Words to Live By – From Catholic Tradition

Mortifying Our Passions and Desires Helps Us Much More Than Choosing to Perform Unusual Voluntary Penances

Here is how St. John of the Cross, Mystical Doctor of the Church, counsels us:

One must greatly lament the ignorance of certain men, who burden themselves with extraordinary penances and with many other voluntary practices, and think that this practice or that one will suffice to bring them to the union with Divine Wisdom. But such will not be the case if they endeavor not diligently to mortify their desires. If they were careful to bestow half of that labor on this, they would profit more in a month than they profit by all the other practices in many years.

For, just as it is necessary to till the earth if it is to bear fruit, and unless it be tilled it bears nothing but weeds, so likewise is mortification of the desires necessary if the soul is to profit. Without this mortification, I make bold to say, the soul no more achieves progress on the road to perfection and to the knowledge of God of itself, however many efforts it might make, than the seed grows when it is cast upon untilled ground. Wherefore the darkness and rudeness of the soul will not be taken from it until the desires be quenched. For these desires are like cataracts, or like motes in the eye, which obstruct the sight until they be taken away.

Ascent Of Mount Carmel, St. John of the Cross, Bk.1, ch.8, §4.

The Blessing of a True, Catholic Liberal Education – Part X

Catholic Candle note: Below is part 10 of our exploration of the best type of education – which is a true Catholic Liberal Education. Do not confuse this education with many university programs called “liberal arts” but which are full of fluff, falsehood, and aimless so-called “cultural enrichment” courses and “humanities”.

A liberal education also does not refer to liberalism, nor is a true liberal education an indoctrination into that error of liberalism or political correctness. In fact, a true Catholic Liberal Education is the best antidote to the errors of liberalism.

As context for this tenth part of this article, let us recall what we saw in the earlier nine parts:

Previously, in part 1 of this article,1 we examined the problems we see in modern education:

  • Modern colleges do not improve the quality of their students’ minds (and their thinking ability) much or at all.


  • Most “education” is merely job training, fluff courses, and/or leftist indoctrination.


  • The students are trained to sound like someone in their field but they do more memorizing and little thinking.


  • Grade “inflation” and degree “inflation” are rampant. Grades and academic degrees do not mean much anymore.

In part 2 of this article,2 we examined, in general, what education is. We considered the human soul and the perfection of its highest faculty (i.e., its highest power) – which is the intellect – and which is immaterial (i.e., incorporeal). We saw that our intellects are perfected through knowing eternal, unchangeable truths and the causes of things.

In part 3 of this article,3 after having seen what true education is, we examined the question who should perfect his intellect.

In part 4 of this article,4 having seen that modern universities do not provide a true education, we consider whether there is ever a good reason for men or women to attend them.

In part 5 of this article,5 having seen that women and girls should pursue a True Catholic Liberal Education – just as men and boys should, too – we then considered what the best environment is in which women and girls should do this.

In part 6 of this article, we addressed the objection that, having seen the great value of a true Catholic Liberal Education, we should be afraid that the great blessing of this education would be a danger to our souls because it might foster in us the vice of pride.6

In part 7 of this article, we considered more fully the difference between the education which is appropriate for a free man as contrasted to the education which is appropriate for a slave.7

In part 8 of this article, we considered further how the truth perfects our minds. This shows us that we must really know the truth, not merely believe true opinions.8

In part 9 of this article, we considered more-specifically what studies (sciences) belong in a Catholic Liberal Education.9

Below, in part 10, we explore the motive and the goal of a true Catholic Liberal Education.


What Are the Motive and the Goal of a True Catholic Liberal Education?

A Catholic Liberal Education Begins in Wonder and Aims at Wisdom

Part 10

In an earlier part of this article10, we saw that the seven liberal arts are important studies by means of which we should begin our study of the highest sciences – which are philosophy and theology.

We saw that the liberal arts are not the only parts of liberal education or even the most important parts, but they are the key beginning of it. They develop our thinking and help make our minds disciplined, vigorous, and animated by wonder, so that we will not only desire, but also have the means to can acquire knowledge and wisdom, especially the highest truths, which are again, those of philosophy and theology.

Here is the motive and goal of the education that all of us should seek, each according to his circumstances:

A true, Catholic Liberal Education
begins in wonder and aims at wisdom
.

Let us “unpack” that statement by first looking at what we mean by wonder and then let us consider what wisdom is.


What is Wonder?

Wonder is the proper human motive for true education. Wonder involves two things simultaneously: ignorance and knowledge (in different respects).  Man finds himself wondering because, at the same time, he both knows something and also doesn’t know everything. 

Let us contrast wonder with mere curiosity.  Wonder implies that a person knows a group of facts (i.e., truths) and, knowing these facts, he seeks an explanation of them – viz., their causes.  Wonder involves a certain delight and joy, a sort of fascination with the way things are. But at the same time, the person has a certain lack of comfort because he is aware of his own lack of knowledge. So he asks why things are the way they are.  Wonder implies that a person has a certain confidence that the world around him is ultimately explainable.  When a person is animated by wonder, he goes through his day, week, or month, seeing additional intellectual connections between various things. He goes through life seeing more aspects of the world around him which are interesting and for which he seeks explanations.

By contrast, a person motivated by curiosity is more interested in questions concerning how.  When a person is motivated by curiosity, he is not so interested in questions concerning why – and is not so motivated to seek to know why something is true and what its causes are.  Rather, curiosity leads a person to focus on seeking to do something and desiring to see if his idea will “work” to achieve a useful practical result or even merely a sensational spectacle. A curious man ultimately seeks power.11  He is more concerned to see how certain generalizations work or how they apply to varying circumstances.  In contrast to a person who wonders, a person motivated by curiosity assumes the validity of a principle, in order to see how effectively this principle can be harnessed to exploit a given situation in order to achieve a particular useful result.

This is not to say that the methods of verification in experimental science may not very well be an instrument of wonder of a high order, but when those instruments are employed not in order to understand the truths of Nature, but in order to find what works, then curiosity and not wonder is the immediate motive.

So the man who wonders at the lightning he sees in the sky is considering questions such as what causes lightning and what is the nature of lightning.  But the man who sees the lightning and seeks to protect his house from being struck by lightning is curious rather than wondering.  He asks himself things such as, if he places a metal pole on his roof, will that protect his house?

The proper satisfaction of a man who wonders is knowledge of the causes of things around us, e.g., what is lightning and what causes it.  By contrast, the proper satisfaction of a curious man is seeing that his idea works successfully, e.g., the

lightning rod protected his house from a lightning strike. 12

Curiosity and the practical improvements engendered by it are generally not evil13 and are sometimes even necessary. But they are much lower than the possession of universal, eternal truth. Such curiosity is lower than wonder in a way similar to food for the body being lower than food for the mind. This is because wonder leads to the perfection of our intellect; curiosity leads to perfection of the practical circumstances of our life. The perfection of our intellect is much greater and nobler!

So a man who sees and wonders is spurred on to learn the causes of the things around him because they are interesting and the world around him is explainable by reason. Those causes are worthy of investigation for the sake of the truth because Nature is worthy of investigation (and even more worthy is the First Cause of Nature, Who is God).  By contrast, curiosity spurs a man to solve a problem which improves the practical aspects of his life or otherwise helps him, e.g., have a safer home.

Thus, a liberal education begins in wonder, not in curiosity. By contrast (for example), building a better mousetrap begins in curiosity, not in wonder.

So a Catholic Liberal Education begins with wonder and involves the seeking of the truth which is the knowledge of the causes of things. This true education aims at wisdom (as we stated above).

But what is wisdom? Let us next consider that question.


First, Let Us Remember that Wisdom is a Priceless Treasure!

First, let us reflect that wisdom is one of the most important blessings from God. “All wisdom is from the Lord God”.14

Wisdom is incomparably better than fame, prestige, power, riches, pleasures, or comfort. As the Book of Wisdom declares:

I preferred her [viz., wisdom] before kingdoms and thrones, and esteemed riches nothing in comparison of her. Neither did I compare unto her any precious stone: for all gold in comparison of her, is as a little sand, and silver in respect to her shall be counted as clay.15

In fact:

Wisdom is better than all the most precious things: and whatsoever may be desired cannot be compared to it.16

And:

She [i.e., wisdom] is an infinite treasure to men! 17

Therefore, we should pursue wisdom above all of these things. As the wise man teaches us in the Book of Proverbs:

Get wisdom, because it is better than gold.18


What is Wisdom?

St. Thomas Aquinas explains to us (following Aristotle’s teaching) that:

Wisdom is a knowledge of causes.19

This definition fits perfectly with what we saw above about wonder. That is, seeking the true knowledge which is offered in a Catholic Liberal Education begins in wonder. As we saw above, true wonder (as contrasted to mere curiosity) motivates us to seek to understand the things that are, and to know their causes.


The Wisdom We Discuss Here (and Which We Seek) is Wisdom Simply Speaking, not Wisdom in a Restricted Sense

In this present article, we are considering the nature of wisdom simply, that is, unqualifiedly. Let us contrast this unqualified wisdom to what we could call “wisdom” as that word is used in a narrow or restricted sense.

In a qualified sense – i.e., in some way – we could call something “wisdom” which is the knowledge of causes pertaining to a narrow field or pursuit, such as carpentry (or one of the other manual arts). A man could be called a “wise carpenter” because he has the knowledge of the causes of his art. For example, a “wise carpenter” might reject the use of a particular beam (i.e., plank) which is full of knots because he knows that such a beam would not possess the strength it should have because those knots weaken it.

Such a carpenter is not wise absolutely speaking (unqualifiedly) but is wise in a certain, limited respect (viz., regarding his particular field), because he knows the causes which affect his own special art.

But in this present article, we are considering the wisdom by which we would call a man “wise” without qualification, as opposed to calling him “wise” only in a certain specialized respect (as we would say a “wise carpenter”). In other words, in this article we are examining what wisdom is absolutely, because of which we would call a man “wise” without adding any qualification such as “carpenter”.

This distinction is similar to the difference between a man being called “good” without qualification (because he possesses great virtue) as contrasted to a person being called “good” qualifiedly, such as being a “good plumber” or a “good assassin”. Being a “good assassin” refers to the person possessing a high degree of the assassin’s skill for killing people. We do not call this assassin “good” without qualification (but we could call him “good” in this certain respect).

Likewise, calling a man “wise” with respect to carpentry is not the same as calling him “wise” without qualification. So in this article, we examine the nature of wisdom as it gives a general excellence to a person and because of which he would be called “wise” as a person (and not in a qualified sense such as wise as a carpenter).


There Are Two Kinds of Wisdom Simply Speaking

There are two kinds of wisdom simply speaking. They are speculative20 wisdom and practical wisdom. Both of them are the knowledge of causes, but in different ways. They reflect the two kinds of causes that every person should know. Each of these kinds of wisdom causes a person to be called “wise” without qualification:

  • Because of speculative wisdom, a person is called wise as the knower of the deep causes of things, especially the First Cause of all things; and


  • Because of practical wisdom, a person is called wise as a doer, acting well in light of his final end.

Both kinds of wise men we call “wise” simply speaking, without limiting this adjective by a qualifying word such as “carpenter”.

Let us briefly look at each of these types of wisdom.


What Is Speculative Wisdom?

Speculative wisdom is wisdom in those matters which concern the highest truths21 which are most worth knowing and which most-greatly perfect our intellects.

But in addition to knowing high truths, we must also know the causes of those high truths; (of course, God is uncaused but is the ultimate Cause of everything else). It is important that, in knowing the highest truths, we also know their causes because we do not know something fully if we do not know its causes.

But there is a difference in causes. Some are lower-level, proximate causes which are themselves caused by higher causes. For example, a dog is one of the causes of its own puppies but God is the higher cause of not only those puppies, but also the parent dogs, as well as all other dogs and creatures.

The most complete and most satisfying knowledge of a thing is to know it with all of its causes, even up to (and especially) the Highest Cause, which is the First and Highest Cause of all creatures. This is God.

St. Paul infallibly teaches us that we can know God by natural reason, as the First Cause of all other things. In other words, looking at creatures, we can see God’s work in them and that God is their cause. Here are St. Paul’s words:

[T]he invisible things of Him [viz., God], from the creatures of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; His eternal power also, and Divinity.22

St. Thomas refers to speculative wisdom when he explains (following Aristotle’s teaching) that “it belongs to wisdom to consider the Highest Cause.”23

This knowledge of things with their highest causes is the deepest and fullest way to know things and is speculative wisdom.

The science which treats of the first causes (including naturally knowable truths about God Himself, such as His existence and some of His perfections) in the light of the natural capacity of human reason is called metaphysics – which is a type of speculative wisdom – as this wisdom is attainable by the power of human reason. The science which studies God in the higher light of what He has revealed about Himself is also called speculative wisdom, but it is wisdom as attainable by the greater light of the Catholic Faith. Thus, Catholic theology is the highest wisdom and is the principal satisfaction of wonder on this side of the grave.


What Is Practical Wisdom?

The other kind of wisdom is called practical wisdom and is also called prudence. It is one of the four Cardinal Virtues. It is also a Gift of the Holy Ghost, as well as an infused moral virtue (infused into the souls of those who are in the state of Sanctifying Grace).

Practical wisdom is concerned with right reason as it applies to our active life. This wisdom regulates the passions and appetites which move us. Practical wisdom does this by ordering all of our actions (and our life) to our Final End. This Final End is also called the Final Cause of our actions because our end (that is, the goal) is the ultimate cause (reason) why we do what we do.

For example, suppose that a man has an urgent need to travel to an adjoining city immediately. He might go into his bedroom, for the sake of getting his car keys. His obtaining his keys is for the sake of driving his car, which is for the sake of going to the gas station, which is for the sake of filling his empty gas tank, which is for the sake of being able to drive to that adjoining city without running out of gas, all for the sake of making the urgent journey. The Final Cause (the ultimate reason) for each of those activities was in order to arrive in the adjoining city. In other words, finally, the cause of all of those activities was the arriving there. By contrast, if the man stopped to read a novel, the Final Cause of that pastime would not be the urgent trip to the adjoining city.

Likewise, any part of our life which does not promote our Final Cause, is vain. Anything we do which will not help us to achieve the goal for which we have been created (and for which are on earth) is ultimately foolishness that we will regret. That is why one way in which practical wisdom can be summed up is as follows:

It is Practical Wisdom (Prudence) to live every minute of our lives in the way that, at our Judgment, we will want to have lived.

Here is how St. Ignatius of Loyola teaches this practical wisdom:

Man is created to praise, reverence, and serve God Our Lord, and by this means to save his soul. All other things on the face of the earth are created for man to help him fulfill the end for which he is created. From this it follows that man is to use these things to the extent that they will help him to attain his end. Likewise, he must rid himself of them insofar as they prevent him from attaining it.

Therefore, we must make ourselves indifferent to all created things, insofar as it is left to the choice of our free will and is not forbidden. Acting accordingly, for our part, we should not prefer health to sickness, riches to poverty, honor to dishonor, a long life to a short one, and so in all things we should desire and choose only those things which will best help us attain the end for which we are created.24

St. Paul urged his flock to live according to practical wisdom when he taught them that they should:

Walk with wisdom towards them that are without.25

St. Paul is teaching us that (practical) wisdom should guide our actions, i.e., our “walk”.

Following St. Augustine, Doctor of the Church, St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that prudence, i.e., practical wisdom, “judges of human acts by Divine things, and directs human acts according to Divine rules.”26

We see that practical wisdom should cause us to order our lives fearing the Lord so that we can live a life obeying Him and living in His friendship. Here is one way in which the Book of Proverbs teaches this truth:

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.27

As we saw in an earlier part of our current investigation of The Blessings of a True Catholic Liberal Education,28 we should study the truths of Ethics and Politics to attain this practical wisdom.


Both Types of Wisdom Have the Same Ultimate Object: God

We see, by looking at both speculative wisdom and practical wisdom, that God is the beginning and end. That is, both kinds of wisdom ultimately are knowledge of God but in different aspects.

Speculative wisdom starts with all of the various truths around us and traces them back to their First Cause, Who is God. By contrast, through Ethics and Politics, practical wisdom considers our Final End (Who is God) as the reason and guiding principle for all of our actions and makes sure that all of our actions are for the sake of Him, Who is our Last End and our Final Cause (to use the proper philosophical term).

Thus, we see more fully the literal truth of what Our Lord says in the Apocalypse:

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.29

Our Lord is the Beginning and First Cause of all that exists; He is the End and Highest Principle to which all of our actions and our lives should conform.

