Catholic Candle note: The article immediately below is part thirteen of the study of the Choleric temperament. The first twelve parts can be found here:
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #36: About the Temperaments – Beginning our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Part I: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/08/27/lesson-35-about-the-temperaments-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #37: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament– Part II: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/09/26/lesson-37-about-the-temperaments-continuation-of-the-choleric-temperament/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #38 — About the Temperaments – Continuing our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part III:: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/10/24/lesson-38-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #39 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – That Temperament’s Spiritual Combat – Part IV: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/11/26/lesson-39-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-iv/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #40: Temperaments – Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat – Part V: https://catholiccandle.org/2024/12/30/lesson-40-temperaments-choleric-temperament-their-spiritual-combat-part-v/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #41 – About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament: a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat — Part VI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/01/27/lesson-41-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vi/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #42: About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – a Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part VII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/02/21/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-vii/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #43 About the Temperaments –Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament — Their Spiritual Combat Part VIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/03/27/lesson-42-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-viii/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #44 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – Their Spiritual Combat, Part IX: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/04/23/lesson-44-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-ix/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #45 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part X: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/05/20/lesson-45-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-x/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #46 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Cholerics’ Spiritual Combat – Part XI: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/06/28/lesson-46-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xi/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #47 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/07/24/lesson-47-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xii/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity – Lesson #48 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIII: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/08/29/lesson-48-temperaments-choleric-temperament-a-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiii/
-
Mary’s School of Sanctity — Lesson #49 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat Part XIV: https://catholiccandle.org/2025/09/24/lesson-49-temperaments-choleric-temperament-the-cholerics-spiritual-combat-part-xiv/
Mary’s School of Sanctity
Lesson #50 About the Temperaments – Continuing Our Study of the Choleric Temperament – The Choleric’s Spiritual Combat – Part XV
Note: In this article, when referring to a person with a choleric temperament we simply will call him a “choleric”.
In
our last lesson, we considered how we are all affected by the wounds
of Original Sin and, in addition to this, we have our own personal
inclinations and disinclinations which arise from our genetic
(material, bodily) dispositions. We saw that one could have a
natural disinclination to think deeply and how, ultimately, this
disinclination stems back to the passion of fear.
The Passions Influence Us
We know that the passions are part of our human nature. We know that we all have them. In general, the passions work in our souls in the same way. However, what is unique to each of us is the strength of those passions and the particular ones which influence us most. We might not notice how each person, with his own particular temperament, has his own propensities and, therefore, his own unique battle to fight in order to train and discipline his passions to conform to his reason.
As
we consider the four temperaments, one crucial aspect of our
investigation is to understand how the passions are involved in the
way people behave. Because we want to better understand how the
passion of fear, in particular, affects each temperament, we first
consider, more generally, what a passion is. Then, with this
foundation, we will be better able to understand the role of the
passion of fear in our lives. Thus, in this lesson we will discuss
what, in general, a passion is and then look at the two types of
passions, namely the concupiscible
and the irascible.
What a Passion Is
St. Thomas Aquinas, the greatest doctor of the Church, treats the passions thoroughly. He begins by explaining the meaning of the word “passion” itself. St. Thomas explains that a passion is a type of receiving or “suffering”. One way that the word “passion” is used is to receive something that is a perfection of the receiver and this perfection (which is received) does not replace anything that had previously been present in the receiver; the second way passion is used it to receive something better, which is an improvement – replacing something worse than what is received; and the third and most proper way “passion” is used is to receive something worse which is a “downgrade” compared to that better thing which is replaced. Here are St. Thomas’ words:
The word passion is used in three ways:
First, in a general way, according as whatever receives anything is passive, even though nothing is taken from the receiver. Thus, we may say that the air is passive when it [viz., the air] is lit up. But this is to be perfected rather than to be passive.
Secondly, the word passive is employed in its proper sense, when something is received, while something else is taken away: and this happens in two ways.
-
For sometimes that which is lost is unsuitable to the thing: thus, when an animal’s body is healed, the body is said to be passive because it receives health, and loses sickness.
-
At other times the contrary occurs: thus, “to ail” is to be passive; because the ailment is received and health is lost. And here we have passion most properly. For a thing is said to be passive from its being drawn to the agent: and when a thing recedes from what is suitable to the receiver, then especially does it appear to be drawn to something else. Moreover, in De Generatione, Bk 1, ch.3 318b2, it is stated when a more excellent thing is generated from a less excellent thing, we have generation simply, and corruption in a particular respect: whereas the reverse is the case, when from a more excellent thing, a less excellent thing is generated. [That is, when a less excellent thing is generated, then this is corruption simply speaking and is generation in a particular respect.]
In these three ways it happens that passions are in the soul. For in the sense of mere reception [viz., the first meaning St. Thomas gives above], we speak of “feeling and understanding as being a kind of passion” (De Anima Bk1, ch.5 410a25). But passion, accompanied by the loss of something, is only in respect of a bodily transmutation [viz., a physical change occurring in the body]; wherefore passion properly so called cannot be in the soul, save accidentally, in so far as the composite1 is passive. But here again we find a difference; because when this transmutation is for the worse, it [the transmutation] has more of the nature of a passion, than when it [the transmutation] is for the better: hence sorrow is more properly a passion than joy.2
Next, St. Thomas gives us St. John Damascene’s definition of passion.
Passion is a movement of
the sensitive appetite when we imagine good or evil; in other words,
passion is a movement of the irrational [part
of the] soul, when
we think of good or evil.”3
Where Do We Find the Passions? Are They in Our Bodies (In Our Sensible Part)? Or in Our Souls (the Will)?
