objectively. This is one reason why Satan does not want humans to think!

Anxiety is the last type of fear mentioned above. This fear certainly wreaks havoc on many fronts in our lives. Countless examples could be found of things that cause man anxiety. There is so much talk of stress in our lives but we rarely consider how our trusting dependence on God is a key remedy to all stress.9 This anxiety also has a direct connection to the concept of thinking deeply (discussed above). When one thinks carefully, he can be more objective in assessing his circumstances and is therefore less prone to anxiety and worry.

Something to Keep in Mind

So as we said in our last lesson, the passions are not bad in themselves. However, they must be used properly. Here we can see that fear in itself is a very important passion and when used well, it helps the moral life, and hence the spiritual life of a man.

A Preview… In our next lesson we will begin considering the Objects of Fear and will apply our understanding of fear to the temperaments.

1 Read this article explaining why faithful and informed Catholics follow Saint Thomas Aquinas more than anyone else: https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/faith/why-faithful-and-informed-catholics-especially-follow-the-doctors-of-the-church

2 Note: by “species” of passion, St. Thomas means the kinds of passions.

3 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.41, a.2, Respondeo.

4 Cf., Summa, Ia IIae, Q.41, a.3.

5 Unwonted: being out of the ordinary : rare, unusual. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unwonted

6 Taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.41, a.4, Whether the Species of Fear Are Suitably Assigned?, Respondeo, (emphasis added; bracketed words added to show the context).

7

This is St. John Damascene’s definition taken from the Summa, IIa IIae, Q.144, a.1, Respondeo.

8 Taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.41, a.4, Whether the Species of Fear Are Suitably Assigned?, ad 4.

Lesson #50: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XV

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part thirteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first twelve parts can be found here:

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #46 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat – Part XI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #47 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #48 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/


  14. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #49 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #50 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XV

Note: In this article, when referring to a person with a choleric temperament we simply will call him a “choleric”.

In our last lesson, we considered how we are all affected by the wounds of Original Sin and, in addition to this, we have our own personal inclinations and disinclinations which arise from our genetic (material, bodily) dispositions. We saw that one could have a natural disinclination to think deeply and how, ultimately, this disinclination stems back to the passion of fear.

The Passions Influence Us

We know that the passions are part of our human nature. We know that we all have them. In general, the passions work in our souls in the same way. However, what is unique to each of us is the strength of those passions and the particular ones which influence us most. We might not notice how each person, with his own particular temperament, has his own propensities and, therefore, his own unique battle to fight in order to train and discipline his passions to conform to his reason.

As we consider the four temperaments, one crucial aspect of our investigation is to understand how the passions are involved in the way people behave. Because we want to better understand how the passion of fear, in particular, affects each temperament, we first consider, more generally, what a passion is. Then, with this foundation, we will be better able to understand the role of the passion of fear in our lives. Thus, in this lesson we will discuss what, in general, a passion is and then look at the two types of passions, namely the concupiscible and the irascible.

What a Passion Is

St. Thomas Aquinas, the greatest doctor of the Church, treats the passions thoroughly. He begins by explaining the meaning of the word “passion” itself. St. Thomas explains that a passion is a type of receiving or “suffering”. One way that the word “passion” is used is to receive something that is a perfection of the receiver and this perfection (which is received) does not replace anything that had previously been present in the receiver; the second way passion is used it to receive something better, which is an improvement – replacing something worse than what is received; and the third and most proper way “passion” is used is to receive something worse which is a “downgrade” compared to that better thing which is replaced. Here are St. Thomas’ words:

The word passion is used in three ways:

First, in a general way, according as whatever receives anything is passive, even though nothing is taken from the receiver. Thus, we may say that the air is passive when it [viz., the air] is lit up. But this is to be perfected rather than to be passive.

Secondly, the word passive is employed in its proper sense, when something is received, while something else is taken away: and this happens in two ways.

  1. For sometimes that which is lost is unsuitable to the thing: thus, when an animal’s body is healed, the body is said to be passive because it receives health, and loses sickness.

  2. At other times the contrary occurs: thus, “to ail” is to be passive; because the ailment is received and health is lost. And here we have passion most properly. For a thing is said to be passive from its being drawn to the agent: and when a thing recedes from what is suitable to the receiver, then especially does it appear to be drawn to something else. Moreover, in De Generatione, Bk 1, ch.3 318b2, it is stated when a more excellent thing is generated from a less excellent thing, we have generation simply, and corruption in a particular respect: whereas the reverse is the case, when from a more excellent thing, a less excellent thing is generated. [That is, when a less excellent thing is generated, then this is corruption simply speaking and is generation in a particular respect.]

In these three ways it happens that passions are in the soul. For in the sense of mere reception [viz., the first meaning St. Thomas gives above], we speak of “feeling and understanding as being a kind of passion” (De Anima Bk1, ch.5 410a25). But passion, accompanied by the loss of something, is only in respect of a bodily transmutation [viz., a physical change occurring in the body]; wherefore passion properly so called cannot be in the soul, save accidentally, in so far as the composite1 is passive. But here again we find a difference; because when this transmutation is for the worse, it [the transmutation] has more of the nature of a passion, than when it [the transmutation] is for the better: hence sorrow is more properly a passion than joy.2

Next, St. Thomas gives us St. John Damascene’s definition of passion.

Passion is a movement of the sensitive appetite when we imagine good or evil; in other words, passion is a movement of the irrational [part of the] soul, when we think of good or evil.”3

Where Do We Find the Passions? Are They in Our Bodies (In Our Sensible Part)? Or in Our Souls (the Will)?

St. Thomas answers these questions in the following words:

[P]assion is properly to be found where there is corporeal transmutation [viz., physical change]. This corporeal transmutation is found in the act of the sensitive appetite [desire], and is not only spiritual, as in the sensitive apprehension [understanding through our senses], but also natural.

Now there is no need for corporeal transmutation in the act of the intellectual appetite [i.e., the will – N.B. “appetite” is another word for “desire”]: because this appetite is not exercised by means of a corporeal organ. It is therefore evident that passion is more properly in the act of the sensitive appetite, than in that of the intellectual appetite; and this is again evident from the definitions of Damascene quoted in the sed contra [above].4

Looking at the Two Classes of Passions that We Possess

St. Thomas explains that there are two groups of passions – the concupiscible and the irascible. Here are his words:

The acts of different powers differ in species [that is in kind]; for instance, to see, and to hear. But the irascible and the concupiscible are two powers, into which the sensitive appetite is divided, as was said [earlier in the Summa, in Ia, Q.81, a.2]. Therefore, since the passions are movements of the sensitive appetite, as stated in Q.22, a.3, the passions of the irascible faculty are specifically distinct from those of the concupiscible part.5

[T]he passions of the irascible part differ in species from those of the concupiscible faculty. For since the different powers have different objects, the passions of different powers must, of necessity, be referred to different objects.

In order, therefore, to discern which passions are in the irascible, and which are in the concupiscible, we must take the object of each of these powers. As was stated above [in Ia, Q.81, a.2], the object of the concupiscible power is sensible good or evil [simply apprehended as such], which causes pleasure or pain. But, since the soul must, of necessity, experience difficulty or struggle at times, in acquiring some such good, or in avoiding some such evil, in so far as such good or evil is more than our animal nature can easily acquire or avoid; therefore, this good or evil itself, inasmuch as it is of an arduous or difficult nature, is the object of the irascible faculty. Therefore, whatever passions consider good or evil absolutely, belong to the concupiscible power; for instance, joy, sorrow, love, hatred, and such like: whereas those passions which consider good or bad, as arduous, through being difficult to obtain or avoid, belong to the irascible faculty; such as daring, fear, hope and the like.6

A Short Summary Concerning the Passions and Their Respective Movements

What is good (or perceived as good) causes the soul to incline toward it and this inclination is the passion of love. Similarly, what is evil (or perceived as evil) causes the soul to incline away from it and this disinclination is the passion of hatred.

If the good be not yet possessed, then this good object causes the soul to seek to possess this good. This inclination of the soul is the passion of desire or concupiscence. If the evil can be avoided (or can be avoided in the future, even if it is possessed now) then the soul seeks to avoid it and this is the passion of dislike or aversion.

When the good is obtained, it causes the appetite to rest in that good which has been obtained. This rest in the good which has been obtained is the passion of delight or joy. Similarly, when an evil is present in the soul which is (at least for now) unavoidable, then that possession of the evil is the passion of sorrow or sadness.

Concerning the irascible passions, they pertain to obtaining a good which is difficult to obtain or to avoiding an evil which is difficult to avoid. For the good which is difficult to obtain, the soul’s seeking of this good is hope and the soul’s not seeking it because the difficulty is too great, is despair. With respect to an evil which is difficult to avoid, the soul’s seeking to avoid this evil which is difficult to avoid is daring and the soul’s anticipation of suffering the evil which is difficult to avoid, is fear. There is no irascible passion with respect to the good obtained because it is not a subject of difficulty. But concerning an evil already possessed, the soul’s reaction is anger.

Therefore, we see that there are three pairs of passions in the concupiscible appetites: namely, love and hatred; desire and aversion; joy and sorrow. Likewise, there are three “pairs” in the irascible: namely, hope and despair; fear and daring; and anger, which passion has no opposite. Therefore, there are in all 11 different passions: six which are concupiscible, and five which are irascible; in which all the animal passions are contained.7

A Preview… Having now considered the passions more generally, in our next lesson we will begin looking at the passion of fear in particular. In this way, we will be able to see how fear influences all the temperaments and especially how the passion of fear can hinder the intellectual life of a soul.

