Catholic Candle note:
In February 2022, Catholic Candle began a multi-part examination of how the feminists follow the same program as Satan and Marx. This article is entitled The Feminist Program is the same as that of Satan and Marx.
Part 1 analyzes Satan’s program and begins to analyze how Marx has the same program. Part 1 can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2022/02/24/the-feminist-program-is-the-same-as-that-of-satan-and-marx/.
Part 2 completes the analysis showing how Marx’s program is the same as Satan’s program. Part 2 can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2022/03/27/the-feminist-program-is-the-same-as-that-of-satan-and-marx-part-ii/.
As shown in those first two parts of this article, Satan’s and Marx’s eight-point program:
- Is anti-God (and anti-worship of God);
- Promotes disobedience and opposition to the authority ordained by God;
- Seeks to divide people;
- Promotes discontent, envy, and discord;
- Promotes hatred;
- Is result-oriented and self-interested; Satan neither acts according to immutable principles nor encourages his followers to do so;
- Is full of lies; and
- Is against Nature and is anti-Natural Law.
Last month, Catholic Candle published Part 3 of this series. Part 3 begins the study of modern feminism and feminist leaders to see how they follow this same satanic and Marxist program. Part 3 shows how feminism and feminist leaders are anti-God and anti-worship of God. This article can be found here: https://catholiccandle.org/2022/04/20/the-feminist-program-is-the-same-as-that-of-satan-and-marx-part-iii/.
Part 4
(Continuing where we left off last month)
This month, we cover three of the aspects of how the feminist leaders and feminist principles follow Satan’s and Marx’s program:
- They promote disobedience, revolt, and opposition to the authority ordained by God;
- They seek to divide people; and
- They promote discontent, envy, and discord.
Below we examine each of these parts of the satanic, Marxist, feminist program.
- The feminist leaders and feminist principles are revolutionary and are against the authority ordained by God.
Modern feminist leaders are the “spiritual daughters” of Karl Marx (as well as Satan). Here is how one secular feminist leader described the feminist program at the 1852 Woman’s Rights Convention:
My friends, do we realize for what purpose we are convened? Do we fully understand that we aim at nothing less than an entire subversion of the present order of society, a dissolution of the whole existing social compact?[1]
This feminist leader echoes Marx when he declares that communism aims at “overthrow of all existing social conditions”.[2]
This feminist aim of “subversion” (i.e., “dissolution”) of present society is shown by feminists when they describe their movement as “the feminist revolution.”[3]
It would be false and naïve to think that by promoting feminism, the Marxists (or Satan) really care about women, any more than they really care about other groups who are pawns in their game. Instead, the Marxists are focused on achieving their evil goals. They are not looking to give women “choices”, if those choices include seeking that which is traditional or according to the Natural Law.
Here, for example, are the candid words of one secular feminist writer, Simone de Beauvoir, in an interview with another secular feminist leader, Betty Friedan, in which Beauvoir declared that their aim is a totalitarian system which inflicts compulsion on women (as well as men):
No, we do not believe that any woman should have this choice. No woman should be authorized to stay home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.[4]
Instead of “advocating” for women and giving them “choices”, feminists are rebelling against patriarchy, i.e., against authority. Here is how one feminist leader, Mary Daly, framed feminism’s total opposition to, and rebellion against, patriarchy:
Almost everything has been stolen from us by the patriarchy. Our creativity has been stolen, our creative energies, our religion [viz., the goddess religion]. I want it back.[5]
Feminist leader, Kate Millett, and other feminist leaders would sometimes open their “women’s empowerment” meetings by focusing those in attendance on the principle that the enemy was “patriarchy” and their goal was revolution. Here is one eyewitness account of the ritual exchange at the opening of one of these meetings:
“Why are we here today?” she [i.e., Kate Millett] asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” …[6]
This war on patriarchy includes rebelling against God Himself, since He is a Father and the model of all fathers. He is also the Power Itself and the Authority Itself behind all authority and all fatherhood.
Further, feminism’s war against patriarchy includes warring against the Catholic Church and Sacred Scripture, since they uphold the Natural Law principle that the husband is the head of the family and his wife must obey him. Here is one of the ways that St. Paul states this truth:
Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord: Because the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the Church. He is the Savior of His Body. Therefore, as the Church is subject to Christ, so also let the wives be, to their husbands in all things.
Ephesians, 5:22-24.
Conclusion of this Part
It is clear that feminism and feminist leaders seek revolution and rebel against God’s authority and against the authority of God’s representatives on earth, especially fathers (i.e., patriarchs).
Thus, we see that the feminist leaders and feminist principles follow the second point of Satan’s and Marx’s program: viz., promoting disobedience and opposition to the authority ordained by God.
- The feminist leaders and feminist principles seek to divide people.
