Catholic Candle note: The article
below concerns the leftists’ use of empathy and compassion to promote their
radical agenda.
When discussing empathy, we must first
understand what empathy is.
What is empathy? How does it differ
from compassion?
Webster’s Dictionary defines “Empathy”
as:
the
action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously
experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either
the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully
communicated in an objectively explicit manner
Webster’s Dictionary defines “Compassion”
as:
sympathetic
consciousness of others’ distress, together with a desire to alleviate it.
Some of our users are interested in the difference between empathy and
compassion. Compassion is the broader word: it refers to both an understanding
of another’s pain and the desire to somehow mitigate that pain.
People often use these two terms (viz.,
empathy and compassion) interchangeably, even though Webster’s Dictionary
(quoted above) says that those words are not completely synonymous.
Here are the five key points one
dictionary gives concerning the difference between these two related emotions:
empathy and compassion:
1. Many people use
both words to explain the same emotion.
2. Although
thought of as the same, empathy and compassion are different forms of the same
emotion.
3. Empathy and
compassion require you to imaginatively experience the same feelings as the
person or situation in question.
4. Empathy is seen
as a passive emotional response.
5. Compassion
requires you to take positive action to alleviate a person’s pain or situation.
Although the word “empathy” is the word
more currently in vogue now, the mainstream media and other “thought leaders”
tend to use the word to urge people to action. For example, during the
corona-craziness, on May 5, 2020 (the date on which the Catholic Candle
team happened to begin this article), a liberal, “politically correct” news
commentator emphasized that we must empathize with people by wearing a mask
outside even if we are very far from any other person, because people
who see us even at a long distance might be afraid they will catch the virus
from us. So, (this commentator stated) we should always wear a
mask outdoors, out of empathy for the fears of others.
Note that the news commentator used the
word “empathy” but urged listeners to act upon their feelings.
Thus, according to the above definitions, that commentator technically seems to
be talking about compassion, not empathy. Below, we will use both terms
interchangeably to mean feeling for someone and acting accordingly.
Empathy is used to push a politically
correct radical agenda
The “politically correct”
thought-leaders promote empathy as a tool to achieve their corrupting, radical
agenda. Here are three examples:
Example one: empathy used
to promote religious indifference and indifference to the truth
One of the Catholic Candle
team recently was compelled to endure a “diversity and inclusion” presentation
by a professional diversity presenter (i.e., someone who earns a living
by making these presentations). This presenter’s emphasis was on the
importance of empathy for people who are not like us. The presenter emphasized
how crucial it is for us to “affirm the choices” made by other people who do
not live and choose the way we do.
The presenter gave the example of a person who belongs to a “religious
minority”. The presenter said we should not ignore other persons’ religions
but that we should be empathetic by showing an “intelligent interest” in their religions
and when they explain whatever it is that they do and believe, we should
“affirm” (i.e., praise) their religious practices and beliefs, whatever
they are.
This appeal to empathy is
unreasonable. It treats the truth as irrelevant. It exalts the valuing of
people’s feelings or decisions, however wrong or evil they are. Such conduct (viz.,
praising whatever people believe) is religiously indifferent. Out of charity,
we should try to convert people to the truth, especially to the Catholic Faith
because outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.
What should we conclude about empathy then? Is empathy something which is religiously
indifferent and uncharitable?
Example two: empathy used
to attack the Natural Law and sound
traditional morals
Among those persons who promote
unnatural impurity, one of their main goals (which has been largely achieved) has
been to promote so-called “marriage” for themselves. They “argue” like this:
think how you would feel if people were not “accepting” of your choice of
spouse. Empathize with people who are living in these situations (viz.,
living lives of unnatural impurity). Empathize with how they feel being “marginalized”
and “not respected”. You would not want to be treated this way. Empathize
with them and don’t treat them this way. You should “affirm” and accept their
choices.
After considering this godless, liberal
argument, what should we conclude about empathy? Does empathy promote
violations of the Sixth Commandment? Is empathy evil because it is against the
law of God?
Example three: empathy used
to promote murder
When people are suffering,
especially near the end of their lives, the promoters of euthanasia (i.e.,
so-called “mercy killing”) declare that the “compassionate” response is to kill
that person, either when that person consents, or even when he does not
consent.
These promoters say that it is unempathetic to not kill those who are suffering
and that we should “help” them by ending their suffering and by “allowing” them
to die with “dignity”.