1 Here St. Thomas is referring to the composition of body and soul because the soul is the form of the body. In other words, the soul is what makes the body able to live and to be the type of living creature that it is.

2 Taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.22, a.1, Whether Any Passion is in the Soul? Respondeo. The works St. Thomas is citing are Aristotle’s work about the generation and corruption/dying of animals (De Generatione et Corruptione), and his work on the soul (De Anima) (bracketed words added for clarity).

3 This is taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.22, a.3, Sed Contra, where St. Thomas quotes St. John Damascene’s work De Fide Orthodox, that is Concerning the Orthodox Faith, Book 2, chapter 22 (bracketed words added to show the context).

4 This is taken from the Summa Ia IIae, Q.22, a.3, Whether Passion Is in the Sensitive Appetite Rather Than in the Intellectual Appetite, Which Is Called the Will?, Respondeo, (bracketed words added to show context).

5 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.23, a.1, Whether the Passions of the Concupiscible Part are Different from Those of the Irascible Part?, Sed Contra. When St. Thomas mentions “specifically distinct,” he means that they differ in kind.

6 Summa, Ia IIae Q.23, a.1, Whether the Passions of the Concupiscible Part are Different from Those of the Irascible Part?, Respondeo.

7 This summary is based on Summa, Ia IIae, Q.23, a.4, Whether in the Same Power, There Are Any Passions, Specifically Different, but Not Contrary to One Another?

Lesson #49: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XIV

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part thirteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first twelve parts can be found here:

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #46 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat – Part XI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #47 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #48 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #49 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XIV

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will label him as a choleric.

In our last lesson we discussed how Satan hates the fact that humans are created with intellects and are capable of knowing universal truth. This archenemy of mankind has launched his major attack on man’s highest faculty, namely, his intellect.

We saw how Satan tempts us humans to believe that making efforts to think carefully puts a damper on our enjoyment. We saw how this is a lie and that man’s highest delights come when he engages his mind in the pursuit of truth.

Now we will consider another snare that Satan uses – he inclines people to believe that they do not have the ability necessary for careful thinking. However, in order to understand how it is false to believe that we do not have the ability to think carefully, we must first reflect more about human nature itself.

Satan Preys on Fallen Human Nature

As we stated above, one of the devil’s tricks is to tempt humans into supposing that they do not have the necessary ability to think carefully and deeply. Someone could claim that thinking deeply was easy for Adam but ever since the fall of man, man does not have the ability to think. This is an old deception of Satan.

St. Thomas Aquinas explains the effects of original sin as follows:

Original justice was forfeited through the sin of our first parent [Adam], as already stated above (I-II Q. 81 a. 2); so that all the powers of the soul are left, as it were, destitute of their proper order, whereby they are naturally directed to virtue; which destitution is called a wounding of nature.

Again, there are four of the powers that can be the subject of virtue, as stated above (I-II Q. 61 a. 2), viz. the reason, where prudence resides, the will, where justice is, the irascible [passions], the subject of fortitude, and the concupiscible [passions], the subject of temperance. Therefore, in so far as the reason is deprived of its order to the true, there is the wound of ignorance, in so far as the will is deprived of its order to the good, there is the wound of malice; in so far as the irascible is deprived of its order to the arduous, there is the wound of weakness; and in so far as the concupiscible is deprived of its order to the delectation moderated by reason, there is the wound of concupiscence.

Accordingly, these are the four wounds inflicted on the whole of the human nature as a result of our first parent’s sin. But since the inclination to the good of virtues is diminished in each individual on account of actual sin, as was explained above (in I-II Q. 85 a.1& 2), these four wounds are also the result of other sins, in so far as, through sin, the reason is obscured especially in practical matters, the will hardened to evil, good actions become more difficult, and concupiscence more impetuous.1

Personal Sins Increase the Effects of These Wounds

In the above text from St. Thomas, he explains that not only the wounds of original sin are evident in man, but also that one’s personal, actual sins increase the effect of these wounds of original sin for him. We can readily guess that Satan and all of his fellow demons know the strengths and weaknesses of each individual, so of course, they know exactly what temptations to use on each individual soul.

Natural Inclinations Affect All Humans

Although the wounds of original sin influence all humans, each person is unique in his material dispositions, and from this it is easy to see how each person can be uniquely affected by the wounds of original sin. In other words, each person has his own individual degree of the wounds of original sin. In the vast number of humans that have ever lived, there is a wide spectrum of strengths and weaknesses. For example, some races of people seem to be naturally strong in their mental acuity whereas other races seem to be stronger in their physical prowess.2 We can observe that God certainly has created a variety of humans and we must take many things into consideration in our relations with our neighbor. We will discuss this aspect of relationships in more detail at a future time.

Personal Dispositions and the Seven Capital Sins

The demons make ready use of tempting humans to the seven capital sins. Here is what the Concise Catholic Dictionary tells us about these sins:

The so-called “deadly sins” seven in number, called “capital” because they are the source of most other sins: called “deadly” because they easily lead to mortal sins. They need not be separate acts but can exist as habits or vices. The seven capital sins are: pride, covetousness, lust, anger, gluttony, envy, and sloth.3

Just as humans have natural tendencies connected to their material make-up, they have natural weaknesses and strengths. There is not a perfect balance between the strengths and weaknesses. Some may have far more weaknesses than they have strengths. Some may have only weaknesses and, seemingly, no strengths. Furthermore, there are souls who may have more strengths and fewer weaknesses.

The demons know that humans share the wounds of original sin. The demons also know that one capital sin often leads a soul to the other capital sins, and because the demons know the inclinations of souls, including their strengths and weaknesses, they strive to drag the soul into the capital sin to which that soul is most prone.

In addition to this common condition of the wounds of original sin and the particular genetic (i.e., material, bodily) disposition4, human nature also includes the passions. In Lesson #39 we reflected how the passions work in order to get a better understanding of the passion of anger. We studied anger and how the choleric is prone to this passion. We also saw how anger is one of the capital sins which the choleric is prone to commit.

A Genetic (Material, Bodily) Disinclination toward the Effort to Think Carefully

Thus, there can be a genetic (material, bodily) disinclination to make the effort to think carefully. A person can be ill-disposed to do the mental work involved in deeper thinking. St. Thomas goes so far as to call the fear of mental work, stupor. He adds, “just as laziness shrinks from the toil of external work, so amazement and stupor shrink from the difficulty of considering a great and unwonted thing, whether good or evil; so that amazement and stupor stand in relation to the act of the intellect, as laziness does to external work.”5

So when a person has not previously made habitual efforts to think deeply or carefully, he is not accustomed to the task. In this way, the work involved is unusual to him and viewed by him as “unwonted”.6 Such a person “shrink[s] from the difficulty of considering” a “great and unwonted thing”, as St. Thomas explains.

The Attitude that “I don’t have the ability”, Stems from Fear.

Ultimately this kind of attitude is caused by fear. In order to give this topic a thorough treatment and to gain a clearer understanding of how this problem is not exclusively a choleric one, we will need to consider further the passion of fear.

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will begin our study of the passion of fear because this passion affects all the temperaments. We will then be able to see how deep-thinking is really perceived by the choleric.

1 Summa Ia IIae Q. 85 a.3 Respondeo (bold and italic and bracketed words added for emphasis or clarity).

2 Read this article: God Wills the Natural Inequalities between Different Persons and between Different Peoples. This article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2019/09/22/god-wills-the-natural-inequalities-between-different-peoples/


3 Concise Catholic Dictionary compiled by Robert C. Broderick, M.A. ©1944, the Bruce Publishing Company, Milwaukee.


4 A soul is created by God at the instant of the particular person’s conception. That soul, as such, is identical to every other rational (human) soul created by God. The differences between persons are on the part of the person’s matter. Thus, e.g., a baby girl differs from a baby boy not in the type of soul she has, but in her material part. Likewise, one person’s strengths and weaknesses, as compared to another person, are not because God created them with differences in their souls, but because of differences in their bodily, material parts.

5 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.41, a.4, ad. 4.


6 The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines wont as a noun meaning custom; habit; usage or as a verb meaning- to be accustomed; to be used. Merriam-Webster Dictionary ©1949.

Lesson #48: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XIII

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part thirteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first twelve parts can be found here:

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #46 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat – Part XI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #47 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/


Lesson #48 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIII

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will label him as a choleric.

In our last lesson we discussed how the choleric is easily fooled by the devil and ensnared in various forms of pride including wanting to be considered by others as very knowledgeable and as a great achiever. Hence, he has a tendency to fall into the trap of vainglory. However, these traps of pride are often embraced because the choleric is really trying to cover up the fact that he is a coward when it comes to deep thinking. He is lazy in using his intellectual abilities and therefore is not comfortable using them readily. Because he senses his lack of intellectual acuteness, he gives into the temptation to simply tell himself that it is too difficult to think carefully. This fear of mental work, which St. Thomas calls stupor,1 paralyzes the choleric into not even wanting to try to reason carefully.

Vicious Circle of Self-Feeding Fear of the Intellectual Life

Naturally, the devil fosters this irrational fear of careful thinking because the devil hates the fact that humans were created to be rational and learn the highest truths.