So in all of the studies of a true education, God is the ultimate subject of study – as the First Beginning (the First Cause) of the speculative sciences, and as the Last End of the practical sciences of Ethics and true Political Science.


This Lifetime Pursuit of Wisdom Is The Life of a Free Man

Now through the efforts of a lifetime of study, a man can more fully acquire deeper and broader wisdom. But such precious wisdom nonetheless is indeed the work of a lifetime.

However, this man’s whole “journey” – even the earlier part – should be characterized by the pursuit of this great good, and this work of his entire life is rightly called philosophy – which means the love of wisdom. For every study such a man undertakes is for the sake of wisdom.

And insofar as he lives for wisdom, his whole life is devoted to that which in itself makes life worth living. Thus, he is not a slave but a free man. Accordingly, only the kind of education which introduces a man to the philosophical life is properly named liberal.


Conclusions of this Present Part of the Article (viz., Part 10)

A true, Catholic Liberal Education begins in wonder and aims at wisdom. God made us to wonder at the world around us and to perfect our minds seeking the causes of things. This is speculative wisdom. He instilled this healthy sense of wonder in us precisely so that we would seek Him, the Cause of causes.

Practical wisdom is acting according to our final end (i.e., goal), which is the Final Cause of all of our actions (i.e., the ultimate reason why we act).

Both types of wisdom ultimately lead back to God, the First Cause and Last End (that is, the Final Cause).


Looking Ahead

We seek wisdom through perfecting our highest faculty – viz., our intellect – with the highest truths. But there are many authors of many books written on the subjects which are studied in a Catholic Liberal Education. Which ones are best to use in these studies?


To Be Continued …

6 Part 6 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/3129/

11 In this article, we are treating “scientific curiosity” which motivates inventing useful machines, experimenting to achieve quicker results or more efficient, successful processes and methods, etc. These investigations are generally not evil in themselves but are a lower, practical goal, as compared to the truth about the causes of things.

But the word “curiosity” is also used to mean something sinful and lower than the “scientific curiosity” discussed here. This lower curiosity is the useless and idle desire to know about people or things that do not concern one’s self. This is also called “nosiness” and refers to things such as the desire to know one’s neighbor’s private affairs, or seeking to discover the gossipy details of the private lives of celebrities. Such idle curiosity, which is a sin, is not the type of curiosity which is contrasted with wonder in this article.

12 Of course, there is nothing to prevent a man from having both wonder and curiosity about the same subject. So, by wonder, a man could want to know the causes of lightning; and by curiosity, also want to harvest its power, protect himself from it, etc. Or, curiosity could eventually cause wonder, or we suppose, wonder could degrade into mere curiosity.

13 However, some developments caused by curiosity can be evil, such as many aspects of bio-engineering, stem-cell research, vaccines developed using the bodies of murdered babies, etc.

14 Ecclesiasticus, 1:1.

15 Book of Wisdom, 7:8-9.

16 Book of Proverbs, 8:11.

17 Book of Proverbs, 7:14.

18 Book of Proverbs, 16:16.

19 St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Bk 1, Ch 2.

20 The word “speculative” comes from the Latin word, “speculari”, meaning “to observe”. The word “speculative” here refers to matters which are studied and learned because of their intrinsic value and without seeking practical application leading to action.

This is the original meaning of the word and is very different from the modern usage of the word “speculative” which means “doubtful or based on conjecture”.

21 Here is one way that St. Thomas Aquinas, Greatest Doctor of the Church, explains this point:

Man’s good [unqualifiedly] consists in the knowledge of truth; yet man’s sovereign [i.e., chief] good consists, not in the knowledge of any truth whatever, but in the perfect knowledge of the sovereign truth [i.e., God], as the Philosopher [Aristotle] states (Ethic. x, 7, 8).

Summa, IIa IIae Q. 167. A1, ad 1 (bracketed words added for clarity).

22 Romans, 1:19-20 (bracketed content added to show context).

23 Summa, IIa IIae, Q.45, a.1, Respondeo.

24 Principle and Foundation of the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius.

25 Colossians, 4:5.

26 Summa, IIa IIae, Q.45 a.3, respondeo.

27 Book of Proverbs, 9:10.

28 For a fuller explanation of the importance of studying true Ethics and Politics, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/10/the-blessing-of-a-true-catholic-liberal-education-part-ix/

29 Apocalypse, 1:8 (emphasis added).

Lesson #60 About the Temperaments – Part XXV – The Devil Attempts to Destroy Our Prayer-Life.

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is Part XXIV of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty-three parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our study of the choleric temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

  1. Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/

  1. Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/

  2. Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/

  3. Part XXI: Explaining the effects of fear in all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/04/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxi-explaining-the-effects-of-fear-in-all-temperaments/

  4. Part XXII: Explaining how to order our loves so we can use the passion of fear properly, and how the devil attempts to prevent this ordering: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/05/28/about-the-temperaments-part-xxii-how-to-order-our-loves-so-we-can-use-the-passion-of-fear-properly/

  5. Part XXIII: Explanation of sloth in order to analyze this snare of Satan and to combat him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/


  6. Part XXIV: Explaining more about how the devil tries to draw us away from reasoning and from the things of God: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/07/29/about-the-temperaments-part-xiv-how-the-devil-draws-us-away-from-reasoning-and-the-things-of-god/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #60 About the Temperaments – Part XXV –
The Devil Attempts to Destroy Our Prayer-Life.
How Should We Counterattack?

The Importance of Fostering a Strong Prayer Life

On many occasions, Our Lord emphasizes of the importance of prayer. He tells us to (1) persevere in prayer;1 (2) be humble in prayer;2 and to (3) trust in God saying, “And all things whatsoever you shall ask in prayer, believing, you shall receive.”3

He assures us that His heavenly Father cares about us. He taught His Apostles The Lord’s Prayer, viz. The Our Father, which includes all of these aspects. In fact, The Lord’s Prayer is the perfect prayer4 and is meant to be said with humble submission to God’s will and a desire to receive our intellectual and spiritual daily bread.

Furthermore, Our Lord instructed His Apostles (and us) to pray always. Our Lord said, “Watch ye, therefore, praying at all times, that you may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that are to come, and to stand before the Son of man” 5, and “Pray, lest you enter into temptation”.6

Since prayer is the lifting of the heart and mind to God,7 we fulfill this precept of Our Lord when we live in the presence of God and keep Him in our minds as we try to please Him in all of our thoughts and actions.


The Four Temperaments and How They Typically Affect the Soul’s Spiritual Life

As we saw in our last lesson,8 it is important to know ourselves so we can better use our inclinations to make spiritual progress and to avoid spiritual harm. This is one of the many reasons why it is crucial to discover our own particular temperament. But a person might say, “I do not know what temperament I have.” It is a major goal of this present study of the four temperaments that we will all gain a deeper understanding of the temperaments and discover our own temperament (if we have not already identified it). However, for the present, we list below some general characteristics and spiritual tendencies of persons with a predominance of one of the four temperaments:

A Choleric Tends to:

  • Be extremely high strung;

  • Be very excitable and prone to become agitated;

  • Have lots of nervous energy;

  • Allow his thoughts to race “a mile per minute” and thus he has a tendency to be superficial in his thinking. He needs to force himself to slow down and to deliberate carefully, especially to consider what is most pleasing to God. He has to force himself to relax and be calm; and

  • Be undaunted by anything and tends to be overconfident; this makes it difficult for him to cultivate a deep trust in God and also a healthy mistrust of himself.

A Sanguine Tends to:

  • Predominantly use his imagination;

  • Love beauty, especially in art and religious pictures;

  • Be easily distracted and must strive to stay focused; and

  • Be a shallower thinker and must make efforts to form the habit of probing deeper into a subject.

A Melancholic Tends to:

  • Use lots of considerations to analyze truths and to draw many conclusions;

  • Be a deeper thinker and be attracted to prayer;

  • Be prone to scruples; and

  • Be prone to worry and to a lack trust in God’s Providence; he has to make efforts to look for hope in difficulties.

A Phlegmatic Tends to:

  • Lack energy;

  • Have a hard time motivating himself, as well as feeling and showing enthusiasm;

  • Be a slow and methodical thinker; and

  • Have a difficult time observing the movements of his soul because impressions need to be repeated many times before they leave a mark.

We can see from this short list of the spiritual tendencies of each temperament that some temperaments are more prone to reflection and prayer, while others are more prone to spiritual laziness. But we must remember that no temperament is immune from the traps of the devil! WE MUST NOT FORGET that the devil’s pull to sloth can affect ALL souls although some souls fall into this trap more easily than others do. No one should disdain those souls who fall more easily into this snare. Instead, we should foster pity if we find that prayer is easier for us than for some souls who find it almost impossible to focus and pray!

We must all be on our guard. In this lesson we will look at the Life of St. Teresa of Avila and find some striking snares that Satan used on her. We will see Satan’s subtle temptations to lure her soul away from prayer. We will see how well she endured these temptations and see the ones for which she fell.

By looking at her experience we will be able to see how it is paramount for us to study ourselves and to be on high alert for anything that is detrimental to our prayer life.

Four Aspects Regarding the Spiritual Life of St. Teresa of Avila

In our present consideration of prayer and the devil’s tricks, we will consider four aspects of the life of St. Teresa of Avila:

  1. Her need to read a book in order to try to pray;

  2. Her need to see a picture in order to pray;

  3. Her description of her sloth; and

  4. Her temptation to give up mental prayer in her meditations because she was not humble and sinless enough to pray.

With the help of William Thomas Walsh, one of her biographers, and using the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits of St. Ignatius of Loyola,9 we will be able to make the necessary connections between these four aspects in St. Teresa’s prayer life. Indeed, we will see how Satan was pulling her soul one way into one form of pride and then in another direction to drag her into a different form of pride.

Mr. Walsh explains how St. Teresa was vain, was caught up in worldly friendships, and was not willing to abandon herself completely to God.10 Furthermore, although she was careful to not commit any mortal sins, she was not cautious about venial sin and did not give up occasions of sin. We will see how these things led to her downfall.

Since St. Teresa was trying to avoid mortal sin, Satan tempted her with false reasoning in a different way. As St. Ignatius explains in his Rules for the Discernment of Spirits, this is a typical tactic of the devil.11 The devil certainly did not want her to succeed in having a prayer life, so he deceived her to be disappointed that she needed to use a book to occupy her mind and needed to use a picture to touch her heart in order to move herself to make acts of love for God. Her disappointment in herself and her discouragement about her problems praying were temptations to pride.


Regarding the Need to Use a Book

She thought it was impossible for her to practice mental prayer without a book, and so she says,

Reading is of great service towards procuring recollection in anyone who proceeds in this way [viz., the way of prayer]; and it is even necessary for him, however little it may be that he reads, if only as a substitute for the mental prayer which is beyond his reach.12

And again,

My soul was as much afraid to pray without one [viz., a book], as if it had to fight against a host [i.e., an army]. With a book to help me — it was like a companion, and a shield whereon to receive the blows of many thoughts – I found comfort; for it was not usual with me to be in aridity: but I always was so when I had no book; for my soul was disturbed, and my thoughts wandered at once. With one, [viz., a book] I began to collect my thoughts, and, using it as a decoy, kept my soul in peace, very frequently by merely opening a book – there was no necessity for more. Sometimes, I read but little; at other times, much – according as our Lord had pity on me.13

Regarding Her Need to See a Picture

She expresses her disappointment in her poor imagination as follows:

God never endowed me with the gift of making reflections with the understanding, or with that of using the imagination to any good purpose; my imagination is so sluggish, that even if I would think of our Lord’s Humanity, or picture It to myself, as I used to labor to picture It, I never could do it.14

My understanding was so dull, that I could never represent in the imagination either heavenly or high things in any form whatever until our Lord placed them before me in another way.15

And again,

I was so little able to put things before myself by the help of my understanding, that, unless I saw a thing with my eyes, my imagination was of no use whatever. I could not do as others do, who can put matters before themselves so as to become recollected thereby. I was able to think of Christ only as man. But so it was; and I never could form any image of Him to myself, though I read much of His beauty, and looked at pictures of Him. I was like one who is blind, or in the dark, who, though speaking to a person present, and feeling his presence, because he knows for certain that he is present – I mean, that he understands him to be present, and believes it – yet does not see him. It was thus with me when I used to think of our Lord. This is why I was so fond of images.16

During this period of her life, Satan deluded her to such an extent that she really thought that some people just could not engage in mental prayer. She thought that such people simply did not have the ability although they otherwise had normal abilities and use of their minds. She explained in her autobiography that she thought that she and some other people simply could not engage in mental prayer.

The problem was really with her will as she saw later on. We will treat mental prayer later in this lesson.

Regarding Her Dread of Prayer – Her Sloth

Satan deluded her, moving her to a great dread and fear of prayer. These quickly led her to sloth – i.e., a distaste for the things of God and the loss of charity in the soul.

St. Ignatius of Loyola teaches us that Satan studies the soul in order to detect its weaknesses and then he attacks at those weak spots.17 This includes Satan pushing someone further in a bad direction in which he is already leaning. St. Teresa wrote,

I failed in my duty to God, because I was not leaning on the strong pillar of prayer. I passed nearly twenty years on this stormy sea, falling and rising, but rising to no good purpose, seeing that I went and fell again. My life was one of perfection;18 but it was so mean, that I scarcely made any account whatever of venial sins; and though of mortal sins I was afraid, I was not so afraid of them as I ought to have been, because I did not avoid the perilous occasions of them. I may say that it was the most painful life that can be imagined, because I had no sweetness in God, and no pleasure in the world.19

And again,

When I was in the midst of the pleasures of the world, the remembrance of what I owed to God made me sad; and when I was praying to God, my worldly affections disturbed me. This is so painful a struggle, that I know not how I could have borne it for a month, let alone for so many years.20

Later, speaking from the perspective of her better understanding of these matters after her conversion, she says,

I do not understand what there can be to make them afraid, who are afraid, to begin mental prayer, nor do I know what it is they dread. The devil does well to bring this fear upon us, that he may really hurt us. By putting me in fear, he can make me cease from thinking of my offences against God, of the great debt I owe Him, of the existence of heaven and hell, and of the great sorrows and trials He underwent for me …. I was more occupied with the wish to see the end of the time I had appointed for myself to spend in prayer, and in watching the hour-glass, than with other thoughts that were good. If a sharp penance had been laid upon me, I know of none that I would not very often have willingly undertaken, rather than prepare myself for prayer by self-recollection. And certainly the violence with which Satan assailed me was so irresistible, or my evil habits were so strong, that I did not betake myself to prayer; and the sadness I felt on entering the oratory was so great, that it required all the courage I had to force myself in.21

We can see by these quotes how the Father of lies attacks souls with great violence so he can dissuade them from practicing mental prayer. In these passages one must keep in mind that St. Teresa of Avila was primarily afflicted in her soul because she was not willing to give up worldly friendships. These are the occasions of sin to which she refers.

There were two occasions in which the Lord brought her to tears of compunction as she was beginning to convert and to change her life. Unfortunately, she viewed those tears as womanly weakness and tried to disregard them. She was choleric-sanguine in temperament and did not appreciate those precious tears as she ought to have done. In a future lesson we will come back to the dangers choleric women face when dealing with their feminine nature.

Regarding Her Temptation to Give Up Mental Prayer Because She Was Not Humble and Sinless Enough

The next form of pride Satan tempted her with was to have her believe that she would overcome her sinful tendencies without Divine aid.

She tells us,

I do not think I ever escaped so great a danger as this device of Satan, which he would have imposed upon me in the disguise of humility. He filled me with such thoughts as these: How could I make my prayer, who was so wicked, and yet had received so many mercies? It was enough for me to recite the [Divine] Office, as all others did; but as I did not do that much well, how could I desire to do more? I was not reverential enough, and made too little of the mercies of God. There was no harm in these thoughts and feelings in themselves; but to act upon them, that was an exceedingly great wickedness. Blessed be Thou, O Lord; for Thou camest to my help. This seems to me to be in principle the temptation of Judas, only that Satan did not dare to tempt me so openly. But he might have led me, little by little, as he led Judas to the same pit of destruction.22

A little later in her recounting of this horrific temptation, St. Teresa adds:

I do not think I ever gave up my purpose of resuming my prayer; but I was waiting to be very free from sin first.