The truth is that euthanasia is murder.
After considering the leftist argument given in this example, what should we
say about empathy? Is empathy against the Fifth Commandment? Is empathy
against the law of God?
From these examples (above) and from
countless others published by the liberal mainstream media and promoted by “thought
leaders”, we see liberals using empathy to promote their leftist positions.
Conservatives often label as “bleeding heart liberals” those leftists who
appeal to empathy to push their socialist agenda.
True education develops the mind to
think clearly. But true education is declining and is being replaced by
training in technical skills (e.g., computer skills) and by leftist indoctrination.
This is why people think less often – and also think less clearly. Because
people are now guided less by reason, they inevitably act more on emotion and
passion.
Because there is a general trend toward
fuzzy thinking in society, the liberals effectively use empathy against both
sexes. However, the leftists especially prey upon women, because God made them
more emotional in order to assist them in fulfilling admirably their God-given
role as nurturers, especially of children.
This leftist manipulation of women through empathy is shown, e.g., in
the greater number of women who belong to the more liberal of the two major
political parties (viz., the Democratic party in the U.S.).
Leftists don’t discuss matters by
addressing what is reasonable. Despite constantly talking about
justice, e.g., so-called “racial justice”, the liberals never
really promote anything based on real justice. True
justice means giving everyone his due, i.e., what
is owed to him.
When the liberals promote so-called “racial justice” (or some other kind of
supposed “justice”), they don’t explain or argue why something is DUE to those
who are complaining. So, e.g., if the liberals complain that there is
no “racial justice” because there are not as many black board members on
corporate boards, (or whatever else) they don’t explain why more board
memberships are somehow due to blacks (or due to anyone) and are something
owed to them.
Instead of focusing on reason and real
justice, the liberals focus on harm and fear of harm, e.g., presenting
the listener with a weeping welfare recipient sobbing and angrily declaring
that she cannot feed her children without an increase in welfare payments or
that her government housing is in “unacceptable” and very poor condition.
The liberal media, the entertainment
industry, the advertising industry, the liberal educational establishment, and
the wealthy enemies of Christ who those other groups all serve, all know that
people can be easily manipulated by appealing to their emotions. Although this
is not a new problem, it has gotten much worse.
As these enemies of Christ manipulate
people through emotion, they promote greater dependence on acting according to emotion
and have coined the oxymoronic label “emotional intelligence”. Here is how one
encyclopedia defines this phrase:
Emotional
intelligence (EI), emotional leadership (EL), emotional quotient (EQ) and
emotional intelligence quotient (EIQ), is the capability of individuals to
recognize their own emotions and those of others, discern between different
feelings and label them appropriately, use emotional information to guide
thinking and behavior, and manage and/or adjust emotions to adapt to environments
or achieve one’s goal(s).
This is why it is the current fashion
for the media and other social leaders to constantly emphasize the importance
of being empathetic. For example, liberal Democrat and U.S. president, Joe
Biden, was widely praised (during his campaign for president) as the candidate
of empathy.
Completely turning the meaning of words upside down, one of the big reasons
that the media and Biden proclaim that he is “deeply compassionate” is because
he “empathizes” with women by strongly promoting their murdering their babies.
Similarly, the extremely politically
correct leftist-Marxist group, Black Lives Matter, emphasizes in its
short statement of principles, “we are empathetic”,
referring to their promotion of a long list of grave sins which will increase
the vice, disfunction, and suffering in society through increasing gross
immorality.
So, empathy (compassion) seems to be
bad and to be a tool of the enemies of Christ. But on the other hand, St.
James tells us that “the Lord is merciful and compassionate.”
Further, St. Peter tells us that we should be compassionate too:
Be
ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, being lovers of the
brotherhood, merciful, modest, humble ….
So, what is the truth? Where can we
find the truth? As always, we should look to Our Lord as our guide.
Christ, our Model in all things –
including our Model in Compassion
Our Lord Jesus Christ is our model in
all things. Our life should be a continual “work in progress” to become more
Christlike in all things.
We see that the Gospels tell us
repeatedly that Our Lord was compassionate. For example, here is Our Lord
relieving the people’s distress because of their great hunger:
Jesus
called together his disciples, and said: I have compassion
on the multitudes, because they continue with me now three days, and have not
what to eat, and I will not send them away fasting, lest they faint in the way.