All through the centuries of human existence the devil has attacked mankind and tried to convince men that they should not think, especially deeply. Not only this, but the devil also wants men to believe that they do not have to think carefully. Furthermore, he tells men that thinking deeply interferes with one’s ability to have “fun” and “pleasure”. Ultimately, the devil wants us humans to believe that we were created to enjoy ourselves and that there is nothing more to do. Certainly the devil doesn’t want us to know the truth that our intellect is our highest faculty and when we use it well, we come to have the greatest delight and pleasure.

And so it is when the choleric has given into the temptation to be intellectually lazy, he thereby has allowed himself to become a shallow thinker and has harmed his own natural (i.e., human) desire to know. When he continues in this vein, he builds his fear of intellectual effort and likewise he weakens his willpower to actually make efforts to ponder and consider truth.

He will soon lose any savor to consider God and the higher truths. This manner of acting brings the choleric into more and more pride, a capital sin and into another dangerous capital sin named sloth, which is displeasure in the things of God.

We can see how the devil uses these masterstrokes against souls when he inspires irrational fears to dissuade a man from the proper use of reason.

How Can a Choleric Fight Against Such Demonic Tactics?

  • The choleric must learn to have God as his highest priority in life. The choleric must learn to appreciate having a divine friendship with Almighty God. With these things in his mind, he will not want to offend God.

  • The choleric must foster Fear of the Lord. When the choleric learns to appreciate the fact that sin offends the all good God, especially the sin of abusing our highest faculty, he would not want to shirk his duty to think and think well.

  • The choleric should pray for God’s assistance – the choleric should do everything in his power to foster a healthy prayer life.

  • The choleric should read the lives of the saints, especially a saint with the choleric temperament. This will not only help him get to know himself, but will also encourage him that he can indeed overcome his faults and amend his life. Plus, by applying his mind to the study of the virtues of the saints, he will foster a better development of his mind and a love of study.

  • The choleric should practice penances. Fasting is a powerful tool to strengthen one’s reasoning power and one’s will power.2

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will address the choleric’s false belief that he doesn’t have the ability to think deeply and how this belief has bad influences on the soul. In addition, we will discuss remedies to counteract this lie of the enemy of our souls.

1 St. Thomas explains this fear in Summa Ia IIae, Q.41, a.4, ad 4 & ad 5.

2 St. Thomas explains this truth about fasting in several places in the Summa, e.g., IIa IIae Q.147, a.1-3.

Lesson #47: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part twelve of the study of the Choleric temperament.  The first eleven parts can be found here:

1.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36:  About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

2.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

3.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

4.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

5.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

6.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

7.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

8.    Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

9.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

10. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s  Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

11. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #46 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’  Spiritual Combat – Part XI:  https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

 

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #47 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article, we simply will label him as a choleric.

In our last lesson we examined in detail what is involved with one using his reason and saw that, when he does not listen to the voice of his reason, he sins.

Let us begin to probe into the possible reasons why the choleric has the tendency to not reason deeply or thoroughly.

In our last lesson, we saw some potential motives for why the choleric acts this way. 

Now we look further into the first of those motives, namely that the choleric simply does not want to take the time necessary to think things through.  This can be directly linked back to the problem of pride under several aspects.

First of all, let us recall the definition of pride which we saw in our last lesson.  When one has unreasonable pride[1], he views himself disproportionately, thinking that he is better in some respect than he really is.  For example, he may think he is very important.

Various Types of Unreasonable Pride Which Are Often Associated With the “Hurried” Choleric

We noted in an earlier lesson how the choleric tends to be over-confident and often acts as if he is a “know-it-all”.

This over-confidence naturally coincides with other aspects in the trap of pride.  Here the choleric wants to be seen as a “hero” who carries out the greatest achievements.  He sees himself as the one who “saves the day” especially when there is a crisis or a big problem to solve.

Along with this mentality (that he is a self-made hero) is the choleric’s drive to excel in what he is currently doing and in all his plans.  Because he wants to accomplish a great number of things, he believes that he does not have time to “slow-down” his “progress” and “waste” his time evaluating the details of his plans.  He certainly does not view the idea of analyzing his plan as anything that would be productive in assuring the success of his project.  Indeed, his over-confidence assures him that his plans are perfect so reflection about them is not needed.

This unreasonable pride[2] also prompts this choleric to want “instant fulfillment” of his plans.  We must remember that the choleric has a lot of energy and seems to always be on the move.  He wants to accomplish many things and acts as if he wished that his project could have been done already!  He wants his plans implemented “yesterday” or even “last year”!  He gets impatient if there are any delays in his plans.

Lacking a God-Centered View of Things

This choleric with unreasonable pride may very well think he is working with God’s Will in mind.  However, he more often has put his own will before God’s Will, and  his own glory before God’s glory.[3]

Unfortunately, he is easily ensnared in this kind of unreasonable pride and tends to think that his plan could not possibly have any flaws whatsoever.  If he knew the truth of the matter – viz., that to think thoroughly and deeply about his project would help him consider if his plan was good and/or perfecting to his soul – then he would actually want to take the necessary time to evaluate his plan.

How Should the Choleric Perceive Himself in Order to Prevent Unreasonable Pride and to Help Him Keep His Sights on God’s Will?

The choleric has to understand that God must be his first priority – in fact his only priority.  He must put God first in his heart, therefore, in his life.

In order to have this proper perspective he has to be, first of all, a man of prayer.  He must pray to know God’s will and to be humble.  If he understands how important it is to be humble and work for God – in the time-frame and under the circumstances that God sends – then he will have no problem being patient and waiting for God to enlighten his understanding.  He would seek advice and want to thoroughly examine his goals to be sure that he is not being fooled by a trick that the devil sends in order to entrap him in pride. 

The choleric should especially fear pride, for unreasonable pride is a sin.  Hence, he should fear his tendency to plow ahead heedlessly and impetuously.  He ought to pray to have a great appreciation for proper learning and for the use of reason, knowing that God expects him to use this highest faculty, his intellect.  Thus, he should understand the fact that it is sinful for him to not think deeply and carefully.  He should make it his goal to acquire a horror of displeasing God in any way.  He must see God as his beloved Friend and, thus, it must penetrate deep into his heart that he should avoid, at all costs, anything that would offend his Divine Friend.!  

By repeated efforts, the choleric can learn to want with all his heart to foster a deep love of God and thereby provide himself with the greatest protection against his type of unreasonable pride which leads him quickly to vainglory.

The Choleric Must Have High and Supernatural Goals.

The choleric must seek God’s Will in all things.  He must always ask himself what service/task/plan God wants from him.  The choleric must see his own nothingness first before he will be able to discover God’s Will and have the desire to work for God.  The choleric must be aware of his tendency to see himself as a special hero when, after all, he knows the truth that only God’s Will matters!   The choleric must overcome his temptation to vainglory.   If he fears vainglory, this will help him overcome the temptation to it.  He must see that the only true glory is to do God’s Will.  He must see his need to be united with God and that without God, he can do nothing.

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will address the second motive on the list (in lesson #46) of reasons why cholerics have a tendency to not think deeply and carefully, namely, because of a false belief that such reasoning is too difficult.



[1]           All sin is unreasonable and all unreasonable pride is a sin.  But there can be good pride, e.g., a parent’s proper pride in his children’s good conduct or a workman’s proper pride in his work, leading him to do good quality work and not “cut corners”.

[2]           All sin is unreasonable and all unreasonable pride is a sin.  But there can be good pride, e.g., a parent’s proper pride in his children’s good conduct or a workman’s proper pride in his work, leading him to do good quality work and not “cut corners”.

[3]           Here is one way that St. Thomas Aquinas, greatest Doctor of the Catholic Church, explains that this motive is vainglory:

 

Now the sin of vainglory, considered in itself, does not seem to be contrary to charity as regards the love of one’s neighbor; yet as regards the love of God it may be contrary to charity in two ways. 

 

In one way, by reason of the matter about which one glories; for instance, when one glories in something false that is opposed to the reverence we owe to God.  Or again, when a man prefers to God the temporal good in which he glories: for this is forbidden.  Or again, when a man prefers the testimony of man to God’s, thus, it is written in reproval of certain people [John 12:43], “For they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God.”

In another way vainglory may be contrary to charity, on the part of the one who glories, in that he refers his intention to glory as his last end; so that he directs even virtuous deeds thereto, and, in order to obtain it, forbears not from doing even that which is against God.   In this way it is a mortal sin.  Wherefore [St.] Augustine says (De Civ. Dei v. 14) that “this vice, namely the love of human praise, is so hostile to a godly faith, if the heart desires glory more that it fears or loves God, that Our Lord said (John 5:44): How can you believe, who receive glory one from another, and the glory which is from God alone, you do not seek?”

 

Summa, IIa IIae, Q.132, a.3, Respondeo (bracketed words added).

Lesson #46: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XI

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part eleven of the study of the Choleric temperament.  The first ten parts can be found here:

1.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36:  About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

2.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

3.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

4.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

 

5.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

6.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

 

7.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

8.    Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

9.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

10. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s  Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

 

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #46 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’  Spiritual Combat – Part XI

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will call him a “choleric”.