Oh, how deluded I was in this expectation! The devil would have held it out before me till the Day of Judgment, that he might then take me with him to hell. Then, when I applied myself to prayer and to spiritual reading, – whereby I might perceive these truths, and the evil nature of the way I was walking, and was often importunate with our Lord in tears, – I was so wicked, that it availed me nothing; when I gave that up, and wasted my time in amusing myself, in great danger of falling into sin, and with scanty helps, – and I may venture to say no help at all, unless it was a help to my ruin, –what could I expect but that of which I have spoken?

I believe that a certain Dominican friar, a most learned man, has greatly merited in the eyes of God; for it was he who roused me from this slumber. He made me – I think I said so before – go to Communion once a fortnight, and be less given to evil; I began to be converted, though I did not cease to offend our Lord all at once; however, as I had not lost my way, I walked on in it, though slowly, falling and rising again; and he who does not cease to walk and press onwards, arrives at last, even if late. To lose one’s way is – so it seems to me – nothing else but the giving up of prayer. God, of His mercy, keeps us from this!23

We can see how insidiously clever Satan is when we consider St. Teresa’s temptations. We see how the devil had earlier lured St. Teresa into the worldly vanities into which she fell. Then because her conscience was pricking her, the devil “took her in the opposite direction” by preying upon her sensitive conscience and trying to drive her into scruples (which is another form of pride). The devil’s motive was to do anything he could to have her give up prayer because that would surely be her downfall.

The devil’s attacks on St. Teresa are interesting and instructive for us concerning the devil’s use of this same tactic especially targeting Catholics – because the damnation of a Catholic is a much greater victory for Satan (as compared to the damnation of a person outside of the Church) and such damnation mocks God’s greater goodness toward Catholics.

An Important Note about Mental Prayer. What is Mental Prayer?

Mental prayer, like all prayer, is lifting the heart and mind to God.24 This speaking to God is making an act of our will. It can be telling Him that we love Him. Our words to God do not have to be elaborate. We simply can tell Him what we are thinking. It is not that He doesn’t already know this, but He wants us to desire to tell Him. He wants us to cooperate with Him in the work of our salvation.

Thus, mental prayer is dependent upon our actions. It is important to keep in mind that St. Teresa really had the human ability to collect her thoughts and say something to God. She explains how she was fooled by the fear (with which Satan deluded her) of trying to gather her thoughts and simply to open her heart to speak to God. She was simply resisting God’s call to give Him her whole heart. Once she was willing to abandon her heart to God, her friendship with Him grew to a beautiful mystical marriage.25

St. Teresa herself has this to say as a lesson we should learn from her experience:

One must humbly ask himself to consider (1) what the world is; (2) what he owes to God; (3) the great sufferings of God for him; (4) his own scanty service in return; and (5) the reward God reserves for those who love Him.

If one considers these things then, he learns how to defend himself against his own thoughts and against the occasions and perils of sin.26

We should be grateful to God for allowing us to have knowledge of the wonderful lives of the saints in order to learn how they cooperated with God in their salvation. God is marvelous in His Providence and His sculpting of souls. What a great inspiration for us all!

A Preview…

We want to learn, as did St. Teresa of Avila and the other saints, the fruits of avoiding worldliness. In our next lesson we will look further into how we can know ourselves better in order to help us to avoid worldliness, so that we can foster and preserve a solid prayer life and to grow in friendship with God.

1 For help and encouragement to persevering in prayer, read this short article: https://catholiccandle.org/2020/05/01/be-assured-your-prayers-are-always-answered-so-persevere/

2 “The prayer of him that humbleth himself, shall pierce the clouds”. Ecclesiasticus, 35:21.

3 St. Matthew’s Gospel, 21:22.

4

For a greater appreciation of The Our Father and for help learning to pray it more perfectly, read this short article: https://catholiccandle.org/2022/09/22/if-you-want-to-say-the-most-effective-prayer-say-the-our-father/

5 St. Luke’s Gospel, 21:36.

6 St. Luke’s Gospel, 22:40.

7 To better understand the essence of prayer, read this short article: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/10/cc-in-brief-essence-of-prayer/

10 For example, see, St. Teresa of Avila, by William Thomas Walsh, Bruce Publishing Co., Milwaukee, ©1943, pages 75, 84-85.

11 St. Ignatius explains:

In the persons who are going on intensely cleansing themselves from their sins and rising from good to better in the service of God our Lord, each spirit uses a method contrary to the one he used in the first Rule, for then it is the way of the evil spirit to bite, sadden and put obstacles, disquieting with false reasons, that one may not go on; and it is proper to the good [spirit] to give courage and strength, consolations, tears, inspirations and quiet, easing, and putting away all obstacles, that one may go on in well doing.

Rule #2 of the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits Week One of the Spiritual Exercises.

12 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶12.

13 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶13.

14 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶10.

15 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 9, ¶6.

16 Taken from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 9, ¶7.

17 St. Ignatius explains:

The enemy’s behavior is like that of a military leader who wishes to conquer and plunder the object of his desires. Just as the commander of an army pitches his camp, studies the strengths and defenses of a fortress, and then attacks it on its weakest side, in like manner, the enemy of our human nature studies from all sides our theological, cardinal, and moral virtues. Wherever he finds us weakest and most in need regarding our eternal salvation, he attacks and tries to take us by storm.

Rule #14, of the Rules for the Discernment of Spirits Week One of the Spiritual Exercises.

18 St. Teresa is not saying here that she was perfect. When she says “my life was one of perfection” she refers to the fact that she was bound by the vows in the religious life. This life is called the “life of perfection” because this life has perfection as its goal and because this life is ordered more directly to lead a person to becoming perfect, as compared to the life of a layman. Here is how St. Thomas explains this distinction:

One is said to be in the state of perfection, not through having the act of perfect love, but through binding himself in perpetuity and with a certain solemnity to those things that pertain to perfection. Moreover, it happens that some persons bind themselves to that which they do not keep [viz., unfaithful religious], and some fulfil that to which they have not bound themselves [viz., spiritual laymen], as in the case of the two sons (Matthew 21:28-30), one of whom when his father said: “Work in my vineyard,” answered: “I will not,” and “afterwards . . . he went,” while the other “answering said: I go . . . and he went not.” Wherefore nothing hinders some from being perfect without being in the state of perfection, and some in the state of perfection without being perfect.

Summa, IIa IIae, Q.184, a.4, Respondeo (bracketed words added for clarity).

19 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 8, ¶1 [bold and italic added for emphasis].

20 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 8, ¶2.

21 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 8, ¶10.

22 Quoted from the Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 19, ¶16, [emphasis added; bracketed word added for clarity].

23 Quoted from The Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 19, the end of ¶17, & ¶¶ 18-19 [bold and italic added for emphasis].

24 For a further explanation of mental prayer including meditation, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2021/09/03/lesson-2-meditation-how-why/

25 Concerning this mystical marriage of the soul with Christ, to which all souls in the state of grace are called, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2019/06/20/our-souls-should-be-docile-brides-of-christ/

26 Quoted from The Autobiography of St. Teresa of Avila, Ch. 4, ¶11.

Words to Live By – From Catholic Tradition

God Sends to Us Life’s Blows and Disappointments for Our Own Good

St. Anthony of Padua, Doctor of the Church, invokes the teaching of Pope St. Gregory the Great, Doctor of the Church, about the Crosses that God sends for our own good:

Constant temporal success is a sure sign of
eternal damnation.

St. Anthony of Padua, Sermon for the 6th Sunday after Pentecost, quoting Pope St. Gregory the Great, from his work entitled de Moralis, XXVI, 18:35.

About the Temperaments Part XIV – How the Devil Draws Us Away From Reasoning and the Things of God

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is Part XXIV of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty-three parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

  1. Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/

  1. Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/

  2. Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/

  3. Part XXI: Explaining the Effects of Fear in All Temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/04/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxi-explaining-the-effects-of-fear-in-all-temperaments/

  4. Part XXII: Explaining How to Order Our Loves So We Can Use the Passion of Fear Properly, and How the Devil Attempts to Prevent this Ordering: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/05/28/about-the-temperaments-part-xxii-how-to-order-our-loves-so-we-can-use-the-passion-of-fear-properly/

  5. Part XXIII: Explanation of Sloth in Order to Analyze This Snare of Satan and to Combat Him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #59: About the Temperaments – Part XXIV – Explaining More about How the Devil Tries to Draw Us Away From Reasoning and From the Things of God

Let us begin our investigation about the allurements the devil uses to drag us away from the use of our reason, as well as the great benefit and the enjoyment that come from thinking deeply. Undertaking this study is crucial if we want to form strategies to fight our arch-enemy.

In a recent lesson we considered the beautiful reality of filial love1 (i.e., the love of a son or daughter) and the satisfaction we get when using our reason and especially thinking deeply. Let us look at some initial considerations regarding filial love and careful thinking.

Some Important Considerations about Filial Love

  • Filial love brings satisfaction to the soul;

  • Filial love draws us close to the heart of God and to a deep, meaningful friendship with Him;

  • Filial love helps us to discipline ourselves and to bring order to our souls;

  • Filial love increases the soul’s hunger for God and our desire to have companionship with Him; and

  • Filial love makes our soul more disposed to understand the truths of God.

Mindful of these considerations, we are able to see how important it is to foster this kind of love in our souls.

Some Important Considerations about Using One’s Reason and Thinking Deeply

  • Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) strengthens man’s highest faculty, namely, the intellect;

  • Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) fosters a love of this faculty;

  • Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) helps one to increasingly appreciate God and all truth;

  • Reasoning (i.e., thinking deeply) ignites a burning hunger to know more truth.

Because of these great benefits, Satan makes every effort to distract people from using their intellects.

Sin Depends Upon the Abuse of Reason

Sin occurs when man does not use his reason for the purpose that God intended and when he puts reason’s admonitions aside (viz., his conscience) and consents to evil. Of course, the devil wants people to commit sins. Satan’s goal is the downfall of souls. He seeks sin because he knows that every sin is a step closer to his goal of bringing another soul to damn itself.

Satan strives to weaken man’s power of reasoning and to induce him to abandon the proper use of his reason. The old proverb is true, “If you don’t use it, you lose it.” Hence, when a man begins to reason less, he will soon form the habit of not reasoning well. Then, he will become progressively inclined to not think of the consequences of his actions, which, in turn, leads him to live more and more by his emotions. He will weigh things only based on how he feels, or worse yet, upon the yearnings of his base passions. . Hence, his life will become very unstable, unreasonable, and disorderly. In this way, he will increasingly lead a life of vice (as we will explain next).

Habits Can Be Stronger than Natural Tendencies

We have discussed how, with our fallen human nature, effort is needed to reason well. We weak humans are disinclined to make efforts. But we can develop good habits that can completely overcome those weaknesses and ill-directed tendencies. But for this to occur, we must work against these tendencies and force ourselves to make the effort to think and especially to think carefully.

Habits are formed by repeated actions. Repeated bad actions form a bad habit, i.e., a vice. By contrast, repeated good actions form a good habit, i.e., a virtue. Consequently, it is crucial that we resolutely make every effort to develop patterns of good actions regardless of the “protests” of our passions and without “counting the cost” to our comfort, convenience, and human respect. In this way, we can foster good habits and a life of virtue.

The devil knows these truths about us humans and so he tempts us to give up trying to form good habits. The devil knows that God created an entire spectrum of souls – each soul having its own personal tendencies and inclinations. Thus, what we treat here is the devil’s general plan of action to ruin souls. But he customizes his plan to fit each individual, tailoring his temptations and tantalizing each with a “particular individualized mix” of allurements and fears through which he strives for that individual’s ruin.

Three Things the Devil Does Not Want Us to Know: 1) God;
2) Ourselves; and 3) the Purpose for Which We Were Created.

Knowing God. The devil knows the truths about filial love and deep thinking that we considered above. The devil does not want us to think about God. He does not want us to know God and His Divine attributes. This is because the more we know God, the more we will be drawn to love Him (since He is perfectly loveable) and to unselfishly serve Him. Because the devil hates God as well as us humans, he works against us because he does not want us to have an intimate friendship with God.

Knowing Ourselves. The devil does not want us to know ourselves. True self-knowledge fosters humility and consequently fosters a love of God. Indeed, the devil wants the exact opposite of this. That is, the devil wants us to be full of pride, having an inaccurate and inflated opinion of ourselves, and to hate God. Satan wants us to pamper ourselves and make efforts only to have a life of pleasure, comfort, and honor because these pursuits will lead us to a life of vice – and ultimately to perdition.

Knowing Our End. The devil does not want us to know the purpose of our existence. Knowing our final end will foster a healthy respect for God and fear of the Lord, which in turn, will foster filial love of God. The devil does all he can to distract our thoughts from God. One of the devil’s major strategies is to encourage us to be as selfish as possible. Selfishness leads to a life of wretchedness which naturally will lead to sorrow at the spiritual good of any virtue – which is sloth (as we saw in our last lesson).2 Because sloth makes a soul reluctant to begin doing any good, one does not feel inclined to even begin making any effort to amend himself. The devil can easily convince a soul in this sorry state that, indeed, it cannot change. The devil tells this soul that it simply cannot avoid being the way that it is and that it is useless to try to improve itself.

If We Fail to Know Either God, or Ourselves, or Our End, then the Devil Has Succeeded

The devil knows that all it takes for a soul to be lost is to lose knowledge of even one of these three, although often, when a soul is ignorant of one of these, it is also ignorant of one or both of the others. Thus, the devil wages his attacks on the soul to bring that soul to become ignorant of at least one of these.

God, ourselves, and our End: these three critical areas of knowledge influence everything in our lives because our relationship with God and our neighbor depends on this knowledge. In particular, on these three truths depends our willingness to be generous with God and our neighbor.

Charity is necessary for Divine friendship, and indeed, charity is Divine friendship.3 Further, charity is necessary for salvation.4 So we can readily see how Satan wants charity to grow cold and to die in us. In fact, Satan would never want charity to exist in us at all!

So the devil likes to use the weapon of sloth and to subtly weaken souls to bring them to this vice because sloth is a vice particularly opposed to charity.5 The devil knows that persons of all temperaments have the wounds of Original Sin and so can be steadily drawn to laxity in the moral life.

But where does the devil start in his attempts to wear down the soul? Most commonly, he targets a person’s prayer life because:

Prayer is the lifeblood of the spiritual life.6

Prayer is a tremendous source of strength and spiritual growth in the soul. Prayer fosters 1) our filial love; 2) deep and careful thinking; and 3) the three kinds of necessary knowledge (discussed above). Also, these, in turn, reciprocally foster our prayer life and praying well.

But how do we pray well and counteract the devil’s attacks on our prayer life?

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will analyze the devil’s tactics to destroy our prayer life (and so also, the rest of our spiritual life). In that lesson, we will consider the importance of knowing ourselves and finding effective ways to counteract the devil’s tricks regarding prayer.

2 Read this article: Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #58 – About the Temperaments Part XXIII – Explanation of Sloth in Order to Analyze This Snare of Satan and to Combat Him: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/06/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxiii-explanation-of-sloth-in-order-to-analyze-this-snare-of-satan/

3 For a further explanation of this truth that charity is Divine Friendship, read this article: https://catholiccandle.org/2021/06/04/sanctifying-grace-companion-charity/


4 Here is how St. Thomas Aquinas, greatest Doctor of the Church, teaches this truth, following and quoting St. Augustine:


Whosoever does not possess charity is wicked, because “this gift alone of the Holy Ghost distinguishes the children of the kingdom from the children of perdition”.  


Summa, IIa IIae, Q.178, a.2, sed contra, quoting St. Augustine’s treatise on the Blessed Trinity, De Trinitate, bk.15, ch.18.

5 Here is one way St. Thomas teaches this truth: “Sorrow because of the Divine good about which charity rejoices, belongs to a special vice, which is called sloth.” Summa, IIa IIae, Q.35, a.2, Respondeo.


Words to Live By – From Catholic Tradition

Beware of Pride Regarding How We View Ourselves!

Esteem not thyself better than others, lest, perhaps, thou be accounted worse in the sight of God, Who knows what is in man.

My Imitation of Christ, by Thomas à Kempis, ©1982, Confraternity of the Precious Blood, 5300 Fort Hamilton Parkway, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11219, Bk.1 ch.7.


The Blessing of a True, Catholic Liberal Education – Part IX

Catholic Candle note: Below is part 9 of our exploration of the best type of education – which is a true Catholic Liberal Education. Do not confuse this education with many university programs called “liberal arts” but which are full of fluff, falsehood, and aimless so-called “cultural enrichment” courses and “humanities”.

A liberal education also does not refer to liberalism, nor is a true liberal education an indoctrination into that error of liberalism or political correctness. In fact, a true Catholic Liberal Education is the best antidote to the errors of liberalism.