Notice several things about Our Lord’s
compassion here. First, remember that He knows all things and can do all
things. He knew that they had nothing to eat. He could have sent them away
after one day, but in His infinite Wisdom, He knew it was better for them to be
with Him for three days, to hear His doctrine and have His Presence.
Our Lord could have fed the multitude
on each of the days, not only on the third day. The crowd would have preferred
the more frequent meals. However, Our Lord did not give them what they wanted
but what they needed. Perhaps, He wanted them to suffer more for the
sake of the truth. Our Lord’s compassion caused Him to give them food when
they could not humanly go longer without food. He fed them when necessary, not
based on the multitude’s comfort or preference. He acted according to their
true good, rather than according to their desires.
Here is another example of Our Lord
having compassion by curing a leper who was suffering from his disease:
And
there came a leper to Him, beseeching Him and kneeling down, said to Him: If
thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. And Jesus, having compassion on
him, stretched forth His hand and touching him saith to him: I will. Be thou
made clean.
But in Our Lord’s public life, He
showed compassion not only by relieving the people’s bodily needs and not only
by relieving needs that the people knew they had. For example, when a great
crowd came to Our Lord, He had compassion on them and began to teach them
because they needed guidance (whether they knew it or not). Here is how St.
Mark explains this event, when the crowds caught up with Our Lord and His
apostles, in the desert:
And
going up into a ship, they [viz., Our Lord and His apostles] went into a
desert place apart. And they [viz., the crowd] saw them going away, and
many knew: and they ran flocking thither on foot from all the cities, and were
there before them [Our Lord and His apostles]. And Jesus going out saw a great
multitude: and He had compassion on them, because they were as sheep not
having a shepherd, and He began to teach them many things.
Here Our Lord is giving us an example
of a compassion not connected to the bodily needs of the people and not
necessarily even connected to any lack those people explicitly knew they suffered.
But Our Lord knew (knows) the importance of His doctrine for the happiness and
holiness of people. In His compassion, Our Lord gives the people what they need
and what was best for them, even if it is not what they wanted
most or even knew they needed.
Our Lord’s compassion caused Him to put
Himself in the “shoes” of others and see the importance of telling them the
truth, rather than having them remain in ignorance. Our Lord prioritizing the
truth shows us that the truth is paramount, even when it causes people to leave
Him. When Our Lord’s truth about the Holy Eucharist was rejected by the people
and they “walked no more with Him”, He did not falter but asked those that
remained: “Will
you also go away?”
The
saints showed us the same example of true compassion, helping those who are in
need to learn the truth, even though this is not what they might have wanted or
what emotion would incline to give them. It is this compassion which moves
great missionaries to help the pagans. Here is how St. Wulfran’s compassion is
described:
He
was chosen and consecrated archbishop of Sens, in 682, which diocese he
governed during two years and a half with great zeal and sanctity. A tender
compassion for the blindness of the idolaters of Friseland, and the
example of the English zealous preachers in those parts, moved him to resign
his bishopric with proper advice, and, after a retreat at Fontenelle, to enter
Friseland in quality of a poor missionary priest.
Here is how St. Amand’s compassion is
described:
In
649, he [St. Amand] was chosen bishop of Maestricht; but three years after he
resigned that see to St. Remaclus, and returned to his missions, to which his compassion
for the blindness of infidels always inclined his heart.
God treats us this way too, giving us
what we need and what is in our true best interests, rather than what we might
want instead. For example, God sends us crosses which we don’t want or think
we need, as an expression of His compassion for us. This Divine compassion
could be called “tough love”. Here is how The Catechism Explained
teaches this truth:
“A
grievous sickness makes the soul sober” (Ecclus. xxxi. 2). In sickness God
knocks at the door of the heart and asks for admission. “I am always glad,”
said St. Ignatius, “when I see a sinner fall ill, for sickness brings back to
God.” How foolish it is then to regard sickness as a mark of God’s
anger, when it is really a mark of His compassion.
On the other hand, upon God’s enemies
He is sometimes said to not have compassion. For example,
And
the Lord the God of their fathers sent to them, by the hand of His messengers,
rising early, and daily admonishing them: because He spared His people and His
dwelling place. But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised His words,
and misused the prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his
people, and there was no remedy. For He brought upon them the king of
the Chaldeans, and he slew their young men with the sword in the house of His
sanctuary, He had no compassion on young man, or maiden, old man
or even him that stooped for age, but He delivered them all into his hands.