In our last lesson we delved further into the typical form of pride a choleric has. Now we begin a more in depth look at the core of the choleric pride.  We mentioned that the source of the choleric pride is a lack of mental discipline, that is, an unwillingness to force himself to reason deeply and carefully.

In order to discuss this unfortunate failure to use his intellect – which leads to pride – we need to have a basic understanding of how God expects us to use our intellect.

In his Spiritual Exercises, St. Ignatius explains that man is created to praise, revere, and serve God.[1]  The Baltimore Catechism refers to these actions as knowing, loving, and serving God. 

The highest faculty a man possesses is his intellect and so it makes sense that the more a man knows, the better he will be able to praise, revere, and serve God.  This is true even if he knows about God merely through observing God’s creation.[2]  The more someone knows the truth, the more he is inspired to love God and consequently to serve God better.[3]

The Purpose of the Intellect

Man is intended to use his God-given reason to know his proper goal, namely, the happiness of enjoying God in heaven, and to take the proper means to accomplish this goal.  However, because of original sin, man’s mind has the wound of ignorance and his body has the wounds of the concupiscence of the eyes and the flesh.  In addition to this, man is prone to inordinate pride (i.e., the pride of life, as St. John the Evangelist calls it, 1 St. John, 2:16).

St. Thomas explains that the goodness of an action depends on the will of a man being directed to his proper end, that is, to God.  He explains how God intended man’s reason to direct and inform his will about the end (i.e., goal) of man and about the proper means he should take to obtain his end.  The whole of the moral life involves man listening to the voice of reason (also known as his conscience).

God has set down His laws plainly and His Catholic Church, in her Divine Element, has expounded upon the moral life in detail.  Nevertheless, the law of God, the Natural Law, is written in the heart of each man – as Genesis tells us that we are made in the image and likeness of God.[4]

So When Does the Failure to Use the Intellect Cause Sin to Occur?  Whenever a man does not listen to his reason.

Every conscious thought, word, or deed is either good or is a sin – there is no “in between”.[5]  Whenever a man is acting voluntarily,[6] it is a sin for him to not act according to his reason.  In other words, he sins whenever he voluntarily does something unreasonable.[7]  

 

Pride is a type of unreasonableness because it is an unreasonable exaltation of oneself.[8]  Thus, pride is inherently a sin because it is inherently unreasonable.[9]

The Importance of Good Will in Using Our Reason

One must be of good will.  That is, a man’s will must follow the good shown by the reason.  The will pursues the good or the apparent good.  Thus, man has the grave moral responsibility to find out if a particular object is really good or is only apparently good.  If something is only apparently good and not truly good, then we are obliged to avoid it.  Because use of reason is the center of the moral life, a man has a duty to properly inform his conscience/reason.

Further, St. Thomas tells us that even if the will listens to (i.e., follows) the reason in a situation where reason is erroneous, there is no sin provided that there is no bad motive on the part of the will and provided that the will (i.e., the man) is not blamable for his ignorance.

This explanation shows how crucial the use of reason is in the moral life of the soul.

A preview

We have more work to do to examine the subject of the choleric temperament and reasoning.  What would motivate cholerics to not think deeply and carefully?  Here are some possible motives:

Ø  They do not want to take the time necessary to think things through because they want to accomplish things quickly or they want to race forward to act in a way that would cause them to be perceived as heroes (or heroines).

Ø  Or, they believe that it is too difficult to think carefully and deeply. (This fear of mental effort is what St. Thomas Aquinas calls stupor.)

Ø  Or, they believe that they do not have the ability to think deeply. 

Ø  Or, they falsely view thinking deeply and carefully as “proud”.

Using these or other rationalizations, cholerics are fooled by the father of lies.



[1]           Read these articles which examine this essential truth of our Faith and of human existence:

 

      https://catholiccandle.org/2022/05/24/lesson-9-the-principle-and-foundation-part-i/

 

      https://catholiccandle.org/2022/06/27/lesson-11-the-principle-and-foundation-part-ii/

 

[2]           St. Paul teaches how man knows of God’s existence and goodness through looking at the world around us:

 

For the invisible things of Him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; His eternal power also, and Divinity:  so that they [atheists] are inexcusable.

 

Romans, 1:20 (bracketed word added to show context).

[3]           Here is one way that St. Augustine, great Doctor of the Church, teaches this truth, addressing himself directly to God:

 

Heaven and earth and all that is in them tell me, wherever I look, that I should love You [i.e.¸God], and they cease not to tell it to all men, so that there is no excuse for them.

St. Augustine, The Confessions, Bk 10, Ch.6 (bracketed words added to show context).

[4]           Genesis, 1:26-27.


[5]           Here is one way this truth is explained by St. Thomas Aquinas, greatest Doctor of the Catholic Church:

 

It belongs to the reason to direct; if an action that proceeds from deliberate reason be not directed to the due end, it is, by that fact alone, repugnant to reason, and has the character of evil. But if it be directed to a due end, it is in accord with reason; wherefore it has the character of good. Now it must needs be either directed or not directed to a due end. Consequently, every human action that proceeds from deliberate reason, if it be considered in the individual, must be good or bad.

 

Summa, Ia IIae, Q.18, a.9, Respondeo, Whether an individual action can be indifferent? (emphasis added).

[6]           St. Thomas contrasts voluntary (human) action with involuntary action proper to brute beasts:

 

If, however, [an action] does not proceed from deliberate reason, but from some act of the imagination, as when a man strokes his beard, or moves his hand or foot [e.g., in his sleep]; such an action, properly speaking, is not moral or human [but is the type of action a brute beast could perform], since this [moral and human action] depends on reason.  Hence [an act proceeding only from imagination] will be indifferent, as standing apart from the genus [i.e., category] of moral actions.

Summa, Ia IIae, Q.18, a.9, Respondeo, Whether an individual action can be indifferent? (emphasis added; bracketed words added to show the context).

[7]           St. Thomas explains this truth by quoting and following Pope St. Gregory the Great, Doctor of the Church:

 

Gregory says in a homily (vi in Evang.): “An idle word is one that lacks either the usefulness of rectitude or the motive of just necessity or pious utility.” But an idle word is an evil, because “men . . . shall render an account of it in the day of judgment” (Matthew 12:36): while if it does not lack the motive of just necessity or pious utility, it is good. Therefore, every [voluntary] word is either good or bad. For the same reason every other action is either good or bad. Therefore, no [voluntary] individual action is indifferent.

Summa, Ia IIae, Q.18, a.9, Sed Contra, Whether an individual action can be indifferent? (emphasis added; bracketed words added to show the context).

[8]           This article pertains to the unreasonable pride which is a sin.  We are not treating the proper and reasonable pride that a parent might have for his child or a citizen might have for his country.

[9]           St. Thomas explains the unreasonableness of pride in this way:

 

Right reason requires that every man’s will should tend to that which is proportionate to him [i.e., he recognizes the truth about himself].  Therefore, it is evident that pride denotes something opposed to right reason, and this shows it [pride] to have the character of sin, according to Dionysius (Div. Nom. iv. 4), “the soul’s evil is to be opposed to reason.”  Therefore, it is evident that pride is a sin.

 

Summa, IIa-IIae Q.162, a. 1, Respondeo (bracketed words added to show the context).

 

Lesson #45: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part X

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part ten of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first nine parts can be found here:

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  1. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/


  2. Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  3. Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/


Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament –
The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article, we simply will label him as a choleric.

Previously, we have discussed anger and its link to pride in the choleric. Likewise, we have discussed at length how a choleric must acquire self-knowledge so he can master himself. He must beware of nurturing hatred, which fosters holding grudges.

In addition to all of this is another character trait which is directly linked to pride, namely, the choleric’s tendency to criticize and misjudge others.

When one thinks about the fact that with fallen human nature we are all infected with pride, one can see many results of this infection. One result is that we do not like others to see our weaknesses and failings. In fact, we tend to try to hide our faults rather than admit that we have them.

The bad-willed choleric is especially prone to this tendency to never admit that he is wrong. He does not want to see himself the way he really is. He avoids looking deeply into himself because he dreads discovering anything that he needs to improve in himself. This is a form of pride which in turn leads to blinding himself further regarding his own defects. He tries to convince himself that does not have his various defects. Likewise, he does not want others to see that he has any flaws.

One common way that this choleric attempts to deflect attention from his defects is to accuse others of flaws or supposed flaws. Thus, this choleric has a very strong tendency to criticize others as a means of keeping others from seeing him as he really is. Of course, this is directly linked to his denial of some (or all) of his defects. (A bad-willed choleric might be aware of his defects but does not want to correct them.) This form of pride is extremely strong in him.

An interesting point is that it seems that the more pride the bad-willed choleric has, the more critical he is and, therefore, the more he is unbearable he is to others. He seems to find constant fault with everyone around him. Thus, it can be that with some cholerics, nothing seems to please them.

Another important point to consider is that the proud choleric is instinctively intimidated by virtuous people around him, as if he can sense his defects more intensely in comparison to them. The intimidation he feels is so great within him that he vents his vexation by especially attacking any virtuous person associated with him.

If anyone points out to him any defect, this proud choleric can’t handle it and he lashes out at the “accuser”. He hurls insults at him and insists that the virtuous one, who was giving fraternal correction with love, is full of vice. It is ironic that oftentimes the so-called vice the choleric accuses his corrector of having, is the very vice he himself is full of. Instead of the choleric showing gratitude to the one giving charitable fraternal correction, the proud choleric displays his defects even more prominently by his haughty reaction to the correction.