As context for this ninth part of this article, let us recall what we saw in the earlier eight parts:

Previously, in part 1 of this article,1 we examined the problems we see in modern education:

  • Modern colleges do not improve the quality of their students’ minds (and their thinking ability) much or at all.


  • Most “education” is merely job training, fluff courses, and/or leftist indoctrination.


  • The students are trained to sound like someone in their field but they do more memorizing and little thinking.


  • Grade “inflation” and degree “inflation” is rampant. Grades and academic degrees do not mean much anymore.

In part 2 of this article,2 we examined, in general, what education is. We considered the human soul and the perfection of its highest faculty (i.e., power) – which is the intellect – and which is immaterial (i.e., incorporeal). We saw that our intellects are perfected through knowing eternal, unchangeable truths and their causes.

In part 3 of this article,3 after having seen what true education is, we examined the question who should perfect his intellect.

In part 4 of this article,4 having seen that modern universities do not provide a true education, we consider whether there is ever any reason for men or women to attend them.

In part 5 of this article,5 having seen that women and girls should pursue a True Catholic Liberal Education – just as men and boys should, too – we then considered what the best environment is in which women and girls should do this.

In part 6 of this article, we addressed the objection that, having seen the great value of a true Catholic Liberal Education, we should be afraid that the great blessing of this education would be a danger to our souls because it might foster in us the vice of pride.6

In part 7 of this article, we considered more fully the difference between the education which is appropriate for a free man as contrasted to the education which is appropriate for a slave.7

In part 8 of this article, we considered further how the truth perfects our minds. This shows us that we must really know the truth, not merely hold true opinions.8

At the end of part 8 of our exploration of a genuine Catholic Liberal Education, the question arose What Studies (Sciences) More-Specifically Belong in a Catholic Liberal Education? Below, in part 9, we explore this issue.


What Studies Belong in a True Catholic Liberal Education?

Part 9

Having seen that a Catholic Liberal Education is truly education and not merely fluff, job training, or indoctrination into leftist ideology, it is time to consider more specifically: What studies belong in a true Catholic Liberal Education? This canon of study has long been set out and perennially followed in Western Civilization (Christendom) by those seeking to perfect their highest faculty (their mind). Below, we outline that canon of study and some of the reasons for it. These are the studies which enable us to appreciate and to love the Life of Truth – which is the life that we should all lead.

So, let us explore an outline of what a true education should be.


We Should Study Theology

Theology is the science of God and the things intimately connected to God. There are two types of theology because there are two ways for men to come to know God. The first way is through God revealing to us truths about Himself, and this is called revealed theology. These revealed truths are found in two founts: Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

The second way to know God is through natural theology, and in this, man uses his reason alone. This latter is the sort of theology the great (non-Catholic) minds such as Aristotle pursued although they did not have the gift of Faith. But Natural Theology is important for those who have the Catholic Faith too. Thus, St. Thomas and other Doctors of the Church delve deeply into Natural Theology and St. Paul commends it too. Romans, 1:20.

Let us say a few words about each of these types of theology.


Revealed Theology

As we saw earlier,9 we should perfect our intellect by knowing the highest truths. Thus, we should especially know and study God and the things intimately connected to God.

We should study revealed theology for these two reasons:

  1. Some of these Divine truths cannot be known except by Divine revelation, e.g., the fact that God is a Trinity.

  2. Revealed theology cannot err because the Catholic Faith is infallible. Revealed truths are the most certain of all knowledge because God is the Author of those truths and directly reveals those truths to us; man is not involved in deriving these truths.

So, we should study revealed theology – which is the study of what God has revealed about Himself and also what He has revealed about things which are closely related to Himself (e.g., the universe, angels, man).


Natural Theology

Besides revealed theology, we should also study Natural Theology, i.e., the truths concerning God (or related to God) which are knowable by the light of natural reason. For example, God’s existence can be proved five ways by unaided reason. Summa, Ia, Q.2 a.3. Likewise, through reason, we can prove that God is wholly simple, He is infinitely powerful, and many other things about God.

Just as the happiness and perfection of the blessed in heaven is the knowing (the contemplation) of God’s essence, i.e., the Beatific Vision, so the knowledge which perfects our mind (our highest faculty) on earth is likewise, most of all, the knowledge of God as deeply as He can be known in this life – both by revelation and by natural reason.


We Should Study Philosophy

Metaphysics

We should study the philosophy called metaphysics because it pertains to the deepest truths we can know by reason. Metaphysics studies Being most broadly and so includes some natural theology. Metaphysics studies and defends the truth that the Good is convertible with Being. That is, they are the same in reality but different in our understanding. This truth explains, for example, how God is understood by us under various aspects which seem separate, such as that He is both good and beautiful in His very Nature even though His Nature is entirely simple.10 This truth also explains, for example, why God loves even the devils insofar as pertains to God’s Own work creating their natures and the good that He placed into their natures.

Metaphysics also defends the truths at the foundation of human learning. For example, metaphysics examines and defends the Principle of Non-Contradiction, viz., that something cannot be and not be at the same time in the same respect. This Principle of Non-Contradiction tells us, e.g., that it would be false to both say that a square is not a triangle and also that a square is a triangle. This principle is crucial and is the basis for knowing all truth and is the firm unshakable foundation upon which rests all of our knowledge.

Revealed theology, natural theology, and metaphysics are three parts of the educational plan for developing and perfecting our minds with a Catholic Liberal Education.


Ethics

Besides revealed theology, natural theology, and metaphysics, a true education should include the science of ethics, which pertains to the proper ordering of our soul and our actions in the moral life, according to reason and according to our Catholic Faith. St. Thomas explains that “The essence (or nature) of human virtue consists in this: that the movements of the soul are regulated by reason”.11

All of our thoughts, words, deeds, and omissions which are properly human and intentional (as contrasted to unreflecting and instinctive) are either good (and so are according to virtue), or are evil and sinful. Here is how St. Thomas Aquinas, greatest Doctor of the Church, teaches this truth:

It belongs to the reason to direct; if an action that proceeds from deliberate reason be not directed to the due end, it is, by that fact alone, repugnant to reason, and has the character of evil. But if it be directed to a due end, it is in accord with reason; wherefore it has the character of good. Now it must be either directed or not directed to a due end. Consequently, every human action that proceeds from deliberate reason, if it be considered in the individual, must be good or bad.

If, however, it does not proceed from deliberate reason, but from some act of the imagination, as when a man [“mindlessly”] strokes his beard, or moves his hand or foot, such an action, properly speaking, is not moral or human; since [a moral or a human action] depends on the reason. Hence it will be indifferent, as standing apart from the genus of moral actions.12

A liberal education is the education that a free man should have.13 (“Liberal” comes from the Latin word “liber”, which means free.) Ethics is included in a liberal education because a free man should know how to live well and virtuously and so avoiding the slavery of sin – which is contrary to the life of a free man. As Our Lord told the Jews:

Amen, amen I say unto you, whosoever committeth sin, is the slave of sin.

St. John’s Gospel, 8:34

Thus, we should study True Ethics because:

  • this is a science proper to a free man;


  • it shows us how to live well and live according to reason; and


  • it shows us how to attain our end in life – both our natural end and our supernatural end.

Just as there exists a theology of revelation as well as a natural theology, similarly there is a Catholic ethics as well as a natural ethics. In the science of natural ethics, correct reason (even without the help of the Faith) shows us that the happy life is the life of virtue and the life of truth and reason. The Catholic Ethics which is taught by our Catholic Faith shows us the same thing, but in a manner which is in some ways more elevated to include some supernatural truths of ethics, such as the value of fasting for a supernatural motive.

Because we are one single whole, i.e., one person, our different faculties and parts intimately affect each other. Thus, a disorderly and sinful will prevents us from having the good habits which promote the practice of our devoting ourselves, like we should, to the life of truth. Further, when our mind is darkened, then this prevents us from living the virtuous and happy life that we should.

Thus, the perfection of our minds with the light of the truth goes together with the perfection of our wills with moral virtue. A disorderly intellect harms our will and a disorderly will harms our intellect. Here is how St. John of the Cross, Doctor of the Church, explains the grave effects of error in our mind, upon our will and memory:

When the soul is darkened in the understanding, it is benumbed also in the will, and the memory becomes dull and disordered in its due operation.

Ascent of Mount Carmel, Ch.8, §2.

Thus, we see that the correct understanding of ethics is necessary:

  • to achieve our practical ends of happiness both


    • here in the present life;


    • as well as, even more so, in Heaven,

but also

  • to enable us to effectively study and perfect our minds in all intellectual fields because a mind which is not enlightened by the truth:

  • Is an obstacle to avoiding sin; and

  • Results in a man’s weakness of will and dullness of memory that is an obstacle to learning.


Political Philosophy

A true Catholic Liberal Education should include political philosophy. This study of political philosophy to which we refer does not consist in matters such as “crisis management” in “politics” when this is needed by some politician who has been caught engaged in evil conduct which could end his career.

The study of political philosophy also does not involve things like:

  • how a political candidate can persuade voters to vote for him;


  • how to conduct accurate political polls;


  • how to effectively raise funds for a political campaign;


  • how to benefit special interest groups while giving voters the impression of serving them;


  • how to speak as if you agree with diverse voters who disagree with each other; or


  • any other trick to succeed in the business of practical politics.

Man is by nature a political animal, as St. Thomas Aquinas and Aristotle explain.14 This means that man is not only a social animal – viz., one who naturally lives in a group – as bees and ants do also – but he naturally organizes collectively and works with other men, using his reason for this organized, joint work.

So the science15 of politics to which we refer, is the science which examines how political animals (men) should organize and work together performing collective works which are rational and thus are natural to them. That political activity (which is political in this broad sense) is God’s Will for man and involves such cooperation and joint work which shows that God created man to live a higher life than is lived by irrational animals. (The collective activity of irrational animals is by instinct, whereas the organized activity of men is using their own reason.)

Whereas, in the science of ethics, we study the life that each individual man should lead – which is life according to reason and virtue – by contrast, political science is the study of the life that men should live collectivelyviz., the organized joint activity of rational, virtuous men united in society.

This political science investigates how virtuous men should collectively promote the Common Good, suppress evil conduct, and rectify the characters of evil men because the end/goal of collective (political) action is to make society virtuous,16 since this is the happy life.

Thus, the science of politics studies such things as:

  • What law is;


  • Whether the civil law is binding in conscience;


  • Whether revolution is morally permissible;


  • Whether “civil disobedience” is morally permissible;


  • What is the end of political life for the individual man and for society collectively?;


  • What is the life of man in society which promotes man’s good, his perfection, and his happiness both on the natural level and the supernatural level?;


  • What is the virtue of patriotism and how is it subordinate to the virtue of piety and how is it ordered by the virtue of justice?;


  • The proper operation of government according to the rule of subsidiarity;


  • What types of government are permissible; what type of government is best; and


  • How can the ruler best facilitate the formation of virtue in the citizens?

These and many other truths which are studied in the science of politics are of great value in seeing and promoting the True and the Good in society, just as the science of ethics is of great value in seeing and promoting the True and the Good in the individual.

Both of these sciences are grounded in man’s rational nature – there is neither ethics nor politics for brute beasts. Both of these sciences aid the intellectual life by fostering the orderly conditions in which the pursuit of high truth and the achievement of great good can be accomplished.


Philosophy of Nature

Besides these sciences, what else should a free man (or woman) study? He would study the principal works of creation. Here are two reasons for this:

  1. We already saw (above) that natural theology is part of a Catholic Liberal Education. But in the order of natural theology (i.e., studying these highest things known according to reason) our knowledge of Divine things comes through our knowing God as the Cause of His effects and His works in this world. In other words, our study of nature helps us in our study of natural theology, through which we understand God as the Cause of the being and of the operation of natural beings (i.e., creatures).


  2. Further, we study the chief parts of natural science, because God made us to naturally wonder about the world around us and to seek to understand God’s work of creation.

In this study of nature, we should especially study the principles of nature, e.g., things such as:

1) What is time;

2) What is place;

3) What is occurring when one substance is changed into a different substance?;

4) Whether infinite distance is possible (in the universe);

5) What is life and what is the soul, as it is present in plants and animals;

6) How does the human soul differ from the souls of other animals – its rationality and immortality;

7) What is motion; and

8) Whether Nature acts for an end or not.

These truths are much more perfecting to our minds and important to study and to know compared to such narrow topics of nature such as “What is a genetic code?”. Here are three reasons for this:

  1. The foundational truths of our world are greater in themselves than the studies of things that are less foundational;


  2. The foundational truths are more certain and less apt to be overthrown by new theories e.g., about genes; and

  3. Those matters which are less foundational depend for their true understanding upon the knowledge of those foundations underlying them. For example, the truth of the matters studied regarding the genetic code depends on the foundational understanding of what is happening when one substance changes into another.


Mathematics – viz., Geometry, Arithmetic, Music, and Astronomy

A liberal education should include the mathematical sciences. Geometry and other types of mathematics have a unique clarity because the mathematical sciences abstract from aspects of bodies which can obscure universal principles. For example, we can consider what a straight line is as a universal concept and abstracted from the fact that the lines that we see around us (e.g., on the edges of a table at which I am sitting) are slightly crooked or bumpy.

Arithmetic, as a science, is not the working out of particular problems as “532347296 divided by 34”. Rather, arithmetic considers universal truths about all numbers. Questions such as these are considered: “Is it true that any number is either prime or is measured by some prime number?” and “If three numbers are in continued proportion, and the first is square, then is the third one also square?” Considering universal truths about numbers is important. God created two different types of quantities: those like lines, circles, cubes, and other figures (continuous quantities studied in geometry). But He also ordered nature in discrete quantity (studied in arithmetic). Not only does studying arithmetic (as a science) help form the mind to be logical, but doing so is necessary to come to a more complete understanding of the reality of God’s order.

In addition to this unique clarity of the mathematical sciences, there are many aspects of the world around us which are mathematically quantifiable and so the mathematical sciences are tools to further study certain properties of nature insofar as they are quantifiable. For example, we can learn more about the properties of light and sound as they bounce off of a wall, by considering what we learned about angles in the science of geometry.

Music is a science which involves mathematics applied to musical pitches. For example, various musical intervals are characterized by different ratios, such as a musical octave having the ratio of 1:2 in the length of strings and pipes of musical instruments. That is, for example, a piano string which provides a “C” note is half as long as an otherwise-similar piano string which provides the “C” note which is one octave lower. So this string ratio is 1:2.

Likewise, astronomy, which is the study of the heavens, is mathematical in nature, since it involves angles, distances, speeds, etc. of the heavens and the bodies in the heavens. Just as music applies mathematics to sound, astronomy does so to observations of the heavens.


Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric

Logic. Early on in this course of studies, it will help a person to refine his mind by studying logic. This will help him in many ways. For example, it enables him to more carefully and explicitly understand which arguments result in a necessary conclusion, compared to those arguments which result in a conclusion which is merely probable. Further, the science of logic will enable a person to also contrast those arguments which are valid, to fallacious arguments (that conclude falsely).

Grammar. The student should also study the science of grammar because (among other reasons):

  1. Grammar is the liberal art which helps to form logical, true, and clear sentences. Since we think in words and sentences, these must be clear and grammatical in order to be cogent and to reflect nature and reality; and


  2. The process of learning is a discussion with others (as well as in our own mind) and so we must master the art of grammar in order to be clear and articulate in those discussions with others as well.

Rhetoric. Lastly, the discussions we have in our own minds and with others will be more enjoyable and profitable if we have some acquaintance with the art of rhetoric so that we can express ourselves beautifully and persuasively, as well as clearly and cogently.


The Seven Liberal Arts

The study of the seven liberal arts are sometimes thought to be the same as a liberal education. That is not true. Rather the liberal arts are the proper beginning of a liberal education.

Above, we saw that four mathematical sciences have a role in a true Catholic Liberal Education. These are: geometry, arithmetic, music, and astronomy. Traditionally, these four are collectively called the quadrivium of the liberal arts. The word “quadrivium” is a word combining the Latin prefix “quadri” with the Latin word “viae”, which mean the “four paths”.

Above, we reflected on why we should also include logic, grammar, and rhetoric in a liberal education. These three are traditionally called the trivium. The word “trivium” is a word combining the Latin prefix “tri” with the Latin word “viae”, which mean the “three paths”.

These seven intellectual disciplines are the liberal arts. In modern times, the phrase “liberal arts” (as that phrase is now usually used) has come to mean something vague such as “the humanities” or “the studies of the works of man” or “general education.”