Plainly, God is showing us that there
is a time for compassion and a time for no compassion. In his parable of
Lazarus and Dives, Our Lord has Abraham show no compassion on Dives:
There
was a certain rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen; and feasted
sumptuously every day. And there was a certain beggar, named Lazarus, who lay at
his gate, full of sores, desiring to be filled with the crumbs that fell from
the rich man’s table, and no one did give him. Moreover, the dogs came, and
licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried
by the angels into Abraham’s bosom. And the rich man also died: and he
was buried in hell. And lifting up his eyes when he was in torments, he saw
Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom: And he cried, and said: Father
Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his
finger in water, to cool my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame.
And Abraham said to him: Son, remember that thou didst receive good things in
thy lifetime, and likewise Lazareth, evil things, but now he is
comforted; and thou art tormented. And besides all this, between us
and you, there is fixed a great chaos: so that they who would pass from hence
to you, cannot, nor from thence come hither. And he said: Then, father, I
beseech thee, that thou wouldst send him to my father’s house, for I have five
brethren, that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of
torments. And Abraham said to him: They have Moses and the prophets; let them
hear them. But he said: No, father Abraham: but if one went to them from the
dead, they will do penance. And he said to him: If they hear not Moses and
the prophets, neither will they believe, if one rise again from the dead.
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Doctor of
the Church, comments on this parable and teaches that the just are completely conformed
to the righteousness of God so that they are not “moved with
compassion towards the reprobate” because God would not want them to feel
compassion for the damned.
We are now in a position to see what
empathy (compassion) is good and what empathy (compassion) is evil.
➢ Compassion must
conform to reason.
➢ Compassion must
be in the appropriate amount and not be excessive. As shown
above, Our Lord multiplied simple bread to feed the crowd to prevent them from collapsing
on the way home. He did not give them feasts and riches, although that would
have been easy for him to do and although the people would have preferred those
instead of plain bread. But riches and feasts would have been excessive and
not good for them.
➢
Compassion
is bad when contrary to reason. For example, parents could empathize
and “feel” for their children when those children are acting willful or need to
be corrected.
St. Alphonsus de Liguori, Doctor of the
Church, condemns this empathetic over-indulgence this way:
Great
indeed is the misfortune of the child that has vicious parents, who are
incapable of bringing up their children in the fear of God and who, when they
see their children engaged in dangerous friendships and in quarrels, instead
of correcting and chastising them, rather take compassion on them ….
Thus, we see that compassion (empathy)
is good and God-like, provided it is according to right reason and thus, conforms
to God’s own righteousness. We should not feel empathy willy-nilly, but only as
God wants us to feel it, and only toward those for whom God wants us to feel
it.
For if it were good for us to have
compassion/empathy whenever a person is suffering, and to have
greater compassion/empathy on whoever is suffering more acutely, then it would
be good to have the greatest compassion on the damned because no one on earth
suffers as much as they do in hell. Yet Our Lord has no compassion on the
damned and wants us to have no compassion/empathy for them either.
If a person were to have
compassion/empathy on the damned, this would clearly be unreasonable and would
be contrary to God’s Will. In other words, such compassion/empathy would be
evil (i.e., unreasonable). Our compassion must always be directed by
reason.
Our compassion is not well-regulated
and formed properly if we are moved to compassion toward the wrong person or in
the wrong circumstances. If we feel compassion/empathy when we should not feel
it, this spontaneous feeling might not be a sin but we must strive hard to
conform our feelings to our reason and to the truth. One example of this misplaced
compassion would be to feel sorry for the damned, e.g., Judas.
Our ability to feel natural compassion
is a good thing just like anger or our desire for food. All three come from
God. But all three must be directed by reason. So, we see that it is not
true that “the more compassionate we are, the better”, any more than “the
angrier we are, the better”. Instead, compassion (and anger) must always
conform with reason.
Compassion is a good passion to the
extent that it readies us to help someone who is suffering,
just like anger is a good passion to the extent that it assists us in facing
danger in a difficult situation. Those passions are good when directed toward
the right object, in the right amount. But these passions are good only if and
to the extent that right reason approves of the help they move us to give
(assist the suffering or facing danger in difficult situations). If compassion
and anger are according to reason, they should be promoted. If they are
against reason, then they are bad and should be suppressed (or moderated).