Unfortunately, this pattern of behavior in a proud choleric is usually a vicious circle. His relatives and acquaintances become overwhelmed with the situation and do not know how to try to help him. However, since pride is blind, the choleric tends not to see any problem, so the problem becomes worse.

What can a choleric do to avoid turning into an unjust criticizer? (Below is a short list of suggestions. Of course, more can be found.)

1) Be aware of the tendency of cholerics to be proud.

2) Work very hard at acquiring the virtue of humility.

3) Saying ejaculations such as, “Jesus Meek and Humble of Heart make my heart like unto Thine,” is extremely helpful. Likewise, saying the Litany of Humility1 often, even twice a day, is a powerful means to fight pride.

4) When a critical comment/thought about another person comes into his mind, he could tell himself that he himself possesses that problem and he should not say or think of criticizing others, because doing so would be like the “pot calling the kettle black.”

5) He should pray to Our Lord and Our Lady to help him acquire more and more self-knowledge so he can see himself more in the Divine Light and work on improving his character.

6) He must tell himself to not be afraid of seeing his flaws because God intends him to continually convert and become more Christ-like— for our life on earth is to be an imitation of Christ and so we Catholics should want with all our hearts to go to heaven and to be divine friends with Our Lord.

7) He should remind himself that everyone has a form of pride and other defects to work on, and being aware of his is a great blessing. Knowing oneself is half the battle, so to speak; then all he needs to do is to get to work and improvements and peace of soul will come.

8) He should also remind himself that others will find him easier to bear if he has begun in earnest to change his attitude to a humble one.

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will examine the very core of the choleric pride – a lack of mental discipline, i.e., an unwillingness to force himself to reason deeply.

This lack of mental discipline has the following consequences (which we will examine):

  • Not making good choices/decisions;

  • Plans are poorly formulated and poorly implemented;

  • Failures leading to blaming others;

  • Failures leading to making excuses and covering up problems;

  • Trying to compensate for poor thinking by acting overconfident and/or bragging; and

  • Trying to manipulate others and control them to avoid the problems caused by bad planning.

1 Litany of Humility
O Jesus! meek and humble of heart, Hear me.

From the desire of being esteemed, Deliver me, Jesus.

From the desire of being loved… Deliver etc.

From the desire of being extolled …

From the desire of being honored …

From the desire of being praised …

From the desire of being preferred to others…

From the desire of being consulted …

From the desire of being approved …

From the fear of being humiliated …

From the fear of being despised…

From the fear of suffering rebukes …

From the fear of being calumniated …

From the fear of being forgotten …

From the fear of being ridiculed …

From the fear of being wronged …

From the fear of being suspected …

That others may be loved more than I, Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That others may be esteemed more than I … Jesus, grant etc.

That, in the opinion of the world, others may increase and I may decrease …
That others may be chosen and I set aside …
That others may be praised and I unnoticed …
That others may be preferred to me in everything…
That others may become holier than I, provided that I may become as holy as I should…



Lesson #44: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part IX

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part nine of the study of the Choleric temperament.  The first eight parts can be found here:

1.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36:  About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

2.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

3.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

4.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

 

5.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

6.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

 

7.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

 

8.    Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/


Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will label him as a choleric.

In our last lesson we saw how anger is inherently caused by some slight that someone has felt.  We had a list of questions that a choleric, in particular, can ask himself about feeling slighted and some means to take to prevent himself from getting angry.

Because anger becomes sinful when it is unreasonable, the choleric must learn to watch his feelings very closely.  As we mentioned, St. Thomas reminds us that the person with a choleric temperament is prone to become “angry too quickly or for any slight [meaning small/trivial] cause.”[1]

In addition to these two ways for anger to become sinful, we discussed what St. Thomas said about anger being “too long in a man’s memory, the result being that it gives rise to a lasting displeasure, wherefore he is grievous and sullen to himself.”[2]

This brings us to the important topic of the choleric tendency to hold grudges.  Let us take a brief look at the definition of the word grudge:

Grudge = sullen malice, cherished ill will [Merriam-Webster New Collegiate Dictionary, ©1949]

Grudge = a feeling of deep-seated resentment of ill will [Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, ©1987]

These meanings given for the word grudge plainly tell us that a grudge is something bad for the soul because these meanings refer to the ‘lasting displeasure’ that St. Thomas is talking about.

 

Recognizing and Squelching Anger/Not Allowing Anger to Linger

St. Paul warns us not to keep lasting anger in our hearts, “Be angry: and sin not.  Let not the sun go down upon your anger.” [Ephesians 4:26].

Rightly does St. Paul warn us because he knows that anger can quickly become unreasonable and therefore sinful.  This tendency of anger to be unreasonable is because anger has a close connection to pride.  We know that pride blinds the soul. So pride makes it very difficult to discover that one’s anger is unfounded, hence, unreasonable.  St. Paul says, “Be angry.”  Be tough on yourself.  Further, he says, “Sin not.”  Don’t be unjustly angry with your neighbor.  And again, St. Paul says, “Let not the sun go down upon your anger.”  Do not let your anger linger.

Thus, it is crucial that a person must judge himself strictly when he feels anger flaring up in his soul.  He must keep a close guard on himself.  He must find the source or cause of his feeling of anger.  This requires much self-knowledge.  By studying himself and his tendencies closely, he can discover what types of things spark his anger into action.  He must “nip-in-the-bud” his unjust anger.  In other words, he must quench the fire of anger at its beginning.

We discussed in our last lesson how a choleric’s anger is usually attached to pride. This pride makes the choleric frequently view everything as an insult.  We gave some typical things that a choleric feels slighted about.  We showed how each of these was linked to pride.  We gave some suggestions on how the choleric could counteract his pride and his anger for each case.  We list here again some common links to pride.  

A person feels slighted because:

1) He feels that he is not getting attention from others.

2) He feels that someone insulted him.

3) He thinks someone is making fun of him.

4) He feels that someone is getting in the way of his plans and his getting what he wants.

5) He thinks someone is insulting his (God-given) talents.

6) He does not like someone pointing out his defects or anything that he has done wrong.

A Strategy to Counteract His Tendency to Feel Slighted

A choleric must ask himself some hard-hitting questions and give himself some tough rebukes.  He cannot be gentle with himself.  He must be strict with himself. So here is a sample of the toughness the choleric has to have on himself and tell himself the following:

1) What do you want attention for?  Who do you think you are?  You act as if you are God’s gift to mankind!!  You are not the center of the universe!  Stop being so self-centered!  And how many times have you failed to give others the attention they deserved?

2) So, you think you have been insulted?  What makes you think that?  Do you really think that everyone must treat you as a king?   Treat you with kid-gloves?  Why are you so sensitive?  Most likely you deserve to be insulted.  Think of all your past sins and how you yourself have insulted God and then you will not be so prone to think that you deserve anything better than you have.  In fact, you have gotten far better than you have ever deserved!  And how many times have you insulted others?

3) Likewise, you feel that you have been mocked/made fun of?  Haven’t your past sins truly mocked Our Lord?  And here you allow yourself to take offense at the tiniest word spoken about you or to you.  Further, how many times have you mocked/made fun of others?

4) Now you are upset because your plans are disrupted in any way whatsoever?  What makes you think that God is pleased with your plans?  Did you pray to God about them and think deeply whether your plans would help you save your soul or help you to become a straight-to-heaven saint?

5) You are so upset because you think your (God-given) talents are being insulted?  If they are truly God-given talents, then you are not acting grateful for them by getting upset.  God did not have to give you anything and you should not act as if you were not given these talents from God and as if they were simply automatically yours.  God could, if He wanted to, take these away from you in an instant.

6) So now you are upset because someone pointed out a defect in you/or something that you have done wrong?  Do you really think you are perfect and there is absolutely no room for improvement in you?  Do you think you are without sin? Shouldn’t you be grateful that someone is trying to help you improve?  Do you not feel ashamed for your ingratitude toward the person trying to help you become holy?

Grudges Come When One Does Not Humble Himself and Is Not Willing to Forgive

Grudges, because they are unreasonable, are always sinful.  One must see himself in the true light, and thereby see that he deserves slights, insults, chastisements, admonishments, and punishments.  These are needed not only for the strengthening of the soul in virtue, but also to make reparation for one’s past sins. 

Grudges may not necessarily be because one is seeking to get revenge, but is rather the case of a person not being willing to forgive his neighbor.  Our Lord speaks many times in the Gospel about forgiving one’s neighbor.  He says we should always forgive from our hearts even if we were treated unjustly.   The following (from St. Matthew’s Gospel) is a good example:

Then came Peter unto Him and said: Lord, how often shall my brother offend against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?  Jesus saith to him: I say not to thee, till seven times; but till seventy times seven times.  

St. Matthew’s Gospel,18:21-22.

Our Lord here means to forgive always.

Again, in St. Matthew’s Gospel [18:23-35] we find the parable about the man being forgiven a huge debt and then he went out and throttled his fellow servant and demanded prompt payment of a very small debt.

[Our Lord says:] Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened to a king, who would take an account of his servants.