St. Thomas answers these questions in the following words:
[P]assion is properly to be found where there is corporeal transmutation [viz., physical change]. This corporeal transmutation is found in the act of the sensitive appetite [desire], and is not only spiritual, as in the sensitive apprehension [understanding through our senses], but also natural.
Now there is no need for
corporeal transmutation in the act of the intellectual appetite
[i.e.,
the will – N.B. “appetite” is another word for “desire”]:
because this appetite is not exercised by means of a corporeal organ.
It is therefore evident that passion is more properly in the act of
the sensitive appetite, than in that of the intellectual appetite;
and this is again evident from the definitions of Damascene quoted in
the sed contra
[above].4
Looking at the Two Classes of Passions that We Possess
St. Thomas explains that there are two groups of passions – the concupiscible and the irascible. Here are his words:
The acts of different powers differ in species [that is in kind]; for instance, to see, and to hear. But the irascible and the concupiscible are two powers, into which the sensitive appetite is divided, as was said [earlier in the Summa, in Ia, Q.81, a.2]. Therefore, since the passions are movements of the sensitive appetite, as stated in Q.22, a.3, the passions of the irascible faculty are specifically distinct from those of the concupiscible part.5 …
[T]he passions of the irascible part differ in species from those of the concupiscible faculty. For since the different powers have different objects, the passions of different powers must, of necessity, be referred to different objects.
In order, therefore, to
discern which passions are in the irascible, and which are in the
concupiscible, we must take the object of each of these powers. As
was stated above [in Ia, Q.81, a.2], the object of the concupiscible
power is sensible good or evil [simply apprehended as such], which
causes pleasure or pain. But, since the soul must, of necessity,
experience difficulty or struggle at times, in acquiring some such
good, or in avoiding some such evil, in so far as such good or evil
is more than our animal nature can easily
acquire or avoid; therefore, this good or evil itself, inasmuch as it
is of an arduous
or difficult nature,
is the object of the irascible faculty. Therefore, whatever passions
consider good or
evil absolutely,
belong to the concupiscible
power; for instance, joy, sorrow, love, hatred, and such like:
whereas those passions which consider good
or bad, as arduous,
through being difficult to obtain or avoid, belong to the irascible
faculty; such as daring, fear, hope and the like.6
A Short Summary Concerning the Passions and Their Respective Movements
What is good (or perceived as good) causes the soul to incline toward it and this inclination is the passion of love. Similarly, what is evil (or perceived as evil) causes the soul to incline away from it and this disinclination is the passion of hatred.
If the good be not yet possessed, then this good object causes the soul to seek to possess this good. This inclination of the soul is the passion of desire or concupiscence. If the evil can be avoided (or can be avoided in the future, even if it is possessed now) then the soul seeks to avoid it and this is the passion of dislike or aversion.
When the good is obtained, it causes the appetite to rest in that good which has been obtained. This rest in the good which has been obtained is the passion of delight or joy. Similarly, when an evil is present in the soul which is (at least for now) unavoidable, then that possession of the evil is the passion of sorrow or sadness.
Concerning the irascible passions, they pertain to obtaining a good which is difficult to obtain or to avoiding an evil which is difficult to avoid. For the good which is difficult to obtain, the soul’s seeking of this good is hope and the soul’s not seeking it because the difficulty is too great, is despair. With respect to an evil which is difficult to avoid, the soul’s seeking to avoid this evil which is difficult to avoid is daring and the soul’s anticipation of suffering the evil which is difficult to avoid, is fear. There is no irascible passion with respect to the good obtained because it is not a subject of difficulty. But concerning an evil already possessed, the soul’s reaction is anger.
Therefore,
we see that there are three pairs of passions in the concupiscible
appetites: namely,
love and
hatred; desire and
aversion;
joy and sorrow.
Likewise, there are
three “pairs” in the irascible:
namely, hope and
despair; fear
and daring; and
anger,
which passion has no opposite. Therefore, there are in all 11
different passions: six which are concupiscible, and five which are
irascible; in which all the animal passions are contained.7
A Preview… Having now considered the passions more generally, in our next lesson we will begin looking at the passion of fear in particular. In this way, we will be able to see how fear influences all the temperaments and especially how the passion of fear can hinder the intellectual life of a soul.
1 Here St. Thomas is referring to the composition of body and soul because the soul is the form of the body. In other words, the soul is what makes the body able to live and to be the type of living creature that it is.
2 Taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.22, a.1, Whether Any Passion is in the Soul? Respondeo. The works St. Thomas is citing are Aristotle’s work about the generation and corruption/dying of animals (De Generatione et Corruptione), and his work on the soul (De Anima) (bracketed words added for clarity).
3 This is taken from the Summa, Ia IIae, Q.22, a.3, Sed Contra, where St. Thomas quotes St. John Damascene’s work De Fide Orthodox, that is Concerning the Orthodox Faith, Book 2, chapter 22 (bracketed words added to show the context).
4 This is taken from the Summa Ia IIae, Q.22, a.3, Whether Passion Is in the Sensitive Appetite Rather Than in the Intellectual Appetite, Which Is Called the Will?, Respondeo, (bracketed words added to show context).
5 Summa, Ia IIae, Q.23, a.1, Whether the Passions of the Concupiscible Part are Different from Those of the Irascible Part?, Sed Contra. When St. Thomas mentions “specifically distinct,” he means that they differ in kind.
6 Summa, Ia IIae Q.23, a.1, Whether the Passions of the Concupiscible Part are Different from Those of the Irascible Part?, Respondeo.
7 This summary is based on Summa, Ia IIae, Q.23, a.4, Whether in the Same Power, There Are Any Passions, Specifically Different, but Not Contrary to One Another?