But this is not properly what the liberal arts were or are. In the educational tradition of Christendom and the Western World (including the ancient world), the liberal arts referred to seven introductory disciplines which are valuable in themselves but which are also exceedingly helpful for developing the student’s mind to prepare him for studying the very highest subjects – philosophy and theology.

St. Thomas Aquinas, the greatest Doctor of the Church, sets out the wise advice of prudent educators – telling us that students should not begin their studies with the highest truths (philosophy and theology), but rather, approach them through studying the liberal arts first.

Here are his words, advising how students should approach the study of great truths:

Concerning how to acquire the treasure of knowledge, choose to enter, not immediately into the ocean [of the knowledge of philosophy and theology] but enter by little streams that flow into the ocean, for difficult things can more easily be reached by means of the easier ones.17

These “little streams” are the seven liberal arts through which we should approach the highest truths of Faith and Reason.


Conclusions of this Article

All of the primary things studied in a true Catholic Liberal Education are works of God, not the works of man.

Above, we saw many important elements of a good Catholic Liberal Education:

  • We should perfect our intellect by knowing the highest truths. Thus, we should especially study and know God and the things most intimately related to God. We should study revealed theology, natural theology, and metaphysics.

  • Besides these highest studies, we saw that we should study the science of ethics, which pertains to the proper ordering of our soul and of our actions in the moral life – according to reason and according to our Catholic Faith. This is important because a liberal education is the education that a free man should have so that he knows how to live well, virtuously, and happily.


  • We also saw that we should study political philosophy, that is, the science of how men should live collectively according to reason and how they should organize and work together performing collective works which are suited to their rational nature.


  • Next we saw that we should study the most important parts of nature especially those which are most at the foundation of all truth about creatures, such questions as what is time, what is motion, what is a soul, what is special about the human soul, what occurs during a change of one substance to another, etc. These creatures, especially the higher ones, manifest the goodness, wisdom, and power of God, Who designed them.


  • Lastly, we should approach the highest truths through the study of the seven liberal arts.


Looking Ahead

Wonder and wisdom are often mentioned in connection with a Catholic Liberal Education. What are wonder and wisdom and what is that connection with a true education?


To Be Continued …

6 Part 6 of this article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/3129/

10 God being entirely simple means that He is not made up of multiple parts and does not have multiple aspects in His Being.

11 Here is St. Thomas’s words in Latin: “Ratio virtutis humanae consistit in hoc quod motus animi ratione reguletur”. Summa, IIa IIae Q.30 a.3.

12 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.18, a.9, Whether an individual action can be indifferent? (emphasis added; bracketed words added for clarity).

Here is the longer quote:

[Pope St. Gregory the Great] says in a sermon (Sermon #6 on the Gospels): “An idle word is one that lacks either the usefulness of rectitude or the motive of just necessity or pious utility.” But an idle word is an evil, because “men . . . shall render an account of it in the day of judgment” (Matthew 12:36): while if it does not lack the motive of just necessity or pious utility, it is good. Therefore, every word is either good or bad. For the same reason every other action is either good or bad. Therefore, no individual action is indifferent.

I answer that, It sometimes happens that an action is indifferent in its species, but considered in the individual it is good or evil. And the reason for this is because a moral action, as stated above (Article 3), derives its goodness not only from its object, whence it takes its species, but also from the circumstances, which are its accidents, as it were; just as something belongs to a man by reason of his individual accidents, which does not belong to him by reason of his species. And every individual action must have some circumstance that makes it good or bad, at least in respect of the intention of the end. For since it belongs to the reason to direct; if an action that proceeds from deliberate reason be not directed to the due end, it is, by that fact alone, repugnant to reason, and has the character of evil. But if it be directed to a due end, it is in accord with reason; wherefore it has the character of good. Now it must be either directed or not directed to a due end. Consequently, every human action that proceeds from deliberate reason, if it be considered in the individual, must be good or bad.

If, however, it does not proceed from deliberate reason, but from some act of the imagination, as when a man strokes his beard, or moves his hand or foot, such an action, properly speaking, is not moral or human, since this depends on the reason. Hence it will be indifferent, as standing apart from the genus of moral actions. …

Reply to Objection 2. … evil, in general, is all that is repugnant to right reason. And in this sense every individual action is either good or bad, as stated above.

Summa, Ia IIae, Q.18, a.9, Whether an individual action can be indifferent?

14 Aristotle’s Politics, §1252b and St. Thomas’ commentary on this passage.

15 On a future occasion, we will compare the term “science” with the term “philosophy”. But for the present, the term “science” can be understood as encompassing philosophy, theology, and any other body of knowledge whose object is eternal truth.

16 St. Thomas Aquinas, On Kingship, Book 1, ch.15.

17 Quoted from Concerning the Proper Approach for Studying (Epistola De Modo Studendi).


Here are the Latin words that he wrote:


Quia quaesisti a me, in Christo mihi carissime Ioannes, qualiter te studere oporteat in thesauro scientiae acquirendo, tale a me tibi traditur consilium: ut per rivulos, non statim in mare, eligas introire, quia per faciliora ad difficiliora oportet devenire.

CC in Brief – The Upcoming SSPX Episcopal Consecrations

Catholic Candle note: Catholic Candle normally examines particular issues thoroughly, at length, using the teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas and the other Doctors of the Church. By contrast, our feature CC in Brief, usually gives an extremely short answer to a reader’s question. We invite every reader to submit his own questions.


CC in Brief

The Upcoming SSPX Episcopal Consecrations

Q. Do you have any thoughts on the upcoming SSPX consecrations (any reason to hope for a real return to tradition)?

A. Regarding the upcoming SSPX consecrations, all appearances indicate that
those four episcopal candidates are all SSPX “company men” who will not stand up against the SSPX liberalism – as indicated by their prior years of silence and refusal to stand up against the liberalism in the now-liberal SSPX.  Those four would not have been chosen by the liberal leadership if that leadership sensed even the slightest danger that any of them would turn against the new liberal direction of the SSPX.

However, God is in charge and He can turn their hearts away from their compromises and could make them His excellent tools for great good in the future, if He chooses to use them.  We will see.  But pray for them that they leave their compromises and their liberalism and serve God the way He wants to be served!

Words to Live By – From Catholic Tradition

A Remedy for Our Sins during our Time of Apostasy

After our baptism, Our Lord has given us other daily remedies. The Lord’s Prayer is our daily purification. Let us say, and let us say with sincerity because it is an alms in itself: “Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors.” Give alms and all things are clean to you.”

St. Augustine, Doctor of the Church, Sermon #261 For the Feast Of The Ascension

Catholic Candle note: It is true at all times of the Church that our sins are remitted through praying the Our Father well. How much more does Divine Providence make the Our Father efficacious for the remission of sins during the present Great Apostasy, when our Loving Heavenly Father has willed to withdraw the Sacraments from faithful and informed Catholics, most of whom do not currently have access to an uncompromising priest!

God has not abandoned us! Rather, He lovingly gives us different efficacious tools to use to help us to save our souls during these apostate times. Read these articles:

About the Temperaments Part XXII – How to Order Our Loves So We Can Use the Passion of Fear Properly

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part twenty-first part of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

  1. Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/

  1. Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/

  2. Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/


  3. Part XXI – Explaining the Effects of Fear in All Temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/04/26/about-the-temperaments-part-xxi-explaining-the-effects-of-fear-in-all-temperaments/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #57 – About the Temperaments Part XXII – Explaining How to Order Our Loves So We Can Use the Passion of Fear Properly, and How the Devil Attempts to Prevent this Ordering

In our most recent lessons we have studied the causes of fear and the effects of fear on our bodies and souls. We discussed briefly the role that love plays in determining our fears and likewise the role that the imagination has in our passion of fear. We said that our loves must be orderly and reasonable and that we must control our imagination to make it reasonable also. At this point it is necessary to delve deeper into our spiritual battle and the means we must take to ensure we are indeed monitoring our loves as we ought; and controlling our imagination to keep it reasonable. Our salvation depends on how well we know ourselves and how we cooperate with God’s graces and blessings. In this lesson we focus on three main ideas:

  1. The plan of our arch-enemy;

  2. The teaching of our dear Holy Mother Church; and

  3. Satan’s attempts to disorder man’s loves.

    Below, we discuss each of these.

  1. The Plan Of Our Arch-Enemy — The Demonic Plan Has Not Changed

Since the fall of Adam the devil has not changed his methods of luring man into sin. We may think that humans had an easier battle against Satan in another period of history. For example, one may think that it was easier for people to save their souls in the Middle Ages because there weren’t so many distractions, such as, modern technology and because their lives were not as hectic as in our modern times.

However, we must remind ourselves that all throughout human history man has had to contend with the devil and all his worldly allurements. Certainly, the devil will use whatever is available to distract a person from doing his duty. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that fallen human nature has not changed. We could simply say that Satan tries to get men to commit the Seven Capital Sins (Pride, Sloth, Gluttony, Envy, Anger, Lust, and Avarice), and this is true. However, there are two chief fronts of attack that the devil uses against mankind.

Satan’s Two Main Lines of Attack

The devil traps souls in these two main ways:

  • Through getting humans to not use their reason;

(We must not forget that the devil will use just about anything to distract someone from reasoning – especially reasoning carefully!)

  • Through getting humans to focus on their bodies including pleasures and comforts.

It is important to note here that the easiest way for the devil to capture souls is through sins of the flesh. Our Lady warned us at Fatima that “more people go to hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason.”1 (She also reminded us that these souls fall because they have no one to pray and do sacrifice for them.)

We will discuss more about the first of these lines of demonic attack in this present lesson, and then about the second type of attack in lessons to come. First, however, we must connect what we have studied about fear so far with this overall plan of the devil.

The Role That Fear Plays in the Devil’s Work

Because the devil knows that our fears are based on what we love and what we imagine, he uses his knowledge of us in designing his snares against us. Thus, it is important that we apply what we have been studying about fear in order to defend ourselves against Satan’s tricks – one of which is use fear in a twisted manner.

  1. The Teaching of Holy Mother Church

Our Best Defense against Satan is Understanding the Church’s Teaching about Proper Fear

Let’s begin by examining what the Church tells us about proper fear. We were taught in our Catechism that Fear of the Lord is a Gift of the Holy Ghost. “The beginning of wisdom is fear of the Lord” (Proverbs 1:7).

With this precious Gift, we are intended to have filial fear which is “the dread of offending God based on love for Him.”2 This is in contrast with servile fear of God which is “the dread of the punishment which God inflicts on sinners”.3

St. Bernard of Clairvaux explains the difference between servile fear and filial fear. He describes servile fear as follows:

The slave and the hireling have a law, not from the Lord, but of their own contriving; the one does not love God, the other loves something else more than God. They have a law of their own, not of God, I say; yet it [their own law] is subject to the law of the Lord. For though they [viz, the slave and the hireling] can make laws for themselves, they cannot supplant the changeless order of the Eternal Law. Each man is a law unto himself, when he sets up his will against the universal laws, perversely striving to rival his Creator, to be wholly independent, making his will his only law.4

He adds more about servile fear as follows:

He was a burden to himself through the law which was of his own devising: yet he could not escape God’s law, for he was set as a mark against God. The Eternal Law of righteousness ordains that he who will not submit to God’s sweet rule shall suffer the bitter tyranny of self: but he who wears the easy yoke and light burden of love will escape the intolerable weight of his own self-will.5

Then St. Bernard contrasts servile fear with filial fear:

Freed from the weight of my own will, I can breathe easily under the light burden of love. I shall not be coerced by fear, nor allured by mercenary desires. I for one shall be led by the Spirit of God, that free Spirit whereby Thy sons are led which beareth witness with my spirit that I am among the children of God.

Love is a good and pleasant law; it is not only easy to bear, but it makes the laws of slaves and hirelings tolerable; not destroying but completing them; as the Lord saith: ‘I am not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill’ (Matt 5:17). It tempers the fear of the slave, it regulates the desires of the hireling, it mitigates the severity of each.

Love is never without fear, but it is a godly fear. Love is never without desire, but it is a lawful desire. So love perfects the law of service by infusing devotion. It perfects the law of wages by restraining covetousness. Devotion mixed with fear does not destroy fear – devotion purges fear.

Then the burden of fear which was intolerable while it was only servile, becomes tolerable; and the fear itself remains ever pure and filial … . Self-interest is restrained within due bounds when love supervenes. For then self-interest rejects evil things altogether, prefers better things to those merely good, and cares for the good only on account of the better.

In like manner, by God’s grace, it will come about that man will love his body and the things pertaining to his body, for the sake of his soul. He will love his soul for God’s sake; and he will love God for Himself alone.6

  1. Satan’s Attempt to Disorder Man’s Loves

Man’s reason is his highest faculty. God intends that man use this faculty to learn more about Him. Man usually starts by observing the world around him and then comes to know universal truths gradually.7 God, being the Sculptor of Souls, draws souls to Him in order to have a beautiful friendship which He intends to culminate in the celestial possession of Himself, viz., the Beatific Vision.

Man has a foretaste of this Vision when he ponders deeply about the high truths concerning God. God created man to have a sense of wonder and to have a desire to know truth. Therefore, God designed it to be really exhilarating and satisfying for man to consider something deeply, come to proper conclusions, and in this way come to know a truth.

Furthermore, God intends that deep consideration of truth, especially high truths, should inflame the soul with appreciation for that truth. In turn, God wills that this same appreciation will foster gratitude and then love for Him, while also bringing humility into the soul.8

Consequently, it follows that man learning truth inspires gratitude, humility, and love of God – which likewise fosters friendship with God and our neighbor. With all of this in mind, it is easy to see that God intends man to have a life of virtue wherein he is unselfish and is full of filial love of God and a genuine love of his neighbor.

Of course, all of this is the opposite of what Satan seeks for souls. Satan does not want God to come first in our lives. He does not want us to learn to love God and certainly does not want us to grow in love of God. He does not want us to love our neighbor or to be unselfish. He does not want us to grow in virtue. He does not want us to discipline our minds, and control our imagination. In short, he does not want us to lead a life of reason and he certainly does not want us to think deeply!

Satan tempts men of all temperaments to avoids using their reason. Here are some of his common lies:

  • It is too hard to think, especially to think deeply;

  • It is so tiring to think or to try to understand and figure something out;

  • It takes too much time to think, because we have to get something done quickly, after all, we are supposed to be efficient workers;

  • It is so boring to dig deeply into things;

  • It taxes the body too much to think;

  • It makes one “proud” to think carefully because a person only does this when he wants to be “noticed” and thought to be “clever”;

  • I am not “intellectually” inclined or “gifted” and therefore, I simply cannot think and I certainly cannot think carefully or deeply;

  • I do not want people to label me as “brainy”; and

  • It is too much of a bother to think about God, or our Faith.

Here are some typical traits regarding thinking, as related to the four temperaments:

  • Cholerics and sanguines tend to be extroverted but also shallower.

    This does NOT mean that they cannot think deeply or learn to love to think deeply. All Catholics are all called to the life of high contemplation (even though contemplation is a gift of God).

  • Melancholics and phlegmatics are more introverted and tend to be deeper thinkers.

Nevertheless, the tactic of Satan is to have all people not desire to use their highest faculty (which is their intellect). Thus, Satan uses his tactic (to get man to not use his reason) not only against persons of one temperament but against everyone.

The devil targets all men in his attempt to get them to not LOVE thinking deeply and well. He wants to instill sloth in us so that the spiritual life and things of God are unappealing to us humans.

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will discuss more about the lies of the devil listed above and the devil’s temptations to twist our loves in order to lead us away from God, primarily through sloth. We will discuss strategies on how to counterattack Satan’s pomps.

1 The Whole Truth About Fatima, Frere Michel de la Sante Trinite, Vol. II, Ch.4, Appendix II.

2 This definition is taken from the Concise Catholic Dictionary by Robert C Broderick, M.A., The Bruce Publishing Company of America, ©1944, p.63.


3 This definition is taken from the Concise Catholic Dictionary by Robert C Broderick, M.A., The Bruce Publishing Company of America, ©1944, p.63.


4 St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church, Treatise on the Love of God, Ch.13 (bracketed words added to show context).

5 St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church, Treatise on the Love of God, Ch.13 (bracketed words added to show context).

6 St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church, Treatise on the Love of God, Ch.14 (bracketed words added to show context).