And when he had begun to take the account, one was brought to him, that owed him ten thousand talents. And as he had not wherewith to pay it, his lord commanded that he should be sold, and his wife and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.  But that servant falling down, besought him, saying: Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. And the lord of that servant being moved with pity, let him go and forgave him the debt. But when that servant was gone out, he found one of his fellow-servants that owed him a hundred denarii: and laying hold of him, he throttled him, saying: Pay what thou owest.  And his fellow-servant falling down, besought him, saying: Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.  And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he paid the debt.  Now his fellow servants seeing what was done, were very much grieved, and they came, and told their lord all that was done. Then his lord called him: and said to him: Thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all the debt, because thou besoughtest me.  Shouldst not thou then have had compassion also on thy fellow servant, even as I had compassion on thee?   And his lord being angry, delivered him to the torturers until he paid all the debt. So also shall my heavenly Father do to you, if you forgive not everyone his brother from your hearts. [bold emphasis added]

And if these quotes are not enough to convince a choleric to keep a close eye on his pride and beware of the beginning of his anger, then simply looking at the Our  Father that Our Lord taught us shows us plainly enough that we must forgive our neighbor  if we are going to expect forgiveness from God.

Let’s face it.  We have all known someone who has held a grudge.  We can see that the grudge is very ugly and ridiculous.  Holding a grudge truly shows the pride and foolishness of the one holding it.  The grudge shows a gross lack of compassion and patience.  Most importantly, grudges show a grave lack of charity in the person holding the grudge.  It is as we have seen from what we have studied in St. Thomas, anger and pride married together and kept for a long time, engender hatred.  How can someone willing to hold a grudge really think he will be able to meet His Judge Who has been so forgiving and meek to him, when the reality remains that he was not willing to show any mercy and meekness to his neighbor?

Let the choleric remind himself of Our Lord’s words:

Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.  Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the greater in the kingdom of heaven. [St. Matthew 18:3-4]

And let us all – especially cholerics – often pray: “Jesus, meek and humble of Heart, make our hearts like unto Thine.”

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will study another character flaw of the choleric which is directly linked to his pride—his tendency to criticize and misjudge others.  Again, our goal will be to investigate this bad trait and strategize on the means to amend it.

 

 



[1]           Summa Theologica IIa IIae, Q. 158, a. 6, Respondeo [bracketed words added for clarity]

[2]           Summa Theologica IIa IIae, Q. 158, a. 6, Respondeo [Bold emphasis added.]

Lesson #43: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VIII

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part eight of the study of the Choleric temperament.  The first seven parts can be found here:

1.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36:  About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

2.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

3.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

4.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

 

5.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

6.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

7.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/


Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #43 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric TemperamentTheir Spiritual Combat Part VIII

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article, we simply will label him as a choleric.

In our last lesson we studied more about the nature of anger, both just anger and unjust anger.  We also saw the various ways in which anger becomes sinful.  Since St. Thomas explained to us how the choleric is prone to anger, it is important to help the choleric analyze his anger.

Since one of our intentions for studying the temperaments is to gain self-knowledge and improve our spiritual lives, it is important to make the appropriate connections between the weaknesses found in each temperament.   Making these connections really helps one to find good strategies on how to conquer his bad tendencies which lead him to sin.  Thus, we need to look at the weakness of anger in the choleric and see how it is linked to the other weaknesses the choleric has.

St. Thomas tells us that:

The inordinateness of anger may be considered in relation to two things. First, in relation to the origin of anger, and this regards choleric persons, who are angry too quickly and for any slight cause.  Secondly, in relation to the duration of anger, for that anger endures too long; and this may happen in two ways.  In one way, because the cause of anger, to wit, the inflicted injury, remains too long in a man’s memory, the result being that it gives rise to a lasting displeasure, wherefore he is grievous and sullen to himself.  In another way, it happens on the part of vengeance, which a man seeks with a stubborn desire: this applies to ill-tempered or stern people, who do not put aside their anger until they have inflicted punishment.[1]

In Lesson #42 we spoke of long-lasting anger leading to the horrible sin of hatred.  This, of course, means that the choleric must work hard to keep a sharp eye on his anger and be able to discern whether his anger is just or sinful. 

Before we discuss ways to help a choleric discern more about his anger, we need to recall that pride, a prominent weakness of the choleric,[2] is directly linked to his anger.  Let us briefly look at St. Thomas’s definition of pride in order to see how pride is linked to the typical causes of anger which we discussed in Lesson #40.

St. Thomas defines pride as follows:

Pride (superbia) is so called because a man thereby aims higher (supra) than he is; whereby Isidore says (Etym. X): “A man is said to be proud, because he wishes to appear above (super) what he really is”; for he who wishes to overstep beyond what he is, is proud.[3]

With this definition in mind let us look at what St. Thomas taught us in Lesson #40. St. Thomas explained, “All the causes of anger are reduced to slight in these three forms: contempt, despiteful treatment (i.e. hindering one from doing one’s will), and insolence.”[4]

St. Thomas says that each of the three causes of anger really boils down to some kind of slight.  Here are his words:

Each of those causes amounts to some kind of slight.  Thus, forgetfulness is a clear sign of slight esteem, for the more we think of a thing the more is it fixed in our memory.  [In other words, those things we often think about and which we care about, we do not tend to forget.  So, forgetting about a person suggests we don’t care much about that person.]

Again, if a man does not hesitate by his remarks to give pain to another, this seems to show that he thinks little of him: and those too who show signs of hilarity when another is in misfortune, seem to care little about his good or evil.  Again, he that hinders another from carrying out his will, without deriving thereby any profit to himself, seems not to care much for his friendship.  Consequently, all those things, in so far as they are signs of contempt, provoke anger.[5]

There are two other aspects upon which St. Thomas touches in regard to a cause of anger.  He asks two questions, namely, (1) whether a man’s excellence is a cause of his anger, and (2) whether a man’s defect is the cause of his anger.  St. Thomas answers these questions as follows:

The cause of anger, in the man who is angry, may be taken in two ways.  First, in respect to the motive of anger: and thus excellence is the cause of a man being easily angered, because the motive of anger is an unjust slight, as stated above (A. 2). However, it is evident that the more excellent a man is, the more unjust is a slight offered him in the matter in which he excels.  Consequently, those who excel in any matter, are most of all angry, if they be slighted in that matter; for instance, a wealthy man in his riches, or an orator in his eloquence, and so forth.

Secondly, the cause of anger, in the man who is angry, may be considered on the part of the disposition produced in him by the motive aforesaid. However, it is evident that nothing moves a man to anger except a hurt that grieves him: while whatever savors of defect is above all a cause of grief; since men who suffer from some defect are more easily hurt.  And this is why men who are weak, or subject to some other defect, are more easily angered, since they are more easily grieved.[6]

So now let us make a list of the causes of anger and see how each of them can be infected with pride.  It should be noted that these apply to any human but we are here considering especially the choleric who St. Thomas has classified as getting “angry too quickly or for any slight cause.”

·         A) Thus, forgetfulness is a clear sign of slight esteem, for the more we think of a thing the more is it fixed in our memory.

 

·         B) If a man does not hesitate by his remarks to give pain to another, this seems to show that he thinks little of him.

 

·         C) Those, too, who show signs of hilarity when another is in misfortune, seem to care little about his good or evil.

 

·         D) He that hinders another from carrying out his will, without deriving thereby any profit to himself, seems not to care much for his friendship.

 

·         E) A man who excels in an area is insulted by someone who slights his excellence.

 

·         F) A man who is weak or has a defect is easily grieved and angered.


The list of slights when attached to pride and what remedies to take: (These are in connection with the typical pride of the choleric.)

A) When One Feels Slighted Because Someone Has Forgotten Him.

A proud choleric would assume that his friend is trying to hurt him or insult him.  Thus, if he feels slighted he should first examine if the offense he feels is real or imagined.   He needs to think on a more objective level.  He should take care not to make a rash judgment.  One thing he should do is give the benefit of the doubt to the one he feels slighted by.  There may well be a logical reason why the friend could not accomplish what the choleric expected.
 

B) When One Feels Offended Because Of Something That Someone Has Said.  

Here again, a proud choleric would automatically assume that there was an evil motive and premeditation involved in what was said to him.  He must really make every effort to pull out of the situation and be objective.  He should assume that no ill-will was intended.

He could forgive-and-forget or he could patiently communicate to the person who made the comment that he (the choleric) took it the wrong way.  This communication is in itself an act of humility and will help the situation.  He should try to “clear the air” and make sure there is no misunderstanding or hard feelings shown about the comment. 

The choleric could also think that if someone said something that rubbed the choleric the wrong way, this proves that the choleric is proud and needs to admit to himself that he deserved the comment.  Sometimes, people do not know how to approach a choleric to give him fraternal correction and consequently an admonishment or instruction can come out sounding harsh.

C) When One Feels Hurt Because Someone Found Humor in a Mishap/Misfortune that Occurred to the Choleric.

The proud choleric would usually take a great offense at this.  Of course it is against charity to treat someone’s misfortune or accident as humorous.  However, fallen human nature often finds humor in some silly circumstance and might laugh yet without intending any slight or insult.

What should one do if he should be laughed at?  Our first thought should be of Our Lord who was unjustly mocked and laughed to scorn.  He took it with meekness and forgave His offenders, and so we should do likewise. 

Also, we can thank God for the humiliation and unite our embarrassment to Our Lord’s.  We can remind ourselves that we really do not deserve any better.  This is a good way to make reparation for our past sins and learn how to love others, especially our enemies. 