We need to follow reason and always
make sure that our compassion/empathy is Christlike and reasonable, just like
we must make sure that our anger, our desire for food, and everything else that
we do, say, and think is reasonable and Christlike.
“Solving” the false arguments promoting
an evil empathy, given at the beginning of this article
Example one: empathy used
to promote religious indifference and indifference to the truth. We should
resist the temptation to make a person feel good in his false religion because
it will lead him to hell. We should help to guide him to the true Catholic
religion, even if he “feels bad” or becomes angry because we tell him the truth.
Example two: empathy used
to attack the Natural Law and sound traditional morals. We should
resist the temptation to make a person feel good in his unnatural vice, because
that vice will lead him to hell. True compassion would move us
to disapprove of his sin, to pray for him and help him to fight
and escape his life of vice. This is called “tough love”. This
is truly doing unto others as we would want them to do unto us.
Example three: empathy used
to promote murder.
Whereas empathy which is misplaced could promote euthanasia (i.e.,
so-called “mercy killing”) because our heart is moved by a person’s suffering,
making us want to end his suffering, true empathy would move us
to help/support/pray with someone who is suffering/dying, while he is
suffering, to help him die well. This is truly doing unto
others as we would want them to do unto us. In other words, true empathy
moves us to help a person, but in the way our reason and our Catholic Faith
tell us to help.
Conclusion
We must strive to avoid feeling compassion
toward the wrong person or in the wrong circumstances. By promoting
unreasonable compassion, the leftists prey upon unwary people and draw them to
support the leftists’ evil agenda. We must guard against this trap through our
efforts to conform our compassion (and everything else in our lives) to reason.
See.,
e.g., this 2009 article concerning the results of a survey of voters, which
states:
In
the current analysis of 149,192 Gallup Poll Daily tracking interviews conducted
in January through May of this year [2009], 41% of women identify as Democrats,
some nine points higher than the 32% of men who identify as Democrats. The 34%
of men in this sample who are independents can be contrasted with the smaller
26% of women who are independents. There is little difference by gender in
terms of identification as Republicans — 28% of men are Republicans, compared
to 25% of women.

Overall,
the data confirm that men currently have a much more even distribution of party
identification than do women. The range across the three partisan groups for
men is just 6 points, from a low of 28% identifying as Republicans to a high of
34% identifying as independents. On the other hand, the range for women is a
much larger 16 points, from 25% Republican to 41% Democratic.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/120839/Women-Likely-Democrats-Regardless-Age.aspx (bracketed date added for
clarity).
We see in
daily experience and in the mainstream media, that the U.S. Democratic Party is
the party of fear instead of reason. For example, notice how strongly the
Democrats promote COVID-terror and “climate catastrophe”. Thus, because the
Democrats use fear more, they have more women in the party because scare tactics
work better on women than they do on men. Here is a study showing this fact: Appealing
to fear: A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeal Effectiveness and Theories, Tannenbaum,
et al., published by the National Institute of Health, U.S. National
Library of Medicine, and found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789790/
Here is how St. Basil
the Great, Doctor of the Church, teaches that Our Lord Jesus Christ is our
model in everything:
Each
word and deed of Our Savior, Jesus Christ, is for us a lesson in virtue and
piety. For this end also did He assume our nature, so that every man and every
woman, contemplating as in a picture the practice of all virtue and piety,
might strive with all their hearts to imitate His example. For this He bore
our body, so that as far as we could we might repeat within us the manner of
His Life. And so therefore, when you hear mention of some word or deed of His,
take care not to receive it simply as something that incidentally happened, but
raise your mind upwards towards the sublimity of what He is teaching, and
strive to see what has been mystically handed down to us.
St.
Basil the Great, as quoted in Sunday Sermons of the Great Fathers,
(translated by M. F. Toal), Regnery Co., Chicago, ©1958, sermon for the 5th
Sunday after Easter, entitled That Prayer is to be placed before all things,
volume 2, p.377.
St. Matthew’s Gospel, 15:32 (emphasis added).
St. Mark’s Gospel,
1:40-41 (emphasis added).