7

Read the following articles about the blessings of a True Catholic Liberal Education:


8 Read this article: A True Catholic Liberal Education is so Great, Will It Make Us Proud? This article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/3129/


Modest Sleeves for Women and Girls

Catholic Candle note: Genuine conservatives and uncompromising Traditional Catholics are extremely rare. Most people who consider themselves conservative, traditional, or uncompromising, are really only “conserving” the less extreme liberalism or decadence from a few decades ago when things were not as bad as they are now. But whatever the intentions and self-image of these people are, objectively they are not really and fully conservatives. They are only comparatively less liberal or less decadent than the society around them.

One aspect of being Traditional Catholic is to hold the traditional standard of feminine modesty. The article below addresses modest sleeves for women and girls. This is only one condition required for fulfilling the Catholic standard of Marylike modesty.

This article is a companion article to these other Catholic Candle articles about Marylike modesty:

A Defense of the Traditional Catholic Standard

We live in a pagan world.  Most Catholic women and girls adopt some version of the evil fashions they see all around them. Dressing like a faithful and informed Catholic involves many things. One of these for women and girls is feminine modesty in sleeves. 

But before considering that issue, let us first inquire whether this subject is one that only women and girls need to know about.


Is it Important for Men and Boys (as well as Women and Girls) to Know the Catholic Standard for Feminine Modesty?

Both sexes should care about feminine modesty and know the standards of Catholic modesty.  It is obvious that a woman should understand and live the Catholic standard of modesty so that she can please God, edify her neighbor, be a good example to other women and girls, teach her daughters, and avoid sin.

But there are five reasons why men (and boys) should also know these standards:

1.    It is important for men and boys to know the standards of female modesty because they have a duty to avert their eyes from women’s and girl’s attire which does not comply with such modesty standards.

This is obvious.  A crucial reason why women and girls have standards of modesty (and must not “wear whatever they want to”) is because there are men and boys who will look at them. 

Women must cover up for the sake of the men.  This is common decency and is a minimum charity that they owe to their (male) neighbors.  Women would be callously disregarding the salvation of men (and themselves) if women dressed without concern for the temptations their attire would cause in men.

This is like the fact that a person must not wildly swing a butcher knife “whenever he wants to” without regard for the risk of injuring those around him.  In fact, immodesty can be more dangerous than a butcher knife because immodesty can kill the soul whereas a butcher knife can only kill the body. 

Of course, it is also true that men must dress modestly for the sake of the women too.  This is part of men’s minimum charity toward their (female) neighbors. However, there are three reasons that female immodesty is a greater problem:

➢  Women are the more beautiful sex and so are more attractive;

➢  Men are more prone than women are to sins of impurity by looking impurely at the opposite sex, as is evident by the fact that the filthy practice of viewing pornography is a sin which is far more frequently committed by men rather than by women; and

➢  Both men and women are more inclined to dilute modesty standards for females than for males.  This is because women have a stronger focus on pleasing men by their (i.e., women’s) appearance, and men have less of a focus on pleasing women by their own (i.e., the men’s) appearance but have a greater tendency to be pleased by women’s appearance (than are women focused on and pleased by men’s appearance).  Here are three signs that this is true:

first, women desire (and usually have) a far larger wardrobe and wear far more jewelry than men do;

second,
 women take many other pains to look attractive for men, such as wearing makeup, getting their hair curled or permed, etc., and

third, men’s clothes and shoes are more practical and serviceable.  By contrast, women’s clothes and shoes are much more likely to be less comfortable because they are designed more to please men rather than for comfort.  (For example, women’s shoes are usually designed more to make a woman’s foot look smaller than for her comfort.)  

2.    It is important for an unmarried man who is called to the married vocation (and not to the life of a consecrated religious) to have prominently featured in his “blue print” of the future spouse he seeks, that she possess and love this great treasure of the Catholic standard of holy modesty.1 This man himself would need to understand the standard of feminine modesty in order to assess whether a potential future spouse follows and loves this standard; 

3.    It is important for a man to know the Catholic standard of feminine modesty so that he can give moral support and defend the modesty of good women against scoffers, mockers, and other enemies of Our Lord.  (For example, women and girls who take modesty seriously are often made to feel prudish and isolated, especially by other women who have a more liberal dress code.)  Men should be gallant and gentlemanly.  They should defend women, especially good women who are living the standards of modesty and other virtues; 

4.    It is important for a man to know the Catholic standard of feminine modesty because he will be ultimately responsible for guiding his wife and daughters (when God sends to him his own family) and he will be ultimately responsible for this standard being implemented in his own home and family;2 and 

5.    It is important for a man to know the Catholic standard of feminine modesty so he can love this beautiful virtue and admire and appreciate the Marylike women and girls who practice it.

Brief Reminder: Because of Original Sin, We Are Prone to Evil, Especially to Sins of the Flesh

Our nature is wounded by original sin:

  1. Our intellect is darkened;

  2. Our will is weakened;

  3. Our passions are unruly and rebellious; and

  4. We are inclined to evil.

But our duty and our happiness require that we be pure and modest in thought, word, and deed. Impure deeds, words, and thoughts lead to Hell:

  • Impure deeds lead to Hell:

    Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the
    effeminate … shall possess the kingdom of God. 1
    Corinthians. 6:9-10;

  • Impure words lead to Hell:

But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not so much as be named among you, as becometh saints: or obscenity3, or foolish talking, or scurrility, which is to no purpose; Ephesians, 5:3-4;

The tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity. The tongue is placed among our members, which defileth the whole body …. St. James, 3:6;

  • Consenting to Impure thoughts, imaginings, and glances leads to Hell:

Whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart. St. Matthew’s Gospel, 5:28.

External words and actions are the fruit of internal thoughts and desires:

The things which proceed out of the mouth, come forth from the heart, and … from the heart come forth … adulteries, fornications …. St. Matthew’s Gospel, 15:18-19.

Plainly, women are the more beautiful sex. But the Church recognizes that the body, though good, is not the highest good; and a body that is shamelessly unregulated by virtue and reason is notoriously bad.

Satan especially promotes impurity because he knows impurity is such an effective tool for damning souls. Our Lady warned at Fatima that “more people go to hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason.”4

Therefore, modesty requires that we do everything we reasonably can to avoid whatever inflames our passions or the passions of others, and so makes it harder to avoid sins against the holy virtue of purity. A person is potentially the murderer of another person’s soul by failing to guard against inflaming his passions.

Modesty requires great care related to thoughts, words, and deeds. These deeds include concealing the body instead of unduly emphasizing it or revealing it.


Dangers Regarding Impurity Are Different for Men and Women

Men and women are different and possess different tendencies towards impurity.  Men are more easily led into sins against purity through their sense of sight.  For this reason, modesty for men chiefly requires custody of their eyes as the guard of purity.5 

By contrast, women are more tempted in matters of impurity through vanity by seeking to attract the eyes of men by excessive exposure of their (viz., the women’s) bodies.  Thus, it is in the “nature” of women that they are more interested in being admired by men for their appearance rather than admiring men’s appearance.  Also, as noted above, men are more interested in the appearance of women than they are interested in women admiring their (viz., the men’s) appearance.

Of course, this does not mean that men should be unconcerned with the modesty of their own dress or that women should be unconcerned with custody of their own eyes.  But the stronger, typical tendencies are for men to encounter dangers against purity because of looking at women, and women to encounter dangers against purity by the way they seek to attract men’s eyes by their appearance.  These different tendencies of the two sexes are why men are the usual consumers of pornography and women are the usual subjects of pornography.

Further, because God made woman the more beautiful and attractive sex, He made women’s bodies more sensual.  Thus, the virtue of modesty requires that this greater attractiveness be concealed with womanly attire, which takes Nature into account.  So, women must wear clothes that cover up more – including sleeves of proper length and that are otherwise modest. 


The Catholic Standard Ordered by Pope Pius XI:

Pope Pius XI ordered the following standard to be published:

We remind all concerned that a garment cannot be considered modest if it leaves the base of the neck exposed by more than two finger-widths6; if it fails to cover the arm at least as far as the elbow; or if it does not extend slightly below the knee.7 Likewise, a garment made of transparent fabric is not considered modest, nor are stockings that so perfectly mimic the color of the skin as to create the illusion that the leg is bare.8

Although Pope Pius XI’s standard refers to multiple aspects of feminine modesty, the present article focuses on the virtue of modesty requiring feminine sleeves to extend at least to the elbow.


Feminine Modesty Pertains to Sleeves in Six Ways.

Sleeves must:

  1. Be long enough;

  2. Not be made of a flesh-colored material (i.e., a color creating the illusion of bare skin);

  3. Not be made of transparent or “see-through” material;

  4. Not be too tight;

  1. Not be made of a fabric that is too supple or clingy; and

  2. Not allow a “line of sight” up a woman’s or a girl’s arm inside her sleeve, above her elbow.

Below, we discuss each of these requirements for modest sleeves.


1. Sleeves Must Not Be Too Short

Pope Pius XI’s standard explicitly requires that a woman’s or a girl’s sleeve must “cover the arm at least as far as the elbow”.9

Obviously, a sleeve which is too short is one way that a sleeve can be immodest, viz., by exposing a woman’s or a girl’s upper arm.

2. Sleeves Must Not Be Made of a Flesh-Colored Material
(
i.e., a Color Creating the Illusion of Bare Skin)

Pope Pius XI’s standard warns about the immodesty of garments which “mimic the color of the skin [so] as to create the illusion that the leg is bare”.10 Although this is said in the context of immodest stockings, this same problem plainly occurs whenever any garment is similar enough to the color of the woman’s or girl’s skin that there is an illusion of improper exposure of any part of her body which must be covered.

3. Sleeves Must Not Be Made of Transparent or “See-
Through” Material

Pope Pius XI’s standard includes the warning that “a garment made of transparent fabric is not considered modest”.11

This is obvious. Clothes are supposed to conceal certain parts of the body. However, transparent fabrics, laces, nets, organdy, nylons, etc. do not do this sufficiently, as Pope Pius XI warns.

There is nothing inherently wrong with laces, nets, organdy, and nylons. They can add to the beauty and charm of feminine clothing. Such fabrics, however, should be considered as mere ornaments – additions to already-modest clothing. Thus, such fabrics should be placed on top of another fabric which is modest.


4. Sleeves Must Not Be Too Tight

Clothes are immodest if they are too tight. This is obvious. Clothes are supposed to conceal certain parts of the body. However, if sleeves are too tight or form-fitting, they do not sufficiently conceal the woman’s or girl’s upper arm, which must remain concealed to be modest.12

  1. Sleeves Must Not Be Made of a Fabric Which is Too Supple or Clingy

Just like sleeves which are too tight reveal too much of the shape and contours of a woman’s or girl’s body, likewise sleeves made out of a fabric which is too supple or clingy has this same defect: it does not sufficiently conceal the female form.

Just as paint is not suitable to be used as clothing/covering – even if it is completely opaque – because it is too conforming to the shape of the body, likewise fabric is immodest and inappropriate if it is too supple and conforms too much to the shape of the body.

6. Sleeves Must Not Allow a “Line of Sight” Up a Woman’s or a Girl’s Arm Above Her Elbow

Another aspect of feminine modesty is to not allow a “line of sight” inside a woman’s or a girl’s sleeve to expose to view her upper arm (or another part of her body which should not be exposed to view) when she lifts or extends her arm.

As shown above, a woman’s or girl’s sleeves should be loose-fitting – not too tight. But it is also important to avoid a “line-of-sight” up the sleeve. One way to do this is for the loose-fitting sleeve to have a fitted cuff which could have a button or a tuck at the end of the sleeve.


Feminine Modesty Applies to Young Girls as well as Older Girls and Women

The standard ordered by Pope Pius XI was explicitly stated to apply to “young girls”13 (as well as to older girls and to women).14 Proper manners of conduct and dress should start when a child is very young. It is important to begin to train children early and to start instilling habits of modesty in them, as well as to give good example (i.e., reinforce good habits in others who see those children).

Just as children can be taught even before they can speak, not to touch objects that their parents decide are “off-limits”, and not to “scream bloody murder” to get attention, likewise children can be taught how to dress and act modestly.

In reality, then, there should exist little if any difference between the way adults and children practice the virtue of modesty.  The pictures of the three young children of Fatima illustrate this fact.


Modesty Standards Apply In All Activities – There is No “Sports or Swimming Exception”!

Modesty standards (including regarding modest sleeves) do not change based on the activities in which the woman or girl is engaged. Catholic modesty does not have an exception for swimming or athletic pursuits. The same standard of modesty must be practiced at all times and in all places15 since human nature is always the same and subject to the same temptations.

For example, Pope Pius XI stated that it is better for girls and women to not even attend athletic events but, if they are forced to attend, then they must do so dressed completely modestly. Here are his words:

Let parents keep their daughters away from public gymnastic games and contests; but if their daughters are compelled to attend such exhibitions, let them see that they are fully and modestly dressed. Let them never permit their daughters to don immodest garb.16

This is obvious. How blunted and ruined would a girl’s or woman’s sense of modesty be if it were somehow acceptable for her to expose herself as long as she was engaged in certain activities! For example, it would be irrational to consider it acceptable for a girl or woman to be seen in a swimming suit as long as there is a pool or lake located nearby!

The same applies to other sports such as volleyball, tennis, running, horseback riding, and so on. In all such activities, females must take extra care to ensure their dress as well as all their bodily movements and postures will not violate Catholic modesty.

Six Additional Considerations Regarding the Catholic Standard of Modesty

Please note the following six consequences that flow directly from the above Catholic requirements of Marylike modesty:

  1. This standard is not declared to be the ideal, but rather is the minimum to avoid sin. It certainly shows a spirit contrary to the love of God and to the love of virtue for any Catholic to try to “get as close as possible to sin without crossing the line into sin”. Thus, a Marylike spirit of modesty would not aim merely at these minimum modesty requirements as if they were the ideal.

  2. Parents, especially fathers, have a duty to guide the women and girls under their care and enforce this Catholic standard of modesty. Here is one way in which Pope Pius XI declared the responsibility of parents for the modesty of their children:

    Let parents never permit their daughters to don immodest garb.17

  1. Parents, especially mothers, have a duty to guide their daughters not only to comply with this Marylike sleeve standard (and all other aspects of modesty), but to love modesty. Mothers can do this especially by their own example.

  1. Faithful and informed Catholics must avoid the scandal of complimenting or praising the appearance of anyone who is immodestly dressed.

  1. Just as women and girls must wear modest sleeves, this same modesty standard also applies to photographs, paintings, and statues, whether the woman or girl who is depicted is known or unknown.  Obviously, it would be illogical for a woman to carefully dress modestly herself but also to promote or display scandalous art on her wall (or scandalous pictures of her relatives hung with magnets on her refrigerator, etc.).  For the very same reason that she is forbidden to dress this way, a Catholic is forbidden to promote or display such immodest images. 

  1. If we somehow come into possession of immodest garments (such as garments with immodest sleeves), we should not give them away or donate them, because then we would become an accomplice or accessory to someone else’s sin of wearing them.18


Objections Which Might Be Raised

One could suppose that there are six objections which could be made to the Catholic standard set forth above:

  1. Standards have changed – laxer, modern modesty standards now apply. (This objection is closely related to the excuse that “everyone does it”.)

  2. The standard given by Pope Pius XI is too extreme, too strict, or exaggerated.

  3. If anyone has a problem with the way I dress, he must have a dirty mind.”

  4. Sleeves which fail Pope Pius XI’s standard for modesty are “no big deal” and “I’m used to them”.

  5. But where I live it gets so hot in the summer!  So, I need to wear sleeves which fail Pope Pius XI’s standard for modesty in order to stay cool.”


  6. I cannot find clothing which fulfills Pope Pius XI’s requirements. So I just do the best I can, and God will understand.”

Below, we examine each of these objections.

  1. Modesty Standards have Changed – Laxer, Modern Modesty Standards Now Apply.

We live in pagan times. Let us beware of rationalizing immodesty by saying that this standard of Marylike modesty is old-fashioned and that we live in modern times where the requirements of modesty are weaker.

Here is one way that Pope Pius XII warns about allowing our modesty standards to weaken as society becomes more decadent:

[A] garment must not be evaluated according to the estimation of a decadent or already-corrupt society, but according to the aspirations of a society which prizes the dignity and seriousness of its public attire.19

So we should not take our cues regarding modesty from our godless, degenerate society which uses false, lax, modern modesty standards. Our Lady warned at Fatima about these immodest fashions of our times. Here are here words:

Certain fashions will be introduced that will offend Our Lord very
much.