D) When One Feels Angry Because Someone Interferes with His Plans, Even Though the Said Someone Does Not Gain Any Profit Thereby.

A proud choleric would typically get very upset about this situation.  What should the choleric do?  He should remember that when something happens that is outside of his control, then it is God’s Will for him at least at that present time.

He should first thank God for the cross.  He should examine whether his plans were good for his salvation in the first place.  If he finds that the plans were not conducive to his salvation then, of course, he should immediately abandon that plan.

If he is not sure whether his plan was good or not, he must pray for enlightenment from God.  He should also seek advice and get help evaluating the situation.  He could also use St. Ignatius’s technique of considering the plan as someone else’s.  Then the choleric would ask himself if this plan is conducive to salvation.  Likewise, he should ask himself what he would have wanted to do if he were on his deathbed and about to die.  Then he could implement the results of his internal inquiry.

All of these thoughts would certainly curb his first inclination to get upset or angry.

E) When One Who Has a God-Given Talent Has Been Insulted by Someone Who Slights his Excellence.

A proud choleric is very prone to get upset and angry when his talents are not recognized.  One could say that the proud choleric wants the whole world to acknowledge his talents.  This may seem like an exaggeration to make a point, but we would have to admit knowing some choleric somewhere who acts exactly like this.  What should this choleric do?  First of all, if one has talents, he must give the glory to God.  Our Lord and Our Lady are perfect examples of how to magnify God for the excellence they possessed.  As St. Paul said, “What hast thou that thou hast not received?  And if thou hast received, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?” 1 Corinthians, 4:7.

We all have to thank God for what we have received. The choleric must do all he can to foster humility in himself and should try to form the habit of thanking God often for all the benefits he has received from God.

He should be meek and offer up the cross of being insulted.  This is a great way to make reparation for his past sins and to imitate Our Lord. 

He must remember that the insult may be a way for someone to subtly point out the choleric’s pride concerning his talents.  So this is another reason for the choleric to be thankful that someone has insulted him.  His conscience will undoubtedly tell him that he may really deserve the insult to curb his pride. 

Of course, the choleric should forgive the person who insults him and this forgiveness must be with his whole heart.  Otherwise he might get the temptation to harbor a grudge against the offender. [7]

F) When a Man Who Is Weak Has his Defect Pointed Out.

A proud choleric who has a natural weakness and/or a defect will find himself, as St. Thomas says, very easily irked and spontaneously lashes out if anyone makes a reference to his problem(s).  Naturally, his pride does not want to face the fact that he has a problem.  The most obvious reason for this is that the problem he has could in most circumstances be addressed and fixed.  If someone points out his shortcomings, his conscience reminds him that his lack of effort to amend is the cause of the weakness/defect still abiding in him.  The old adage, “God helps those who help themselves” is involved here.  If the choleric worked hard, first to face himself, then to seek the means to improve and to take those means, then he would be on his way to overcoming the weakness and/or defect(s).

We all have tendencies which need to be conquered in us.  As St. Paul says, “But I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and captivating me in the law of my sin, that is in my members.”  Romans, 7:23.

Of course, St. Paul here is talking about the concupiscence of the flesh which we all must deal with.  Consequently, St. Paul exhorts us numerous times to use our reason.  God intends each person to use his reason to avoid sin and to conquer the natural weaknesses which are in his temperament.

Therefore, the proud choleric, when his weakness and/or defect is revealed, should force himself to humbly be grateful to the person who makes it known.     

We can readily see that if one does not view himself correctly, he would easily take offence at anything that he perceives as negative to him.  It is truly a great blessing of God to help us see ourselves the way we really are, especially our defects.  God often uses others as His tools to show us what we need to work on most in our souls.  Therefore, we should not shun fraternal correction but embrace it to help us conquer pride.

A  Short Self-Examination to Check if Pride is involved in One’s Anger (based on our discussion above)

  Do I feel slighted?

  Is this slight sent to me to show me that I need to amend some aspect of my life/character?

  Should I not take this opportunity to examine my conscience? {Because this occasion may seem to me to be a slight only because it pricks my conscience about one of my failings and in my pride I do not want to see myself as I really am.}

  Am I imitating Our Lord if I am unjustly accused?

  Am I offering up this humiliation for the Glory of God?

  Would it not be better to simply say a prayer for the person I feel slighted by and then forget about the incident?

This short examination can be very helpful to keep in mind the next time one, especially a choleric, feels like he is beginning to boil inside.  When one humbles himself, especially seeing all things as coming from the Hands of God, then one can crush angry feelings which are often linked directly to pride.

In our next lesson we will deal more with various ways that a choleric can work on humility to restrain his anger.  We will see more how pride greatly influences the choleric’s frame of mind.  We will connect our investigation of slights (see above) with an examination of how a choleric can slow down his impulsive tendencies to take offense, get angry, and cling to anger for long periods of time.



[1]           Summa Theologica IIa IIae, Q.158, a.6, Respondeo (emphasis added).

[2]           See Lesson #39, in which the pride of the choleric is described.

 

[3]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.162, a.1, Respondeo.


In that Respondeo, St. Thomas further teaches regarding pride:
  

However, right reason requires that every man’s will should tend to that which is proportionate to him.  Therefore, it is evident that pride denotes something opposed to right reason, and this shows it [pride] to have the character of sin, according to Dionysius (Div. Nom. iv. 4), “the soul’s evil is to be opposed to reason.”  Therefore, it is evident that pride is a sin.

 

[4]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.47, a.2,  Respondeo.

[5]           Summa Theologica II IIae, Q. 47 a.3 Reply #3 (bracketed words added for clarity).

[6]           Summa Theologica, Ia IIae, Q.47, a.3, Respondeo.

 

[7]           One could ask the question, “What if the man (even a choleric man) was humble and is slighted for his excellence?”  This excellent man would have to weigh the matter carefully and be sure if he should indeed show disapprobation against the offender.  For example, if he would cause scandal by not expressing his just anger, then he must be sure to not simply blow off the incident but rather show that he has just anger and use this anger in an appropriate way.

Lesson #42: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part seven of the study of the Choleric temperament.  The first fix parts can be found here:

1.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36:  About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

2.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

3.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

4.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

 

5.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

6.    Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/


Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII

Note: When referring to a person with a choleric temperament in this article we simply will label him as a choleric.

In our last two lessons we have described: how one is moved to anger; what effects anger has on the body; and how anger affects the proper use of one’s reason.

Also, we saw in Lesson #41, in particular, how anger requires an act of reason insofar as one seeks just vengeance when he has been wronged.  Furthermore, we saw that because anger causes changes in the body, these changes hamper the proper role of one’s reason.

Since anger is a passion and classified as one of the seven capital sins, we need to be careful in our understanding of anger.  Let us consider the following three points:

1) When is anger lawful?

2) When is anger sinful?

3) When anger is sinful, how does it connect with additional sins, such as, hatred?

1) When is anger lawful?  

St. Thomas clarifies the answer to this question for us in the following explanation:

Now this [the evil of envy][1] does not apply to anger, which is the desire for revenge, since revenge may be desired both well and ill.  Secondly, evil is found in a passion in respect to the passion’s quantity, that is, in respect to its excess or deficiency; and thus, evil may be found in anger, when, to wit, one is angry, more or less than right reason demands.  But if one is angry in accordance with right reason, one’s anger is deserving of praise.[2]

St. Thomas explains in more depth when he comments on St. Gregory’s work On Morals:

Anger may stand in a twofold relation to reason.  First, antecedently; in this way it withdraws reason from its rectitude, and has therefore the character of evil.  Secondly, consequently, inasmuch as the movement of the sensitive appetite is directed against vice and in accordance with reason, this anger is good, and is called zealous anger.  Wherefore, Gregory says (De Moral. vol. 45): “We must beware lest, when we use anger as an instrument of virtue, it overrules the mind, and go before it as its mistress, instead of following in reason’s train, ever ready, as its handmaid, to obey.”  This latter anger, although it hinders somewhat the judgment of reason in the execution of the act, does not destroy the rectitude of reason.  Hence Gregory says (Moral. v, 45) that zealous anger troubles the eye of reason, whereas sinful anger blinds it.  Nor is it incompatible with virtue that the deliberation of reason be interrupted in the execution of what reason has deliberated: since art also would be hindered in its act, if it were to deliberate about what has to be done, while having to act.[3]

2) When does anger become sinful?

St. Thomas gives us guidelines here as well:

Anger, as stated above (a.1), is properly the name of a passion.  A passion of the sensitive appetite is good in so far as it is regulated by reason, whereas it is evil if it set the order of reason aside.  Now the order of reason, in regard to anger, may be considered in relation to two things.  First, in relation to the appetible [desirable] object to which anger tends, and that is revenge.  Wherefore if one desire revenge to be taken in accordance with the order of reason, the desire of anger is praiseworthy, and is called zealous anger [*Cf. Greg., Moral. v, 45].  On the other hand, if one desire the taking of vengeance in any way whatever contrary to the order of reason, for instance if he desire the punishment of one who has not deserved it, or beyond his deserts, or again contrary to the order prescribed by law, or not for the due end, namely the maintaining of justice and the correction of faults, then the desire of anger will be sinful, and this is called sinful anger.