Here is the longer
account from St. John’s Gospel, Ch.6:
[Our Lord declared:] I am the bread of
life. Your fathers did eat manna in the desert, and are dead. This is the Bread
which cometh down from heaven; that if any man eat of it, he may not die. I am
the living Bread which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this Bread, he
shall live forever; and the Bread that I will give, is My Flesh, for the life
of the world. The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can
this man give us his flesh to eat? Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say
unto you: Except you eat the Flesh of the Son of man,
and drink His blood, you shall not have life in you. He that eateth My
flesh, and drinketh My blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in
the last day. For My Flesh is meat indeed: and My Blood is drink indeed. He
that eateth My Flesh, and drinketh My Blood, abideth in Me, and I in him. As
the living Father hath sent Me, and I live by the Father; so he that eateth Me,
the same also shall live by Me. This is the bread that came down from heaven.
Not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead. He that eateth this bread,
shall live forever. These things he said, teaching in the synagogue, in
Capharnaum. Many therefore of His disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is
hard, and who can hear it? But Jesus, knowing in Himself, that His disciples
murmured at this, said to them: Doth this scandalize you? If then you shall
see the Son of man ascend up where He was before? It is the spirit that
quickeneth: the flesh profiteth nothing. The words that I have spoken to you,
are spirit and life. But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus
knew from the
beginning, who they were that did not
believe, and who he was, that would betray him. And He said: Therefore did I
say to you, that no man can come to Me, unless it be given him by my Father. After
this many of his disciples went back; and walked no more with him. Then
Jesus said to the twelve: Will you also go away?
St.
John’s Gospel,
Ch.6, vv.48-68 (emphasis added).
Here are St. Gregory’s words:
For
as the wicked desire to pass over to the elect, that is, to depart from the
pangs of their sufferings, so to the afflicted and tormented would the just
pass in their mind by compassion, and wish to set them free. But the souls of
the just, although in the goodness of their nature they feel compassion, after
being united to the righteousness of their Author, are constrained by such
great uprightness as not to be moved with
compassion towards the reprobate. Neither then do the unrighteous pass
over to the lot of the blessed, because they are bound in everlasting
condemnation, nor can the righteous pass to the reprobate, because being now
made upright by the righteousness of judgment, they in no way pity them from
any compassion.
Catena
Aurea on St. Luke’s Gospel,
Ch. 16 section 5 (emphasis added).
St.
John Chrysostom, Doctor of the Church, teaches that not only don’t the blessed
have compassion on the damned but that they rejoice in the
torments of the damned. St. John Chrysostom explains this truth teaching that,
in these words of Abraham, it is:
as
if he [viz., Abraham] says, “we can see, we cannot pass; and we see what
we have escaped, you, what you have lost; our joys enhance your torments; your
torments enhance our joys.”
Catena
Aurea on St. Luke’s Gospel,
Ch.16, section 5 (emphasis added).
St. Alphonsus de Liguori,
Sermon 36, On the Education of Children, First Point, section 4.
Here is how St. Thomas
explains the importance of compassion being directed and controlled by reason:
I
answer that, compassion signifies grief for another’s distress. Now this grief
may denote, in one way, a movement of the sensitive appetite, in which case
compassion is not a virtue but a passion; whereas, in another way, it may
denote a movement of the intellective appetite, in as much as one person’s evil
is displeasing to another. This movement may be ruled in accordance with
reason, and in accordance with this movement regulated by reason, the movement
of the lower appetite may be regulated. Hence Augustine says (De Civ.
Dei ix, 5) that “this movement of the mind” (viz., compassion) “obeys
the reason, when compassion is vouchsafed in such a way that justice is
safeguarded, whether we give to the needy or forgive the repentant.” And since
it is essential to human virtue that the movements of the soul should be
regulated by reason, as was shown above (I-II:59:4 and I-II:59:5), it follows
that compassion is a virtue.
Summa, IIa IIae, Q. 30, a.3, in an
article entitled: Whether mercy is a virtue? Note: the Latin word St.
Thomas uses here is “misericordia”, the same Latin word translated as
“compassion” in the Douay Rheims quotes above.
Here is how St. Thomas
Aquinas, following St. Augustine, explains how compassion is a help to virtuous
action, when that compassion is ruled by our reason:
As
Augustine says (De Civ. Dei ix, 5), mercy is heartfelt sympathy for another’s
distress, impelling us to succor him if we can. For mercy takes its name
"misericordia" from denoting a man’s compassionate heart [miserum
cor] for another’s unhappiness.
Summa, IIa IIae, Q.30, a.1 respondeo
(translating “misericordia” as “mercy”).
Thus,
we see that compassion helps us by moving us to perform works of mercy which we
might otherwise not perform or might not perform as readily.