A variation of this claim (that modesty standards have weakened) is:

Do you know how badly the girls are dressing now? So even just my wearing a dress is good enough!

This false claim is the sin of moral relativism! It is the heresy of Situation Ethics. This error states that what is right and wrong changes based on the current conditions and what other people do. When others dress badly enough, this can allow me to change my own standards of modesty. But the truth is that modesty never changes because human nature never changes.

Here is how Pope Pius XII condemned this pernicious method of making decisions:


The distinctive mark of this morality [i.e., Situation Ethics] is that it is in fact in no way based on universal moral laws, for instance, on the Ten Commandments, but on the real and concrete conditions or circumstances in which one must act, and according to which the individual conscience has to judge and choose. This state of things is unique and valid only once for each human action. This is why the supporters of this ethics affirm that the decision of one’s conscience cannot be commanded by universal ideas, principles, and laws ….”20


But at the Particular Judgment of each person, God will not “ask” how many people around us committed sin. Rather, He will “ask” us why we sinned.

  1. The Standard Given by Pope Pius XI is Too Extreme, Too Strict, or Exaggerated.

Calling Pope Pius XI’s modesty standard “extreme” implies that the objector is unreceptive to the Catholic Standard of modesty (and not wanting to be different from the world). But we should make all efforts to please God, ignoring the sinful standards of the persons around us who are on the road to hell. As Pope Pius XII taught:

Our Savior demands of us above all that we never consent to any sin, even internally, and that we steadfastly remove far from us anything that can even slightly tarnish the beautiful virtue of purity. In this matter no diligence, no severity can be considered exaggerated.”21

Let us understand that the world will always say that God’s friends are “extreme” in their practice of virtue and in their filial fear of offending Him.

  1. If Anyone has a Problem with the Way I Dress, He Must Have a Dirty Mind.”

Another rationalization of a girl’s or woman’s immodesty (and attempt to deny culpability for the sins she causes in others by the way she dresses), is to say that if someone else is concerned about the way she dresses, it shows that there is a problem with that other person, not with herself. But the truth is just the opposite!

Sensitivity to someone else’s failure to dress modestly is a good sign in that sensitive person. Here is how Pope Pius XII teaches this truth:

Greater sensitivity to this warning against the snares of evil [of immodesty], far from being grounds for criticizing those who possess it, as though it were a sign of interior depravity, is actually a mark of an upright soul and of watchfulness over the passions.22

A person with a “dirty mind” is callous to the filth in his mind and is unaffected by additional filth entering it. But a man with a clean heart and mind is disturbed at the entrance of immodesty through the windows of his eyes, in a way which resembles the perturbation of a housewife at the prospect of a person wearing muddy shoes while walking on the clean white carpet in her home.

  1. Sleeves which Fail Pope Pius XI’s Standard for Modesty are “No Big Deal” and “I’m Used to Them”.

A woman or girl could say that wearing a sleeveless garment (or a garment with inadequate and immodest sleeves) is “no big deal” and that “I’m used to it”. 

But such an excuse merely shows that she has become used to sin and is contaminated by some moral taint.  Here is Pope Pius XII’s warning against this excuse:

The most insidious of sophisms, which are usually repeated to justify immodesty, seems to be the same everywhere. One of these resurrects the ancient saying “let there be no argument about things we are accustomed to”, in order to brand as old-fashioned the rebellion of honest people against fashions which are too bold…23

We must take great care to not allow ourselves to become used to the immodesty that we see all around us. Instead, we should reflect that “more people go to hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason.”24

One important way to develop a stronger sense of modesty (and to avoid becoming callous to the sin of immodesty) is to avoid as much as possible the frequent exposure to the immodesty of others.

  1. But where I live it gets so hot in the summer!  So in order to stay cool, I need to wear sleeves which fail Pope Pius XI’s standard for modesty.”

Hot weather is not a new phenomenon and summer is not a new invention. Throughout the history of mankind, women have dressed modestly, in womanly clothes, and stayed cool enough, even if the weather gave them the opportunity to practice patience and to offer up some discomfort.

We should reflect that our neighbor’s spiritual good is more important than our bodily comfort. Therefore, as St. Thomas Aquinas teaches, “as regards the welfare of the soul we ought to love our neighbor more than our own body.”25

Even if we were to suppose that offering up the heat of summer out of love of God were somehow “heroic”, then this is a tiny bit of “heroism” that God expects us to practice.

  1. I cannot find clothing which fulfills Pope Pius XI’s requirements. So I just do the best I can, and God will understand.”

At the heart of this excuse is the false claim that God fails to provide a way to avoid every sin. The truth is that God always provides a way to be virtuous and do the right thing in every circumstance. Of course, we may have to make more effort. We may have to give up certain pleasures or make certain sacrifices. But He will aid us.

In the case of finding modest clothing, it can be done if a woman/girl truly puts virtue (especially modesty and charity) above all else.

First, a woman or girl can wear a long sleeve blouse either with the sleeves down to her wrists or rolled up to her elbows.

Second, altering a blouse (to cut off long sleeves and hem them) does not require advanced seamstress skills, but only the basics. But, even if one does not know the basics of sewing (and plenty of women do not because they were never taught), then let them prioritize learning those essentials over other matters. There are free videos available teaching the basics such as hems, cuffs, extending sleeves, and so on.

If one has no computer, then public libraries can provide books on the subject or obtain books through an interlibrary loan. It is generally quite easy to obtain free or very affordable fabric on which to practice sewing. Also, one can ask older, experienced women for help.

But if for whatever reason a woman cannot learn the basics of sewing, let her make the sacrifice of buying a few modest outfits and wearing them more frequently (regardless of what other people might think about the lack of variety), rather than sacrificing modesty for the sake of variety in her clothing.

Question: Was the Catholic Standard for Modest Sleeves Relaxed to Allow Quarter-Length Sleeves – that is, Sleeves Extending Only Half Way Between the Arm Pit and the Elbow?

In articles published about modesty, it is common for authors to first quote Pope Pius XI’s standard that feminine modesty requires sleeves to extend to the elbow at a minimum. But then, often, these authors add the following note:

Because of impossible market conditions, quarter-length sleeves are temporarily tolerated with Ecclesiastical Approval, until Christian womanhood again turns to Mary as the model of modesty in dressing.

Question: Is it true that this loosening of the modest sleeve standard is really allowed?

Below, we consider this question, considering that this standard is said to be loosened:

  1. with Ecclesiastical Approval”;

  2. temporarily”; and

  3. because of impossible market conditions”.

1. Was the Standard for Modest Sleeves Loosened with
“Ecclesiastical Approval”?

If Pope Pius XI’s modesty standard was overridden by “ecclesiastical authority”, who is this authority that could change the standard given by the pope himself?

In all of the many modesty articles we have read, no ecclesiastical authority is ever identified as the source of this loosening of the modesty standard of Catholic female sleeve length. Catholic Candle carefully researched this question and sought the origin of that loosening of the minimum sleeve-length standard.

A number of articles published in the last fifty years asserted that Fr. Bernard A. Kunkel is the origin of the loosening of this Catholic standard. (Fr. Kunkel was a priest in the diocese of Belleville, Illinois, in the middle of the 1900s who founded a well-publicized worldwide crusade for Marylike modesty.) But Catholic Candle could not locate any proof for the claim that Fr. Kunkel was, in fact, the origin of that looser standard.

In Fr. Kunkel’s own publications on modesty he does state that there is this loosening of the sleeve-length standard “with Ecclesiastical Approval”. But he does not disclose who that ecclesiastical authority is that approved the dispensation.

Catholic Candle diligently searched and was unable to find anyone earlier than Fr. Kunkel who claimed there to be a dispensation from Pope Pius XI’s minimum feminine modesty standard for sleeves.

Based on Catholic Candle’s research, we tentatively believe that Fr. Kunkel received the permission from his own diocese’s ordinary, Bishop Henry Althoff, to publish this loosened minimum sleeve standard. Bishop Althoff supported Fr. Kunkel’s work and approved of his modesty crusade, including Fr. Kunkel’s booklet which was called The Marylike Modesty Handbook of the Purity Crusade of Mary Immaculate.

Fr. Kunkel’s principal booklet was published on December 8, 1944, with the Nihil Obstat, by Leonard A. Bauer, S.T.D., with the approval of Bishop Althoff. This “Nihil Obstat” declares on behalf of the bishop that there is nothing in this publication regarding Marylike modesty which is contrary to the Catholic Faith. So, apparently, Fr. Kunkel (likely, after discussing the matter with his bishop), stated that he had “ecclesiastical approval” – likely from his own bishop – to “temporarily” loosen the standard for sleeve-length modesty.


What Would Be the Effect of Bishop Althoff Approving the Loosening of the Sleeve-Length Modesty Standard?

Whereas the pope has authority and jurisdiction over all Catholics worldwide, a bishop only has authority and only has the power to bind and loose those Catholics in his own diocese. Bishop Althoff was the bishop of Belleville, Illinois.

Further, even in his own diocese, a bishop does not have the authority to change the rulings of the pope in all things. But in those matters on which the bishop does have the authority to modify the pope’s rulings, that modification applies only for his own diocese. Thus, it would seem that Bishop Althoff of Belleville did not have the authority to loosen the standard of modesty for persons outside of his diocese – even assuming that he had this authority for his own flock.


This Loosening of the Sleeve-Length Modesty Standard was Purportedly Done “Temporarily” More than 80 Years Ago!

Even if Bishop Althoff had authority to loosen the modesty standard for his own diocese, that occurred in 1944 – when Fr. Kunkel published this “approval” of the loosened standard. But this loosening was stated to be “temporary”. It is now more than 80 years later. Is that “temporary” measure still in effect? Did Bishop Althoff intend this “temporary” loosening to continue more than 80 years later?

What is Implied by the Statement that the Loosened Modesty Standard Is “Because of Impossible Market Conditions”?

This purported justification for the loosened modesty standard is puzzling. The reference to “market conditions” seems to imply that women’s and girls’ garments with modest sleeves could not be purchased or were “impossible” to find for sale.

It would seem that, if it were hard to find blouses with elbow-length sleeves, it would be sensible for women and girls to sew their own blouses or to cut off full-length sleeves at the elbow (and hem them, as needed).

This puzzle is all-the-more bewildering because Fr. Kunkel’s note (quoted above) states that this loosening of the modesty standard extends “until Christian womanhood again turns to Mary as the model of modesty in dressing”.

So, which is it?

  • Was the standard (purportedly) loosened because modest garments could not be purchased?

    or

  • Was it because women have turned away from Marylike modesty?

If it is the second of these, then is this statement acknowledging that the standard was loosened because “Chistian womanhood” ceased to follow the proper standard and no longer dressed modestly? If so, since when does the Catholic Church change Her moral standards on anything because Catholics do not obey? Again, Fr. Kunkel’s note is puzzling!

Can a Minimum Modesty Standard be Further Reduced?

Pope Pius XI gave a modesty standard which is a minimum to avoid sin. It seems dubious that a minimum standard of modesty could be reduced to less than that minimum. In other words, isn’t a minimum, a minimum? A minimum standard does not disappear simply because a decadent society ignores this standard (as Pope Pius XII points out above).


The “Bottomline” About Fr. Kunkel’s and Bishop Althoff’s Temporary Loosening of the Modesty Standard

Although we assume all good intentions on the part of Fr. Kunkel and Bishop Althoff (who were apparently responsible for the claim that the modesty standard was “temporarily” loosened), it seems doubtful that this loosening ever applied anywhere outside of the diocese of Belleville, Illinois. Further, it seems even more certain that this loosened standard does not apply outside of Belleville now, 80 years later.

So it seems that prudent Catholics should simply follow the standard issued by Pope Pius XI.

Conclusion of this Article

Feminine Modesty Pertains to Sleeves in Six Ways. Sleeves must:

  1. Be long enough;

  2. Not be made of a flesh-colored material (i.e., a color creating the illusion of bare skin);

  3. Not be made of transparent or “see-through” material;

  4. Not be too tight;

  1. Not be made of a fabric that is too supple or clingy; and

  2. Not allow a “line of sight” up a woman’s or a girl’s arm inside her sleeve, above her elbow.

We live in pagan times.  Just as a living organism only stays alive (i.e., remains a living plant or animal), if it resists the corrupting influences (e.g., of bacteria) which are all around it, likewise we must protect the life of our souls (which live the life of grace) by resisting the moral corruption of sin all around us.

Let us beware of rationalizing immodesty by saying that the standard of Marylike modesty is too old-fashioned and that we live in modern times where the requirements of modesty are weaker.

It is Catholic Common Sense that we should not adopt the dress or other practices of the anti-Christ revolution (including immodesty) no matter how many other people do so in our decadent times.26 

Let us live our Catholic Faith!  We need to devote ourselves to restoring all things in Christ!  One important aspect of this is for women to dress modestly.

Catholic feminine modesty is a beautiful ornament of a good woman or girl.  All of us – men and women – should love and appreciate this virtue!

Let women and girls love to always dress with Marylike modesty, including modest sleeves!

Let men and boys appreciate, admire, and defend women and girls who dress modestly!

1 Truly, an unmarried man is a fool if the future wife that he seeks is not first-of-all a woman of deep virtue – including modesty. Further, an unmarried woman should realize that the potential future husband she is attracting would not be a man of virtue (who prioritizes virtue in his future family), if she does not love and live the virtues herself.


2 Here is how Pope Pius XI declared the responsibility of parents for the modesty of their children:


Let parents never permit their daughters to don immodest garb.

Quoted from #3 of the January 12, 1930 Instruction issued by the Sacred Congregation of the Council at the order of Pope Pius XI.

3 For a fuller analysis of the evil of obscene speech, read this article: https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/faith/sins-caused-by-obscene-speech


4 The Whole Truth About Fatima, Frere Michel de la Sante Trinite, Vol. II, Ch.4, Appendix II.

5 Truly, an unmarried woman is a fool if the future husband that she seeks is not first-of-all a man of deep virtue – including the strong, manly custody of his eyes.

6 As shown here, the correct standard of modesty is proportional. So a modest, minimum length for the skirt of a tall woman would not be the same minimum length for a short woman or a girl because the tall woman’s legs are longer. Similarly, a blouse’s neckline would be a different maximum distance from the base of a woman’s neck for a tall woman compared to a short woman or a girl. This is accounted for by every female using the width of her own fingers in gauging the maximum distance from her blouse’s neckline to the base of her neck.

7 Catholic Candle note: This standard requires that a woman’s or a girl’s knees be entirely covered, at all times not only sometimes. Thus, the full knee must be covered whether she is standing, sitting, kneeling, genuflecting, running, walking, going up or down stairs, riding a bicycle, outside on a windy day, etc.


8 Published by Cardinal Vicar Basilio Pompili at the direction of Pope Pius XI, September 24, 1928.


Here is the Italian version of this standard, published contemporaneously:


Ricordiamo che non può essere ritenu¬ to modesto il vestito che lasci scoperta per più di due dita la base del collo, quello che non copra il braccio almeno fino al gomito e quello che non scenda un poco più giù del ginocchio. Egualmente non è modesto l’abito di stoffa trasparente, e la calza che imiti perfettamente il color della carne tanto da far credere che la gamba sia ignuda.


Published by Cardinal Vicar Basilio Pompili at the direction of Pope Pius XI, September 24, 1928, in the Bollettino Del Clero Romano, October, 1928, p.134. This October, 1928 issue of the periodical can be found here: https://archive.org/details/circolare-alle-superiore-degli-istituti-religiosi-femminili

9 September 24, 1928 standard published at the order of Pope Pius XI.

10 September 24, 1928 standard published at the order of Pope Pius XI.

11 September 24, 1928 standard published at the order of Pope Pius XI.

12 September 24, 1928 standard published at the order of Pope Pius XI.

13 In the Italian version of this decree, the word for “young girls” is “giovanette”.

14 September 24, 1928 standard published at the order of Pope Pius XI.

15 Obviously, we are not referring to necessary activities undertaken in private related to proper hygiene.

16 January 12, 1930 decree ordered by Pope Pius XI and issued by the Congregation of the Council, through its Prefect, Cardinal Sbarbetti (emphasis added).


17 Quoted from #3 of the January 12, 1930 Directive issued by the Sacred Congregation of the Council at the order of Pope Pius XI.


18 One of many reasons for a woman or girl to become skilled in the art of sewing, is so that she can alter immodest garments, if feasible, to make them modest. For example, she could place a tuck at the end of a sleeve to prevent it from allowing a “line of sight” up the sleeve.