Feminist leaders and their principles seek to divide people. They set one group against another. This is a classic Marxist (as well as a satanic) tactic, as we saw earlier in this multipart article.
One way feminists seek to divide groups of people is by name-calling. They call men “sexists”, “male chauvinists”[7], and “misogynists”[8]. They describe the traditional family as “domestic slavery” for the wife and mother, in which she (supposedly) suffers “social oppression” and “economic oppression”.[9]
One secular feminist leader, Simone De Beauvoir, showed that such characterizations are merely a tactical attempt to win sympathy for the feminist movement from the gullible and naïve. Although De Beauvoir does indeed call the family “domestic slavery”, she candidly expressed her concern that so many women want to live the life of a wife and mother in a traditional family. (This is not surprising, since this is the natural role God created them to have.) Here are De Beauvoir’s words:
No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.[10]
Although the feminist movement can sway many fuzzy-thinking people, nature is a strong force and the feminists must constantly remind women that they are “victims”, in order to try to prevent them from choosing this traditional, God-given vocation. Thus, these feminists must work hard to remind women they are “oppressed” by men, i.e., by patriarchy. Here is how secular feminist, Kate Millett put it:
A sexual revolution begins with the emancipation of women, who are the chief victims of patriarchy ….[11]
As we saw earlier in this multipart article, Marx and Satan have always promoted their goals in terms of “liberating” and “freedom”. As we see, the feminist movement is no exception.
Phyllis Schlafly, the astute anti-feminist founder of Eagle Forum, remarked that:
The feminist movement taught women to see themselves as victims of an oppressive patriarchy. … Self-imposed victimhood is not a recipe for happiness.[12]
Indeed, as Mrs. Schlafly observes, Marxist “victimhood” never brings happiness. But notice that neither Satan, nor Marx, nor the modern feminists state that happiness is one of their goals. Instead, their goals are power and “liberation” (which, in one way or another, means rebelling against the authority established by God) so that they can be “powerful” and can “be as gods”. Genesis, 3:5.
Patriarchy, properly understood, means men meeting their vocational responsibilities selflessly, as Christ gave Himself for His Body, the Church.[13] This is beautiful and sublime. Plainly, this is nothing Satan, Marx, or the modern feminist leaders would ever want.
In feminism, this war against authority is framed as a war of women against the other group, viz., men. It is framed as women fighting for “liberation” against patriarchy, i.e., against men meeting their vocational responsibilities to lead their families and/or to lead various aspects of religious and civil society for the good of the group they lead. So modern feminists declare their fight is to destroy patriarchs[14] and patriarchy.[15]
- Like Satan and Marx, feminism promotes discontent, envy, and discord.
Feminists spurn femininity as well as all of the particular qualities and characteristics of a woman. Although feminists oppose real men, feminists imitate the masculine aspects of creation. They seek complete egalitarianism[16] between men and women based on the natural characteristics of men. In this way, they take masculinity as their aspiration and model.
One illustration of this is located on LinkedIn.com (the business “social” media website). While browsing through this website, one can observe the adjectives used to describe women who are managers and executives. A great many of these descriptions assert that the woman is “strong” or “powerful”. Why is this? It is in order to claim that those women have just as much of this masculine trait as the men do. Do the men’s profiles say this too? No. Few or none of them do. The men’s profiles don’t need to say “I am like a man”. But these members of the “weaker sex” want the world to believe that they are as strong as the “stronger sex”.
In 1917, Pope Benedict XV deplored the evil practice in modern society that women:
take up occupations ill-befitting their sex, took to imitating men; others abandoned the duties of the house-wife, for which they were fashioned, to cast themselves recklessly into the current of life.[17]
One of the ways that feminism inherently promotes discontentment and envy is by causing women to desire that which for them is impossible, i.e., to be just like a male. However hard they try, theirs will be a poor, failed-attempt to be male. Theirs is the same unhappy path of discontentment trodden by a man who is “transgender” and is trying to convince himself that he is female – a change which is impossible and delusional.
In a section of this article above, we saw how modern feminists divide women from men by constantly emphasizing that men are opposed to them. This feminist “gospel” of division also effectively makes women discontented because they continually hear that they are “oppressed”, “enslaved”, and that they are victims of men.[18] Feminists tell women that they need emancipation from patriarchy[19] and even that patriarchy is a form of terrorism waged against them![20]
The women’s discontent and envy are an important goal for Satan, Marx, and the feminist leaders. For if women are content and happy, they will not be “apostles” of rage, protesting, fighting for feminism and other satanic causes. Instead, they will be suitable for God to mold into the members of the Catholic Church and into His friends and citizens of heaven. But this is exactly the opposite of what Satan wishes.
Next month, we will examine how the feminist leaders and feminist principles follow the fifth point of Satan’s and Marx’s program by promoting hatred.