Secondly, the order of reason in regard to anger may be considered in relation to the mode of being angry, namely that the movement of anger should not be immoderately fierce, neither internally nor externally; and if this condition be disregarded [namely, the proper degree of anger], anger will not lack sin, even though just vengeance be desired.[4]

3) When anger is sinful, how does it connect with additional sins, such as, hatred?

St. Thomas makes some very interesting and useful distinctions regarding the forms of anger when defending the names and descriptions that Aristotle used.  He cites the authority of St. Gregory of Nyssa, a father of the Church.

St. Gregory of Nyssa says there are three species of irascibility, namely, the anger which is called wrath, and ill-will which is a disease of the mind, and rancor.  Now these three seem to coincide with the three aforesaid [viz., the three-fold division used by Aristotle].  For wrath he describes as having beginning and movement, and the Philosopher (Ethic. iv, 5) ascribes this to choleric persons: ill-will he describes as an anger that endures and grows old and this the Philosopher ascribes to sullenness; while he describes rancor as reckoning the time for vengeance, which tallies with the Philosopher’s description of the ill-tempered.  The same division is given by Damascene (De Fide Orth. ii, 16).  Therefore, the aforesaid division assigned by the Philosopher is not unfitting.[5]

St. Thomas continues his explanation as follows here:

The aforesaid distinction may be referred either to the passion, or to the sin itself of anger.  We have already stated when treating of the passions (I-II, Q. 46, A. 8) how it is to be applied to the passion of anger.  And it would seem that this is chiefly what Gregory of Nyssa and Damascene had in view.  Here, however, we have to take the distinction of these species in its application to the sin of anger, and as set down by the Philosopher.  For the inordinateness of anger may be considered in relation to two things.  First, in relation to the origin of anger, and this regards choleric persons, who are angry too quickly and for any slight cause.  Secondly, in relation to the duration of anger, for that anger endures too long; and this may happen in two ways.  In one way, because the cause of anger, to wit, the inflicted injury, remains too long in a man’s memory, the result being that it gives rise to a lasting displeasure, wherefore he is grievous and sullen to himself.  In another way, it happens on the part of vengeance, which a man seeks with a stubborn desire: this applies to ill-tempered or stern people, who do not put aside their anger until they have inflicted punishment.[6]

Then St. Thomas gives us additional information about the dangers that come with sullenness and being ill-tempered.

Both sullen and ill-tempered people have a long-lasting anger, but for different reasons.  For a sullen person has an abiding anger on account of an abiding displeasure, which he holds locked in his breast; and as he does not break forth into the outward signs of anger, others cannot reason him out of it, nor does he of his own accord lay aside his anger, unless his displeasure wear away with time and thus his anger cease.  On the other hand, the anger of ill-tempered persons is long-lasting on account of their intense desire for revenge, so that it does not wear out with time, and can be quelled only by revenge.[7]

An additional important aspect about anger is to see the connection between what St. Thomas has explained about holding anger inside and the situation in which the angry person becomes taciturn.  Let’s see St. Thomas’s explanation here:

On the part of the impediment to reason because, as stated above (A. 2), the disturbance of anger reaches to the outward members, and chiefly to those members which reflect more distinctly the emotions of the heart, such as the eyes, face and tongue; wherefore, as observed above (A. 2), the tongue stammers, the countenance takes fire, the eyes grow fierce.  Consequently, anger may cause such a disturbance, that the tongue is altogether deprived of speech; and taciturnity is the result. [8] 

St. Thomas quotes St. Gregory when referring to this taciturnity, “Gregory says (De Moral. v, 30) that when anger does not vent itself outwardly by the lips, inwardly it burns the more fiercely.”[9]

Now we can see how long-lasting and deep-seated anger has additional serious consequences.  For St. Thomas tells us that when anger lasts a long time, it engenders hatred.  Here are his words:

Anger is said to grow into hatred, not as though the same passion which at first was anger, afterwards becomes hatred by becoming inveterate; but by a process of causality.  For anger when it lasts a long time engenders hatred.[10]

Since St. Thomas teaches us that anger can turn into hatred, it would be an appropriate time to see what he teaches us about the seriousness of hatred.

St. Thomas investigates whether anger is graver than hatred.  He concludes that hatred is graver than anger.  He explains his conclusion as follows:

The species and nature of a passion are taken from its object.  However, the object of anger is the same in substance as the object of hatred; since, just as the hater wishes evil to him whom he hates, so does the angry man wish evil to him with whom he is angry.  But there is a difference of aspect: for the hater wishes evil to his enemy, as evil, whereas the angry man wishes evil to him with whom he is angry, not as evil but in so far as it has an aspect of good, that is, in so far as he reckons it as just, since it is a means of vengeance.   Wherefore also it has been said above (A. 2) that hatred implies application of evil to evil, whereas anger denotes application of good to evil.  However, it is evident that to seek evil under the aspect of justice, is a lesser evil, than simply to seek evil to someone.  Because to wish evil to someone under the aspect of justice, may be according to the virtue of justice, if it be in conformity with the order of reason; and anger fails only in this, that it does not obey the precept of reason in taking vengeance.  Consequently, it is evident that hatred is far worse and graver than anger.[11]

We add an additional explanation that St. Thomas gives regarding the differences between anger and hatred.  

In anger and hatred two points may be considered: namely, the thing desired, and the intensity of the desire.  As to the thing desired, anger has more mercy than hatred has.  For since hatred desires another’s evil for evil’s sake, it is satisfied with no particular measure of evil: because those things that are desired for their own sake, are desired without measure, as the Philosopher states (Politic Bk. 1; ch.9 #1257b26)[12], instancing a miser with regard to riches.  Hence it is written (Ecclus. 12:16): “An enemy . . . if he find an opportunity, will not be satisfied with blood.”  Anger, on the other hand, seeks evil only under the aspect of a just means of vengeance.  Consequently, when the evil inflicted goes beyond the measure of justice according to the estimate of the angry man, then he has mercy.  Wherefore, the Philosopher says (Rhetoric Bk.2; ch.4 #1382a8) that the angry man is appeased if many evils befall, whereas the hater is never appeased.[13]  As to the intensity of the desire, anger excludes mercy more than hatred does; because the movement of anger is more impetuous, through the heating of the bile.  Hence the passage quoted continues: “Who can bear the violence of one provoked?[14]

We can see plainly from what St. Thomas has set forth and the striking quote from Aristotle’s Rhetoric (in the footnote before last), that sinful anger must be shunned with all one’s might. Not only does unreasonable anger lead to further sin, but it also is closely joined with pride.

A Preview…

We will look more into the connection of how pride fosters anger and other sins.  In our next lesson we will look into ways that a choleric can learn how to keep himself in check.  We will also look at ways in which he can curb his anger and refrain from holding grudges – which have direct links to hatred as we have shown above.



[1]           Here, St. Thomas is commenting on a quote from Aristotle: “The very mention of envy denotes something evil.”  These words are found here: Ethics, Bk.2, ch.6.

[2]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.158, a.1, Respondeo.

[3]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.158, a.1, ad. 2.

[4]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.158, a.2 Respondeo, [bracketed words are added for clarification].

[5]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.158, a.5, Sed Contra (bracketed words added for clarity).  The citation of St. Gregory of Nyssa is from Nemesius, De Nat. Hom. Xxi and the word ‘wrath’ in the citation above is rendered from the word ‘Fellea’, i.e., like gall.  But in Ia IIae, Q.46, a.8, St. Thomas quoting the same authority has ‘Cholos’ which the translators of St. Thomas rendered to be the word ‘wrath’.

[6]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.158, a.5, Respondeo.

[7]           Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.158 a.6 ad.2.

[8]           Summa Theologica, Ia Iiae, Q.48 a.4, Respondeo.

[9]           Summa Theologica, Ia Iiae, Q.48 a.4, Sed Contra.

[10]         Summa Theologica, Ia Iiae, Q.46 a.3, ad.2.

[11]         Summa Theologica, Ia IIae, Q. 46, a.6, Respondeo, [bold emphasis added].

 

[12]         Here are the words of Aristotle to which St. Thomas refers:

 

As in the art of medicine there is no limit to the pursuit of health, and as in the other arts there is no limit to the pursuit of their several ends, for they aim at accomplishing their ends to the uttermost (but of the means there is a limit, for the end is always the limit), so, too, in this art of wealth-getting there is no limit of the end, which is riches of the spurious kind, and the acquisition of wealth.

 

Aristotle’s Politics, Bk. 1; ch.3, #1257b26”.

 

[13]         The quote that St. Thomas refers to is from Aristotle and is quite striking:

 

Moreover, anger can be cured by time, but hatred cannot.  

 

Here are Aristotle’s fuller explanation from this same passage, to give a fuller context:

 

The one aims at giving pain to its object, the other at doing him harm; the angry man wants his victims to feel; the hater does not care whether they feel or not.  All painful things are felt; but the greatest evils, injustice and folly, are the least felt, since their presence causes no pain.  And anger is accompanied by pain, hatred is not; the angry man feels pain, but the hater does not.  Much may happen to make the angry man pity those who offend him, but the hater under no circumstances wishes to pity a man whom he has once hated: for the one would have the offenders suffer for what they have done; the other would have them cease to exist.

 

Aristotle’s Rhetoric Bk.2; ch.4 #1382a8.  Bold emphasis added to highlight the gravity of the sin of hatred.

 

[14]         Summa Theologica, Ia IIae, Q.46, a.6, ad.1.