19 Pope Pius XII, Address to the Latin Union of High Fashion, November 8, 1957.

20 Quoted from Acts of the Apostolic See, 1952, pp 413-419 (emphasis added).


For a further explanation of the heresy of Situation Ethics in the context of Bishop Richard Williamson teaching this same pernicious error, read this article: https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/williamson-teaches-situation-ethics


21 Sacra Virginitas, by Pope Pius XII, March 25, 1954 (emphasis added).


22 Pope Pius XII, Address to the Latin Union of High Fashion, November 8, 1957 (bracketed words added to show the context).

23 Pope Pius XII, Address to the Latin Union of High Fashion, November 8, 1957.

24 The Whole Truth About Fatima, Frere Michel de la Sante Trinite, Vol. II, Ch.4, Appendix II.

25 Summa, IIa IIae, Q.26, a.5, respondeo.

26 For further analysis of the importance of not dressing like the revolutionaries around us, read this article: We Should Not Dress Like Cultural Revolutionaries! which is found at this link: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/02/05/we-should-not-dress-like-cultural-revolutionaries/

About the Temperaments Part XXI – Explaining the Effects of Fear in All Temperaments

Philosophy Notes

Catholic Candle note: The article below is part twenty-first part of the study of the temperaments, starting with the Choleric temperament. Here are links to the first twenty parts:

  1. Part I: Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/

  2. Part II: A general overview of the weaknesses of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/

  3. Part III: A consideration of the pride of the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/

  4. Part IV: A general discussion of anger as a passion – in order to establish a foundation for studying anger in the Choleric Temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/

  5. Part V: Concerning the motivations for anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/

  6. Part VI: Concerning what anger does to the body: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/

  7. Part VII: Explaining when anger is sinful: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/

  8. Part VIII: Explaining how being slighted provokes anger: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/

  9. Part IX: Explaining how anger turns into the sin of holding a grudge: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/

  10. Part X: Recommendations to help cholerics to overcome pride: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/

  11. Part XI: Explaining how a person sins by not using his reason: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/

  12. Part XII: Explaining some reasons why a choleric does not use his reason properly: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/

  13. Part XIII: Explaining why the choleric fears to use his reason well: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/

  14. Part XIV: Explaining generally how Satan targets our fallen and weakened intellects: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/

  1. Part XV: Explaining the passions in general, to lay the foundation for our consideration of the passion of fear: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/10/26/3050/

  1. Part XVI: Explaining fear as a passion: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/11/25/lesson-51-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvi/

  1. Part XVII: Explaining how fear works in the soul and influences all of the temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/12/29/lesson-52-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xvii/

  1. Part XVIII: Explaining how pain and death are objects of fear for persons of any temperament: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/01/26/lesson-53-temperaments-choleric-temperament-pain-and-death-are-objects-of-fearf-any-temperament/

  1. Part XIX: Explaining in what way sin is an object of fear for all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/02/26/lesson-54-temperaments-choleric-temperament-whether-sin-is-an-object-of-fear-for-all-temperaments/

  2. Part XX: Explaining the causes of fear – applying to all temperaments: https://catholiccandle.org/2026/03/31/marys-school-of-sanctity-3/

Mary’s School of Sanctity

Lesson #56 About the Temperaments – Part XXI – Explaining the Effects of Fear in All Temperaments

Earlier, when we considered the passions in general, we noted that the passions cause transmutations (physical changes) in the body. Because one of these passions is fear, St. Thomas Aquinas, greatest doctor of the Church, addresses the physical changes which occur in those who are afraid.

Let us now examine how he explains the effects of fear on our bodies. This will help us to see the benefit of understanding our fallen human nature and how our body and soul work together in a very intricate and complete manner.

We know from our catechism that we humans are composed of body and soul. However, we do not ponder as much as we should the fact that the union of our body and soul is so complete that nothing happens in the one which does not affect the other. Below, we will consider further the soul’s manifold influences on the function of the body.

But, correspondingly, our frail and delicate human body influences our soul. Both soul and body suffer the wounds of original sin. The soul suffers four wounds, namely, the darkening of the intellect, the weakening of the will, the unruliness of the passions, and malice (i.e., the inclination to evil). The body suffers sickness, fatigue, aging, and, of course, death.

For example, when we suffer a bodily ailment, such as a headache, our intellect has difficulty focusing on our mental work. And when we have a spiritual problem, our body partakes of suffering in the form of stress pain which could include any number of things, for instance, muscle cramps, headaches, nausea etc.

St. Thomas Addresses Some Very Interesting Effects of Fear

St. Thomas tells us that there are two movements which occur in someone when he is afraid:

  1. The movement in the appetitive power which is in the soul itself; and

  2. The physical change which occurs in the body.

Both of these movements are mutually proportionate; and consequently the physical change resembles the very nature of the appetitive movement.

However, as to the appetitive movement of the soul, fear implies a certain contraction or inward withdrawal. The reason for this inward withdrawal is that fear arises from imagining some threatening evil which is difficult to repel. Now a thing is difficult to repel because the person lacks the power to repel it. Consequently, the weaker the person’s power is, the more he withdraws inwardly.1

On the physical level, there is a change in the body which corresponds to this fear arising in the soul.

In other words, St. Thomas is telling us that because we are composed of body and soul, fear affects us in both of our parts. There are the spiritual effects and there are bodily effects. Let us first consider the bodily effects and then come back to the spiritual effects.

Bodily effects –an Inward Contraction and Trembling

Let’s take a moment to review the definition of passion in order to better understand what happens in the soul and body when one is afraid.

We explained in a previous lesson that a passion is:

a movement of the sensitive appetite when we imagine good or evil. In other words, passion is a movement of the irrational [part of the] soul, when we think of good or evil.2

St. Thomas tells us that fear moves the irrational part of the soul to an inward contraction of bodily heat3 which further causes one to tremble.

St. Thomas gives two analogies which help us to understand the concept of this inward contraction:

We observe in one who is dying that nature withdraws inwardly on account of the lack of power; and again we see the inhabitants of a city, when seized with fear, leave the outskirts and as far as possible, move to the inner quarters of the city. It is in resemblance to this contraction, which pertains to the appetite of the soul, that in fear, a similar contraction of heat and vital spirits towards the inner parts takes place in regard to the body. 4

Here is how St. Thomas explains the physical trembling which is caused by fear:

In fear there takes place a certain contraction from the outward to the inner parts of the body, the result being that the outer parts become cold; and for this reason trembling is occasioned in these parts, being caused by a lack of power in controlling the members, which lack of power is due to the want of heat, which is an instrument whereby the soul moves those members, as stated in De Anima, Bk. 2; ch.4, #416b29.5

St. Thomas adds:

In fear, heat abandons the heart, with a downward movement: hence in those who are afraid the heart especially trembles, as also those members which are connected with the breast where the heart resides. Hence those who fear tremble especially in their speech, on account of the tracheal artery being near the heart.

The lower lip, too, and the lower jaw tremble, through their connection with the heart; which explains the chattering of the teeth. For the same reason the arms and hands tremble. Or else because the aforesaid members are more mobile and for this reason the knees tremble in those who are afraid, according to Isa. 35:3: Strengthen ye the feeble hands, and confirm the trembling [Vulg.: ‘weak’] knees.6

St. Thomas explains that this difficulty which a fearful person has in his speech can render the person speechless. 7

A further result is when a person is mortally afraid, he will even turn pale. Here are St. Thomas’s words concerning this aspect:

Mortal perils are contrary not only to the appetite of the soul, but also to nature. Consequently in such like fear, there is contraction not only in the appetite, but also in the corporeal nature: for when an animal is moved by the imagination of death, it experiences a contraction of heat towards the inner parts of the body, as though it were threatened by a natural death. Hence it is that those who are in fear of death turn pale (Ethic. Bk.4, ch. 9, #1128b13).8

The Two Spiritual Effects of Fear

Fear causes two spiritual effects in a man:

  1. It makes him more willing to take counsel – but less able to give good counsel; and

  2. It hinders him from performing good actions under some conditions.

Below, we will consider each of these spiritual effects of fear.

  1. Fear Makes a Man More Willing to Take Counsel But Less Able to Give Good Counsel

A man can be said to be a “man of counsel” in two ways:

  1. From his being willing or anxious to take counsel; and

  2. As a man who is well-suited for giving good counsel.

In the first way, St. Thomas tells us that fear makes men more willing to take counsel. Here are his words:

Because, as the Philosopher says (Ethic. Bk. 3, ch.3 #1112b10), “we take counsel on great matters, because therein we distrust ourselves.” However, things which make us afraid, are not simply evil, but have a certain magnitude, both because they seem difficult to repel, and because they are apprehended as near to us, as stated above (Q.42, a.2). Wherefore men seek for counsel especially when they are afraid.9

In the second way, St. Thomas tells us that fear (or any other passion) does not make a man apt for giving good counsel. He explains as follows:

Because when a man is affected by a passion, things seem to him greater or smaller than they really are: thus to a lover, what he loves seems better; to him who fears, what he fears seems more dreadful. Consequently, owing to the lack of right judgment, every passion considered in itself, hinders the faculty of giving good counsel.10

  1. Fear Hinders a Man From Doing Good Actions Under Some Circumstances

As set forth above, the second spiritual effect of fear is that it hinders a man from performing good actions.

St. Thomas quotes St. Paul’s famous words, “With fear and trembling work out your salvation,” and tells us plainly that St. Paul would not say this if fear were a hindrance to a good work. Therefore fear does not hinder a good action.

Here are St. Thomas’s words:

Man’s exterior actions are caused by the soul as first mover, but by the bodily members as instruments. However, action may be hindered both by defect of the instrument, and by defect of the principal mover. On the part of the bodily instruments, fear, considered in itself, is always apt to hinder exterior action, on account of the outward members being deprived, through fear, of their heat. But on the part of the soul, if the fear be moderate, without much disturbance of the reason, it conduces [i.e., contributes] to reason working well, in so far as it causes a certain solicitude and makes a man take counsel and work with greater attention. If, however, fear increases so much as to disturb the reason, it hinders action even on the part of the soul. But of such a fear the Apostle does not speak.11

St. Thomas’s comment here about St. Paul’s words is very crucial for our understanding of fear. It is important to note well that our will is supposed to moderate our passions. St. Paul is obviously speaking of having a healthy Fear of the Lord. We must fear displeasing Our Lord most importantly because He is All-Good. We use Fear of the Lord which is one of the seven Gifts of the Holy Ghost, to help us work out our salvation. The context of St. Paul’s words show that it is to this that he refers.

A fear being moderate and not paralyzing is the main reason why St. Thomas says that fear does not hinder action (but makes a person more solicitous). But someone could respond that since laziness and sloth are kinds of fear (regarding physical work and spiritual work respectively), they are examples of fear hindering good action. St. Thomas grants that objection regarding laziness, in the following words:

Everyone in fear shuns that which he fears: and therefore, since laziness is a fear of work itself as being toilsome, it hinders work by withdrawing the will from it. But fear of other things conduces to action, in so far as it inclines the will to do that whereby a man escapes from what he fears.12

Now that we have finished looking into the effects of fear in both the spiritual realm and the body, we can turn our attention to the proper use of the passion of fear.

How Can We Use the Passion of Fear As We Ought?

There are two key aspects to consider about fear. We must consider its cause, namely, what we love, and the role that our imagination plays in the passion of fear.

In our last lesson we discussed how love is the cause of fear.13 We said that we either fear that we will not obtain the object of our desire or that we will lose an object that we love. We stated how we must be cautious about what we decide to love and make sure our loves are pleasing to God and conform to right reason.

In our current lesson we paraphrased St. Thomas’s words about the appetitive movement of the soul:

However, as to the appetitive movement of the soul, fear implies a certain contraction or inward withdrawal. The reason for this inward withdrawal is that fear arises from the imagination of some threatening evil which is difficult to repel.14

Here we see again the important role that our imagination plays in our passion of fear. Above, St. Thomas teaches the importance of our fear being moderate. This means our fear must be reasonable and not uncontrolled. We are ultimately responsible for our use of our will because sin is an inordinate use of our God-given faculties. In other words, we are obliged to control ourselves.

A Preview…

In our next lesson we will take a deeper look into these two aspects (viz., love and imagination) to make sure our loves are orderly and that we use our imagination carefully and according to reason. In this deeper look at these two aspects, we will see how the devil lays snares for persons of every temperament.

1 This is taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.41, a.2.

2 This is taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.22, a.3, Sed Contra, where St. Thomas quotes St. John Damascence’s work De Fide Orthodox (that is Concerning the Orthodox Faith), Book 2, chapter 22 (emphasis added; bracketed words added to show the context).

3 As St. Thomas explains, following Aristotle, “heat is an instrument whereby the soul moves those members” of the body. Summa, Ia IIae, Q.44, a.3, Respondeo.

4 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.44, a.1. Respondeo.

5 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.44, a.3, Respondeo. Note: the work entitled De Anima is a work by Aristotle.

6 Summa, Ia Iiae, Q.44, a.3, Reply, ad 2.


7 Here is how St. Thomas explains this truth:


[In] those who are afraid, the internal heat and vital spirits move from the heart downwards, as stated above (ad 1): wherefore fear hinders speech which ensues from the emission of the vital spirits in an upward direction through the mouth: the result being that fear makes its subject speechless. For this reason, too, fear makes its subject tremble, as the Philosopher says (De Problematibus section 27, prob.1.6 #947b12, and7 #948a35).


Summa, Ia IIae Q. 44, a.1. Reply, ad 2.

8 Summa, Ia IIae Q.44, a.1. Reply ad. 3 (citing and relying on Aristotle’s treatise called Nicomachean Ethics).

9 Summa, Ia IIae Q.44, a.2. Respondeo (citing and relying on Aristotle’s treatise called Nicomachean Ethics).

10 Summa, Ia Iiae, Q.44, a.2, Respondeo.

11 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.44, a.4, Respondeo (emphasis and bracketed word added).


12 Summa, Ia IIae Q. 44, a.4. Reply ad. 3.


14 Summa, Ia IIae Q. 41, a.2 (emphasis added).

Brief Analysis of the Justness of the Current U.S. War with Iran

There are many false assertions in the media about many aspects of current events. The mainstream media slants and lies about many things. Also, much of the so-called “conservative” media slants, lies and/or is not objective about at least some things. So for example, Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire are supposed to be conservative but they so strongly and uncritically support Israel that they would predictably support whatever Israel does, including Israel’s attacks on Iran.

But based on our best information, it seems clear that Trump’s Iran war is unjust on two grounds:

  1. The U.S. and Israel Attacked Preemptively: Trump tried to defend his starting the war based on the questionable supposition that Iran was about to attack the U.S. Here are Trump’s words:

If we didn’t do it, they [Iran] were going to attack first.1

This is unjust because it is a mortal sin and is unjust to attack a country because of the supposition that that other country plans to attack (although has not begun actually doing so).

  1. The U.S. and Israel Unreasonably Kill Innocent Non-Combatants, especially women and children. Very many non-combatants have been killed in the Iran war. This is like Israel inexcusably butchering women and children in Gaza.

    It does not seem correct that Trump is taking sufficient measures to avoid killing innocent non-combatants. One proof of this fact is that he has even openly threatened the mass murder of innocent non-combatants. Here are Trump’s words at the time of one of his threatened deadlines:

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.2 

It is true that Iran similarly kills innocent non-combatants but two wrongs do not make a right.

It is a mortal sin to fail to make all reasonable efforts in a war to spare the lives of innocent non-combatants. Trump’s Iran war seems to fail to spare and protect such non-combatants.

Because the U.S. war is unjust (based on the best information we have), Trump and those others who are responsible appear to be guilty of thousands of murders in cold blood.


One Further Question about the Iran War:

If the U.S. is Not the “Good Side” of the War,
Does that Make Iran the “Good Side”?

Although the U.S. certainly appears unjust in starting and conducting this war, this does not mean that Iran is the “good side” in this war. Iran’s government and populace are largely against Christ, the Son of God, against His Church and against the Natural Law and justice.

So Iran is not the “good side”, even though the U.S. is not either.

Just as there is no good side in the Iran war, we see that some other wars do not have a “good side” either. However, it would often be that one side is less-bad than the other side. This is like the situation where two rival drug gangs are killing each other’s members while engaged in a “turf war” in a city. It need not be that one of those drug gangs must be the “good side” – although one side could be less-bad than the other.

Bottomline: The U.S. war against Iran is unjust, inexcusable, and is the occasion of thousands of murders in cold blood – which are grave mortal sins.