To be continued next month …
[1] From Manfred Hauke, God or Goddess? Feminist Theology: What Is It? Where Does It Lead? (Ignatius Press, 1995), p.79, quoting convention speaker, Elizabeth Oakes Smith.
[2] The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, published in 1848 (emphasis added).
[3] One of countless examples of feminist leaders referring to their “revolution”, is when Mary Daly declared: “Courage to be is the key to revelatory power of the feminist revolution.” https://www.quotes.pub/q/courage-to-be-is-the-key-to-revelatory-power-of-the-feminist-205124 (italic emphasis added).
[4] Manfred Hauke, God or Goddess? Feminist Theology: What Is It? Where Does It Lead? (Ignatius Press, 1995), p.57 (emphasis added).
[5] Words of Mary Daly, found here: https://quotesguru.org/mary-daly-quotes/ (bracketed comment added to show context).
[6] https://mallorymillett.com/?p=37 (bracketed words added to show context).
[7] “Chauvinism” is the unreasonable belief in the superiority or dominance of one's own group or people, who are seen as strong and virtuous, while others are considered weak, unworthy, or inferior.
[8] A misogynist is “one who hates or mistrusts women.
[9] See, e.g., The Second Sex, by secular feminist leader, Simone De Beauvoir, Vintage Books, New York, pages 88-89 (bracketed word and a semicolon added for improved clarity). Here is the longer quote:
This is the advent of the patriarchal family founded on private property. In such a family woman is oppressed. Man reigning sovereign permits himself, among other things, his sexual whims: he sleeps with slaves or courtesans, he is polygamous. As soon as customs make reciprocity possible, woman takes revenge through infidelity: adultery becomes a natural part of marriage. This is the only defense woman has against the domestic slavery; [that] she is bound to her social oppression is the consequence of her economic oppression.
[10] Simone de Beauvoir, interviewed by secular feminist, Betty Freidan, published in the Saturday Review, June 14, 1974, p. 18 (emphasis added).
[11] Words of Kate Millett, found here: Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/topics/patriarchy-quotes
[12] Quote from Eagle Forum Founder, Phyllis Schlafly, found here: https://www.quotemaster.org/q76bfbcd7f12c5e2bf6d9a15f7f8c1494
[13] “Husbands, love your wives, as Christ also loved the church, and delivered Himself up for it”. Ephesians, 5:25.
[14]
As shown earlier in this multipart article, secular feminist leader, Kate Millett, sought to destroy the family by destroying the patriarch, i.e., the man protecting his family. Here is part of the chant she used to open their “women’s empowerment” meetings:
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,”
https://mallorymillett.com/?p=37 (emphasis added).
[15] Here is one way religious feminist, Mary Daly, framed women’s fight against men and their patriarchy:
I urge you to sin. But not against these itty-bitty religions, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism – or their secular derivatives, Marxism, Maoism, Freudianism and Jungianism – which are all derivatives of the big religion of patriarchy. Sin against the infrastructure itself!
Quote from former nun and apostate Catholic, Mary Daly, found here: https://www.quotemaster.org/q553ec7a243f69bb2f969cbd6bd5e3d1b
In Mary Daly’s call to sin, can anyone fail to notice the stench of Satan?
[16] Egalitarianism is defined as “a belief in human equality especially with respect to social, political, and economic affairs.”
[17] Pope Benedict XV, Encyclical Natalis trecentesimi, (Woman in the Modern World), December, 27 1917 (bracketed word added to show the context).
[18] Here is one way that secular feminist leader Simone De Beauvoir emphasized the downtrodden state of women:
This is the advent of the patriarchal family founded on private property. In such a family woman is oppressed. Man reigning sovereign permits himself, among other things, his sexual whims: he sleeps with slaves or courtesans, he is polygamous. As soon as customs make reciprocity possible, woman takes revenge through infidelity: adultery becomes a natural part of marriage. This is the only defense woman has against the domestic slavery; [that] she is bound to her social oppression is the consequence of her economic oppression.
The Second Sex, Simone De Beauvoir, Vintage Books, New York, pages 88-89.
[19] Here is how secular feminist leader, Kate Millett put it:
A sexual revolution begins with the emancipation of women, who are the chief victims of patriarchy ….
Words of Kate Millett, found here: Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/topics/patriarchy-quotes
[20] Here is how the secular feminist bell hooks (who is a woman who employed the gimmick of spelling her name without initial capital letters) strung together a laughable series of adjectives to characterize men, including that they are terrorists:
Often in my lectures when I use the phrase “an imperialist, white-supremacist capitalist patriarchy” to describe our nation’s political system, audiences laugh. No one has ever explained why accurately naming this system is funny. The laughter is itself a weapon of patriarchal terrorism.
Quote from bell hooks, found here: https://www.quotemaster.org/qd1b9809d204b3a0926962163ecf22929 (emphasis added).